| Literature DB >> 35669465 |
Wenhao Li1,2, Guanwen Qu3,4,5, Congcong Huo1,2, Xiaoling Hu5, Gongcheng Xu1,2, Huiyuan Li1,2, Jingsha Zhang3,4, Zengyong Li3,4.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to assess brain oxygenation status and cerebral autoregulation function in subjects with cognitive dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: arterial blood pressure; cognitive dysfunction; coupling function; near-infrared spectroscopy; tissue oxygenation index
Year: 2022 PMID: 35669465 PMCID: PMC9163710 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.904108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.702
Figure 1Flow chart of participant inclusion.
Figure 2Overview of modeling of interaction between NIRS and ABP signals.
Basic information of the participants.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 70.72 ± 7.66 | 72.02 ± 9.90 | 72.50 ± 10.93 | 0.535 | 0.484 | 0.829 |
| Gender (male/female) | 9/23 | 31/32 | 13/13 | 0.051 | 0.096 | 0.945 |
| Body mass index | 22.00 ± 1.92 | 22.89 ± 3.00 | 22.52 ± 2.33 | 0.123 | 0.456 | 0.550 |
| MoCA score | 26.94 ± 1.54 | 20.60 ± 3.42 | 10.62 ± 3.16 | <0.001* | <0.001* | <0.001* |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 120.55 ±17.18 | 124.60 ± 19.92 | 129.14 ± 24.60 | 0.361 | 0.113 | 0.341 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | 70.41 ± 8.60 | 69.93 ± 12.70 | 68.20 ± 15.79 | 0.860 | 0.506 | 0.555 |
Values are presented as means and standard deviations. *Indicates p < 0.05.
Figure 3Box-plots picturing the distributions of (A) LTOI, (B) RTOI, and (C) mean TOI. In each boxplot, the NC group (NC) is indicated by red rectangles, the MCI group (MCI) by blue rectangles, and the CI group (CI) by yellow rectangles. The line connectors on the tops of individual panels indicate cases where the difference between two boxplot distributions was statistically significant. p < 0.05 are marked with *, p < 0.0167 are marked with **.
Figure 4The average coupling functions from all subjects within the group between ABP and Δ [O2Hb] in the (A) VLF interval and (B) LF interval. The coupling between ABP and Δ [O2Hb] in the bilateral PFC is denoted as ABP - LPFC and ABP - RPFC. ϕ and ϕ[ represent the dynamical phase information of ABP and Δ [O2Hb] signal, respectively. Each boxplot shows the coupling strength distribution of a specific coupling relationship in the resting state indicated by the NC (Group NC), MCI (Group MCI), or CI (Group CI). The NC group is indicated by red rectangles, the MCI group by blue rectangles, and the CI group by yellow rectangles. The line connectors on the tops of individual panels indicate cases where the difference between two boxplot distributions was statistically significant. p < 0.0167 are marked with *.
Figure 5Scatterplots of TOI vs. MoCA scores and coupling strength vs. MoCA scores. (A) MoCA scores vs. TOI, (B) MoCA scores vs. CS in the VLF interval, and (C) MoCA scores vs. CS in the LF interval.
Correlations between the MoCA scores, TOI, and CS at rest in the bilateral PFC.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||
| TOI | LTOI | 0.199 | 0.029* |
| RTOI | 0.282 | 0.002* | |
|
| ABP → LPFC (VLF) | −0.390 | <0.001* |
| ABP → LPFC (LF) | −0.378 | <0.001* | |
| ABP → RPFC (VLF) | −0.328 | <0.001* | |
| ABP → RPFC (LF) | −0.226 | 0.014* | |
p < 0.05 are marked with .