Literature DB >> 35675746

Certainty about uncertainty in sleep staging: a theoretical framework.

Hans van Gorp1,2, Iris A M Huijben1,3, Pedro Fonseca1,2, Ruud J G van Sloun1,2, Sebastiaan Overeem1,4, Merel M van Gilst1,4.   

Abstract

Sleep stage classification is an important tool for the diagnosis of sleep disorders. Because sleep staging has such a high impact on clinical outcome, it is important that it is done reliably. However, it is known that uncertainty exists in both expert scorers and automated models. On average, the agreement between human scorers is only 82.6%. In this study, we provide a theoretical framework to facilitate discussion and further analyses of uncertainty in sleep staging. To this end, we introduce two variants of uncertainty, known from statistics and the machine learning community: aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. We discuss what these types of uncertainties are, why the distinction is useful, where they arise from in sleep staging, and provide recommendations on how this framework can improve sleep staging in the future.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aleatoric; epistemic; hypnogram; inter-rater agreement; machine learning; sleep staging; uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35675746     DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsac134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   6.313


  1 in total

1.  Automated sleep staging algorithms: have we reached the performance limit due to manual scoring?

Authors:  Philip de Chazal; Diego R Mazzotti; Peter A Cistulli
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 6.313

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.