Literature DB >> 35673535

Probing recycled carbonate in the lower mantle.

Li-Hui Chen1, Xiao-Jun Wang1, Sheng-Ao Liu2.   

Abstract

Whether surficial carbonates can be carried into the Earth's lower mantle is key to global deep carbon cycles but remains poorly understood. New clues from magnesium and zinc isotopic systematics on rocks from deep-rooted mantle plumes are presented and discussed in this Perspective.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of China Science Publishing & Media Ltd.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35673535      PMCID: PMC9166543          DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwac061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Natl Sci Rev        ISSN: 2053-714X            Impact factor:   23.178


Carbonates in marine sediments and altered oceanic crust are major carbon reservoirs on Earth's surface, which can be transported into Earth's interior by subduction. High-pressure experiments and thermodynamic models demonstrate that carbonates can stably exist under Earth's lower mantle conditions [1,2]. However, melting experiments suggest that subducting carbonate-bearing oceanic crust will eventually undergo decarbonation melting at the mantle transition zone [3]. Therefore, whether there are some recycled carbonates in the lower mantle remains poorly understood. Fortunately, an answer has begun to take shape from the perspective of metal stable isotopes. Given the considerable differences in δ26Mg (=[(26Mg/24Mg)sample/(26Mg/24Mg)DSM3 − 1] × 1000) and δ66Zn (= [(66 Zn/64 Zn)sample / (66 Zn/64 Zn)JMC Lyon − 1] × 1000) between carbonates and the mantle [4], Mg and Zn isotopes of basalts can be used to trace recycled carbonates or carbonate-bearing materials in the mantle (see contributions in this Special Topic and Refs [4,5]). Many plumes stem from the core–mantle boundary and their derivant ocean island basalts (OIBs) can be regarded as a probe into the lower mantle. If carbonates can be transported into the lower mantle and captured by upwelling plumes, we will have an opportunity to find light Mg and heavy Zn isotopic anomalies in OIBs. The same is true for magmas from large igneous provinces (LIPs), which have also been regarded as plume products. Pitcairn Island in the South Pacific Ocean and St. Helena Island in the South Atlantic Ocean are well known for the occurrence of EM1 (Enriched Mantle 1, characterized by unradiogenic Pb and Nd isotopic signatures) and HIMU (high μ, μ = 238U/204 Pb, with extremely radiogenic Pb) OIBs, respectively. In general, recycled ancient pelagic sediments are thought to have contributed to the EM1 component in the lower mantle [6] while the recycling of ancient altered oceanic crust is critical for the formation of HIMU [7]. Given that both kinds of recycled crustal components may incorporate carbonates therein, lavas from these two islands are ideal candidates for probing potential recycled carbonates in the lower mantle. Pitcairn OIBs have the lowest δ26Mg (as low as –0.4‰) so far in fresh OIBs [6] (Fig. 1a) that are distinct from the normal mantle. The low δ26Mg values are coupled with low Nb/Th and unradiogenic Pb and Nd isotopic ratios, which can be best explained if the Pitcairn EM1 source contains subducted carbonate-bearing pelagic sediments [6]. However, the low CaO/Al2O3 ratios of these EM1 basalts (Fig. 1b) contradict with experimental melts of carbonated mantle [8] and thus argue against any carbonates in the Pitcairn EM1 source. This paradox can be reconciled by early decarbonation reactions during subduction and the low-δ26Mg signature of carbonates has been inherited by silicate residue (e.g. eclogite), which ultimately became part of the Pitcairn plume [6]. Therefore, the low δ26Mg values of Pitcairn basalts do not support subduction of actual carbonate components into the lower mantle.
Figure 1.

Variations in δ26Mg versus (a) 206Pb/204Pb and (b) CaO/Al2O3 ratio for different types of OIBs. In panel (a), the gray arrows denote general explanations for genesis of the two groups of OIBs: recycled (decarbonated) pelagic sediments (+ oceanic crust) for EM1 lavas (Arrow 1), carbonated peridotite source for HIMU lavas (Arrow 2). The blue curve shows the modeling for isotopic modification of a peridotitic mantle when it is metasomatized by carbonatitic melts with HIMU-type Pb isotopes. See Supplementary Data for data sources and modeling process.

Variations in δ26Mg versus (a) 206Pb/204Pb and (b) CaO/Al2O3 ratio for different types of OIBs. In panel (a), the gray arrows denote general explanations for genesis of the two groups of OIBs: recycled (decarbonated) pelagic sediments (+ oceanic crust) for EM1 lavas (Arrow 1), carbonated peridotite source for HIMU lavas (Arrow 2). The blue curve shows the modeling for isotopic modification of a peridotitic mantle when it is metasomatized by carbonatitic melts with HIMU-type Pb isotopes. See Supplementary Data for data sources and modeling process. Carbonated mantle has been regarded as the source of HIMU OIBs because (i) their low SiO2, high CaO and high CaO/Al2O3 (Fig. 1b) can be generated by melting of carbonated peridotite or eclogite [8], (ii) their trace element signatures are similar to those of carbonatitic melt inclusions in diamonds and (iii) olivine phenocrysts in HIMU OIBs have high Ca and low Al contents [7]. However, mantle-like δ26Mg values were observed in HIMU lavas (Fig. 1) [9] rather than frequently seen low-δ26Mg values in basalts generated by the melting of carbonated sources [4,5]. This is consistent with the metasomatism model for the generation of HIMU OIBs [7]: the HIMU mantle source could be carbonated peridotite formed by interaction between normal peridotite and carbonatitic melts from subducting carbonated oceanic crust. Such carbonatitic melts have MgO contents (typically <7.0 wt%; [3]) far lower than mantle peridotite, which cannot modify the latter's Mg isotopic compositions under a low melt/rock ratio condition (see the blue curve in Fig. 1a). Therefore, the St. Helena HIMU melts from carbonated peridotites still retain mantle-like δ26Mg values. Recently, heavy δ66Zn values (0.31–0.38‰) have been found in Crozet OIBs and have been attributed to carbon-bearing oceanic crust in the sources [10]. However, it is unclear whether the major element (e.g. CaO and CaO/Al2O3) and trace element compositions (e.g. Hf/Sm ratio) of the Crozet OIBs are consistent with a carbonated source. Additionally, we still do not know whether the OIBs with a previously suggested carbonated source (e.g. HIMU OIB) have heavy δ66Zn. Therefore, it is too early to claim that the high δ66Zn values observed in several OIB samples are definite evidence for recycled carbonate in the deep mantle. For LIP-related rocks, Mg and Zn isotopic anomalies have not yet been observed in flood basalts. For example, picrites and basalts of the Emeishan LIP have mantle-like δ26Mg (–0.35‰ to –0.19‰) [11] and MORB-like δ66Zn (0.24–0.34‰) [12]. Considering their high-degree melting origin, the normal δ26Mg and δ66Zn values of flood basalts do not mean the lack of recycled carbonate in their sources because of enhanced dilution of melts from peridotitic mantle. Recently, low δ26Mg values (–1.09‰ to –0.35‰) have been observed from carbonatites and nephelinites (low-degree mantle melts) from the Tarim LIP in NW China [13], though their relationship to the mantle plume is not as clear as OIBs. In summary, the ‘carbonate memory’, including low δ26Mg and high δ66Zn values, has been found in some OIBs, although there is still a certain distance to go in proving recycled carbonates in the lower mantle. Currently, published data of metal stable isotopes for fresh OIBs and LIP rocks are still limited. The fractionation behavior of these isotopes during melting has not been verified experimentally. There are still few integrated studies with measurements of multiple metal stable isotopes, radiogenic isotopes and major and trace elements on a same batch of OIB samples. These impedes the application of these metal stable isotopes to trace deep carbonate recycling. Nevertheless, with the further developments of analytical techniques, the expanding high-quality database of metal stable isotopes and the integrated geochemical study of plume-related lavas, we shall have a clear picture of deep carbonate recycling in the near future. Click here for additional data file.
  5 in total

1.  Slab melting as a barrier to deep carbon subduction.

Authors:  Andrew R Thomson; Michael J Walter; Simon C Kohn; Richard A Brooker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Key new pieces of the HIMU puzzle from olivines and diamond inclusions.

Authors:  Yaakov Weiss; Cornelia Class; Steven L Goldstein; Takeshi Hanyu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Structures of dolomite at ultrahigh pressure and their influence on the deep carbon cycle.

Authors:  Marco Merlini; Wilson A Crichton; Michael Hanfland; Mauro Gemmi; Harald Müller; Ilya Kupenko; Leonid Dubrovinsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Recycled ancient ghost carbonate in the Pitcairn mantle plume.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Wang; Li-Hui Chen; Albrecht W Hofmann; Takeshi Hanyu; Hiroshi Kawabata; Yuan Zhong; Lie-Wen Xie; Jin-Hua Shi; Takashi Miyazaki; Yuka Hirahara; Toshiro Takahashi; Ryoko Senda; Qing Chang; Bogdan S Vaglarov; Jun-Ichi Kimura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Transient Deformation in California From Two Decades of GPS Displacements: Implications for a Three-Dimensional Kinematic Reference Frame.

Authors:  Emilie Klein; Yehuda Bock; Xiaohua Xu; David T Sandwell; Dorian Golriz; Peng Fang; Lina Su
Journal:  J Geophys Res Solid Earth       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.848

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Tracing deep carbon cycling by metal stable isotopes.

Authors:  Shu-Guang Li
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 23.178

2.  Zinc isotopic evidence for recycled carbonate in the deep mantle.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Zhang; Li-Hui Chen; Xiao-Jun Wang; Takeshi Hanyu; Albrecht W Hofmann; Tsuyoshi Komiya; Kentaro Nakamura; Yasuhiro Kato; Gang Zeng; Wen-Xian Gou; Wei-Qiang Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 17.694

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.