| Literature DB >> 35665230 |
Hun-Young Park1,2, Won-Sang Jung1,2, Sung-Woo Kim1,2, Jisu Kim1,2, Kiwon Lim1,2,3.
Abstract
Interval training under hypoxia (IHT) is commonly used to enhance endurance exercise performance. However, previous studies examining hematologic changes related to the immune system that affect health and conditioning are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of IHT for 6-weeks on hematological parameters, hemodynamic function, and endurance exercise performance in amateur Korean female runners. Twenty healthy amateur Korean female runners (age: 24.85 ± 3.84 years) were equally assigned to normoxic training group (NTG) for interval training under normoxia (760 mmHg) and hypoxic training group (HTG) for interval training under hypobaric hypoxia (526 mmHg, 3000 m simulated altitude) according to their body composition and endurance exercise performance. All participants performed 120-min of training sessions, consisting of 20-min of warm-up, 60-min of interval training, and 20-min of cool-down. The training program was performed 3-days per week for 6-weeks. Warm-up and cool-down were performed for 20-min at 60% maximal heart rate (HRmax). The interval training sessions comprised 10 repetitions of interval exercise (5-min of exercise corresponding to 90-95% HRmax and 1-min of rest) on a treadmill. All participants underwent measurements of hematological parameters, hemodynamic function, and endurance exercise performance before and after training. Both groups showed a significant increase in erythropoietin (EPO) level and a decrease in monocyte abundance, with EPO showing a greater increase in the HTG than in the NTG. B cell abundance significantly increased in the NTG; hematocrit and neutrophil counts significantly increased, and lymphocyte counts significantly decreased in the HTG. The HTG showed a significant improvement in oxygen uptake, stroke volume index, and end-diastolic volume index compared to the NTG. In addition, both groups showed significant improvements in heart rate, end-systolic volume index, and cardiac output index. The maximal oxygen uptake and 3000 m time trial record were significantly improved in both groups, and the HTG showed a tendency to improve more than the NTG. In conclusion, the IHT was effective in enhancing endurance exercise performance through improved hemodynamic function. Furthermore, hematological parameters of immune system showed a normal range before and after training and were not negatively affected.Entities:
Keywords: amateur female runners; endurance exercise performance; hemodynamic function; hypoxia; immune function; interval training
Year: 2022 PMID: 35665230 PMCID: PMC9158122 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.919008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.755
Participants’ characteristics.
| Variables | NTG | HTG |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number (n) |
|
| — | — |
| Environmental condition (mmHg) | Sea level (760 mmHg) | 3000-m simulated altitude (526 mmHg) | — | — |
| Age (year) | 24.5 ± 3.8 | 25.2 ± 4.0 | -0.398 | 0.695 |
| Height (cm) | 164.8 ± 0.9 | 163.2 ± 3.9 | 1.243 | 0.243 |
| Weight (kg) | 52.0 ± 3.4 | 51.2 ± 4.7 | 0.409 | 0.687 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 19.1 ± 1.2 | 19.2 ± 1.6 | -0.140 | 0.890 |
| FFM (kg) | 35.6 ± 2.3 | 35.5 ± 3.2 | 0.057 | 0.955 |
| Percent body fat (%) | 20.7 ± 0.9 | 20.6 ± 1.1 | 0.090 | 0.929 |
Note. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. NTG, normoxic training group; HTG, hypoxic training group; BMI, body mass index; FFM, free fat mass.
FIGURE 1Study design. Difference in hemorheological function (mean ± SD) between non-obese and obese. Note. NTG = normoxic training group, HTG = hypoxic training group, HRmax = maximal heart rate, VO2max = maximal oxygen uptake.
Changes in body composition parameters before and after 6 weeks exercise training in each environmental condition.
| Variables | NTG ( | Cohen’s d (95% CI) | HTG ( | Cohen’s d (95% CI) |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Group | Time | Interaction | |||
| Weight (kg) | 52.0 ± 3.4 | 51.7 ± 3.3 | −0.07 (−0.90, 0.78) | 51.2 ± 4.7 | 51.1 ± 4.4 | −0.03 (−0.87, 0.81) | 0.697 (0.009) | 0.057) (0.187) | 0.659 (0.011) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 19.1 ± 1.2 | 19.0 ± 1.1 | −0.07 (−0.91, 0.77) | 19.2 ± 1.6 | 19.2 ± 1.6 | 0.00 (−0.83, 0.84) | 0.829 (0.003) | 0.191) (0.093) | 0.119 (0.130) |
| FFM (kg) | 35.6 ± 2.3 | 35.4 ± 2.4 | −0.07 (−0.90, 0.78) | 35.5 ± 3.2 | 35.5 ± 3.2 | 0.00 (−0.84, 0.84) | 1.000 (0.000) | 0.539) (0.021) | 0.590 (0.016) |
| Percent body fat (%) | 20.7 ± 0.9 | 20.6 ± 0.8 | −0.09 (−0.93, 0.75) | 20.6 ± 1.1 | 20.4 ± 1.4 | −0.15 (−0.99, 0.70) | 0.806 (0.003) | 0.150) (0.112) | 0.476 (0.029) |
Note. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. NTG, normoxic training group; HTG, hypoxic training group; CI, confidential interval; BMI, body mass index; FFM, free fat mass.
Changes in the hematological parameters before and after 6 weeks exercise training in each environmental condition.
| Variables | NTG ( | Cohen’s d (95% CI) | HTG ( | Cohen’s d (95% CI) |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Post | Pre | Post | Group | Time | Interaction | |||
| RBC (106/uL) | 4.5 ± 0.3 | 4.4 ± 0.3 | −0.28 (−1.11, 0.58) | 5.0 ± 0.3 | 5.0 ± 0.5 | −0.08 (−0.92, 0.76) | 0.003 (0.402)† | 0.356 (0.047) | 0.730 (0.007) |
| Hb (g/dl) | 14.2 ± 0.8 | 14.0 ± 1.1 | −0.12 (−0.96, 0.72) | 14.9 ± 0.7 | 14.9 ± 0.6 | 0.02 (−0.82, 0.85) | 0.031 (0.232)† | 0.488 (0.027) | 0.427 (0.035) |
| Hct (g/dl) | 43.4 ± 2.3 | 43.1 ± 2.1 | −0.13 (−0.96, 0.72) | 44.5 ± 1.3 | 46.0 ± 2.3 | 0.67 (−0.22, 1.51)* | 0.031 (0.232)† | 0.065 (0.177) | 0.009 (0.320)† |
| EPO (mIU/ml) | 10.0 ± 1.2 | 12.1 ± 2.7 | 0.93 (0.00, 1.77)* | 10.7 ± 3.3 | 16.4 ± 3.0 | 1.84 (0.76, 2.76)* | 0.015 (0.285)† | 0.000 (0.608)† | 0.026 (0.246)† |
| WBC (103/uL) | 5.0 ± 0.3 | 5.0 ± 0.5 | 0.15 (−0.70, 0.99) | 5.2 ± 0.9 | 5.3 ± 1.0 | 0.16 (−0.68, 1.00) | 0.474 (0.029) | 0.107 (0.138) | 0.430 (0.035) |
| Monocyte (%) | 10.2 ± 1.9 | 8.0 ± 1.7 | −1.20 (−2.06, −0.23)* | 11.5 ± 2.8 | 9.0 ± 2.6 | −0.93 (−1.77, −0.01)* | 0.249 (0.073) | 0.000 (0.745)† | 0.552 (0.020) |
| Eosinophil (%) | 2.8 ± 1.1 | 2.4 ± 1.0 | −0.41 (−1.24, 0.46) | 3.0 ± 1.6 | 3.1 ± 2.5 | 0.04 (−0.80, 0.88) | 0.500 (0.026) | 0.453 (0.032) | 0.248 (0.073) |
| Neutrophil (%) | 54.3 ± 5.1 | 57.0 ± 7.5 | 0.37 (−0.50, 1.20) | 49.4 ± 9.2 | 57.4 ± 10.7 | 0.74 (−0.16, 1.58)* | 0.543 (0.021) | 0.000 (0.655)† | 0.010 (0.317)† |
| Basophil (%) | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | −0.75 (−1.58, 0.15) | 1.2 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.4 | −0.25 (−1.08, 0.61) | 0.195 (0.091) | 0.024 (0.253)† | 0.825 (0.003) |
| Lymphocyte (%) | 37.9 ± 4.9 | 33.3 ± 8.8 | −0.61 (−1.45, 0.27) | 40.0 ± 4.0 | 35.7 ± 7.0 | −0.54 (−1.37, 0.34)* | 0.380 (0.043) | 0.008 (0.334)† | 0.914 (0.001) |
| B-cell (%) | 11.5 ± 1.5 | 13.4 ± 1.5 | 1.31 (0.33, 2.18)* | 15.2 ± 2.5 | 15.3 ± 2.6 | 0.05 (−0.79, 0.89) | 0.004 (0.380)† | 0.015 (0.288)† | 0.030 (0.236)† |
| T-cell (%) | 81.4 ± 6.7 | 80.8 ± 6.1 | −0.09 (−0.92, 0.76) | 74.7 ± 4.7 | 71.9 ± 5.9 | −0.51 (−1.34, 0.36) | 0.006 (0.353)† | 0.081 (0.159) | 0.241 (0.075) |
| NK cell (%) | 13.7 ± 6.2 | 12.2 ± 5.0 | −0.22 (−1.05, 0.63) | 16.6 ± 1.7 | 19.1 ± 6.4 | 0.51 (−0.37, 1.34) | 0.030 (0.237)† | 0.611 (0.015) | 0.066 (0.176) |
Note. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. NTG, normoxic training group; HTG, hypoxic training group; RBC, red blood cell, Hb = hemoglobin, Hct = hematocrit, EPO, erythropoietin; WBC, white blood cell; NK cell = natural killer cell; CI, confidence interval; Significant interaction or main effect: †p < 0.05; Significant difference between the pre- and post-tests: *p < 0.05.
FIGURE 2Changes in hemodynamic function parameters during 30 min of submaximal exercise before and after 6 weeks exercise training in each environmental condition. (A) Change in HR. (B) Change in VO2. (C) Change in SVi. (D) Change in EDVi. (E) Change in ESVi. (F) Change in COi. Note. NTG = normoxic training group, HTG = hypoxic training group, HR = heart rate, VO2 = oxygen uptake, SVi = stroke volume index, EDVi = end-diastolic volume index, ESVi = end-systolic volume index, COi = cardiac output index. Significant interaction or main effect: †p < 0.05; Significant difference between the pre- and post-tests: *p < 0.05.
FIGURE 3Changes in endurance exercise performance parameters before and after 6 weeks exercise training in each environmental condition. (A) Change in VO2max. (B) Change in 3 km time trial. Note. NTG = normoxic training group, HTG = hypoxic training group, VO2max = maximal oxygen uptake. Significant interaction or main effect: †p < 0.05; Significant difference between the pre- and post-tests: *p < 0.05.