Literature DB >> 35675612

Variation in Operative Time and Work Relative Value Units in Gynecologic Surgery.

Rosa M Polan1, Emma L Barber.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2022        PMID： 35675612      PMCID： PMC9199588          DOI： 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN： 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.623


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of 1997 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: is Adam still worth more than Eve?

Authors:  B A Goff; H G Muntz; J M Cain
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Comparison of 2015 Medicare relative value units for gender-specific procedures: Gynecologic and gynecologic-oncologic versus urologic CPT coding. Has time healed gender-worth?

Authors:  M F Benoit; J F Ma; B A Upperman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Since surgery isn't getting any easier, why is reimbursement going down? An update from the SGO taskforce on coding and reimbursement.

Authors:  Shitanshu Uppal; Mark S Shahin; Jill A Rathbun; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Reimbursement for Female-Specific Compared With Male-Specific Procedures Over Time.

Authors:  Rosa M Polan; Emma L Barber
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Discrepancies Created by Surgeon Self-Reported Operative Time and the Effects on Procedural Relative Value Units and Reimbursement.

Authors:  Shitanshu Uppal; Laurel W Rice; Ryan J Spencer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 7.661
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.