| Literature DB >> 35665035 |
Jinjin Mei1, Yang Xue2, Jingwen Li1, Lihong Zhang1, Jianyun Zhang1, Yiying Wang1, Kaiqi Su1, Jing Gao2, Jian Guo2, Ruiqing Li1,2.
Abstract
Background: Upper limb spasticity (ULS) is a common complication after stroke, which seriously affects the quality of life and rehabilitation of patients. There are different treatment methods for post-stroke spasticity (PSS). Our group found that functional acupuncture (FA) can effectively improve forearm spasticity and hand dysfunction after stroke, but the efficacy of ULS needs to be further verified. Therefore, this subject has mainly used clinical randomized controlled trials to evaluate the clinical efficacy of FA in the treatment of ULS after ischemic stroke. Method: This is a parallel design and randomized controlled trial. We selected 108 patients who met the predefined criteria and randomized them into two groups, the experimental group and the control group. The experimental group receives FA and routine rehabilitation treatment. The control group received traditional acupuncture (TA) and routine rehabilitation treatment. All patients received 20 courses of treatment for 4 weeks, and the modified Ashworth score (MAS), clinical neurological deficit score (CSS), Fugl-Meyer upper extremity function assessment (FMA-UE), and the Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores were evaluated before and after treatment. Discussion: This trial is mainly to study the clinical efficacy of FA in the treatment of ULS after ischemic stroke. It will not only provide a new idea for the clinical treatment of upper limb post-stroke spasticity (ULPSS) but also will provide effective experimental support and a theoretical basis for the clinic. Trial registration: China Clinical Trials Registry No. ChiCTR2100050440. Registered on 27 August 27 2021.Entities:
Keywords: functional acupuncture; ischemic stroke; motor function; rehabilitation; upper limb spasticity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35665035 PMCID: PMC9157496 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.835408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.086
Qualification screening and informed consent was completed before the assignment.
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Enrollment | ||||||
| Eligibility screen | X | |||||
| Baseline | X | |||||
| Informed consent | X | |||||
| Medical history | X | |||||
| Merger disease | X | |||||
| Allocation | X | |||||
| Interventions | ||||||
| Experiment group | X | X | X | X | ||
| Control group | X | X | X | X | ||
| Assessments | ||||||
| MAS | X | X | ||||
| FMA-UE | X | X | ||||
| CSS | X | X | ||||
| MBI | X | X | ||||
| Safety evaluation | X | X | ||||
| Needle sensation | X | X | X | X | ||
| Adverse events | X | X | X | X | ||
After allocation, each patient was treated within 4 weeks. The clinical outcome was evaluated twice: after allocation and after treatment. Adverse events were recorded on the case report form (CRF) at any time during treatment.
Figure 1Flowchart of the trial. FA, functional acupuncture; TA, traditional acupuncture; MAS, the Modified Ashworth Scale; FMA-UE, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity; CCC, clinical neurological deficit score; MBI, the Modified Barthel Index.
Location of acupoints for treating post-stroke upper limb spasticity.
|
| |
|---|---|
| Daling (PC7) | Located at the midpoint of the transverse stripes of the palm of the hand, between the palmar longus tendon and the flexor carpi radialis tendon. |
| Hegu (LI4) | Located between the first and second metacarpal bones on the back of the hand, at the midpoint of the radial side of the second metacarpal bone. |
| Functional point 1 | Location roughly equivalent to the position of the elbow-liu (LI12) point in the Large Intestine meridian of the hand |
| Functional point 2 | Location roughly equivalent to the location of the Waiguan (SJ5) in the triple energizer meridian of the hand. |
The modified Ashworth score (MAS)-specific scoring rules.
|
| |
|---|---|
| 0 | No increase in muscle tone |
| 1 | Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM) when the affected part(s) is (are) moved in flexion or extension |
| 1+ | Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM |
| 2 | More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved |
| 3 | Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult |
| 4 | Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension |