Literature DB >> 35674832

S100A8 inhibition in leukemic lymphoblasts induces sensitivity to chemotherapy and inhibition of disease relapse.

Mohamad Javad Hejazi1, Gholamhossein Tamaddon2, Narges Kohan3, Mohammadreza Sharifi4.   

Abstract

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children and relapsed B-ALL is the leading cause of mortality in children with leukemia due to a lack of response to treatment. S100A8 is a low molecular weight calcium-binding intracellular protein that is expressed in certain cells, and its increased expression is seen in most tumors as well as in relapsed childhood B-ALL cases. The present study indicates the important role of S100A8 in improving viability and resistance to chemotherapy in relapsed B-ALL lymphoblasts. S100A8 levels were compared in B-ALL and relapsed B-ALL lymphoblasts that were sensitive and resistant to Vincristine, respectively. S100A8 was inhibited in the lymphoblasts of two patients by antisense locked nucleic acid (LNA) GapmeRs and the decreased expression of S100A8 was evaluated using quantitative real-time PCR and ELISA. Then, the S100A8 antisense LNA GapmeRs-transfected cells were treated with Vincristine and the expression levels of S100A8 mRNA and S100A8 protein were re-determined. At all of these stages, cell viability and LC50 were assessed by MTT assay. The results showed that S100A8 levels in relapsed B-ALL lymphoblasts were significantly higher than B-ALL lymphoblasts. Moreover, the increase in S100A8 expression was proportionate to the increase in Vincristine resistance in these cells. The S100A8 knockdown procedure using antisense LNA GapmeRs decreased the cell viability and increased vincristine sensitivity in lymphoblasts of two patients, and it also increased the sensitivity to chemotherapy in relapsed B-ALL lymphoblasts. According to the findings of the present study, S100A8 is effective in developing lymphoblast resistance to chemotherapy, and its enhanced expression may contribute to shifting B-ALL into the relapse phase of the illness. As a result, S100A8 may be a valuable target for managing and improving relapses B-ALL.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antisense; Chemotherapy; Leukemic lymphoblasts; S100A8

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35674832     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-022-01709-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  30 in total

Review 1.  Predicting relapse risk in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  David T Teachey; Stephen P Hunger
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2013-06-29       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  The gene expression signature of relapse in paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: implications for mechanisms of therapy failure.

Authors:  Alex H Beesley; Aaron J Cummings; Joseph R Freitas; Katrin Hoffmann; Martin J Firth; Jette Ford; Nicolas H de Klerk; Ursula R Kees
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.998

3.  How I treat relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Franco Locatelli; Martin Schrappe; Maria Ester Bernardo; Sergio Rutella
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Integrating genomics into therapy.

Authors:  Sarah K Tasian; Mignon L Loh; Stephen P Hunger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  DNA microarrays for comparison of gene expression profiles between diagnosis and relapse in precursor-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia: choice of technique and purification influence the identification of potential diagnostic markers.

Authors:  F J T Staal; M van der Burg; L F A Wessels; B H Barendregt; M R M Baert; C M M van den Burg; C van Huffel; A W Langerak; V H J van der Velden; M J T Reinders; J J M van Dongen
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Factors influencing survival after relapse from acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  K Nguyen; M Devidas; S-C Cheng; M La; E A Raetz; W L Carroll; N J Winick; S P Hunger; P S Gaynon; M L Loh
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 7.  New and emerging prognostic and predictive genetic biomarkers in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Anthony V Moorman
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 8.  Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2017 update.

Authors:  T Terwilliger; M Abdul-Hay
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 9.  Non-infectious chemotherapy-associated acute toxicities during childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy.

Authors:  Kjeld Schmiegelow; Klaus Müller; Signe Sloth Mogensen; Pernille Rudebeck Mogensen; Benjamin Ole Wolthers; Ulrik Kristoffer Stoltze; Ruta Tuckuviene; Thomas Frandsen
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-04-07

10.  Meta-analysis of gene expression in relapsed childhood B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Yock-Ping Chow; Hamidah Alias; Rahman Jamal
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.