| Literature DB >> 35669185 |
Pedro A Jurado-Camacho1,2, Miguel A Cid-Soto1, Francisco Barajas-Olmos1, Humberto García-Ortíz1, Paulina Baca-Peynado1,2, Angélica Martínez-Hernández1, Federico Centeno-Cruz1, Cecilia Contreras-Cubas1, María Elena González-Villalpando3, Yolanda Saldaña-Álvarez1, Guadalupe Salas-Martinez1, Elvia C Mendoza-Caamal4, Clicerio González-Villalpando3, Emilio J Córdova5, Lorena Orozco1.
Abstract
Background: Plasma lipid levels are a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Although international efforts have identified a group of loci associated with the risk of dyslipidemia, Latin American populations have been underrepresented in these studies. Objective: To know the genetic variation occurring in lipid-related loci in the Mexican population and its association with dyslipidemia.Entities:
Keywords: association study; dyslipidemia; exome analysis; genetic variants; mexican population
Year: 2022 PMID: 35669185 PMCID: PMC9164108 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.807381
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
Clinical and demographic characteristics of the studied cohort.
| Characteristic | DMS | MCDS | MAIS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Women/Men (%) | 70.3/29.7 | 60.6/39.4 | 63.2/36.8 | |
| Age (Years) | 54.1 ± 9.8 | 62.9 ± 7.6 | 58.6 ± 12.1 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.4 ± 4.9 | 29.5 ± 4.9 | 27.5 ± 5.0 | |
| FG (mg/dl) | 125.2 ± 61.4 | 114.3 ± 54.2 | 114.2 ± 63.9 | |
| HTG (%) | 54.9 | 58.8 | 66.8 | |
| Mean TG (mg/dl) | 203.7 ± 129.3 | 176.3 ± 96.3 | 207.5 ± 119.5 | |
| HTC (%) | 65.1 | 44.1 | 29.7 | |
| Mean TC (mg/dl) | 201.1 ± 43.8 | 195.9 ± 36.5 | 182.8 ± 38.3 | |
| Low HDL-C (%) | 70.8 | 82.8 | 75.2 | |
| Mean HDL-C (mg/dl) | Women | 39.7 ± 12.1 | 31.5 ± 8.5 | 40.6 ± 12.6 |
| Men | 37.4 ± 13.0 | 28.6 ± 13.4 | 38.7 ± 12.6 | |
| High LDL-C (%) | 37 | 40.0 | 14.9 | |
| Mean 1LDL-C (mg/dl) | 120.7 ± 35.3 | 131.5 ± 33.6 | 103.7 ± 29.5 | |
Data are presented as the mean ± SD, or the percentage, as indicated. BMI, body mass index; FG, fasting glucose; HTG, hypertriglyceridemia; TG, triglycerides; HTC, hypercholesterolemia; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein; LDL-C, Low density lipoprotein. 1LDL-C values were calculated with the Friedewald equation.
FIGURE 1Features of the analyzed gene variant set. (A) Cumulative variant distribution according to the minor allele frequency (MAF). Rare variants include Singletons, Doubletons, and variants with MAFs <0.01. Low Frequency variants include variants with MAFs = 0.01–0.05. Common variants are those with MAFs >0.05. (B) Distribution of coding and non-coding annotations, according to the Variant Effect Predictor tool (VEP) in the entire set of variants.
FIGURE 2Manhattan plots from a meta-analysis based on the genome-wide association analysis. Panels show the −log p value for SNVs for each lipemic traits. Top hits for each trait are indicated in the figure. Red line indicates the significant threshold line: p = 6.4 × 10−5.
FIGURE 3Forest and regional plots showing the top hits associated with lipemic traits. Forest plot showing odds ratio estimates and 95% confidence intervals (squared boxes) from the 3 cohorts DMS, MCDS, and MAIS, included in the study in HTG (A), HTC (C), and low HDL-C (E). Odds ratios for the meta-analyses are represented with a diamond. Regional plot of associated SNVs in HTG (B), HTC (D), and low HDL-C (F).