| Literature DB >> 35668481 |
Yeye Chen1, Jiaqi Zhang1, Mengxin Zhou1, Chao Guo1, Shanqing Li2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thymic neuroendocrine tumors comprise a heterogeneous group of rare diseases. This study aimed to investigate the real-world clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes of thymic neuroendocrine tumors.Entities:
Keywords: Clinicopathological features; Prognosis; Thymic neuroendocrine tumors
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35668481 PMCID: PMC9169285 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02366-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.303
Real-world clinicopathological characteristics of 104 TNET patients
| Variables | Value |
|---|---|
| Gender (male) | 66 (63.46%) |
| Age at diagnosis (years) | 45.3 (13.4–74.4) |
| Before 2000 | 11 (10.58%) |
| Between 2000 and 2010 | 39 (37.50%) |
| After 2010 | 54 (51.92%) |
| Tumor size (centimeters) | 5.7 (0.6–30.0) |
| 79 (75.96%) | |
| MEN | 14 (13.46%) |
| EAS | 28 (26.92%) |
| 97 (93.27%) | |
| Radical resection | 79 (81.44%) |
| Palliative resection | 18 (18.56%) |
| Lymph node dissection | 47 (48.45%) |
| Vessel/pericardium dissection | 22 (22.68%) |
| Low-middle grade | 69 (66.35%) |
| High grade | 35 (33.65%) |
| I | 19 (18.27%) |
| II | 13 (12.50%) |
| III | 34 (32.69%) |
| IV | 38 (36.54%) |
Fig. 1The pathological descriptions of different subtypes of TNETs. A, E, I and M, the HE staining of typical carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma and small cell carcinoma, respectively. B, F, J and N, immunocytochemistry staining indicated the positive expression of CgA in the four subtypes, respectively. C, G, K and O, immunocytochemistry staining indicated the positive expression of Syn in the four subtypes, respectively. D, immunocytochemistry staining indicated the 3% of ki-67 expression in typical carcinoid. H, immunocytochemistry staining indicated the 5% of ki-67 expression in atypical carcinoid. L Immunocytochemistry staining indicated the 5% of ki-67 expression in large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. P Immunocytochemistry staining indicated the 70% of ki-67 expression in small cell carcinoma. All the pictures were shown in 150x. HE, hematoxylin–eosin; CgA, chromogranin A; Syn, synaptophysin
Fig. 2Distribution of metastatic sites in 41 cases during the course of disease
Fig. 3Curve of overall survival analysis of 99 patients with thymic neuroendocrine tumors
Fig. 4Univariate analysis of overall survival in 99 thymic neuroendocrine tumor patients. A Years at diagnosis. B Tumor size. C Surgical resection. D Pathological grade. E Distant metastasis. F Masaoka–Koga stage
Multivariate Cox regression analysis of 99 TNET patients
| Variables | Multivariate Cox regression analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | ||
| years at diagnosis | 0.559 | 0.364–0.857 | 0.008 |
| surgical resection (radical resection versus palliative/no resection) | 2.860 | 1.392–5.878 | 0.004 |
| pathological grade | 1.963 | 1.058–3.644 | 0.033 |
| Masaoka–Koga stage | 2.250 | 1.548–3.272 | 0.000 |
| Tumor size (≤ 5.7 versus > 5.7) | 1.190 | 0.662–2.141 | 0.560 |
| comorbidity | 0.875 | 0.427–1.794 | 0.715 |
Fig. 5Univariate analysis of overall survival in 92 thymic neuroendocrine tumor patients treated by surgery. A Comorbidity. B Neoadjuvant therapy. C Surgical procedure. D Radical resection. E Vessel/pericardium dissection. F ACTH-Immunohistochemical staining. ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone
Multivariate Cox regression analysis of 92 TNET patients treated by surgery
| Variables | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI | ||
| years at diagnosis | 0.563 | 0.367–0.866 | 0.009 |
| Tumor size (≤ 5.7 versus > 5.7) | 1.117 | 0.601–2.077 | 0.727 |
| comorbidity | 0.946 | 0.448–1.995 | 0.884 |
| neoadjuvant therapy | 0.248 | 0.071–0.872 | 0.030 |
| surgical resection (radical resection versus palliative resection) | 3.674 | 1.685–8.008 | 0.001 |
| vessel/pericardium dissection | 1.258 | 0.632–2.506 | 0.513 |
| pathological grade | 2.082 | 1.098–3.947 | 0.025 |
| Masaoka–Koga stage | 2.445 | 1.607–3.719 | 0.000 |
Fig. 6Univariate analysis of overall survival in thymic neuroendocrine tumor patients with Masaoka–Koga stage III/IV disease. A Radical resection. B Vessel/pericardium dissection. C Neoadjuvant therapy. D EAS comorbidity. EAS, ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome