Literature DB >> 35669176

Emergency Medical Services Prehospital Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US: A Brief Literature Review.

Christian Angelo I Ventura1,2,3, Edward E Denton3,4,5, Jessica Anastacia David6, Brianna J Schoenfelder7, Lillian Mela8, Rebecca P Lumia9, Rachel B Rudi3, Barnita Haldar3,10.   

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze prehospital Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the US through a brief systematic review of available literature in context with international prehospital counterparts. An exploration of the NCBI repository was performed using a search string of relevant keywords which returned n=5128 results; articles that met the inclusion criteria (n=77) were reviewed and analyzed in accordance with PRISMA and PROSPERO recommendations. Methodical quality was assessed using critical appraisal tools, and the Egger's test was used for risk of bias reduction upon linear regression analysis of a funnel plot. Sources of heterogeneity as defined by P < 0.10 or I^2 > 50% were interrogated. Findings were considered within ten domains: structural/systemic; clinical outcomes; clinical assessment; treatment; special populations; dispatch/activation; education; mental health; perspectives/experiences; and transport. Findings suggest, EMS clinicians have likely made significant and unmeasured contributions to care during the pandemic via nontraditional roles, ie, COVID-19 testing and vaccine deployment. EMS plays a critical role in counteracting the COVID-19 pandemic in addition to the worsening opioid epidemic, both of which disproportionately impact patients of color. As such, being uniquely influential on clinical outcomes, these providers may benefit from standardized education on care and access disparities such as racial identity. Access to distance learning continuing education opportunities may increase rates of provider recertification. Additionally, there is a high prevalence of vaccine hesitancy among surveyed nationally registered EMS providers. Continued rigorous investigation on the impact of COVID-19 on EMS systems and personnel is warranted to ensure informed preparation for future pandemic and infectious disease responses.
© 2022 Ventura et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; EMS; EMT; pandemic response; paramedic; prehospital

Year:  2022        PMID: 35669176      PMCID: PMC9165654          DOI: 10.2147/OAEM.S366006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med        ISSN: 1179-1500


Introduction

Prehospital clinical care under the purview of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) has been traditionally understudied in the United States, as illustrated by the scarcity of literature as compared to other allied health professions. Under the federal oversight of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), EMS models of care vary drastically, shaped largely by geographic assignment, local community partners, and additional presiding authorities. Common models include municipality-based, private nonprofit, and private for-profit services.1 Within these structural differences exist a subset variance of agencies’ scope of practice. In accordance with the National EMS Scope of Practice Model, the Basic Life Support (BLS) scope extends to Emergency Medical Responders (EMRs) and Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs), while the Advanced Life Support (ALS) scope is characteristic of Advanced EMTs (AEMTs) and Paramedics (EMT-Ps).2 As of January 2022, COVID-19, the respiratory infection caused by novel SARS-CoV-2, is a leading cause of death in the US.3 This global pandemic has established an unprecedented call for rigorous investigation of resource capacity and competency amid allied health care industries to ascertain structural deficits and strengths that have implications for future pandemic response. Further, preliminary mixed-method studies on EMS pandemic response in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic have identified deficits in the domains of resource availability, continued education, administrative protocols, and decontamination practices.4 Although evidently there is an apparent scarcity of academic literature centering US EMS systems in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, it may be useful to summatively review existing literature of satisfactory methodical quality to highlight research areas that warrant further investigatory attention, as no review of this scope and nature currently exists. In this study, we aimed to systematically review peer-reviewed literature indexed in PubMed pertaining to COVID-19 considerations, effects, and implications on US EMS systems and clinicians within the context of prehospital international counterparts by employing artificial intelligence and conventional PRISMA and PROSPERO recommendations.

Methods

Search Strategy

On 07 March 2022 a PubMed National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) repository search was conducted using the keywords “COVID,” “COVID-19,” “SARS-COV-2,” “CORONAVIRUS,” “EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES,” “EMS”, “EMT”, “PREHOSPITAL,” “OUT OF HOSPITAL,” and “PARAMEDIC.” The returned English results were uploaded to Rayyan.ai for comprehensive abstract and full text review.5

Data Extraction

Duplicate results were assessed for and removed. Editorials, commentaries, and non-peer reviewed manuscripts were excluded. Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts to identify articles eligible for full text review. The investigators then independently reviewed full text articles to identify studies that met the PICOS-guided inclusion criteria.6 Studies were excluded if there were concerns regarding methodical quality or integrity of the data as per discretion of the two investigators and a third consultant. SIGN appraisal tools were used to exclude retrospective and cohort-based studies that did not meet an acceptable level of evidence for inclusion in the review.7 Conflicts were resolved through discussion and by mediation from a third or fourth consultant when necessary. Study methods were consistent with PRISMA recommendations, and although PROSPERO registration was not sought, the work remained faithful to conventional review standards.8,9

Analysis

Stata/BE software was used to assess aggregate prevalence of data. Heterogeneity was defined as P < 0.10 or I^2 > 50% which warranted a fixed effects approach.10 Otherwise, a random effects approach was assumed. We then sought to investigate sources of heterogeneity. During full text review, studies were primarily taxonomized in one of the following ten domains: i. structural/systemic, ii. clinical outcomes, iii. clinical assessment, iv. treatment, v. special populations, vi. dispatch/activation, vii. education, viii. mental health, ix. perspectives/experiences, x. transport.

Methodical Quality

Investigators determined risk of bias for prevalence studies based upon appropriateness of sampling, sampling methods, use of standard assessment methods, and setting characteristics. The criteria were adapted from either the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data or the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tool for Quasi-Experimental Studies.11,12 A 95% confidence interval was used to standardize prevalence and pooling of data, and the linear regression based Egger’s test was used to analyze the presence of any publication bias after a funnel plot was created and assessed.13 P > 0.05 deemed no risk of publication bias. Microsoft Excel was used to calculate standard deviation and mean. Sensitivity analyses assessed for source of heterogeneity and stability of results. Because the work did not involve the use of human research subjects, it did not require approval or review by an institutional review board or bioethics committee.

Diversity in the Research Team

The work represents a cross-institutional and multi-disciplinary collaboration amongst public health oriented researchers, EMS clinicians, and physician scientists.

Results

The NCBI repository returned n=5128 results, with n=77 utilized for analysis and inclusion in this study. Results were excluded if they did not satisfy the inclusion criteria. Figure 1 depicts an overview of the exclusion schema. AI identified n=111 duplicative results, n=4916 results were excluded due to irrelevance with respect to the area of investigation, and n=24 studies were excluded after investigators performed full text reviews and found studies to be of unsatisfactory evidence levels in accordance with SIGN appraisal guidelines. Table 1 depicts characteristics of studies selected for inclusion, with high confidence in stability and quality of the aggregate data.
Figure 1

Schematic selection of relevant articles for inclusion in review.

Table 1

Characteristics of Studies Selected for Inclusion

#Author(s)TitleDesignSampleCountry/RegionSummary of Key FindingsPrimary Domain
1Slavova et. al14Signal of increased opioid overdose during COVID-19 from emergency medical services dataCohortIncidences of opioid overdoseKentucky, US● Post-COVID emergency declaration, daily opioid overdose runs increased.● EMS conditions for other chief complaints remained static or declined.● 50% increase in suspected opioid overdose death calls.Clinical Outcomes
2Tien et. al15Critical care transport in the time of COVID-19CasePerformance of region-based medical transport serviceOntario, CA● Ornge, a critical care transport service, has transported 325 patients either confirmed or suspected to have COVID-19.● This was divided into three types of transport: critical care land ambulances (52.3%), PC-12 Next Generation fixed wing aircraft (28.9%), and AW-139 rotary wing aircraft (16.6%).● No staff members tested positive for COVID-19 during this period.● Though not typical for critical care transport, Ornge has also transported 450 COVID-19 test samples.Transport
3Dahmen et. al16COVID-19 Stress test for ensuring emergency healthcare: strategy and response of emergency medical services in BerlinCaseEmergency calls by region-based medical transport serviceBerlin, DE● Increase in visits to patients with acute respiratory diseases.● 11% of all visits were to patients suspected of having COVID-19.● The average call time increased by 1 minute and 36 seconds due to extended screening processes.● The average visit time increased by 17 minutes when patients experienced acute respiratory problems.Structural/Systemic
4Levy et. al17Correlation between Emergency Medical Services Suspected COVID-19 Patients and Daily HospitalizationsRetrospective, correlationalStatewide EMS electronic medical recordsMaryland, US● 26,855 patients out of 225,355 emergency calls were considered to be suspected COVID-19 cases.● 91.2% of these patients were moved to hospitals and 25.6% had abnormal initial pulse oximetry.● Cross correlation was found between transports and daily hospitalizations, with a 9-day lag in hospitalization rate (p < 0.01).Clinical Outcomes
5Şan et. al18Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Medical ServicesRetrospective, correlationalProvincial EMS electronic medical recordsAnkara, TR● 90.9% increase in calls during the COVID-19 pandemic.● Of these, 15.2% were suspected to have COVID-19 and 2.9% were eventually diagnosed.● Frequency of cases for children 0–18 decreased, while 18+ saw an increase.● Symptoms of fever and cough increased by 14.1% and 956.3%, respectively.● Other cases such as myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular disease decreased in frequency.Structural/Systemic
6Handberry et. al19Changes in Emergency Medical Services Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States, January 2018-December 2020LongitudinalNationwide 911 activations from NEMSIS dataUS● Decrease in overall volume of EMS cases during the early pandemic.● However, there was an increase in on-scene death (1.3% to 2.4%), cardiac arrest (1.3% to 2.2%), and opioid use or overdose (0.6% to 1.1%) during the early height of the pandemic.Structural/Systemic
7Roto-Cámara et. al20Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Out-of-Hospital Health Professionals: A Living Systematic ReviewSystematic ReviewPeer-reviewed literatureGlobal● 6.8% of participants examined experience post traumatic stress, between 15–20% experience anxiety, and around 15% have a history of depression.● Female out-of-hospital health professionals, and those who worked closely with COVID-19 patients were more likely to have stress or anxiety during this time.● Health professionals with history of illnesses that could make them more susceptible to infection were more likely to have depressive symptoms.Mental Health
8Al Amiry, Maguire21Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Calls During COVID-19: Early Lessons Learned for Systems Planning (A Narrative Review)Narrative ReviewPeer-reviewed literatureGlobal● Call volume and response time dramatically increased, most notably Israel with a 1900% increase in calls and India with an up to 12 hour response time.● Length of call time increased, eg from 8 minutes to 1 hour in Italy.● Fewer calls were made for cases of stroke and cardiac arrest, which lead to collateral mortality (eg 300% increase in mortality in Italy one month post-pandemic).Dispatch/Activation
9Satty et. al22EMS responses and non-transports during the COVID-19 pandemicCase Control911 call responses by 22 regiospecific EMS agenciesPennsylvania, US● 26.5% decrease in EMS response in 2020, compared to responses per year from 2016–2019.● Slight increase in respiratory illnesses and patients’ abnormal vital signs.● 48% increase in non-transports in April 2020 compared to April 2019.Transport
10Grawey et. al23ED EMS time: A COVID-friendly alternative to ambulance ride-alongsQualitativeMedical studentsWisconsin, US● ED-EMS time is an effective alternative to EMS ride time.● Medical students report increased understanding of EMS capabilities and prehospital considerations.● Method limits patient contact, maintains PPE, and limits COVID-19 exposure.Education
11Fernandez et. al24COVID-19 Preliminary Case Series: Characteristics of EMS Encounters with Linked Hospital DiagnosesCohortNational EMS electronic medical recordsUS● EMS COVID-19 Suspicion was present in 78% of hospital diagnosed COVID-19 patients.● EMS COVID-19 Suspicion had a 20% positive predictive value compared to hospital codes.● EMS PPE use was documented at higher rates on records that has a hospital COVID-19 diagnosis.Clinical Outcomes
12Gregory et. al25COVID-19 Vaccinations in EMS Professionals: Prevalence and PredictorsCross SectionalNational Survey of EMS ProfessionalsUS● 70% of EMS professionals are vaccinated in the US.● The majority of those who did not receive the vaccine reported concerns of safety as well as feeling it was not necessary.● 84% of those who had not yet received the vaccine do not plan to receive it in the future.Perspectives/Experiences
13Ardebili et. al26Healthcare providers experience of working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative studyQualitativeMedical Professionals of 3 major citiesIR● 4 major themes present in interviews included: ‘Working in the pandemic era’, ‘Changes in personal life and enhanced negative affect’, ‘Gaining experience, normalization and adaptation to the pandemic’ and ‘Mental Health Considerations’.Perspectives/Experiences
14Jaffe et. al27Responses of a Pre-hospital Emergency Medical Service During Military Conflict Versus COVID-19: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort StudyCohortEmergency Ambulance Calls to A National EMS OrganizationIL● During conflict call amounts decreased with an increase in calls post-conflit compared to pre-conflict.● During COVID lockdown call amounts increased with a decrease in calls post-conflit compared to pre-conflict.● There was a significant decrease in MVC and other injuries only during the lockdown.Structural/Systemic
15Vanhaecht et. al28COVID-19 is having a destructive impact on health-care workers’ mental well-beingCross SectionalSurvey of Healthcare workers in a cit.Flanders, BE● Negative psychological symptoms increased during the pandemic and Positive symptoms were experienced less frequently.● 18% of healthcare workers felt there was a need for psychological guidance and 27% wanted more leadership support.● Strongest correlation between COVID-19 and psychological symptoms was in 30–49 years, females, nurses and residential care centers.Mental Health
16Jensen et. al29Strategies to Handle Increased Demand in the COVID-19 Crisis: A Coronavirus EMS Support Track and a Web-Based Self-Triage SystemCross SectionalCity EMS Agency Call RecordsCopenhagen, DK● Total EMS call volume increased by 23.3% between 2019 and 2020.● 4.4% increase was seen in the 112 emergency line and a 25.1% increase in the 1813 medical helpline.● The wait time of the medical helpline increased from 2m:23s to 12m:2s from 2019 to 2020.● There appears to be no correlation between call volume and web triage system usage.Structural/Systemic
17Firew et. al30Protecting the front line: a cross-sectional survey analysis of the occupational factors contributing to healthcare workers’ infection and psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USACross SectionalNational survey of healthcare workersUS● 29% of respondents could be considered a probable case from symptoms or test results.● Healthcare workers with COVID-19 appear to have higher levels of depressive symptoms.● Emergency Department workers have the highest likelihood of contracting COVID-19.Mental Health
18Jouffroy et. al31Hypoxemia Index Associated with Prehospital Intubation in COVID-19 PatientsCase ControlClinical care reports of COVID-19 patients cared for by regional ALS prehospital serviceParis, FR● A hypoxemia index (HI) < 1.3 correlated with a 3 fold increase in prehospital endotracheal intubation of patients with COVID-19.● Hypoxemia index may be a reliable indicator for prehospital endotracheal intubation in respiratorily compromised patients with COVID-19.Clinical Outcomes
19Ventura et. al4Emergency Medical Services resource capacity and competency amid COVID-19 in the United States: preliminary findings from a national surveyCohortSurvey of Practicing US EMS cliniciansUS● There is a lack of knowledge among EMS providers on the risk and transmission of COVID 19.● There is a lack of equipment and PPE available to EMS providers.● EMS agencies are often not providing training or resources to employees in regard to COVID-19.Structural/Systemic
20Tabah et. al32Personal protective equipment and intensive care unit healthcare worker safety in the COVID-19 era (PPE-SAFE): An international surveyCross SectionalSurvey International Healthcare WorkersGlobal● 52% of Healthcare workers reported missing at least one piece of PPE.● 30% report having to reuse single-use PPE.● Significant adverse effects from long PPE use was reported.Structural/Systemic
21Prezant et. al33System impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on New York City’s emergency medical servicesLongitudinalCity EMS Agency Call RecordsNew York City, US● On March 30, 2020 call volumes increased 60% compared to the same dates in 2019.● The proportion of high acuity calls increased 42.3% in 2020 from 36.4% in 2019.● High acuity call response time had an increase in 3min compared to low acuity calls which had an increase of 11min.● The most common call types were respiratory and cardiovascular related.Structural/Systemic
22Berry et. al34Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Transport of COVID-19 Patients in the “First Wave”: A National SurveyCross SectionalNational Survey of Helicopter EMS servicesUS● 85% of programs reported that they chose to transport known or suspected COVID-19 patients.● 93% reported providing COVID-19 training to its providers.● PAPR or N95 protective equipment was provided in Covid-19 suspected cases by 77% of programs and 95% included pilots in distribution.Transport
23Xie et. al35Predicting Covid-19 emergency medical service incidents from daily hospitalization trendsCaseDocumented EMS incidents within a specific regionTexas, US● On March 17th, the daily number of non-pandemic EMS incidents dropped significantly.● On May 13th, the daily number of EMS calls climbed back to 75% of the number in pre-Covid-19 time.● For every 2.5 cases where EMS takes a Covid-19 patient to a hospital, one person is admitted.● The mean daily number of non-pandemic EMS demand was significantly less than the period before Covid-19 pandemic.Clinical Outcomes
24Gonzalez et. al36Proctologic emergency consultation during COVID-19: Comparative cross-sectional cohort studyCross SectionalRetrospective review of patient dataES● 191 patients were reviewed from 2019–2020.● There was a 56% decrease in protocologic emergency consultation, but the need for surgery was 2x more frequent.● There was no difference in outpatients regimen after emergency surgery.Clinical Assessment
25Greenhalgh et. al37Where did all the trauma go? A rapid review of the demands on orthopaedic services at a UK Major Trauma Centre during the COVID-19 pandemicCohortDatabase of Trauma Patients at a Regional Trauma CenterUK● There was a 50.7% decrease in the number of referrals to the orthopedic team.● There was a 43.2% decrease in the number of trauma operations carried out at the MTC trust.● There was a 53.6% decrease in the number of pediatric referrals.● There was a 35.4% decrease in the number of major trauma patients.● Covid-19 had a big effect of the provision of trauma and orthopedic surgery.Clinical Outcomes
26Bourn et. al38Initial prehospital Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) to predict outcomes for COVID-19 patientsCohortPrehospital and hospital records from ESO Data CollaborativeTexas, US● Initial prehospital Rapid Emergency Response Score was modestly predictive of ED and hospital dispositions for pts with Covid-19.● Prediction was stronger for outcomes closer to the first set of EMS vital signs.● In 13,890 Covid-19 pts, the median Rapid Emergency Response Score was 6.Clinical Outcomes
27Nishikimi et. al39Intubated COVID-19 predictive (ICOP) score for early mortality after intubation in patients with COVID-19CohortHospital medical records of Intubated patients with COVID-19New York City, US● The predictors of death within 14 days after intubation included old age, hx of chronic kidney disease, lower mean arterial pressure or increased dose of required vasopressors, higher urea nitrogen level, higher ferritin, higher oxygen index, and abnormal pH levels.Clinical Outcomes
28Feng et. al40Impact of COVID-19 on emergency patients in the resuscitation room: A cross-sectional studyCross SectionalEmergency room patients in 2019 and 2020Nanning, CN● There was a decrease in the number of emergency patients in the resuscitation room during the Covid-19 Pandemic in intrinsic/extrinsic diseases and pediatric cases.● There was a decrease in the length of stay of emergency patients in the resuscitation room.● Comparison made between 2020 and 2019 in Nanning, China.Clinical Outcomes
29Garcia-Castrillo et. al41European Society For Emergency Medicine position paper on emergency medical systems’ response to COVID-19ReviewLiterature of current and previous pandemic recommendationsEU● Current literature states that only critical patients with COVID-19 should be admitted to the emergency department.● It is suggested that pre-hospital personnel be used to perform initial assessment on COVID-19 patients and possible contacts and if transportation or home isolation is indicated.● It is also stated that an additional consultation line should not be used for noncritical cases instead of the emergency line.Structural/Systemic
30Albrecht et. al42Transport of COVID-19 and other highly contagious patients by helicopter and fixed-wing air ambulance: a narrative review and experience of the Swiss air rescueReviewAir Ambulance Crew NarrativesCH● Lots of different means are being used for the aeromedical transport of infectious pts.● A method of transporting infectious pts are either isolating/pt.● Small Patient Isolation Units are beneficial, ex: transport can easily be changed without contamination and still allowing access to pt.Transport
31US Centers for Disease Control & Prevention43Interim Guidance for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Systems and 911 Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs) for COVID-19 in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and PreventionN/AN/AUS● Face masks are used as an alternative to respirators when the supply chain is low.● Eye protection, gowns, and gloves should continue to be worn.● Recommended EPA-registered disinfectants are on a reference list on the EPA website.Structural/Systemic
32Yang et. al44Clinical Characteristics of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Receiving Emergency Medical Services in King County, WashingtonCohortCOVID-19 patient records of a country EMS serviceWashington, US● Most patients with Covid-19 who went to emergency services were older and had multiple chronic health conditions.● Saying that Covid-19 is a febrile respiratory illness does not necessarily fit for early diagnostic suspicion, at least for prehospital settings.● As of June 1, 2020, mortality among the study cohort was 52.4%.Clinical Assessment
33Murphy et. al45Occupational exposures and programmatic response to COVID-19 pandemic: an emergency medical services experienceCohortMixedWashington, US● Of 700 EMS clinicians 0.4% tested positive during the duration of the investigation.● Less than 0.5% experienced COVID related illness within 14 days of exposure.Perspectives/Experiences
34Spangler et. al46Prehospital identification of Covid-19: an observational studyObservationalPatient care reportsUppsala, SE● Patients who tested positive for Covid-19 had worse outcomes than those who tested negative.● 30 day mortality rates were 24% vs 11% in Covid-19 positive vs negative.● Suspicion of Covid-19 in a prehospital setting should not be solely relied on to rule out using isolation precautions.Clinical Assessment
35Albright et. al47A Dispatch Screening Tool to Identify Patients at High Risk for COVID-19 in the Prehospital SettingCase ControlPrehospital care reports and electronic health chartsMassachusetts, US● In MA, the rate of positive Covid-19 tests was 2%.● Reporting shortness of breath was the most common symptom that resulted in a positive screening for Covid-19.● Most positive tests did not belong to high-risk populations.Dispatch/Activation
36Cash et. al48Emergency Medical Services Personnel Awareness and Training about Personal Protective Equipment during the COVID-19 PandemicCross-sectionalMixedUS● Despite increased CDC guidance for N95 fit testing for EMS, there are still substantial gaps in PPE training use among EMS.● Part-time workers, 911 response service, working at non-fire based EMS services, and working in rural areas are associated with lower odds of awareness/training.Perspectives/Experiences
37Moeller et. al49Symptom presentation of SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative patients: a nested case-control study among patients calling the emergency medical service and medical helplineCaseClinical data from patient care reportsCopenhagen, DK● Loss of smell/taste as a symptom of Covid-19 was almost always reported for patients younger than 60.● Fever and cough were the most common symptoms in all age groups.● Loss of appetite and feeling unwell were symptoms that were more common for patients over 60 years old.Clinical Assessment
38Jouffroy et. al50Prehospital management of acute respiratory distress in suspected COVID-19 patientsCohortEMS and Hospital Patient Care RecordsParis, FR● 15% of 256 patients with COVID-19 symptoms died at the scene but there was a low prevalence of prior cardiovascular risk factors.● Out of the 185 patients analyzed 44% were transported via BLS and 42% received non-invasive ventilation.● 56% were transported via ALS and 52% of these patients received noninvasive ventilation and 18% received intubation.Treatment
39Shekhar et. al51COVID-19 and the Prehospital Incidence of Acute Cardiovascular Events (from the Nationwide US EMS)MixedlMixedUS● 10.33% decrease in EMS calls between January and March 2020.● 4.62% decrease from February to March 2020.● STEMI and CVA alerts decreased across all months.● Incidence of VF/VT and asystole decreased from January to March, but increased from March to April.Clinical Outcomes
40Glenn et. al52Refusals After Prehospital Administration of Naloxone during the COVID-19 PandemicCohortIncidences of refusals following naloxone administrationUS● The amount of patients that refused transport following prehospital administration of naloxone increased during the pandemic.● During the COVID-19 pandemic, over twice as many patients who received naloxone in a prehospital setting refused transport than prior to the pandemic.● 29.7% of patients who did not receive naloxone refused transport prior to the pandemic, while 41.3% refused during the pandemic.Clinical Outcomes
41Jarvis et. al53Examining emergency medical services’ prehospital transport times for trauma patients during COVID-19CohortTrauma patients transported via EMS to six US trauma centersUS● There was no significant difference in total EMS prehospital times between 2019 and during COVID-19 pandemic.● Times during transport were less during the pandemic than in 2019.● Less trauma patients were transported during the pandemic than in 2019.Transport
42March et. al54Effects of COVID-19 on EMS Refresher Course Completion and DeliveryCaseCommission Accreditation for Prehospital Continuing Education database of continuing education recordsUS● There was a 179% increase in completion of EMS refresher courses from 2018 to 2020.● There was a 185% increase in asynchronous online refresher course completion from 2018 to 2020.● No significant difference in mean monthly live in person and virtual instructor-led training in the months between 2018 and 2020.● Study suggests EMS refresher course completions are more likely when given via asynchronous methods rather than live in person methods as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.Education
43Saberian et. al55How the COVID-19 Epidemic Affected Prehospital Emergency Medical Services in Tehran, IranCase ControlRecords of EMS activations, employees, and time codesTehran, UQ● Tehran prehospital personnel experienced a 347% increase in EMS calls and 21% increase in EMS dispatches.● After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Tehran EMS saw an increase in chief complaints of fever by 211% and respiratory distress by 245%.● To keep up with the increased EMS demand, Tehran increased the amount of EMS providers available, decreased time between shifts, and raised amount of overtime hours.● In-service education continued during the pandemic.Structural/Systemic
44Oulasvirta et. al56Paediatric prehospital emergencies and restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based studyCohortEMS contacts involving children between 0 and 15 years oldHelsinki, FL● There was a decrease in pediatric EMS calls by 30.4% from March 2020 to May 2020.● After the onset of the pandemic, a majority of pediatric EMS contacts were a result of trauma or a need for intensive care.● There was a decrease in number of transports of pediatric patients following contact with EMS personnel after onset of the pandemic.● Pediatric patients that made contact with EMS were more likely to be critically ill between March 2020 and May 2020 than prior to this period.Special Populations
45Hadley et. al57911 EMS Activations by Pregnant Patients in Maryland (USA) during the COVID-19 PandemicRetrospectiveRecords of EMS calls related to obstetric emergenciesMaryland, US● There was a decrease in EMS calls in response to obstetric issues during the pandemic than was seen in the months prior.● High fraction (as compared to population demographics) of obstetric-related EMS calls were from African-American women during the pandemic.● Percent of EMS contacts with female patients remained unchanged in the periods during and prior to the pandemic.Special Populations
46Hart et. al58Recommendations for Prehospital Airway Management in Patients with Suspected COVID-19 InfectionSystematic ReviewPeer-reviewed literatureUS● Providers should always don and secure Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to making contact with a patient suspected of having COVID-19.● EMS should not try endotracheal intubation more than once, as to prevent additional exposure to infection, and should attempt with video laryngoscopy rather than direct laryngoscopy if possible.● After ET or SGA placement, HEPA filter should be placed on ET tube or SGA to prevent potential COVID-19 exposure to other equipment.● For BLS crews who are unauthorized to perform intubation or SGA placement techniques, it is recommended to perform two-person resuscitation techniques to ensure a tight seal of BVM on patient’s mouth to prevent contamination.Treatment
47Mohammadi et. al59Management of COVID-19-related challenges faced by EMS personnel: a qualitative studyQualitativeDetailed interviews with pre-hospital emergency care personnelIR● EMS providers are unsure how to approach patients suspected of COVID-19 infection due to a lack of standard, comprehensive treatment protocols.● EMS personnel experience psychological strain as a result of inadequate equipment and increased work hours during the COVID-19 pandemic.● EMS personnel are frustrated with the lack of public education of COVID-19 which leaves many patients unable to take proper precautions to prevent exposing providers to infection.Perspectives/Experiences
48Lancet et. al60Prehospital hypoxemia, measured by pulse oximetry, predicts hospital outcomes during the New York City COVID-19 pandemicLongitudinalAdult patients transported by EMS in NYCNew York, US● Prehospital oxygen saturation level is an indicator of mortality and length of stay in hospital.● In patients over 65 years old, an oxygen saturation above 90% showed a 26% chance of death in hospital, while a saturation below 90% showed a 54% chance of death.● In patients under 66, a prehospital oxygen saturation above 90% revealed 11.5% chance of death, while oxygen saturation under 90% revealed a 31% chance of death in hospital.Clinical Outcomes
49Powell et. al61Prehospital Sinus Node Dysfunction and Asystole in a Previously Healthy Patient with COVID-19CaseFemale with nodal dysfunction and asystole following COVID-19 infectionUS● A 47 year old patient with no history of prior illness experienced nodal dysfunction and asystole episodes, characterized by hypoxia due to pneumonia.● Post-recovery, no other arrhythmias were observed.Clinical Assessment
50Velasco et. al62Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Incidence, Prehospital Evaluation, and Presentation of Ischemic Stroke at a Nonurban Comprehensive Stroke CenterRetrospectivePatients presenting with ischemic stroke symptoms as obtained by prehospital quality improvement databaseUS● There was a decrease in the number of transports of patients experiencing stroke symptoms from 2019 to 2020.● The median amount of transport time between EMS dispatch and hospital arrival for patients diagnosed with a stroke increased from 2019 to 2020.● There is a decrease in patient transport volumes and increase in time taken to access appropriate care from 2019 to 2020 in nonurban areas.Clinical Outcomes
51Solà-Muñoz et. al63Impact on polytrauma patient prehospital care during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional studyCross SectionalRecords of EMS activations as a result of polytrauma patientsCatalonia, ES● There was a 52% decrease in polytraumatic patients treated after the onset of the pandemic.● There was a decrease in EMS dispatches to traffic accidents and pedestrian-vehicle collisions from before the pandemic to the first few months of the pandemic.● There was an increase in injuries caused by weapons and burns after the onset of the pandemic.● The COVID-19 pandemic decreased the amount of polytraumatic patients treated by EMS, and saw a difference in the severity and category of trauma.Clinical Outcomes
52Siman-Tov et. al64An assessment of treatment, transport, and refusal incidence in a National EMS’s routine work during COVID-19ComparativePatient care reportsIL● Incidence of infectious disease, cardiac arrest, psychiatric, and labor and delivery calls increased from March and April 2019 to 2020● Incidence of neurology and trauma calls decreased in the same period.● Refusal by patients for transport to a hospital increased from 13.4% to 19.9%, accompanied by an increase in deaths 8 days post-refusal.Structural/Systemic
53Marincowitz et. al65Prognostic accuracy of triage tools for adults with suspected COVID-19 in a prehospital setting: an observational cohort studyCohortPatient care reportsGB● 65% of patients were transported to hospital and EMS decision to transfer patients achieved a sensitivity of 0.84.● NEWS2, PMEWS, PRIEST tool and WHO algorithm identified pts at risk of adverse outcomes with a high sensitivity.● Using NEWS2, PMEWS, PRIEST tool, and the WHO algorithm can improve sensitivity of EMS triage of patients with suspected COVID-19 infection.Clinical Assessment
54Ong et. al66An international perspective of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the COVID-19 pandemicComparativeMixedGlobal● Studies in Italy, New York City, and France showed a significant increase in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests with the arrival of the pandemic.● The difficulties that the first responder system faced during Covid-19 were dispatcher overload, increased response times, and adherence to PPE requirements, superimposed on PPE shortages.● New noninvasive, adjunct tools, warrant consideration with the rise in OCHA during the pandemic.Perspectives/Experiences
55Yu et. al67Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency medical service response to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Taiwan: a retrospective observational studyObservationalPatient care reportsTW● There was a longer EMS response time for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests during the pandemic.● The rate of prehospital ROSC was lower in 2020.● Significantly fewer cases had favorable neurological function in 2020.Structural/Systemic
56Azbel et. al68Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on trauma-related emergency medical service calls: a retrospective cohort studyCohortPatient care reportsFL● During lockdown, there was a 12.2% decrease in the number of weekly total EMS calls.● There was also a 23.3% decrease in the number of weekly trauma related calls● There was also a 41.8%. decrease in the weekly number of injured patients met by EMS while intoxicated with alcohol.● After the lockdown, numbers returned to normal pre-lockdown.Clinical Outcomes
57Seo et. al69Pre-Hospital Delay in Patients With Acute Stroke During the Initial Phase of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 OutbreakCohortPatient care reportsSeoul, KR● In the initial phase after the Covid-19 outbreak, EMS response times for acute strokes were delayed.● Clinical outcomes of patients with acute stroke deteriorated.● The ICU admission and mortality rate increased in the early phase of the Covid-19 outbreak.Clinical Outcomes
58Mälberg et. al70Physiological respiratory parameters in pre-hospital patients with suspected COVID-19: A prospective cohort studyCohortClinical data from patient care reportsUppsala, SE● The odds of having COVID-19 increased with higher respiratory rate, lower tidal volume and negative inspiratory pressure.● Patients taking smaller, faster breaths with less pressure had higher odds of having COVID-19.● Smaller, faster breaths and higher dead space percentage increased the odds of hospital admission.Clinical Assessment
59Ng et. al71Impact of COVID-19 ‘circuit-breaker’ measures on emergency medical services utilisation and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in SingaporeCase controlPatient care reportsSG● EMS call volume and total out-of-hospital cardiac arrests remained comparable to past years.● There was a decline in prehospital ROSC rates, but not statistically lower than pre-COVID periods.● There is a growing body of literature internationally on the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on EMS utilization and outcomes.Clinical Outcomes
60Cash et. al72Emergency medical services education research priorities during COVID-19: A modified Delphi studyCaseMixedUS● The top 4 research priorities were prehospital internship access, impact of lack of field and clinical experience, student health and safety, and EMS education program availability and accessibility.Education
61Borkowska et. al73Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by emergency medical service teams during COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cohort studyCohortClinical data from patient care reportsPL● The average age of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest was 67.8 years.● Among resuscitated patients, 73.8% were cardiac etiology. 9.4% of patients had ROSC, 27.2% of patients were admitted to hospital with ongoing chest compression.● In the case of 63.4% cardiopulmonary resuscitation was ineffective and death was determined.● The presence of shockable rhythms was associated with better prognosis.Clinical Outcomes
62Kalani et. al74Self-Referred Walk-in (SRW) versus Emergency Medical Services Brought Covid-19 PatientsCohortMixedJahrom, IR● 27.1% of COVID-19 patients in the ER were brought in by EMS while 72.9% were self referred walk ins.● Survival rates were lower among patients brought in by EMS.● Critically ill patients were more likely to utilize EMS therefore EMS usually brought in patients with lower chances of survival.Clinical Outcomes
63Talikowska et. al75No apparent effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence and outcome in Western AustraliaCase ControlIncidences of OOHCA eventsAU● There was no significant change in the number of OOHCAs during the 2020 period compared to a period of similar length in 2017.● There was no significant change in bystander CPR rates between the two periods.● There was no significant change in survival rates for OOHCAs.Clinical Outcomes
64Saberian et. al76Changes in COVID-19 IgM and IgG antibodies in emergency medical technicians (EMTs)CorrelationalAcquired clinical dataTehran, IR● There were less seropositive participants than seronegative ones.● 9.5% only tested positive for IgG.● 1.1% were only positive for IgM.● 32.4% were positive for both.● There was a significant. reduction is seropositivity after the second phase.Clinical Outcomes
65Ageta et. al77Delay in Emergency Medical Service Transportation Responsiveness during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Minimally Affected RegionCasePatient care reportsOkayama, JP● Prehospital time can be divided into three components: response time, on-scene time, and transportation time.● The duration of response time and on-scene time increased in April 2020 from April 2019 from 32.2 to 33.8 minutes and 8.7 to 9.3 minutes, respectively (p < 0.001).● However, there was no significant change in duration of transportation.Transport
66Hunt et. al78Novel Negative Pressure Helmet Reduces Aerosolized Particles in a Simulated Prehospital SettingExperimentalParticle countsMichigan, US● A personal negative pressure helmet (“AerosolVE”) was developed to filter and trap virus particles from the patient.● The amount of particles trapped inside the helmet were significantly higher than those outside.● An average of less than one particle was found externally to the filter.Prevention
67Tanaka et. al79Evaluation of the physiological changes in prehospital health-care providers influenced by environmental factors in the summer of 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemicCorrelationalAcquired clinical dataJP● A positive correlation was found between WGBT, and pulse rate.● Forehead temperature increased upon entrance to a 33°C environment.● Hot environments posed a higher risk of heat stroke while wearing PPE.Clinical Outcomes
68Melgoza et. al80Emergency Medical Service Use Among Latinos Aged 50 and Older in California Counties, Except Los Angeles, During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic PeriodCohortData from the California Emergency Medical Services Information System (CEMSIS)California, US● Latinos are disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, as they make up 32% of the Californian population, but comprised 52% of COVID-19 cases and 64% of COVID-19 deaths.● Latinos also comprised a larger proportion of respiratory distress calls than Whites, but a statistically significant smaller proportion than Blacks.Special Populations
69Goldberg et. al81Home-based Testing for SARS-CoV-2: Leveraging Prehospital Resources for Vulnerable PopulationsCaseCase StudyUS● An EMS-created COVID-19 home testing program was established.● From its inception to April 2020, the program had tested 477 homebound patients, with an average of about 15 per day.● Mass testing locations were also established for up to 900 tests per day.Prevention
70Saberian et. al82The Geographical Distribution of Probable COVID-19 Patients Transferred by Tehran Emergency Medical Services; a Cross Sectional StudyCross-sectionalElectronic patient care dataTehran, IR● The mean age of patients increased over the three month study period, from 53.2 to 54.5 to 56.0.● The average incidence rate of COVID-19 was 4.6 per 10,000 people, with municipalities varying greatly in incidence.Transport
71Tušer et. al83Emergency management and internal audit of emergency preparedness of pre-hospital emergency careCaseMixedCZ● Documents, communications technology, and processes for identification in triage are not uniform across the nation.● Healthcare providers and staff are ill-informed on resource points in life-threatening (for themselves or the patient) situations.Structural/Systemic
72Masuda et. al84Variation in community and ambulance care processes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysisMeta-analysisPeer-reviewed LiteratureUS● Out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest was more common throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, with an odds ratio of 1.38.● Defibrillation by bystanders while waiting for an EMS response was significantly lower (OR = 0.69).● Delays in EMS arrival were more common.Structural/Systemic
73Hasani-Sharamin et. al85Characteristics of Emergency Medical Service Missions in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Death Cases in the Periods of Before and After the COVID-19 PandemicCross-sectionalMission dataTehran, IR● The number of OOHCAs in 2019 was greater than that of 2018 or 2020.● Respiratory distress and infection were more common in 2020 than 2019.● History of diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease was more common in 2020.Clinical Outcomes
74Jaffe et. al86The Role of Israel’s Emergency Medical Services During a Pandemic in the Pre-Exposure PeriodCaseMixedIL● Out of 121 protected transports, 36.3% were referred to by medical sources.● Out of 121 protected transports, 63.7% were identified as “suspected COVID-19” by dispatchers.● EMS can work effectively in the pre-exposure period through instructing home quarantine, providing protected transport, and staffing border control checkpoints.Structural/Systemic
75Masterson et. al87Rapid response and learning for later: establishing high quality information networks and evaluation frameworks for the National Ambulance Service response to COVID-19 - The ENCORE COVID Project ProtocolCaseSurvey responses from a national ambulance serviceIE● The aim of this project was to disseminate pandemic related information using an evidence based framework.● The project intends to systematically evaluate information frameworks for the Irish National Ambulance Service.Structural/Systemic
76Le Borgne et. al88Pre-Hospital Management of Critically Ill Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Multicenter StudyCohortPatient enrollment from regiospecific EMS callsFR● Of patients with suspected COVID-19 no difference was found in hospital mortality between silent hypoxemia and hypoxemia with clinical acute respiratory failure.● 53.4 of patients suspected to have COVID-19 presented with signs of respiratory distress● All patients presenting with COVID-19 symptoms required high flow oxygen therapy.Treatment
77Natalzia et. al89Evidence-based crisis standards of care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in a pandemicCohortCardiac arrest events in the CARES databaseUS● Favorable outcomes were associated with initial shockable rhythms or arrest witnessed by EMS.● A proposed crisis standard of care protocol suggested to only initiate out-of-hospital resuscitation in these patients resulted in a prevalence of 70.5% favorable neurological outcomes.● Incidences of favorable neurological outcome correlated with 6.3 free available bedsTreatment
Characteristics of Studies Selected for Inclusion Schematic selection of relevant articles for inclusion in review. Of the included studies, 44% were US-based. Primary taxonomy schema revealed the following prevalence of data: n=16 structural/systemic, n=23 clinical outcomes, n=7 clinical assessment, n=4 treatment, n=3 special populations, n=2 dispatch/activation, n=6 education, n=3 mental health, n=6 perspectives/experiences, and n=7 transport (see Table 1).

Discussion

Structural Considerations

Of the studies selected for inclusion in the “structural/systemic” domain, only 25% pertained to regions within the US. Only one study at the start of the pandemic (April 2020) rigorously assessed resource capacity and clinical competency at the national level, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Study participants were licensed practicing EMS clinicians in all 50 US states including the District of Columbia. Ventura et al report regular dissatisfactory decontamination practices both prior to and during the pandemic, required prolonged use of N95 respirators past the recommended efficacy period, and overall inadequate education for infection control and clinical considerations for COVID-19 patients.4 Notably, this captures a vulnerable representation of the US EMS system when there was minimal consensus on COVID-19 clinical symptomatology, transmissibility, appropriate precautionary measures, and discovery of vaccines. Globally, highly populated regions in the US, Germany, Turkey, Ireland and Denmark observed an increase in emergency medical calls of varying chief complaints, with many agency and regiospecific ambulance agencies reporting call volumes exceeding 60% compared to 2019.14,16,33 Based upon analysis of 911 de-identified patient care reports from the National EMS Information System (NEMSIS), between January 2018 to December 2020, Methley et al report an increase in frequency of on-scene death (1.3% to 2.4%), cardiac arrest (1.3% to 2.2%), and opioid related emergencies (0.6% to 1.1%) at the national level.6 States such as Kentucky observed higher rates of opioid related 911 calls, with a 50% increase in suspected opioid overdose death calls, while calls for other chief complaints remained static or declined.14 This is consistent with an apparent national trend of a worsening opioid epidemic, which we hypothesize has been only exacerbated by COVID-19. In February 2022, the American Medical Association issued a statement alleging an increase in drug related deaths in all US states and territories.90 To that end, it is critical to acknowledge that recent studies suggest black and brown communities are likely to be disproportionately harmed by both the opioid epidemic and the COVID-19 pandemic, as rates of morbidity and mortality are generally higher in this clinical population.91–94 Because EMS clinicians are crucial in overdose resuscitation and sustaining life of patients experiencing opioid overdose, prehospital providers may be uniquely responsible for understanding foundational systemic issues, such as racial inequity, and how they translate to emergency clinical care, which is not currently requisite by national EMS curriculum standards despite the measurable impact of care and access disparities experienced by patients of color.95–105

Mental Health

It has been well established in the literature that the COVID-19 pandemic has correlated with worse mental health outcomes in healthcare workers (HCWs).20 The strongest correlation among COVID-19 and psychological symptoms appeared in female-identifying HCWs ages 30–49 years.28 There is a continued need for strong psychological support and further investigation into determinants of poor mental health outcomes to develop evidence driven preventive measures.

EMS Activation

911 dispatchers at public safety answering points (PSAPs) are critical to functional operations of the EMS system. Albright et al investigated the efficacy of a dispatch screening tool to identify high suspicion of COVID-19 in patients based upon a questionnaire deployed by the 911 call taker in a study based in Massachusetts. The authors report a sensitivity of 74.9% (CI, 69.21–80.03) and a specificity of 67.7% (CI, 66.91–68.50) where n=263.47 Amiry and Maguire report an exponential increase in emergency medical calls globally during the pandemic, so further investigation into ways PSAPs can best support responding clinicians using evidence based practices may be warranted.21

Clinical Assessment, Treatment, and Outcomes

In a cohort study based in King County, Washington, US, Yang et al found that EMS responded to approximately 16% of COVID-confirmed cases. From study initiation to June 2020 (four months), the study cohort mortality was 52.4%. Fever, tachypnea, and hypoxia was only present in a limited quantity of patients.44 This is consistent with international prehospital consensus that suspicion of COVID-19 based solely on symptomatology should not be solely relied on for contemplating precautionary measures and isolation procedures. In a prehospital study in Denmark, patients under 60 years old were more likely to present with a loss of taste and/or smell upon assessment, however fever and cough were equally distributed across all age groups.49 In England, Marincowitz et al studied the accuracy of prognostic triage tools used prehospitally in the Yorkshire and Humber region. The WHO algorithm, PRIEST, NEWS2, and PMEWS tools all had high sensitivity for detecting COVID-19 infection.65 In Uppsala, Sweden, Mälberg et al report correlational findings of physiological respiratory parameters with patients suspected of having COVID-19. They found that the odds of COVID-19 diagnosis increased with respiratory rate, lower tidal volume, and negative inspiratory pressure.65 In Paris, France, Jouffroy et al report that pulse oximetry may be a reliable indicator for the need of mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients.38 It is important to acknowledge, however, that clinically significant inaccuracy of pulse oximetry for detecting hypoxia in darker skin patients has been well established in the literature.106,107 While many methods for assessing risk of COVID-19 infection exist, a universal guidance for prehospital assessment has not been established. As COVID-19 is categorized as a respiratory illness, the majority of available articles on prehospital treatment had a significant focus on airway and breathing management. A study out of Paris reported that of the 15% of suspected COVID-19 patients who were found to be in cardiac arrest upon arrival, while the majority did not have prior cardiovascular risk factors present. This suggests that it is critical to provide sufficient respiratory support in the prehospital setting. It was found that of the suspected COVID-19 patients who were assessed by EMS personnel, 42% of BLS cases and 52% of ALS cases provided non-invasive ventilation, however, prehospital intubation was significantly less common as it was only present in 18% of ALS cases.50, Jouffroy et al report that of all COVID−19 suspected patients, 53.4% showed signs of respiratory distress. Most of these patients presented with respiratory rates of approximately 30/min and oxygen saturations of 72%. Additionally, all patients required some method of high flow oxygen treatment.88 Studies, such as one conducted by Hart et al, provides recommendations for personal protection protocols for EMS providers. They suggest that if endotracheal intubation is needed, it should only be attempted once and with the assistance of video laryngoscopy to minimize time exposure to aerosols. A HEPA filter should then be added following the placement of an advanced airway to further minimize risk for contamination of the provider and all other equipment present in the ambulance. In the event that advanced airway intervention is not possible or clinically indicated, it is suggested to use two individuals for BVM ventilation to ensure that an air-tight seal is made with the mask. In agreement with other established protocols, they stress that donning of PPE should be performed before any contact is made with a suspected COVID-19 patient.58 As mentioned previously, there is a shortage of available resources not just pre-hospital but in-hospital as well. Considerations need to be made to ensure resources are used in the most efficient manner. Natalzia et al proposes a protocol to maximize cardiac arrest resources in EMS in which one should only initiate resuscitation of a patient in cardiac arrest if the arrest is witnessed or a shockable rhythm is present. They state that this protocol could account for 70.5% of favorable neurological outcomes and provide 6.3 additional available hospital beds per patient.89

Education

As part of their initial education program, EMS students must generally acquire co-requisite field experience.1 During the early era of the COVID-19 pandemic, it may have been difficult to participate in field experience opportunities due to facility policy limitations designed to reduce transmission. Grawey et al examined an alternative model to the traditional ambulance “ride along” by providing a field-like experience in an emergency department setting. Grawey et al report that this alternative experience was likely as effective as traditional prehospital clinical internships. Additionally, they found university medical students to have increased knowledge regarding EMS roles and responsibilities, which may have beneficial implications for transfer of care.23 With regard to continuing education, the Commission on Accreditation for Prehospital Continuing Education (CAPCE) saw a 179% increase in EMS refresher courses during 2018 to 2020, with a 185% increase in asynchronous online learning.54 This may suggest that distance learning as a method for recertifying provider credentials may increase rates of recertification, in contrast with in-person continuing education programs.

Vaccine Perspectives and Prevalence

US EMS clinicians have also assumed nontraditional healthcare roles during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as in the case of a scope of practice expansion which allowed EMS clinicians to administer the COVID-19 to patients in states like New York, Massachusetts, and Vermont. Because EMS clinicians are highly trained in specific psychomotor clinical skills and knowledgeable in fundamental methods of patient assessment and treatment, it is likely that EMS in general has served unmeasurable utility through contributions in traditional and nontraditional roles. In April 2021, Gregory et al conducted a cross sectional study of nationally certified EMS clinicians rostered with the National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians (NREMT). Of a sample size of n=2584, 70% reported receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Of the sampled population, 53% had concerns regarding the safety of COVID vaccines, 39% felt it was not necessary, and 84% of providers who did not receive any dose of the COVID vaccine did not plan to get it in the future.25 The significant vaccine hesitancy amongst EMS clinicians poses a compelling public health concern, and approaches to mediate this, such as through local education and role modeling, may be necessary.108

Limitations

Little literature exists on the interrogated area of investigation, and studies that are relevant to the area are often preliminary and may require continued study and design modifications to increase external validity. While all attempts to achieve a high level of internal validity were made as captured by robust quality assessments at each level of investigation, it was not possible to accommodate for every confounder. While this review is not exhaustive, the authors affirm satisfaction in the methods and results available at the time of study.

Conclusion

US EMS clinicians are healthcare workers that have often held many roles and responsibilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Within the subset domains of i. structural/systemic, ii. clinical outcomes, iii. clinical assessment, iv. treatment, v. special populations, vi. dispatch/activation, vii. education, viii. mental health, ix. perspectives/experiences, and x. transport, there is minimal high quality literature that faithfully reflect the status of modern American EMS in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The available data reflect strides in contemporary approaches to assessment, treatment, transport, and education, but fall short in accounting for care and access disparities influenced by social determinants. Continued investigation on the impact of COVID-19 on EMS systems and personnel is warranted to ensure informed, appropriate, and evidence-based preparation for future pandemic and infectious disease response.
  94 in total

1.  Impact of COVID-19 'circuit-breaker' measures on emergency medical services utilisation and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in Singapore.

Authors:  Qin Xiang Ng; Ebenezer Zh Lee; Joey Am Tay; Shalini Arulanandam
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  Correlation between Emergency Medical Services Suspected COVID-19 Patients and Daily Hospitalizations.

Authors:  Matthew J Levy; Eili Klein; Timothy P Chizmar; Luis M Pinet Peralta; Teferra Alemayehu; Mustafa M Sidik; Theodore R Delbridge
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  COVID-19 Preliminary Case Series: Characteristics of EMS Encounters with Linked Hospital Diagnoses.

Authors:  Antonio R Fernandez; Remle P Crowe; Scott Bourn; Sarah E Matt; Andrew L Brown; Andrew B Hawthorn; J Brent Myers
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.077

4.  Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by emergency medical service teams during COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Magdalena J Borkowska; Jacek Smereka; Kamil Safiejko; Klaudiusz Nadolny; Maciej Maslanka; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Milosz J Jaguszewski; Lukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.737

5.  Hospitalization and Mortality among Black Patients and White Patients with Covid-19.

Authors:  Eboni G Price-Haywood; Jeffrey Burton; Daniel Fort; Leonardo Seoane
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Emergency Medical Services resource capacity and competency amid COVID-19 in the United States: preliminary findings from a national survey.

Authors:  Christian Ventura; Cody Gibson; George Donald Collier
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-05-03

7.  COVID-19 is Having A Destructive Impact On Healthcare Workers' Mental Wellbeing.

Authors:  Kris Vanhaecht; Deborah Seys; Luk Bruyneel; Bianca Cox; Gorik Kaesemans; Margot Cloet; Kris Van den Broeck; Olivia Cools; Andy De Witte; Koen Lowet; Johan Hellings; Johan Bilsen; Gilbert Lemmens; Stephan Claes
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  System impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on New York City's emergency medical services.

Authors:  David J Prezant; Elizabeth A Lancet; Rachel Zeig-Owens; Pamela H Lai; David Appel; Mayris P Webber; James Braun; Charles B Hall; Glenn Asaeda; Bradley Kaufman; Michael D Weiden
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2020-11-09

9.  Intubated COVID-19 predictive (ICOP) score for early mortality after intubation in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Mitsuaki Nishikimi; Rehana Rasul; Cristina P Sison; Daniel Jafari; Muhammad Shoaib; Koichiro Shinozaki; Timmy Li; Kei Hayashida; Daniel M Rolston; Jamie S Hirsch; Lance B Becker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Occupational exposures and programmatic response to COVID-19 pandemic: an emergency medical services experience.

Authors:  David L Murphy; Leslie M Barnard; Christopher J Drucker; Betty Y Yang; Jamie M Emert; Leilani Schwarcz; Catherine R Counts; Tracie Y Jacinto; Andrew M McCoy; Tyler A Morgan; Jim E Whitney; Joel V Bodenman; Jeffrey S Duchin; Michael R Sayre; Thomas D Rea
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.740

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.