Literature DB >> 3566848

Dose-response relationships of the objective and subjective antiemetic effects and of different side effects of metoclopramide against cisplatin induced emesis.

D Hellenbrecht, R Saller.   

Abstract

The graded and quantal responses of metoclopramide (MCL, Paspertin) were studied in patients (17-71 years) treated with cisplatin in combination with other cytostatics. The lowest dose of MCL was 0.125 mg/kg b.w./h i.v. over 2 h as loading infusion, then 0.0625 mg/kg/h over 24 h as the maintenance infusion, the total dose being 1.75 mg/kg per treatment cycle (n = 25). At the same schedule three different higher doses of MCL were run with total doses of 3.5 (n = 44), 7.0 (n = 120), and 14.0 (n = 161) mg/kg per cycle of cisplatin. The mean number of emetic episodes in historical control patients without MCL (n = 41) at the four different doses of cisplatin was 4.2 episodes at 25 mg/m2 of cisplatin, 6.9 episodes at 60 mg/m2, 14.9 at 90, and 21.6 episodes at 120 mg/m2 of cisplatin. The quantitative dose-response curves of the four doses of the emetic agonist cisplatin were shifted to the right by increasing doses of MCL. The following doses of cisplatin for greater than or equal to 95% antiemetic protection (i.e. only 0-2 emetic episodes as clinically sufficient protection) were obtained (at the respective mg/kg of MCL given in brackets): 13 (at 1.75 MCL), 25 (at 3.5 MCL), 42 (at 7 MCL), and 80 (at 14 MCL) mg/m2 of cisplatin, respectively. The MCL dose in order to provide greater than or equal to 95% of the patients against every mg/m2 of cisplatin was about 0.15 (range 0.13-0.18) mg/kg MCL per cycle (i.e. 6.5 mg/m2 of cisplatin are antagonized by 1 mg/kg of MCL).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3566848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung        ISSN: 0004-4172


  4 in total

1.  GR38032F, a 5HT3 receptor antagonist, in the prophylaxis of acute cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  M Marty; J P Droz; P Pouillart; B Paule; N Brion; J Bons
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Methodology and assessment in clinical anti-emetic research: a meta-analysis of outcome parameters.

Authors:  G R Morrow
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1992-12

3.  Efficacy of NEPA, a fixed antiemetic combination of netupitant and palonosetron, vs a 3-day aprepitant regimen for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in Chinese patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) in a randomized Phase 3 study.

Authors:  Jianhua Chang; Gongyan Chen; Dong Wang; Guihua Wang; Shun Lu; Jifeng Feng; Wei Li; Ping Li; Corinna Lanzarotti; Salvatore Chessari; Li Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Methylprednisolone enhances the efficacy of ondansetron in acute and delayed cisplatin-induced emesis over at least three cycles. Ondansetron Study Group.

Authors:  B Chevallier; M Marty; J M Paillarse
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.