| Literature DB >> 35674990 |
Jorge Alberto Camacho-Chacon1, Jorge Cuenca-Espierrez1, Victor Roda-Rojo1, Adrian Martin-Martinez1, Jose Manuel Calderon-Meza1, Ramiro Alvarez-Alegret2, Carlos Martin-Hernandez3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes, MRI imaging and histological characteristics of biopsy samples of the tendon from patients in whom rotator cuff repair was previously performed with a bioinductive type I bovine collagen implants.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35674990 PMCID: PMC9177905 DOI: 10.1186/s40634-022-00495-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Orthop ISSN: 2197-1153
Characteristics of the partial-thickness tears according to Ellman and Goutallier classifications
| Location | Grade | Goutallier |
|---|---|---|
| Articular Sided | III | 1 |
| Articular Sided | II | 1 |
| Articular Sided | III | 1 |
| Articular Sided | II | 2 |
| Bursal Sided | III | 1 |
| Bursal Sided | III | 2 |
| Bursal Sided | II | 2 |
| Bursal Sided | III | 1 |
| Intrasubstance | III | 1 |
| Intrasubstance | III | 2 |
| Intrasubstance | II | 2 |
| Intrasubstance | II | 2 |
| Intrasubstance | III | 1 |
| Intrasubstance | III | 2 |
| Intrasubstance | II | 1 |
| Intrasubstance | III | 2 |
| Intrasubstance | II | 1 |
| Intrasubstance | III | 2 |
Characteristics of the full-thickness tears according to Bateman and Goutallier classifications
| Description | Grade | Goutallier |
|---|---|---|
| Small | I | 1 |
| Massive | IV | 3 |
| Large | III | 2 |
| Large | III | 2 |
| Large | III | 2 |
| Large | III | 2 |
| Large | III | 2 |
| Large | III | 2 |
| Massive | IV | 2 |
| Massive | IV | 2 |
| Massive | IV | 2 |
| Large | III | 1 |
Fig. 1Coronal T2 weighted MRI image of a partial articular tear (A) and results after 6 (B) and 12 months (C), demonstrating the location (arrows) of the measurement of the combined thickness of the layer of new tissue and the underlying tendon
Fig. 2Macroscopic appearance of the repair of a complete tear at 6 months follow-up shows complete healing of the lesion. The second look arthroscopy was performed in the patient who was reoperated on due to arthrofibrosis
Fig. 3Light photomicrograph of the newly regenerated host tissue by the implant at 6 months. This is dense, regularly oriented connective tissue. There was no evidence of any remnants of the collagen implant. (Hematoxylin and eosin) × 100. Pathologists reported it as “Ligamentous-Tendinous fibrous tissue without relevant morphological lesions”