| Literature DB >> 35665247 |
Deanna K Sosnowski1, K Lockhart Jamieson1, Ahmed M Darwesh1, Hao Zhang2,3, Hedieh Keshavarz-Bahaghighat1, Robert Valencia4, Anissa Viveiros2,3, Matthew L Edin5, Darryl C Zeldin5, Gavin Y Oudit2,3, John M Seubert1,3,4.
Abstract
Objective: Metabolites derived from N-3 and N-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have both beneficial and detrimental effects on the heart. However, contribution of these lipid mediators to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM)-associated mitochondrial dysfunction remains unknown. This study aimed to characterize DCM-specific alterations in the PUFA metabolome in conjunction with cardiac mitochondrial quality in human explanted heart tissues.Entities:
Keywords: CYP450; dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM); eicosanoids; mitochondria; soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35665247 PMCID: PMC9160304 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.879209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Demographic and clinical parameters of patients acquired from electronic medical records.
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
| Age, yrs | 38 (27–38) | 51 (44–56) | 0.11 | ||||
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.1 (21.9–24.4) | 25.5 (24.2–27.6) | 0.20 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| LVEF (%) | 45 (40–50) | 55 (43–60) | 0.35 | ||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
| Age, yrs | 52 (47–56) | 55 (44–55) | 0.91 | NYHA II | 1 (8.3) | 1 (16.7) | >0.99 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24.7 (22.6–25.2) | 25.8 (22.1–32.6) | 0.55 | NYHA III | 7 (58.3) | 2 (33.3) | 0.62 |
|
| NYHA IV | 4 (33.3) | 3 (50.0) | 0.63 | |||
| Hemoglobin, g/L | 119 (113–134) | 108 (101–113) | 0.12 |
| |||
| eGFR, mL/min/m2 | 57 (51–62) | 56 (44–61) | 0.77 | Atrial fibrillation | 2 (16.7) | 0 | 0.53 |
|
| Kidney disease | 9 (75.0) | 4 (66.7) | >0.99 | |||
| ACE inhibitor | 7 (58.3) | 6 (100) | 0.11 | Diabetes mellitus | 2 (16.7) | 1 (16.7) | >0.99 |
| ARB | 2 (16.7) | 2 (33.3) | 0.57 | Hypertension | 1 (8.3) | 1 (16.7) | >0.99 |
| β-blocker | 9 (75.0) | 6 (100) | 0.51 | COPD/Asthma | 2 (16.7) | 4 (66.7) | 0.11 |
| Loop diuretics | 11 (91.7) | 4 (66.7) | 0.25 | Dyslipidemia | 1 (8.3) | 0 | >0.99 |
| MRA | 8 (66.7) | 4 (66.7) | >0.99 | Liver disease | 3 (25.0) | 2 (33.3) | >0.99 |
| Antiplatelet | 7 (58.3) | 4 (66.7) | >0.99 |
| |||
| Anticoagulant | 8 (66.7) | 6 (100) | 0.25 | AICD/ICD | 5 (41.7) | 3 (50.0) | >0.99 |
| Statin | 3 (25) | 2 (33.3) | >0.99 | BiV-ICD | 2 (16.7) | 1 (16.7) | >0.99 |
| Antiarrhythmics | CRT | 2 (16.7) | 3 (50.0) | 0.27 | |||
| Class I | 1 (8.3) | 2 (33.3) | 0.25 |
| |||
| Class III | 3 (25.0) | 5 (83.3) | 0.043 | Heart rate, bpm | 96 (74–103) | 95 (81–99) | 0.86 |
|
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 101 (91–116) | 106 (93–120) | 0.75 | |||
| LVEF (%) | 18 (13–20) | 20 (14–29) | 0.68 | Diastolic BP, mmHg | 64 (56–73) | 67 (58–67) | >0.99 |
Descriptive data is expressed as median (interquartile range, IQR) and analyzed using non-parametric Mann Whitney U-test. Categorical data is expressed as absolute number (%) and analyzed using standard chi square with Fisher's exact test (each individual patient = n, male NFC n = 5, male DMC n = 12, female NFC n = 6, female DCM n = 6, .
N−3 and N−6 oxylipin profile (ng/g tissue) from LV heart biopsies measured by LC-MS/MS.
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||
| 6-keto PGF1α | 5.4 ± 2.1 | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 5.7 ± 1.1 | 2.7 ± 2.3 |
| TXB2 | 0.2 ± 0.06 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.2 ± 0.06 | 0.05 ± 0.04 |
| PGF2α | 5.1 ± 3.1 | 7.7 ± 4.4 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.4 |
| PGE2 | 6.0 ± 1.5 | 27.5 ± 4.3 | 9.0 ± 2.7 | 13.8 ± 4.8 |
| PGD2 | 10.6 ± 2.9 | 43.1 ± 4.6 | 16.5 ± 4.4 | 23.9 ± 8.3 |
| 8isoPGF2α | 1.0 ± 0.09 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.09 | 1.1 ± 0.2 |
|
| ||||
| 9-HODE | 159.5 ± 25.0 | 1,074.4 ± 207.3 | 359.4 ± 154.5 | 675.7 ± 417.9 |
| 13-HODE | 282.5 ± 37.6 | 1,488.7 ± 278.6 | 542.2 ± 204.6 | 970.3 ± 527.1 |
| 5-HETE | 26.8 ± 6.7 | 35.5 ± 8.0 | 36.0 ± 5.8 | 17.6 ± 5.1 |
| 11-HETE | 29.6 ± 7.6 | 33.2 ± 6.4 | 33.8 ± 5.8 | 18.2 ± 8.2 |
| 12-HETE | 40.9 ± 12.4 | 34.0 ± 7.2 | 45.6 ± 7.9 | 18.5 ± 8.1 |
| 15-HETE | 39.9 ± 9.9 | 53.1 ± 13.2 | 48.8 ± 8.0 | 23.7 ± 9.7 |
|
| ||||
| 9,10-EpOME | 63.7 ± 22.1 | 411.6 ± 71.6 | 92.4 ± 36.0 | 245.8 ± 87.4 |
| 12,13-EpOME | 17.5 ± 3.9 | 106.2 ± 20.7 | 28.7 ± 9.9 | 61.1 ± 24.0 |
| 8,9-EET | 11.6 ± 1.4 | 20.9 ± 2.5 | 12.6 ± 1.9 | 12.8 ± 3.3 |
| 11,12-EET | 5.6 ± 0.9 | 14.0 ± 2.7 | 6.7 ± 0.9 | 5.0 ± 2.0 |
| 14,15-EET | 8.8 ± 1.0 | 13.9 ± 1.3 | 10.9 ± 1.2 | 8.5 ± 2.23 |
| 19,20-EDP | 47.9 ± 14.3 | 47.8 ± 11.8 | 35.6 ± 2.3 | 35.94± 9.6 |
|
| ||||
| 9,10-DiHOME | 8.7 ± 2.3 | 74.0 ± 10.8 | 12.0 ± 3.8 | 37.9 ± 10.9 |
| 12,13-DiHOME | 4.9 ± 0.7 | 17.8 ± 3.5 | 6.1 ± 1.6 | 16.3 ± 4.7 |
| 8,9-DHET | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.4 |
| 11,12-DHET | 0.8 ± 0.08 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.4 |
| 14,15-DHET | 0.6 ± 0.08 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.5 ± 0.07 | 0.5 ± 0.04 |
|
| ||||
| 9,10-EpOME:DiHOME | 7.0 ± 0.8 | 5.9 ± 0.8 | 7.4 ± 0.7 | 6.5 ± 1.1 |
| 12,13-EpOME:DiHOME | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 7.2 ± 1.3 | 5.1 ± 1.4 | 3.7 ± 0.7 |
| 8,9-EET:DHET | 17.4 ± 2.8 | 15.1 ± 2.5 | 20.4 ± 3.6 | 12.5 ± 5.1 |
| 11,12-EET:DHET | 7.9 ± 1.7 | 17.8 ± 2.9 | 8.3 ± 1.0 | 5.5 ± 2.1 |
| 14,15-EET:DHET | 15.2 ± 3.4 | 21.1 ± 2.9 | 23.5 ± 3.1 | 15.6 ± 3.7 |
Data were analyzed using ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test and are expressed as mean ± SEM (male NFC n = 5, male DCM n = 10, female NFC n = 4, female DCM n = 3, .
Figure 1(A) Fold change in mRNA expression of key enzymes in DCM LV tissue vs. NFC based on microarray analysis (NFC n = 8 and DCM n = 8; NC = no change). Western immunoblot quantification and representative blots showing protein expression of (B), CYP2J2; (C), CYP2C8; (D), mEH; (E), sEH enzymes in microsomal and cytosolic heart tissue fractions. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM and analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test (each individual patient heart = n, male NFC n = 6, female NFC n = 6, male DCM n = 6, female DCM n = 6, *p < 0.05 vs. NFC). The same loading control image is used for illustrative purposes in (B–D).
Figure 2(A) Representative images of mitochondrial morphology and distribution in heart slices by transmission electron microscopy. White arrows indicate damaged mitochondria in DCM heart slices (10,000× magnification, scale bar = 500 nm). (B) Mitochondrial circularity score. (C) Mitochondrial cristae disruption score. (D) Average number of mitochondrial inclusion bodies. Specific enzymatic activities of mitochondrial electron transport chain (E) complex I; (F) complex II; and (G) citrate synthase in nmol/(min*mg) protein. (H) Relative ATP to ADP ratio in LV tissue. (I) Mitochondrial oxygen consumption represented by the respiratory control ratio (RCR) in basal and ADP-stimulated cardiac fibers. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM and analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparisons test (each individual patient heart = n, male NFC n = 6, female NFC n = 6, male DCM n = 6, female DCM n = 6, *p < 0.05 vs. NFC).