| Literature DB >> 35669266 |
Xiaoyi Tian1,2, Xiaoyan Liu3, Yan Wang1, Ying Liu1, Jie Ma1, Haidan Sun3, Jing Li3, Xiaoyue Tang3, Zhengguang Guo3, Wei Sun3, Jishui Zhang4, Wenqi Song1,2.
Abstract
Objectives: Knowledge of the urinary metabolomic profiles of healthy children and adolescents plays a promising role in the field of pediatrics. Metabolomics has also been used to diagnose disease, discover novel biomarkers, and elucidate pathophysiological pathways. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders in childhood. However, large-sample urinary metabolomic studies in children with ADHD are relatively rare. In this study, we aimed to identify specific biomarkers for ADHD diagnosis in children and adolescents by urinary metabolomic profiling.Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers; childhood ADHD; healthy children; mass spectrometry; urinary metabolomics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35669266 PMCID: PMC9163378 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.819498
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 5.435
FIGURE 1The workflow of this study.
Basic characteristics of the subjects enrolled in this study.
| (1a) Numbers of healthy controls in different age stages | |||
|
| |||
| Age stage | Male | Female | Total |
| Aged 1-3 (years) | 29 | 25 | 54 |
| Aged 4-6 (years) | 30 | 29 | 59 |
| Aged 7-10 (years) | 39 | 40 | 79 |
| Aged 11-14 (years) | 39 | 39 | 78 |
| Aged 15-18 (years) | 41 | 39 | 80 |
| Total | 178 | 172 | 350 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||
| Cases | 44 | 32 | 63 |
| Age (years) | 7.9 ± 2.0 | 8.7 ± 1.8 | 7.8 ± 1.8 |
| Gender (Male/Female) | 38/6 | 28/4 | 58/5 |
FIGURE 2Analysis of metabolome interindividual variations and related factors (gender and age). (A) The score plot of the OPLS-DA model between female and male children of all ages. (B) Pathway overrepresentation analysis of differential metabolites in the two sex groups. The analysis was carried out with the metabolites in changes (P < 0.05). Pathway impact values were plotted against the X-axis, and P-values were plotted against the Y-axis. The node color is determined by its P-values, and the node size is proportional to the pathway impact values. (c,d) The score plot of the OPLS-DA model of male children (C) and female children (D) with different age stages. (E,F) Age-dependent metabolic pathways were enriched based on metabolites with the highest level in each age group. The KEGG database was the background pathway database.
Gender dependent metabolism pathways of five age groups.
| Age stages | Metabolism pathways |
| Aged 1-3 (years) | Spermidine and spermine biosynthesis; Estrone metabolism; Mitochondrial beta-oxidation of short chain saturated fatty acids; Propanoate metabolism; Methionine metabolism; Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation |
| Aged 4-6 (years) | Arachidonic acid metabolism; Bile acid metabolism |
| Aged 7-10 (years) | Glutamate metabolism; Bile acid metabolism; Fatty acid metabolism; Leucine metabolism; Androsterone metabolism |
| Aged 11-14 (years) | Leukotriene E4 metabolism; Proline metabolism; Androsterone metabolism |
| Aged 15-18 (years) | Catecholamine biosynthesis; Estrone metabolism; Bile acid biosynthesis; Androgen and estrogen metabolism; Tyrosine metabolism |
Age dependent metabolism pathways in male and female children.
| Gender | Age-dependent metabolism pathways |
| Male | Arachidonic acid metabolism, Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, Beta-alanine metabolism, Tryptophan metabolism, Amino acid metabolism, Fatty acid oxidation, Catecholamine biosynthesis, Tyrosine metabolism, Tryptophan metabolism, Dipeptides, Vitamin B6 metabolism, Androstenedione metabolism, Estrone metabolism, Amino sugar metabolism, Androgen and estrogen metabolism |
| Female | Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, Tryptophan metabolism, Proline metabolism, Dipeptides, Histidine metabolism, Phenylacetate metabolism, Pterin biosynthesis, Cysteine and methionine metabolism |
ROC of three groups.
| Disease vs. Normal | ADHD vs. Normal | ADHD comorbid tic disorders vs. Normal | |
| AUC | AUC | AUC | |
| Training Set | 0.923 | 0.918 | 0.918 |
| Validation Set | 0.877 | 0.96 | 0.918 |
a The panel includes FAPy-adenine, N-Acetylaspartylglutamic acid and Dopamine 4-sulfate.
b The panel includes FAPy-adenine, 3-Methylazelaic acid and Phenylacetylglutamine.
c The panel includes FAPy-adenine, N-Acetylaspartylglutamic acid, Dopamine 4-sulfate, Aminocaproic acid and Asparaginyl-Leucine.
FIGURE 3Analysis of metabolome interindividual variations and related factors. (A) The score plot of the PCA model between ADHD without tic disorder and normal controls. (B) The score plot of PCA based on urine profiling of ADHD comorbid with tic disorder and normal controls. (C,D) Enriched pathway of metabolites for ADHD with/without tic disorder. (E,F) ROC plot of the validation set of ADHD patients with/without tic disorder.