| Literature DB >> 35664973 |
G Conteduca1, A Rossi2, F Megiorni3, A Parodi4, F Ferrera5, S Tardito5, T Altosole5, V Fausti6, C Occella6, F Kalli5, S Negrini5, A Pizzuti3, C Marchese3, E Rizza7, F Indiveri5, D Coviello1, D Fenoglio4,5, G Filaci4,5.
Abstract
Background: Alopecia areata (AA) spares the stem cell compartment and attacks only the base of the hair follicle, which is surrounded by infiltrating lymphocytes. AA is associated with polymorphisms in immune-related genes and with decreased function of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory (Treg) cells. Treg function is modulated by the costimulatory molecules, like inducible costimulator (ICOS) that are crucial in orienting T cell differentiation and function so that they strongly impact on the immunologic decision between tolerance or autoimmunity development. Objective: The aim of our study was to investigate the possible association of AA with single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) present in the ICOS 3'-untranslated region (3'UTR) region and to elucidate how SNPs modulate ICOS gene expression by affecting miRNA binding sites.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35664973 PMCID: PMC9060044 DOI: 10.1002/ski2.34
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Skin Health Dis ISSN: 2690-442X
Comparison of the frequency of ICOS UTR3′ SNPs between alopecia patients and controls
| Genotypes | Percent frequency in controls/patients | OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 19/29 | 0.5 (0.3–0.8) | 0.012 |
|
| 9/6 | 1.5 (0.7–3.5) | 0.25 |
|
| 0.5/0.5 | 0.9 (0.05–14.8) | 0.95 |
|
| 0.5/0.5 | 0.9 (0.05–14.8) | 0.95 |
|
| 4/1 | 4.7 (0.9–24.9) | 0.063 |
|
| 1/4 | 0.3 (0.7–1.2) | 0.091 |
|
| 1/2 | 0.7 (0.1–3.3) | 0.66 |
|
| 4/11 | 0.3 (0.1–0.8) | 0.015 |
Abbreviations: ICOS, inducible costimulator; OR, odd ratio; SNPs, single‐nucleotide polymorphisms.
The C variant of the rs4404254 SNP and the C variant of the rs4675379 SNP are a risk factor for the disease. OR was calculated for the frequency of the minor variant allele in control versus patients.
FIGURE 1The risk allele of rs4404254 is associated with lower inducible costimulator (ICOS) mRNA expression. (a) Relative expression measurements of ICOS expression were calculated by real‐time PCR. Fold change (y‐axis) represents the relative expression of ICOS in 30 AA patients (AA pts) in comparison to 30 healthy controls (ctrl) (p = 0.0004). (b) Correlation analysis between the SNP genotypes and ICOS expression in 12 AA patients carrying the rs4404254 risk allele, and 18 patients carrying the rs4404254 non‐risk allele. For the rs4404254 risk allele we considered the C/C and C/T genotypes, and for the non‐risk allele the T/T genotype (p = 0.01). Error bars in (a) and (b) represent mean and SD of three independent experiments. Normalization of the expression data for the ICOS gene was realized with GAPDH using the 2‐∆∆ C method formula
FIGURE 2Relative expression of miRNA in PBMCs from healthy subjects and AA patients. Relative expression measurements of miRNA were calculated by real‐time PCR, using the 2‐∆∆ C method formula. Fold change (y‐axis) represents the relative expression of the miR‐103, miR‐27b, miR‐369, miR‐101, miR‐1276 and miR‐2355‐3p genes in AA patients (circular plots) in comparison to healthy controls (rectangular plots). U6 small nuclear RNA was used as a control to determine relative miRNA expression. Error bars represent mean and SD of three independent experiments
Bioinformatic prediction of microRNAs potentially targeting the ICOS gene
| SNP in gene3′UTR | miRNA | SNP location and target site on UTR | Chromosome position of gene target | Energy change (kcal/mol) | miRNA/SNP‐target duplexes | Effect by SNP on 3′UTR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICOS rs4404254 (U/C) | Has‐miR1276 | 964951‐970 | Gene NM_012092 chr2:204,821,369 ‐ 204,821,408 (on assembly GRCh37) | Wild:‐15.40SNP:‐17.80 |
| Gain |
| ICOS rs4675379 (G/C) | Has‐miR2355‐3p | 17731755‐1776 | Gene NM_012092 chr2:204 821 369 ‐ 204 821 408 (on assembly GRCh37) | Wild:‐12.10SNP:‐21.20 |
| Gain |
Abbreviations: ICOS, inducible costimulator; SNPs, single‐nucleotide polymorphisms; 3′UTR, 3′‐untranslated.
Numbers indicate the predicted miR‐1276 and miR‐2355‐3p seed sequences using the numbering of the ICOS 3′UTR and predicted ICOS 3′UTR hybrid structure with miR‐1276 or miR‐2355‐3p and mean free energy (kcal/mol) obtained by miRNA SNP V1.0 server.
FIGURE 3Schematic representation of the construct used in the luciferase assays. A fragment of 760 bp of the ICOS 3′UTR, encompassing rs4404254 wild‐type allele (a) or rs4404254 allelic variant (c) the putative responsive elements for miR‐1276 or encompassing rs4675379 wild type (b) or rs4675379 allelic variant (d), the putative responsive elements for miR‐2355‐3p, was cloned in pGL3 vector downstream to the Firefly luciferase coding sequence. Nucleotides in miRNA sequence paired with ICOS 3′UTR are shown in capital letters and miRNA nucleotide paired with the corresponding allelic variant of ICOS 3′UTR SNPs is underlined in bold
FIGURE 4miR‐1276 and miR‐2355‐3p target the ICOS 3′UTR. 293T cells were transfected independently with pGL3‐Report luciferase plasmid or pICOS‐3′UTR vector together with either specific microRNA miR‐1276 or miR‐2355‐3p. Forty‐eight hours after transfection, the percentage of cells expressing the protein luciferase was measured by flow cytometry and normalized to the Firefly control. The results represent the mean and standard error (SE) of at least three independent experiments, each carried out in triplicate. The risk allele for rs4404254 SNP was (C) allelic variant (SNP1 mut) and the non‐risk allele was (T) allelic variant (SNP1 wt), while for rs4675379 SNP the risk allele for was (C) allelic variant (SNP2 mut), and the non‐risk allele was (G) allelic variant (SNP2 wt)