| Literature DB >> 35664742 |
Hui Feng1, Gaofeng Shi1, Hui Liu1, Qian Xu1, Lijia Wang1, Ning Zhang1.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and accuracy of multi-sequence 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of different types of pulmonary nodules.Entities:
Keywords: CT; display ability; magnetic resonance imaging; multi-sequence; pulmonary nodules
Year: 2022 PMID: 35664742 PMCID: PMC9157594 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.844514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Parameters of the applied MRI sequences.
| Parameters | T2-BLADE | T2-HASTE | T1-star VIBE |
|---|---|---|---|
| TR (ms) | 4000 | 1600 | 6.65 |
| TE/TEs (ms) | 79 | 96 | 3.17 |
| Plane | Axial | Axial | Axial |
| FOV (mm) | 380 | 380 | 420 |
| RecFOV (%) | 100 | 75 | 100 |
| Matrix | 320*275 | 320*224 | 320*192 |
| Slice thickness (mm) | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| Breath-hold | NO | YES | NO |
Patient characteristics.
| Characteristics | Finding |
|---|---|
| Age (y) | 55.7 ± 10.3 (47-70) |
| Male (n=33) | 56.8 ± 10.1 (47-68) |
| Female (n=35) | 55.3 ± 9.90 (51-70) |
|
| |
| Middle and lower lobe | 92 |
| Upper lobe | 96 |
|
| |
| SN | 87 |
| PSN | 46 |
| GGN | 55 |
|
| |
| Overall | 7.7 ± 4.2 (3.4-21.1) |
| SN | 7.2 ± 3.1 (3.4-20.3) |
| PSN | 11.8 ± 5.4 (6.2-21.1) |
| GGN | 6.9 ± 2.6 (4-17.7) |
Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. SN, solid nodule; PSN, partial solid nodule; GGN, ground glass nodule.
Figure 1A 50-year-old man with a 7 mm pulmonary solid nodule (arrow) in the right upper lobe. The nodule is clearly seen on the computed tomography image (A) and the images from magnetic resonance image sequences T2-BLADE (B), T2-HASTE (C), and T1-Star-VIBE (D). The arrows represent the location of the nodule.
Figure 2A 45-year-old woman with a 19 mm GGN (arrow) in the right upper lobe. The nodule is clearly seen on the computed tomography image (A) and the magnetic resonance image sequences T2-BLADE (B), T2-HASTE (C), and T1-Star-VIBE (D). The arrows represent the location of the nodule.
The sensitivity of the detection of different subgroups of pulmonary nodules.
| Diameter of pulmonary nodules | Number of nodules | Detected by T1 star-VIBE | Detected by T2- BL- ADE | Detected by T2-HASTE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solid nodule | 87 | 66 (75.9%) | 62 (71.3%) | 55 (63.2%) |
| <6mm | 40 | 20 (50%) | 24 (60%) | 18 (45%) |
| 6-8mm | 15 | 12 (80%) | 13 (87%) | 10 (66.7%) |
| >8mm | 32 | 30 (93.7%) | 29 (90.6%) | 27 (84.3%) |
| Subsolid nodule | 101 | 37 (36.7%) | 72 (71.2%) | 68 (67.3%) |
| PSN | 46 | 28 (60.9%) | 36 (78.2%) | 35 (76.1%) |
| <6mm | 19 | 9 (47.3%) | 13 (68.4%) | 11 (57.9%) |
| ≥6mm | 27 | 19 (70.3%) | 23 (85.1%) | 24 (88.9%) |
| GGN | 55 | 9 (16.4%) | 37 (67.2%) | 32 (58.1%) |
| <6mm | 30 | 4 (13.3%) | 15 (50%) | 12 (40%) |
| ≥6mm | 25 | 5 (20%) | 22 (88%) | 20 (80%) |
| Total | 188 | 103 (54.8%) | 134 (71.3%) | 123 (65.4%) |
The sensitivity was determined according to the Fleischner Society nodule size category.
Mean diameter and mean difference of detected nodules for each sequence and correlation of MRI measurements compared to CT.
| Sequence | Mean diameter of detected nodule by MRI (mm) | Mean difference of detected nodule by MRI compared to CT (mm) | ICC |
|---|---|---|---|
| T2-BLADE | 6.52 ± 2.70 | 0.95 ± 0.34 | 0.98 |
| T2-HASTE | 6.69 ± 2.28 | 0.98 ± 0.39 | 0.94 |
| T1-VIBE | 6.09 ± 3.05 | 0.83 ± 0.35 | 0.98 |
Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. ICC, inter-class correlation coefficient.
The result of image quality score.
| Score | T1 star-VIBE | T2 BLADE | T2 HASTE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observer 1 | Observer 2 | Observer 1 | Observer 2 | Observer 1 | Observer 2 | |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| 3 | 17 | 19 | 23 | 25 | 24 | 27 |
| 4 | 28 | 30 | 22 | 20 | 22 | 17 |
| 5 | 21 | 26 | 15 | 12 | 10 | 13 |
Comparison of CNR and SNR in MRI sequences.
| T1 star-VIBE | T2-BLADE | T2-HASTE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNR | 44.45 ± 28.05 | 17.61 ± 16.364 | 9.92 ± 6.32 |
| SNR | 11.50 ± 4.96 | 4.23 ± 2.64 | 3.32 ± 1.75 |
Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation.