| Literature DB >> 35666337 |
Marc Jambon1,2,3, Tyler Colasante1,2, Danielle Mitrevski1,2,4, Erinn Acland1,2,5,6, Tina Malti1,2.
Abstract
Lacking the capacity for guilt is a defining characteristic of callous-unemotional (CU) traits. Although guilt is a multifaceted construct, past CU research has rarely considered the reasons underlying children's negative emotional responses to wrongdoing. The present study investigated how different forms of guilt were associated with CU traits during early and middle childhood in a Canadian community sample. We interviewed 4- and 8-year-olds (N = 300; 50% female) to assess their emotion attributions and reasoning in response to hypothetical acts of aggression. Interview responses were used to calculate variables representing undifferentiated, ethical, and non-ethical guilt ratings. Caregivers rated children's CU tendencies at baseline and again 3 years later. Higher ethical guilt was associated with lower CU scores concurrently and 3 years later. Higher non-ethical guilt was associated with higher CU scores at baseline (for older children) and 3 years later (for all children). Undifferentiated guilt was not associated with CU after controlling for demographic variables.Entities:
Keywords: Callous-unemotional traits; Child development; Guilt; Prosocial emotions
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35666337 DOI: 10.1007/s10802-022-00909-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol ISSN: 2730-7166