| Literature DB >> 35669078 |
Bei Wang1, Lingling Yan1, Shuchen Guo1, Ling Wen1, Mengli Yu1, Liang Feng1, Xiaobin Jia1.
Abstract
Chinese herbal polysaccharides (CHPs) are natural polymers composed of monosaccharides, which are widely found in Chinese herbs and work as one of the important active ingredients. Its biological activity is attributed to its complex chemical structure with diverse spatial conformations. However, the structural elucidation is the foundation but a bottleneck problem because the majority of CHPs are heteropolysaccharides with more complex structures. Similarly, the studies on the relationship between structure and function of CHPs are even more scarce. Therefore, this review summarizes the structure-activity relationship of CHPs. Meanwhile, we reviewed the structural elucidation strategies and some new progress especially in the advanced structural analysis methods. The characteristics and applicable scopes of various methods are compared to provide reference for selecting the most efficient method and developing new hyphenated techniques. Additionally, the principle structural modification methods of CHPs and their effects on activity are summarized. The shortcomings, potential breakthroughs, and developing directions of the study of CHPs are discussed. We hope to provide a reference for further research and promote the application of CHPs.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese herbal polysaccharides; bioactivity; modification; structural elucidation; structure-activity relationship
Year: 2022 PMID: 35669078 PMCID: PMC9163837 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.908175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1The schematic diagram of the immune system activated by Marine algae polysaccharides after interaction of several molecular events.
Figure 2The schematic diagram of mechanism for determination of molecular weight of CHPs by GPC.
Comparison of determination methods of molecular weight.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional techniques | Osmotic pressure method, Viscosimetry, Vapor pressure osmometry, Terminal method, Sugar Electrophoresis, Ultrafiltration | Complicated to operate, inaccurate | Tea polysaccharide (TPS) Mw 2.287 × 105-2.762 × 105 g/mol | ( |
| GPC | HPSEC/HPGPC-RID | Fast, convenient for detection, high resolution and good reproducibility, homogeneity and molecular weight can be detected simultaneously | ( | |
| HPSEC/HPGPC-ELSD | ( | |||
| Combined techniques | HPSEC/HPGPC-MALLS | Less affected by sample structure or relative molecular weight, not necessary to use reference materials for calibration, high accuracy, can provide samples conformational information in solution | ( |
Comparison of determination methods of monosaccharide composition.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| GC/MS | High sensitivity and accuracy, tedious derivatization process, lead to sample loss, cannot deal with acidic polysaccharides containing uronic acid, generate isomers | ( | |
| HPLC-PMP derivatization | Easy to operate, no isomers peaks, high specificity and accuracy, less sensitive than GC, low specificity of UVD, long analysis time, not suitable for ketose | ( | |
| Detecting directly by HPLC | Non-derivative, simplicity of operation, low sensitivity Sugar analysis columns: suitable for separating monosaccharides, separation conditions, convenient sample preparation, and a wide pH range of 1–14; Amino column: suitable for separating samples oligosaccharides, cheap, lifespan is short, with many precautions for use. | ||
| HPCE | High sensitivity, unique effect in separating charged sugars, high requirements for instruments, complicated to operate, low reproducibility | ( | |
| HPAEC-PAD | Not necessary for derivatization, high sensitivity, columns bearable for NaOH are needed. | The fibrous roots and tuber of | ( |
Figure 3The general process of determining the composition of monosaccharides. (A) Monosaccharide composition of Angelica sinensis polysaccharide by HPLC-UVD; (B) Monosaccharide composition of polysaccharide from the fibrous roots and tuber of Bletilla striata by IC; (C) Monosaccharide composition of polysaccharide from Dendrobium devonianum by GC-MS.
Figure 4Chemical reactions related to the determination of glycosidic bonds. (A) Different polysaccharides are oxidized by HIO4, reduced by NaBH4, and then hydrolyzed with dilute acid to obtain different products; (B) Products obtained by methylation and acid hydrolysis of linear glucans and branched polysaccharides.
Common determination methods of glycosidic bonds of polysaccharides.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Partial acid hydrolysis | Ranking of stability of various sugar: the pyran sugar residue>the furan sugar residue, the hexose sugar>the pentose sugar, the sugar residues in main chain>the branched sugar residues | Poor selectivity, requires precise reaction conditions, not suitable for the complex mixed polysaccharides or heterogeneous structure products | ( |
| Periodic acid oxidation | The position of glycosidic bonds; the degree of polymerization of linear polysaccharides; the number of branches of branched polysaccharides. | Carried out in the dark in an aqueous solution with pH 3–5, less polysaccharide samples are required | ( |
| Smith degradation | Degradation product erythrose: 1 → 4 combined glycosidic bonds; glycerol:1 → 6, 1 → 2 glycosidic bonds or a reducing terminal glucose residue; monosaccharides such as glucose, galactose, mannose: 1 → 3 glycosidic bonds. | Combined with periodic acid oxidation | ( |
| Methylation reaction | GC/MS spectral library; | ( | |
| Enzymatic digestion | α-glucosidase hydrolysis α-glycosidic bond; β-glucosidase hydrolysis β-glycosidic bond. | Specific, few by-products, little digestive enzymes for polysaccharide | ( |
The IR wavenumbers of functional groups in polysaccharides.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| -OH | O-H, ν (stretching vibration) | 3,700–3,100 |
| O-H, δ (scissoring vibration) | 1,075–1,010; 1,120–1,105 | |
| -COOH | C=O | 1,740–1,680 |
| C-O | 1,440–1,395 | |
| O-H | 1,320–1,210 | |
| -O-COR | C=O | 1,749–1,725 |
| C-O | 1,245 | |
| -NH2 | N-H, ν | 3,450–3,380 |
| N-H, δ | 1,650–1,500 | |
| =NH | N-H, ν | 3,460–3,420 |
| -NH+ 3 | N=H | 3,350–3,150 |
| N-H | 1,650–1,550 | |
| -C-O-C | C-O (fatty ether) | 1,150–1,060 |
| C-O (cyclic ether) | 1,150–1,080 | |
| -CH2 | C-H, ν | 2,926–2,853 |
| C-H, δ | 1,465 | |
| -CH3 | C-H, ν | 2,962; 2,872 |
| -C=O | C=O | 1,780–1,540 |
| C=O | 1,740, 1,650 | |
| C-H | 855–833 | |
| β-D-Glc | 905–876 | |
| α-D-Gal | 839–810 | |
| β-D-Gal | 914–886 | |
| α-D-Man | 843–818 | |
| β-D-Man | 898–888 | |
| α-D-Xyl | 760–740 | |
| β-D-Arb | 855–830 |
The parameters, calculation formulas, and the chain conformation information reflected by them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.2–0.4 | A tightly coiled conformation with high branches | ( | |
| 0.5–0.6 | A compliant molecule | |||
| 0.6–1.0 | A rigid or semi-rigid rod | |||
| df | 1.0 | A rigid rod-like structure | ( | |
| 5/3–2 | A linear polymer with a Gaussian coil shape | |||
| 2.5 | A branched structure | |||
| 3 | A compact and uniform spherical structure | |||
| ρ | 0.77 | A hard sphere conformation | ( | |
| 1.0–1.1 | A highly branched conformation | |||
| 1.5–1.8 | A compliant molecule | |||
| > 2 | A worm-like or rigid structure | |||
| α | 0.5 | A spherical structure | ( | |
| 0.6–0.8 | A elastic random curl conformation | |||
| >0.8/> 1.0 | A rigid chain conformation |
Figure 5The schematic diagram of relationship between structural modification and biological activity of CHPs.