Reza Bagheri1, Isabelle Robinson2, Sajjad Moradi3, Jessica Purcell2, Elita Schwab2, Tharindie Silva2, Brooke Baker2, Donny M Camera4. 1. Department of Exercise Physiology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran. 2. Department of Health Sciences and Biostatistics, Swinburne University, Room SPW224, Mail H21, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia. 3. Nutritional Sciences Department, School of Nutritional Sciences and Food Technology, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran. 4. Department of Health Sciences and Biostatistics, Swinburne University, Room SPW224, Mail H21, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia. dcamera@swin.edu.au.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Systematic investigation of muscle protein synthesis (MPS) responses with or without protein ingestion has been largely limited to resistance training. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review determined the capacity for aerobic-based exercise or high-intensity interval training (HIIT) to stimulate post-exercise rates of MPS and whether protein ingestion further significantly increases MPS compared with placebo. METHODS: Three separate models analysed rates of either mixed, myofibrillar, sarcoplasmic, or mitochondrial protein synthesis (PS) following aerobic-based exercise or HIIT: Model 1 (n = 9 studies), no protein ingestion; Model 2 (n = 7 studies), peri-exercise protein ingestion with no placebo comparison; Model 3 (n = 14 studies), peri-exercise protein ingestion with placebo comparison. RESULTS: Eight of nine studies and all seven studies in Models 1 and 2, respectively, demonstrated significant post-exercise increases in either mixed or a specific muscle protein pool. Model 3 observed significantly greater MPS responses with protein compared with placebo in either mixed or a specific muscle fraction in 7 of 14 studies. Seven studies showed no difference in MPS between protein and placebo, while three studies reported no significant increases in mitochondrial PS with protein compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Most studies reporting significant increases in MPS were confined to mixed and myofibrillar PS that may facilitate power generating capacity of working skeletal muscle with aerobic-based exercise and HIIT. Only three of eight studies demonstrated significant increases in mitochondrial PS post-exercise, with no further benefits of protein ingestion. This lack of change may be explained by the acute analysis window in most studies and apparent latency in exercise-induced stimulation of mitochondrial PS.
BACKGROUND: Systematic investigation of muscle protein synthesis (MPS) responses with or without protein ingestion has been largely limited to resistance training. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review determined the capacity for aerobic-based exercise or high-intensity interval training (HIIT) to stimulate post-exercise rates of MPS and whether protein ingestion further significantly increases MPS compared with placebo. METHODS: Three separate models analysed rates of either mixed, myofibrillar, sarcoplasmic, or mitochondrial protein synthesis (PS) following aerobic-based exercise or HIIT: Model 1 (n = 9 studies), no protein ingestion; Model 2 (n = 7 studies), peri-exercise protein ingestion with no placebo comparison; Model 3 (n = 14 studies), peri-exercise protein ingestion with placebo comparison. RESULTS: Eight of nine studies and all seven studies in Models 1 and 2, respectively, demonstrated significant post-exercise increases in either mixed or a specific muscle protein pool. Model 3 observed significantly greater MPS responses with protein compared with placebo in either mixed or a specific muscle fraction in 7 of 14 studies. Seven studies showed no difference in MPS between protein and placebo, while three studies reported no significant increases in mitochondrial PS with protein compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Most studies reporting significant increases in MPS were confined to mixed and myofibrillar PS that may facilitate power generating capacity of working skeletal muscle with aerobic-based exercise and HIIT. Only three of eight studies demonstrated significant increases in mitochondrial PS post-exercise, with no further benefits of protein ingestion. This lack of change may be explained by the acute analysis window in most studies and apparent latency in exercise-induced stimulation of mitochondrial PS.
Authors: Benjamin F Miller; Mette Hansen; Jens L Olesen; Allan Flyvbjerg; Peter Schwarz; John A Babraj; Kenneth Smith; Michael J Rennie; Michael Kjaer Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-08-30 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Thomas M Doering; David G Jenkins; Peter R Reaburn; Nattai R Borges; Erik Hohmann; Stuart M Phillips Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Matthew P Harber; Adam R Konopka; Matthew D Douglass; Kiril Minchev; Leonard A Kaminsky; Todd A Trappe; Scott Trappe Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Matthew P Harber; Justin D Crane; Jared M Dickinson; Bozena Jemiolo; Ulrika Raue; Todd A Trappe; Scott W Trappe Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2008-12-31 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: Sidney Abou Sawan; Stephan van Vliet; Justin T Parel; Joseph W Beals; Michael Mazzulla; Daniel W D West; Andrew Philp; Zhong Li; Scott A Paluska; Nicholas A Burd; Daniel R Moore Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2018-03