| Literature DB >> 35665285 |
Abstract
The language assistance and learning sectors have currently undergone restructuring in the period of fifth-generation (5G) communication and artificial intelligence, influenced by technologies, cloud services, learning techniques, speaker identification, language processing, virtual environments, expanded actuality, and blended actuality. This study proposes a routing protocol of modernized energy-optimized low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchical protocol (M-LEACH) using artificial intelligence and 5G Internet technologies for online English teaching. A dataset of 6,600,000 items, containing 3,250,000 favorable and unfavorable texts in English, is employed. The dataset is preprocessed using normalization to eliminate the impulse noises. Discriminant features are extracted using a variational autoencoder (VAE), and a random forest (RF) classifier is used to classify the features with accurate performance. The performance of the protocol is measured in terms of transmission rate, alive nodes, energy consumption, and a number of transmitted packets. Results show that the proposed M-Leach protocol provides a high transmission rate, maximum transmitted packets, more alive nodes, and minimum energy consumption as compared to other protocols. The proposed protocol will transform online English teaching from closed to open, and passive to active learning, dramatically changing the time and space scenarios, as well as the supply levels of English education.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35665285 PMCID: PMC9159850 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5203066
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Proposed work.
Figure 2VAE interior workings.
Figure 3The entire layout of VAE.
Figure 4M-LEACH protocol algorithm.
Figure 5Transmission rate.
Figure 6Number of alive nodes.
Figure 7Energy consumption (J).
Figure 8Number of packets received.
Figure 9Comparison of energy consumption J in suggested and existing methods.
Figure 10Comparison of number of packets received in suggested and existing methods.
Figure 11Comparison of number of alive nodes in suggested and existing methods.