| Literature DB >> 35669543 |
M Ezzahmouly1,2, A Essakhi3, A El Ouahli2, H El Byad1,2, M Ed-Dhahraouy1, S Hakim1, E Gourri2, A ELmoutaouakkil1, Z Hatim2.
Abstract
One of the most difficult aims of modern biomaterial science is predicting the shape and volume of a bone defect and adjusting the implementation of a bone substitute. Prior to implantation, practitioners must carefully identify the architecture and volume of the defective bone to be filled. This information is often accessed via imaging techniques. The defective bone is frequently confused with its surroundings and the image background. The use of conventional segmentation for the selection and isolation of the cavity to be filled proves to be difficult. In this work, a defect in a dead bone is created and then imaged with the microtomography technique (343 cuts generated). The goal is to separate the defect's shape and volume from both the bone and the background image. An adaptive morphological operation technique was employed to complete these tasks. The proposed method allows for exact segmentation and calculation of the volume of the cavity to be filled. Using several calculated phantoms, the approach is subjectively and quantitatively evaluated: Compared to the high error value of the conventional method, the error value of the proposed one has no bearing on the overall data. The method's accuracy was also confirmed by comparing the calculated volume of the bone defect (0.91 cm3) and the volume of prepared calcium phosphate cement paste necessary for its filling (0.87 cm3). To challenge the method even further, another direct application on a mandibular bone is realized with an advanced number of cuts (1236 cuts). The result of this application proved that the proposed algorithm overcomes the performance of the classical approaches of segmentation with a gain of 2 min on average. A comparison study between the proposed method and other classical segmentation approaches is also presented. The effectiveness of the method is proved by the various reports and metrics generated. The automated procedure can be beneficial in implantology for realizing and guiding surgical acts, as well as in computer-aided scaffolding techniques.Entities:
Keywords: Biomaterial cement; Bone defect; Microtomography; Morphological operation; Segmentation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35669543 PMCID: PMC9163512 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09594
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Photography of the bone sample with an induced defect.
Figure 2Illustrated principle of tomography.
Figure 3Reconstruction process of a digital image.
Figure 4Microtomographic slice image of the defected bone that has been induced.
Figure 5Flowchart of the proposed method.
Figure 6Phantom cases: (a)- phantom with single hole (b)- phantom with different holes and sizes (c)- phantom with a hole with an elliptical shape.
Figure 7Steps of preparation process of a moldable paste for the bone filling.
Figure 8Photographic image of the induced defect with hard cement.
Figure 9–Slice tomographic image of the defect bone filled with hard calcium phosphate cement.
Figure 10Photographic image of the defected mandibular bone.
Figure 11Slice tomographic image of the defected mandibular bone.
Figure 12(a) 3D visualization of the bone sample, Slice of tomographic images (b) before, (c) after applying the non-local mean filter.
Figure 13Tomographic slice image after applying simple threshold method.
Figure 14Results of the proposed method: Slice of tomographic image. (a) Pre-processing step. Application of an advanced rank of (b) erosion, (c) dilation.
The volume of the real computed phantoms, the conventional and the proposed method.
| Phantom | Hole number | The real distribution (vx) | Conventional method (vx) | Proposed method (vx) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| a | 1 | 391620 | 388990 | 391620 |
| b | 1 | 391620 | 388990 | 391620 |
| 2 | 192600 | 189150 | 192600 | |
| 3 | 151200 | 147530 | 151200 | |
| 4 | 131760 | 127520 | 131760 | |
| c | 1 | 581530 | 574062 | 581530 |
MAE value of the conventional and the proposed method for the computed phantoms.
| Phantom | Hole number | Conventional method | Proposed method | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Absolute Error (MAE) | a | 1 | 2630 | 0 |
| b | 1 | 2630 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3450 | 0 | ||
| 3 | 3670 | 0 | ||
| 4 | 4240 | 0 | ||
| c | 1 | 7468 | 0 |
Figure 15Results of tomographic slice image of defected bone segmented after applying (a) Simple threshold (b) Otsu threshold (c) the proposed method.
Comparison between several approaches used for segmentation.
| Method | Principle | Result obtained or constraint encountered |
|---|---|---|
| Global threshold-Otsu | Based on the histogram, seeks to maximize the within-class variance. | Problems in this case with the presence of several classes. |
| Local threshold-Bernsen & al [ | Estimate the threshold value by averaging the highest and lowest value in the window. | The threshold is too low when the window is centered in the background. |
| Local threshold-Niblack & al [ | Taking into account the variance and the mean. | The appearance of noise in uniform areas of the image. |
| Rising water-Kim & al [ | Use pixel values as contour lines to simulate rising waters. | Difficulties in adapting the water flow or the number of iterations to the image. |
| Markov fields-Wolf & al [ | Use Markov fields to find out the areas of interest. | The constants to be adjusted prevent the method from perfectly processing non-uniform images. |
| Growing regions- Lienhart & al [ | Increase of regions where the borders move according to the gradient. | Practically random memory access slows down the algorithm. |
| Neural networks- Caponetti & al [ | Uses two fuzzy neural networks to segment an image. | The learning phase is very cumbersome to set up due to the type of network. |
| Fourier transform- Zhong & al [ | Pass the image in the frequency domain. | Loss of localization. Requires an analysis window. |
| Mathematical morphological operation | Theoretical and practical aspects of geometrical structure analysis and processing. | Information loss. |
| Proposed approach | The method highlights variations in the image. Fast, allows locating outlines and holes. |
Figure 16Tomographic slice image of (a) bone and implant (b) Calcium phosphate Implant extracted from bone tomographic image.