| Literature DB >> 35668477 |
Daniel Gashaneh Belay1,2, Misganaw Gebrie Worku1, Meselech Ambaw Dessie1, Yared Asmare1, Molla Taye1.
Abstract
Palmar creases are unique, permanent, and genetically controlled morphological variables. Recognizing palmar crease types are important for personal identification, criminal investigations, and diagnosis of congenital diseases. This study aimed to reveal the anthropological characteristics as well as contribute to the diagnosing of congenital disease of Ethiopian people. In this study, a cross-sectional study design with a multistage sampling technique were used. Chi-square test, bivariable, and multivariable multinomial logistic regression models were employed. At bivariable analysis variables with a P-value of ≤0.2 were selected for multivariable analysis and at multivariable analysis variables with a P-value of ≤0.05 were considered as statistically significant factors. Most of study participants had normal palmar crease patterns (90.8%), followed by simian crease patterns (5.0%), whereas sydney crease patterns was the least (1.92%). Being male was more likely to have simian crease and sydney crease than normal crease. Right-handed subjects were less likely to have simian crease and suwon crease than normal crease. The simian crease was more common among students whose fathers were from Gurage ethnicity than normal creases. Students who have one point of origin of the primary palmar creases were more likely to have simian crease, sydney crease, and suwon crease than normal crease. In this study, the normal type of palmar crease patterns was the most prevalent. Whereas the simian crease pattern was the commonest type among the variant palmar creases. Palmar crease patterns are affected by sex, ethnicity, handedness, and points of origin of the primary palmar crease.Entities:
Keywords: Dermatoglyphics; Ethiopia; Multinomial; Palmar crease; Simian crease
Year: 2022 PMID: 35668477 PMCID: PMC9256497 DOI: 10.5115/acb.21.251
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anat Cell Biol ISSN: 2093-3665
List of the variables used in the study with their measurement descriptions
| Type | Variable | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | Palmar creases pattern | |
| Normal crease pattern | The Normal crease pattern is formed when proximal transverse creases (II) and distal transverse crease (III) do not meet and no crease line transversely crosses the full palms [ | |
| Simian crease pattern | The Simian crease pattern is formed when proximal transverse crease (II) and distal transverse crease (III) meet to form a single crease that crosses the palm and is not accompanied by the accessory crease [ | |
| Sydney crease pattern | The Sydney crease pattern is formed when proximal transverse crease (II) and distal transverse crease (III) meet, accompanied by accessory distal transverse crease (III) [ | |
| Suwon crease pattern | The Suwon crease pattern is formed when a long distal transverse crease (III) crosses the entire palm appears to join a proximal transverse crease (II) at the radial edge and a second accessory proximal transverse creases (II) is present [ | |
| Independent variable | Sex | The sex of the individual is categorized as male and female. |
| Ethnicity | Categorized as Amhara, Oromo and Gurage, and Others. Others Ethnicities include; | |
| Body side or right/left palm | The bodyside was categorized as right side (right palm) and left side (left palm). | |
| Symmetries | Symmetries were categorized as symmetry when the same crease pattern occurs in bilateral palms and asymmetry when different crease patterns occurrences in both palms. | |
| Number of origin of the primary palmar crease | The number of origin of the creases pattern in the radial base. It was categorized as single radial base creases (one point of origin), double radial base creases (two points of origin), and triple radial base creases (three points of origin). | |
| Handedness | Handedness is the instinctive tendency to use either hand effortlessly and predominantly than the other [ | |
Fig. 1Palmar scanning approaches on HP Deskjet digital scanner 2700 model.
Fig. 2Number of origins of the primary creases among students of the University of Gondar.
Fig. 3Types of palmar crease patterns among students of the University of Gondar. (A) Normal, (B) Simian, (C) Sydney, and (D) Suwon.
Cross-tabulation and chi-squaredtest of factors associated with palmar crease patterns
| Explanatory variable | Palmar creases patterns | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | Simian | Sydney | Suwon | |
| Total | 1,511 (90.80) | 82 (5.0) | 32 (1.92) | 39 (2.30) |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 1,019 (89.5) | 64 (5.6) | 27 (2.4) | 28 (2.5) |
| Female | 492 (93.5) | 18 (3.4) | 5 (1.0) | 11 (2.1) |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Amhara | 921 (92.5) | 50 (5.0) | 11 (1.1) | 14 (1.4) |
| Oromo | 318 (91.9) | 10 (2.9) | 11 (3.2) | 7 (2) |
| Gurage | 79 (77.5) | 11 (10.8) | 4 (3.9) | 8 (7.8) |
| Others | 193 (87.7) | 11 (5.0) | 6 (2.7) | 10 (4.5) |
| Bodyside | ||||
| Right | 756 (90.9) | 43 (5.2) | 16 (1.9) | 17 (2.0) |
| Left | 755 (90.7) | 39 (4.7) | 16 (1.9) | 22 (2.6) |
| Number of points of origin | ||||
| One | 145 (63.6) | 52 (22.8) | 13 (5.7) | 18 (7.9) |
| >One | 1,366 (95.1) | 30 (2.1) | 19 (1.3) | 21 (1.5) |
| Handedness | ||||
| Right | 1,340 (92.5) | 55 (3.8) | 27 (1.9) | 26 (1.8) |
| Left and mixed | 171 (79.2) | 27 (12.5) | 5 (2.3) | 13 (6.0) |
| Symmetries | ||||
| Asymmetry | 55 (48.2) | 26 (22.8) | 12 (10.5) | 21 (18.4) |
| Symmetry | 728 (93.9) | 28 (3.6) | 10 (1.3) | 9 (1.2) |
| Association between patterns | ||||
| Normal | 728 (96.3) | 11 (1.5) | 4 (0.5) | 13 (1.7) |
| Simian | 14 (32.6) | 28 (65.1) | 1 (2.3) | 0 (0.0) |
| Sydney | 6 (37.5) | 0 (0.0) | 10 (62.5) | 0 (0.0) |
| Suwon | 7 (41.2) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.9) | 9 (52.9) |
Values are presented as number (%). The numbers in the parentheses is the prevalence of the crease type. a)Tigre, Sidama, Wolayita, Somali, Benishangul, Dawor, Afar, Gedio, Gamo, Hadiya, Sheka, Siltie, and shinasha. b)Variables which are not valid in chi-square test assumptions.
Bivariable and multivariable analyses of multinomial logistic regression of factors associated with palmar creases patterns
| Outcome | Explanatory variable | COR (95% CI) | AOR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simian | Sex | |||
| Male | 1.72 (1.01, 2.93) | 1.80 (1.01, 3.22) | 0.04 | |
| Female | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Amhara | 0.95 (0.49, 1.86) | 1.33 (0.64, 2.78) | 0.45 | |
| Oromo | 0.56 (0.23, 1.32) | 0.60 (0.23, 1.53) | 0.28 | |
| Gurage | 2.44 (1.02, 5.86) | 3.61 (1.36, 9.61) | 0.01 | |
| Others | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Handedness | ||||
| Right | 0.26 (0.16, 0.42) | 0.33 (0.19, 0.57) | <0.001 | |
| Left and mixed | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Points of origin | ||||
| One | 16.33 (10.18, 26.41) | 16.26 (9.89, 26.73) | <0.001 | |
| >One | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Body side | ||||
| Right | 1.10 (0.71, 1.72) | 1.26 (0.77, 2.05) | 0.36 | |
| Left | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Sydney | Sex | |||
| Male | 2.61 (1.00, 6.81) | 2.98 (1.12, 7.89) | 0.02 | |
| Female | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Amhara | 0.38 (0.14, 1.05) | 0.42 (0.15, 1.18) | 0.10 | |
| Oromo | 1.11 (0.41, 3.06) | 1.15 (0.41, 3.22) | 0.78 | |
| Gurage | 1.62 (0.45, 5.93) | 2.19 (0.58, 8.21) | 0.24 | |
| Others | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Handedness | ||||
| Right | 0.69 (0.26, 1.81) | 0.96 (0.35, 2.59) | 0.93 | |
| Left and mixed | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Points of origin | ||||
| One | 6.45 (3.12, 13.32) | 6.40 (3.05, 13.40) | <0.001 | |
| >One | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Body side | ||||
| Right | 0.9 (0.51, 2.01) | 1.03 (0.51, 2.11) | 0.92 | |
| Left | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Suwon | Sex | |||
| Male | 1.23 (0.61, 2.49) | 1.44 (0.69, 3.02) | 0.33 | |
| Female | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Amhara | 0.49 (0.13, 1.67) | 0.77 (0.37, 1.89) | 0.27 | |
| Oromo | 0.43 (0.16, 1.14) | 0.46 ( 0.17, 1.26) | 0.13 | |
| Gurage | 1.95 (0.74, 5.13) | 2.50 (0.90, 6.91) | 0.08 | |
| Others | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Handedness | ||||
| Right | 0.26 (0.13, 0.51) | 0.36 (0.18, 0.74) | 0.006 | |
| Left and mixed | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Points of origin | ||||
| One | 8.16 (4.23, 15.51) | 7.36 (3.74, 14.46) | <0.001 | |
| >One | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Body side | ||||
| Right | 0.71 (0.41, 147) | 0.84 (0.43, 1.63) | 0.60 | |
| Left | 1.00 | 1.00 | - | |
| Model fitness tests | LR chi squared (21) | 235.52 | ||
| Prob>chi squared | <0.001 | |||
| Pseudo R2 | 0.240 | |||
| Deviance test | 0.72 | |||
| Pearson chi-squared test | 0.24 | |||
Normal palmar crease pattern used as a reference. The numbers in the parentheses is 95% confidence interval (CI) of the odds ratio. COR, crude odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio. a)Tigre, Sidama, Wolayita, Somali, Benishangul, Dawor, Afar, Gedio, Gamo, Hadiya, Sheka, Siltie, and shinasha. b)Two and three points of origin. P-value *<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001.
Comparison of prevalence of palmar crease patterns with other studies in the world
| Palmar crease type | Prevalence in this study | Comparison with other studies in the world | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Similar with | Lower than | Higher than | ||
| Normal crease | 90.8% (95% CI: 89.5, 92.1) | Nigeria, 93.1% [ | Nigeria, 89% [ | |
| Korea, 84.4% [ | ||||
| India, 79.6% [ | ||||
| Simian crease | 5.0% (95% CI: 4.1, 5.9) | Nigeria, 4.1% [ | Nigeria, 8% [ | Japanese, 4%, |
| Indians, 14.4% [ | Swiss, 1.2% and Germans, 2.8% [ | |||
| Suwon crease | 2.3% (95% CI: 1.7, 3.1) | Nigeria, 2.04 % [ | Korea, 0.5% [ | |
| India, 2.4% [ | ||||
| Sydney crease | 1.92% (95% CI: 1.3, 2.6) | Nigeria, 1.85% [ | Sydney Australia, 9% [ | Nigerian, 0.19% [ |
| Korea, 2.5% [ | Indian, 3.6% [ | |||
CI, confidence interval. a)The detail comparisons of simian crease patterns are expressed in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4Comparisons of simian crease prevalence in different parts of the world.