Literature DB >> 35669805

Optimization of polypropylene microplastics removal using conventional coagulants in drinking water treatment plants via response surface methodology.

Danial Adib1, Roya Mafigholami1, Hossein Tabeshkia1, Tony R Walker2.   

Abstract

Background and purpose: The ubiquitous presence of microplastics (MPs) in aquatic environments has been studied widely. Due to toxicological impacts of MPs and associated contaminants, it is crucial to understand the performance of MPs removal in drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs). Few studies have investigated removal characteristics of MPs via coagulation/flocculation processes, yet removal characterization of polypropylene microplastics (PPMPs) in this process is poorly understood. This study aims to optimize coagulation of virgin PPMPs in conventional DWTPs.
Methods: In this study, samples were synthesized through response surface methodology (RSM), polyaluminium chloride (PACl) was applied as a conventional coagulant to remove PPMPs in the coagulation/flocculation process, which has the least density among common polymers and is one of the most abundant manufactured polymers worldwide. A particle size analyzer (PSA) was used to measure floc size at different pH levels. Additionally, a zeta potential analyzer was used to measure stability of the flocs at different pH.
Results: Base on the experimental range in Design-Expert, results revealed that the optimum removal rate was predicted to be at pH 9, PACl concentration of 200 ppm, polyacrylamide (PAM) concentration of 21 ppm, and PPMPs size of d < 0.25 mm. According to the predicted optimum condition, actual and predicted removal rates were 18.00 ± 1.43% and 19.69%, respectively.
Conclusion: According to this study, PACl is not capable of efficiently removing virgin PPMPs in DWTPs, thereby exposing humans to eco-toxicological impacts of PPMPs through tap water.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coagulation; Drinking water treatment plant; Microplastics (MPs); Response Surface methodology (RSM)

Year:  2022        PMID: 35669805      PMCID: PMC9163244          DOI: 10.1007/s40201-022-00803-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng


  57 in total

1.  Retention of microplastics in a major secondary wastewater treatment plant in Vancouver, Canada.

Authors:  Esther A Gies; Jessica L LeNoble; Marie Noël; Anahita Etemadifar; Farida Bishay; Eric R Hall; Peter S Ross
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Drowning in debris: Solutions for a global pervasive marine pollution problem.

Authors:  Tony R Walker
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Microplastics in wastewater: State of the knowledge on sources, fate and solutions.

Authors:  Joana Correia Prata
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 5.553

4.  Removal of metals and hydrocarbons from stormwater using coagulation and flocculation.

Authors:  Fredrik Nyström; Kerstin Nordqvist; Inga Herrmann; Annelie Hedström; Maria Viklander
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Microplastic ingestion cause intestinal lesions in the intertidal fish Girella laevifrons.

Authors:  C Ahrendt; D J Perez-Venegas; M Urbina; C Gonzalez; P Echeveste; M Aldana; J Pulgar; C Galbán-Malagón
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 5.553

6.  Comparing polyaluminum chloride and ferric chloride for antimony removal.

Authors:  Meea Kang; Tasuku Kamei; Yasumoto Magara
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.236

7.  Removal characteristics of microplastics by Fe-based coagulants during drinking water treatment.

Authors:  Baiwen Ma; Wenjing Xue; Yanyan Ding; Chengzhi Hu; Huijuan Liu; Jiuhui Qu
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.565

8.  Microplastics in Taihu Lake, China.

Authors:  Lei Su; Yingang Xue; Lingyun Li; Dongqi Yang; Prabhu Kolandhasamy; Daoji Li; Huahong Shi
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 8.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.