| Literature DB >> 35666395 |
Liang Tan1, Yunfang Yang2, Jing Peng2, Yue Zhang2, Bo Wu2, Bosai He2, Ying Jia2, Tingxu Yan3.
Abstract
The present study aimed to evaluate the antidepressant-like effect of essential oils from Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. (SEO) and its possible mechanisms of SEO. The behavioral despair mouse model in vivo and H2O2-induced PC12 cells model in vitro were employed. And the potential effective components were identified by the spectrum-effect relationships analysis. SEO significantly decreased the immobility time in the forced swimming test and tail suspension test, which indicated a promising antidepressant-like effect of SEO in depressed mice. The decreased levels of SOD, GSH, and CAT, and increased levels of MDA were significantly reversed by SEO treatment, which showed good antioxidant activities both in vitro and in vivo. Besides, SEO significantly promoted the nuclear translocation of Nrf2 and the expression of HO-1 in depressed mice and H2O2-induced PC12 cells. The histopathological examination results showed a potential neuronal protective effect of SEO in the hippocampus and cortex. Furthermore, the upregulation of PI3K/AKT/GSK3β signaling was observed after SEO treatment in the H2O2-induced PC12 cells. Additionally, based on the spectrum-effect relationship analysis, 9 peaks were identified as positively correlated with the antioxidant activity of SEO. These results suggested that SEO promoted Nrf2/HO-1 pathway to improve the oxidative stress status and exerted the antidepressant-like effects.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant activity; Depression; Nrf2/HO-1 signaling; PI3K/AKT/GSK3β signaling; Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill.; Spectrum-effect relationships
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35666395 PMCID: PMC9168360 DOI: 10.1007/s11011-022-01019-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metab Brain Dis ISSN: 0885-7490 Impact factor: 3.655
Origins of SEO
| No. | Origin | Essential oil Contents | The fingerprint ID |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jinzhou 1, Liaoning | 1.03% | S1 |
| 2 | Jinzhou 2, Liaoning | 0.93% | S2 |
| 3 | Huanren, Liaoning | 1.34% | S3 |
| 4 | Fushun 1, Liaoning | 0.74% | S4 |
| 5 | Fushun 2, Liaoning | 0.58% | S5 |
| 6 | Dandong 1, Liaoning | 1.08% | S6 |
| 7 | Dandong 2, Liaoning | 1.13% | S7 |
| 8 | Benxin 1, Liaoning | 1.18% | S8 |
| 9 | Benxi 2, Liaoning | 0.92% | S9 |
| 10 | Panjin, Liaoning | 0.91% | S10 |
| 11 | Donggang, Liaoning | 0.94% | S11 |
| 12 | Yingkou, Liaoning | 1.07% | S12 |
| 13 | Xinbin, Liaoning | 0.98% | S13 |
| 14 | Liaoyang 1, Liaoning | 1.03% | S14 |
| 15 | Liaoyang 2, Liaoning | 0.95% | S15 |
| 16 | Shenyang 1, Liaoning | 0.81% | S16 |
| 17 | Shenyang 2, Liaoning | 1.16% | S17 |
| 18 | Fuxin, Liaoning | 0.93% | S18 |
Effect of SEO on the immobility time in the tail suspension test
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | Immobility time (s) |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle | 101.50 ± 10.45 | |
| Flu | 15 | 67.83 ± 8.42*** |
| SEO 250 | 250 | 84.83 ± 8.33* |
| SEO 750 | 750 | 55.33 ± 5.89*** |
The values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 10 in each group), *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 compared with the Vehicle group
Effect of SEO on the immobility time in the forced swimming test
| Group | Dose (mg/kg) | Immobility time (s) |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle | 124.67 ± 12.60 | |
| Flu | 15 | 77.80 ± 10.76*** |
| SEO 250 | 250 | 98.80 ± 11.56** |
| SEO 750 | 750 | 83.25 ± 6.45*** |
The values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 10 in each group), **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the Vehicle group
Fig. 1The activities of SOD (A), GSH (B), CAT (C) and the levels of MDA (D) in hippocampus(1), cerebral cortex(2) and plasma(3). The values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 8 in each group), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the Vehicle group
Fig. 2The Effect of SEO on nuclear of Nrf2 expression in mice. (A) The expression of nuclear Nrf2 was detected by Western Blot using specific antibodies in mice. (B) graphs represented the arbitary density of blot signal. The values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3 in each group), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the Vehicle group
Fig. 3The histopathological changes in the Hippocampus and Cortex of Vehicle group (A), Flu group (B), 250 group (C), 750 group (D). The magnification was 200×. The arrow points to nuclear retraction
Fig. 4The effect of cell viability by different concentration of SEO in H2O2-treated PC12. The values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3 in each group), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the Vehicle group; ###p < 0.001 compared with the Control group
Fig. 5The activities of SOD (A), GSH (B), CAT (C) and the levels of MDA (D) in H2O2-induced PC12. The values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3 in each group), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the Vehicle group, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 compared with the Control group
Fig. 6The Effect of administration on the nuclear translocation of Nrf2 (A) and the protein level of HO-1 (B) in H2O2-treated PC12. The values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3 in each group), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the Vehicle group; ###p < 0.001 compared with the Control group
Fig. 7The Effect of administration on PI3K, p-PI3K, AKT, p-AKT, GSK3β and p-GSK3β expression in H2O2-treated PC12. The expression of p-PI3K/PI3K, p-AKT/AKT and p-GSK3β/GSK3β were detected by Western Blot (A). (B), (C) and (D) graphs represented the arbitary density of blot signal. The values represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3 in each group), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the Vehicle group; ###p < 0.001 compared with the Control group
IC50 values of DPPH assay of 18 batches of SEO
| No. | IC50(mg/mL) | No. | IC50(mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 7.35 ± 0.23a | S10 | 7.13 ± 0.08a |
| S2 | 7.88 ± 0.33a | S11 | 6.55 ± 0.35a |
| S3 | 6.32 ± 0.62a | S12 | 6.42 ± 0.07a |
| S4 | 7.09 ± 0.41a | S13 | 6.97 ± 0.12a |
| S5 | 2.99 ± 0.13a | S14 | 7.71 ± 1.14a |
| S6 | 8.24 ± 0.11a | S15 | 7.32 ± 0.09a |
| S7 | 7.15 ± 1.18a | S16 | 4.93 ± 0.13a |
| S8 | 6.15 ± 0.19a | S17 | 5.82 ± 0.02a |
| S9 | 4.57 ± 0.02a | S18 | 7.13 ± 1.33a |
aMean ± Standard deviation (SD) (n = 3)
IC50 values of ABTS assay of 18 batches of SEO
| No. | IC50(mg/mL) | No. | IC50(mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 2.76 ± 0.23a | S10 | 2.17 ± 0.25a |
| S2 | 2.80 ± 0.15a | S11 | 2.37 ± 0.33a |
| S3 | 1.40 ± 0.08a | S12 | 1.21 ± 0.07a |
| S4 | 2.35 ± 0.30a | S13 | 1.32 ± 0.46a |
| S5 | 2.65 ± 0.32a | S14 | 1.62 ± 0.04a |
| S6 | 2.61 ± 0.07a | S15 | 1.67 ± 0.21a |
| S7 | 2.06 ± 0.05a | S16 | 1.26 ± 0.01a |
| S8 | 1.38 ± 0.13a | S17 | 1.63 ± 0.05a |
| S9 | 0.50 ± 0.05a | S18 | 2.96 ± 0.20a |
aMean ± Standard deviation(SD) (n = 3)
Fig. 8GC-MS fingerprints of 18 batches of SEO (A), GC-MS reference fingerprint of SEO (B)
The qualitative analysis result of common peaks from the fingerprint of SEO
| Peak No. | Rt | Compound Name | Molecular | Molecular weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12.53 | Benzene, 1-methoxy-4-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)- | C11H16O | 164.1 |
| 2 | 14.48 | Bicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-ol, 1,7,7-trimethyl-, acetate, (1S-endo)- | C12H20O2 | 196.1 |
| 3 | 18.73 | 1,2,4-Metheno-1H-indene, octahydro-1,7a-dimethyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-, [1S-(1.alpha.,2.alpha.,3a.beta.,4.alpha.,5.alpha.,7a.beta.,8S*)]- | C15H24 | 204.2 |
| 4 | 19.09 | Ylangene | C15H24 | 204.2 |
| 5 | 23.06 | Benzene, 1,4-dimethoxy-2-methyl-5-isopropyl- | C12H18O2 | 194.1 |
| 6 | 26.48 | Spiro[5.5]undec-2-ene, 3,7,7-trimethyl-11-methylene- | C15H24 | 204.2 |
| 7 | 26.92 | α-Muurolene | C15H24 | 204.2 |
| 8 | 28.09 | (1R,3aS,4aS,8aS)-1,4,4,6-Tetramethyl-1,2,3,3a,4,4a,7,8-octahydrocyclopenta[1,4]cyclobuta[1,2]benzene | C15H24 | 204.2 |
| 9 | 28.35 | 1H-Benzocycloheptene, 2,4a,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-3,5,5,9-tetramethyl-, (R)- | C15H24 | 204.2 |
| 10 | 29.49 | β-Bisabolene | C15H24 | 204.2 |
| 11 | 30.78 | Naphthalene, 1,2,3,5,6,8a-hexahydro-4,7-dimethyl-1-(1-methylethyl)-, (1S-cis)- | C15H24 | 204.2 |
| 12 | 31.20 | 1H-Benzocycloheptene, 2,4a,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-3,5,5,9-tetramethyl-, (R)- | C15H24 | 204.2 |
| 13 | 31.54 | (1R,3aS,4aS,8aS)-1,4,4,6-Tetramethyl-1,2,3,3a,4,4a,7,8-octahydrocyclopenta[1,4]cyclobuta[1,2]benzene | C15H24 | 204.2 |
| 14 | 39.18 | Ylangenol | C15H24O | 220.2 |
| 15 | 43.30 | 3-epi-Cedrenal | C15H22O | 218.2 |
| 16 | 43.63 | (1R,2R,4S,6S,7S,8S)-8-Isopropyl-1-methyl-3-methylenetricyclo[4.4.0.02,7]decan-4-ol | C15H24O | 220.2 |
| 17 | 44.35 | (E)-2-((8R,8aS)-8,8a-Dimethyl-3,4,6,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-2(1H)-ylidene)propanal | C15H22O | 218.2 |
| 18 | 44.69 | Bicyclo[4.1.0]heptan-2-one, 3,4,4-trimethyl-3-(3-methyl-1,3-butadienyl)-, [1.alpha.,3.alpha.(E),6.alpha.]-(. + −.)- | C15H22O | 218.2 |
| 19 | 44.95 | Ylangenal | C15H22O | 218.2 |
The relative percentage content of common peaks from SEO
| No. | Relative area percentage | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | S9 | S10 | S11 | S12 | S13 | S14 | S15 | S16 | S17 | S18 | |
| 1 | 1.20 | 1.55 | 0.97 | 1.13 | 1.28 | 0.76 | 1.27 | 1.23 | 0.52 | – | 0.99 | 0.90 | 1.03 | 0.82 | 1.16 | 1.11 | 1.04 | 1.18 |
| 2 | 1.63 | 2.13 | 1.61 | 1.63 | 2.12 | 1.47 | 1.71 | 1.64 | 0.95 | 1.77 | 1.37 | 1.37 | 1.27 | 1.32 | 1.49 | 1.74 | 1.75 | 1.58 |
| 3 | 0.36 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.25 | 0.62 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.50 |
| 4 | 28.20 | 33.11 | 31.00 | 26.83 | 40.45 | 36.80 | 33.18 | 41.53 | 19.93 | 40.49 | 29.51 | 36.94 | 29.15 | 36.41 | 33.07 | 38.85 | 33.54 | 33.41 |
| 5 | 0.40 | 1.02 | 1.12 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 1.05 | 1.01 | 1.10 | 1.01 | 0.96 | 1.02 | 0.74 | 1.05 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 1.00 |
| 6 | 5.80 | 6.63 | 4.00 | 4.28 | 4.83 | 3.76 | 4.44 | 4.39 | 5.15 | 5.30 | 4.17 | 3.98 | 4.89 | 3.56 | 4.39 | 4.70 | 3.61 | 4.26 |
| 7 | 1.30 | 1.56 | 1.79 | 1.39 | 1.54 | 1.87 | 1.70 | 1.57 | 1.67 | 2.01 | 1.42 | 1.57 | 1.18 | 1.69 | 1.79 | 1.57 | 1.68 | 1.83 |
| 8 | 11.72 | 12.06 | 8.45 | 10.30 | 8.41 | 7.31 | 8.54 | 6.65 | 7.43 | 7.04 | 7.53 | 8.24 | 8.88 | 8.41 | 8.05 | 10.14 | 9.24 | 8.03 |
| 9 | 5.74 | 7.13 | 7.31 | 8.96 | 9.67 | 7.99 | 6.90 | 10.60 | 8.96 | 7.89 | 9.00 | 7.42 | 9.96 | 9.01 | 6.17 | 10.11 | 8.46 | 8.99 |
| 10 | 0.80 | 0.83 | 1.10 | 1.26 | 0.70 | 1.05 | 1.11 | 1.19 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.67 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 1.40 |
| 11 | 0.92 | 1.15 | 1.64 | 1.30 | 1.04 | 1.46 | 1.31 | 1.02 | 1.57 | 1.45 | 1.39 | 1.11 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.32 | 1.05 | 1.27 | 1.29 |
| 12 | 0.29 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 0.95 | 1.06 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.89 | 1.09 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.96 | 0.81 | 0.96 |
| 13 | – | – | 0.33 | – | – | – | – | – | 0.21 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 14 | 1.99 | 2.05 | 4.36 | 5.01 | 2.10 | 4.27 | 3.92 | 2.68 | 4.93 | 2.04 | 4.04 | 2.94 | 3.21 | 3.29 | 4.41 | – | 3.51 | 3.24 |
| 15 | 1.26 | 0.79 | 1.17 | 1.07 | 0.42 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.60 | 1.49 | 0.62 | 0.92 | 0.62 | 0.89 | 0.55 | 1.12 | 0.51 | 0.64 | 0.66 |
| 16 | 4.93 | 4.18 | 8.12 | 7.12 | 4.82 | 7.86 | 6.87 | 4.58 | 10.00 | 5.70 | 6.75 | 6.04 | 5.66 | 5.83 | 7.07 | 4.30 | 6.20 | 5.85 |
| 17 | 8.99 | 7.48 | 8.17 | 7.72 | 5.45 | 7.54 | 8.55 | 6.90 | 15.07 | 7.57 | 7.90 | 8.35 | 8.89 | 7.29 | 9.00 | 6.99 | 6.98 | 6.34 |
| 18 | 1.57 | 1.24 | 1.80 | 1.64 | 0.75 | 1.38 | 1.66 | 1.17 | 2.77 | 1.35 | 1.78 | 1.44 | 1.72 | 1.31 | 1.91 | 1.19 | 1.26 | 1.29 |
| 19 | 3.96 | 3.11 | 3.88 | 3.05 | 2.10 | 2.89 | 3.43 | 2.51 | 5.95 | 3.35 | 3.68 | 3.74 | 3.73 | 2.95 | 3.81 | 3.20 | 3.05 | 2.64 |
| Total | 81.06 | 87.45 | 88.05 | 85.11 | 88.19 | 89.57 | 88.16 | 90.77 | 89.74 | 90.10 | 83.91 | 87.67 | 85.21 | 86.68 | 88.13 | 88.39 | 85.24 | 84.45 |
Fig. 9The standardized regression coefficients plot of IC50 value of DPPH (A) and ABTS (B) radical scavenging activity of 18 batches SEO