| Literature DB >> 35664796 |
Zhujun Liu1,2,3,4, Tingting Qin1,2,3,4, Xiaohan Yuan1,2,3,4,5, Jie Yang1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9, Wei Shi10, Xiaoling Zhang1,2,3,4, Yanan Jia1,2,3,4, Shaochuan Liu1,2,3,4, Jing Wang1,2,3,4, Kai Li1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Background: Bevacizumab is the representative drug in antiangiogenic therapy for lung cancer. However, it induced resistance in some neoplasm. Anlotinib, a novel multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor which has an inhibitory action on both angiogenesis and malignancy, is possible to reverse the resistance.Entities:
Keywords: MMP2; N-cadherin; RGC32; TGFβ; anlotinib; anlotinib abrogated bevacizumab resistance; bevacizumab; lung adenocarcinoma
Year: 2022 PMID: 35664796 PMCID: PMC9158131 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.875888
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Figure 1Bevacizumab promotes A549 cell migration and invasion. (A) Migration and invasion of A549 cells under different concentrations of bevacizumab. (B) Migration and invasion of A549 cells treated with 200 μg/mL bevacizumab, 1 μM anlotinib, or both. Representative images are shown. Magnification ×200. n=3. Bev: bevacizumab.
Figure 2Transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes induced by bevacizumab. (A) Heat map representation of differentially expressed genes in A549 cells in the control (NC), 100 μg/mL bevacizumab-treated and 200 μg/mL bevacizumab-treated groups. Red color represents gene upregulation and blue color represents gene downregulation. (B, C) GO analysis and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes in A549 cells after bevacizumab treatment.
Figure 3Anlotinib reverses upregulated RGC32 expression by bevacizumab via ERK-MAPK and PI3K-AKT signaling. (A) q-PCR analysis of RGC32 mRNA levels in A549 cells treated with vehicle and bevacizumab at 6-h time point. Values were calculated using the ddCT method. n.s: nonsignificant. (B) Western blot analysis showing RGC32, N-cadherin and MMP2 protein levels in A549 cells after bevacizumab treatment at different concentrations. (C) Western blot analysis of RGC32 and P-ERK protein levels in A549 cells after bevacizumab treatment in the presence or absence of MAPK inhibitor U0126. (D) q-PCR analysis of RGC32 mRNA in A549 cells in response to bevacizumab treatment in the presence or absence of U0126. (E) Western blot analysis of RGC32 and P-AKT protein levels in A459 cells following bevacizumab treatment in the presence or absence of PI3K inhibitor LY294002. (F) q-PCR analysis of RGC32 mRNA in A549 cells in response to bevacizumab treatment in the presence or absence of LY294002. (G) Cultured A549 cells treated with different concentrations of bevacizumab were assessed by ELISA to measure VEGFA. n = 3. (H, I) Cultured A549 cells treated with bevacizumab and anlotinib were assessed by ELISA to measure TGFβ. n = 2. (J) Western blot analysis of RGC32, N-cadherin, MMP2, P-AKT, and P-ERK levels in 200 μg/mL bevacizumab and 1 μM anlotinib treated A549 cells. (K) HTRF analysis of P-Smad2 protein levels after anlotinib treatment. n = 2. Bev, bevacizumab.
Figure 4Bevacizumab elevates RGC32, N-cadherin, and MMP2 expression, and promotes tumor metastasis while inhibiting primary tumor growth in subcutaneous transplanted tumors in mice. (A) Typical image of the primary tumors that formed in mice grafted with A549 cells on the right shoulder, which were treated with or without bevacizumab. Ruler unit: cm. (B) Primary tumor growth curves for each group. (C) Column diagram for the tumor volume with bevacizumab treatment. n = 3. (D) Column diagram for the tumor weight in each group. n = 3. (E) Representational images of mice with tumor cells transplanted and spontaneous metastasis monitored by the IVIS spectral imaging system. Colored bars represent radiation efficiency. (F) Boxplot analysis of metastases focus number. n = 3. (G) Survival after 10 mg/kg bevacizumab, 50 mg/kg bevacizumab or vehicle treatment (n = 10, P = 0.0235) after documented tumor burden. Treatment started at week 0. Median survival 5.32 w for 50 mg/kg bevacizumab vs 7.69 w for 10 mg/kg bevacizumab treatment. (H) Western blot analysis of RGC32 expression in tumor tissues. (I) IHC to detect RGC32, N-cadherin and MMP2 in primary tumors. Representative images are shown. Magnification ×400. (J) Column diagram of IHC scores in each group. Each column is the average of five random fields per tumor. n = 3. Bev, bevacizumab.
Figure 5Anlotinib abolishes the effect of bevacizumab and downregulates RGC32, N-cadherin, and MMP2 expression in tumors of mice. (A) Typical image of the primary tumors that formed in mice grafted with A549 cells on the right shoulder, which were treated with bevacizumab, anlotinib or both. Ruler unit: cm. (B) Tumor growth curves for each group. (C) Column diagram of the tumor volume for each group. n = 5. (D) Column diagram of the tumor weight for each group. n = 5. (E) IHC to detect RGC32, N-cadherin and MMP2 in primary tumors. Representative images are shown. Magnification ×400. (F) Column diagram of IHC scores in each group. Each column is the average of five random fields per tumor. n = 5. Bev, bevacizumab; An, anlotinib.
Baseline characteristics and expression of RGC32/N-cadherin of 121 lung adenocarcinoma patients.
| Characteristics | RGC32 expression | N-cadherin expression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive, n (%) | Negative, n (%) | P- value | Positive, n (%) | Negative, n (%) | P- value | |
|
| 0.925 | 0.909 | ||||
| <45 | 6 (6.1%) | 1 (4.6%) | 5 (5.8%) | 2 (5.7%) | ||
| 45-59 | 50 (50.5%) | 12 (54.5%) | 43 (50.0%) | 19 (54.3%) | ||
| ≥60 | 43 (43.4%) | 9 (40.9%) | 38 (44.2%) | 14 (40.0%) | ||
|
| 0.495 | 0.929 | ||||
| male | 53 (53.5%) | 10 (45.5%) | 45 (52.3%) | 18 (51.4%) | ||
| female | 46 (46.5%) | 12 (54.5%) | 41 (47.7%) | 17 (48.6%) | ||
|
| 0.548 | 0.979 | ||||
| yes | 52 (52.5%) | 10 (45.5%) | 44 (51.2%) | 18 (51.4%) | ||
| no | 47 (47.5%) | 12 (54.5%) | 42 (48.8%) | 17 (48.6%) | ||
|
|
|
| ||||
| yes | 41 (41.4%) | 2 (9.1%) | 40 (46.5%) | 3 (8.6%) | ||
| no | 58 (58.6%) | 20 (90.9%) | 46 (53.5%) | 32 (91.4%) | ||
|
|
|
| ||||
| I-II | 61 (61.6%) | 18 (81.8%) | 50 (58.1%) | 29 (82.9%) | ||
| III-IV | 38 (38.4%) | 4 (18.2%) | 36 (41.9%) | 6 (17.1%) | ||
Bold indicate the expression of RGC32 and N-cadherion was correlated with lymph node metastasis and TNM stage.
Figure 6RGC32 and N-cadherin expression and survival analysis of 121 lung adenocarcinoma patients. IHC to detect (A) RGC32 and (B) N-cadherin in normal lung tissue, paracancerous tissue, and different stages of lung adenocarcinoma. Representative images shown. Magnification ×400. Percentages of (C) RGC32 and (D) N-cadherin expression in stages I & II and stages III & IV (n = 79 in stages I & II group, n = 42 in stages III & IV group). Kaplan–Meier plots of overall survival and progression free survival of patients with (E, F) high and low expression of RGC32, and (G, H) high and low expression of N-cadherin in primary lung cancer specimens.
Figure 7Schematic representation of bevacizumab and anlotinib action in RGC32 signaling pathway. Bevacizumab blocks the VEGF-VEGFR pathway and upregulates the expression of bFGF and TGFβ, which upregulates AKT and ERK, and, accordingly, RGC32 expression, which promotes EMT, invasion, and metastasis. Anlotinib downregulates bFGF(R) axis and TGFβ, thus downregulates RGC32. A black line indicates a blocking action, and a red line indicates a stimulating action.