Hongli Liu1, Yongmao Cai1, Zhendong Guo1, Jing Zhou2. 1. School of Science, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China. 2. School of Chemical Engineering, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China.
Abstract
Two-dimensional metallic electrode materials with high energy density and excellent rate capability are crucial in rechargeable ion batteries. In this work, two-dimensional V2N MXene monolayer has been predicted to be an attractive candidate anode material for rechargeable lithium, sodium, and magnesium ion batteries by first-principles calculations. We observe that V2N monolayer is a metallic compound. The ion diffusion barriers on V2N monolayer are predicted to be 0.025, 0.014, 0.004, and 0.058 eV for Li, Na, K, and Mg ions, respectively, which are rather low on the state-of-the-art two-dimensional energy storage materials. In addition, the calculated theoretical capacities of V2N MXene monolayer are 925 mAh/g for Li ion, 463 mAh/g for Na ion, and 1850 mAh/g for Mg ion. The capacity of Li ions on V2N monolayer is much higher than that of Li ions on the conventional anode graphite, and the extralarge capacity for Mg ions on V2N monolayer is ascribed to the two-electron reaction and multilayer adsorption of Mg ions. Last, the average open circuit voltages of the V2N MXene monolayer are also calculated to be 0.32 V for Li ions, 0.24 V for Na ions, and 0.34 V for Mg ions. These results provide a fundamental insight into electrochemical energy storage applications of two-dimensional V2N MXene monolayer as a suitable candidate anode material for rechargeable Li, Na, and Mg ion batteries on the atomic scale.
Two-dimensional metallic electrode materials with high energy density and excellent rate capability are crucial in rechargeable ion batteries. In this work, two-dimensional V2N MXene monolayer has been predicted to be an attractive candidate anode material for rechargeable lithium, sodium, and magnesium ion batteries by first-principles calculations. We observe that V2N monolayer is a metallic compound. The ion diffusion barriers on V2N monolayer are predicted to be 0.025, 0.014, 0.004, and 0.058 eV for Li, Na, K, and Mg ions, respectively, which are rather low on the state-of-the-art two-dimensional energy storage materials. In addition, the calculated theoretical capacities of V2N MXene monolayer are 925 mAh/g for Li ion, 463 mAh/g for Na ion, and 1850 mAh/g for Mg ion. The capacity of Li ions on V2N monolayer is much higher than that of Li ions on the conventional anode graphite, and the extralarge capacity for Mg ions on V2N monolayer is ascribed to the two-electron reaction and multilayer adsorption of Mg ions. Last, the average open circuit voltages of the V2N MXene monolayer are also calculated to be 0.32 V for Li ions, 0.24 V for Na ions, and 0.34 V for Mg ions. These results provide a fundamental insight into electrochemical energy storage applications of two-dimensional V2N MXene monolayer as a suitable candidate anode material for rechargeable Li, Na, and Mg ion batteries on the atomic scale.
Rechargeable lithium-ion
batteries (LIBs) have played an important
role in the electrochemical energy storage devices since the first
commercialization by Sony in 1991,[1] because
of their high energy density, long cycling life, and lightweight design.[2] However, the large-scale application of LIBs
has been hindered by high cost, safety issues, and limited Li reserves.[3,4] Therefore, batteries utilizing other metal ions are urgently needed.
Compared with LIBs, rechargeable sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), potassium-ion
batteries (PIBs), and magnesium-ion batteries (MIBs) have received
much attention due to their abundant source, low cost, and operational
safety.[5−8] Nevertheless, a bottleneck for practical applications of these batteries
is the lack of high-performance electrode materials. For example,
graphite, which is the most commonly used anode for LIBs, is not suitable
in SIBs because of the extremely low capacity (35 mAh/g) caused by
the weak interaction between Na and C atom.[9,10] Multivalent
rechargeable ion batteries based on Mg2+ ions could provide
higher capacity compared with monovalent ion batteries, however, they
have poor mobility due to the stronger electrostatic interactions
in solids and the polarization effect of divalent ions.[11,12]Two-dimensional (2D) materials have attracted much attention
in
electrochemical energy storage because of their high specific surface
area, adequate electrochemically active sites and large interlayer
space, which enhanced the capacities and mobilities.[13−15] Transition metal dichalcogenides, such as MoS2, have
a high theoretical capacity. However, the intrinsically poor electronic
conductivity of MoS2 seriously limits its electrochemical
performance.[15] A new class of 2D transition-metal
carbides/nitrides (so-called MXenes) with a general chemical formula
MX, where
“M” represents an early transition metal element and
“X” refers to C, N, or their blends, are promising anode
materials because of their good electrical conductivity, high rate
performance, high capacity, and so forth.[16−18] Mashtalir et
al. showed experimentally that Li ion capacity of Ti3C2T nanosheets could reach 410
mAh/g with good rate capability.[19] Moreover,
MXenes can be readily intercalated by a wide range of metal ions,
such as Na, K, Mg, and Al ions, which is different from graphite.[20] As the synthesis of MXene is usually performed
in aqueous solutions containing fluoride ions, the surface of the
MXene layers are generally terminated with O, OH, or F.[21,22] Then, those metal ions’ diffusion becomes more difficult
with higher energy barriers because of these surface functional groups.[23,24] Significantly, these terminations can be altered or completely removed
by postprocessing,[25,26] which has a profound effect on
properties. Er et al. studied the energy storage of a variety of metal
ions, including Li, Na, K, and Ca, on Ti3C2 MXene
monolayers by first-principles calculations and revealed the cation
storage mechanisms of MXenes on the atomic scale.[18] Recently, Wu et al. provided a fundamental insight into
Ta2CS2 in the field of energy conversion and
storage.[27]Compared with the carbide
and carbonitride MXenes, it is more difficult
to synthesize nitride MXenes. In addition, the lower cohesive energy
of MX suggests
the lower stability of the products after selective removal, which
may lead to the products dissolution in the presence of hydrofluoric
acid.[28] To date, only Ti4N3, Ti2N, V2N, MoN, and W2N
have been synthesized.[28−31] However, the study shows that it is feasible to transform the carbide
MXenes into nitrides by high-temperature treatment in ammonia,[32] opening the door to chemical synthesis of 2D
nitride MXenes. It should be noted that transition-metal nitrides
provide higher conductivity than the corresponding carbides, which
is desired in the battery applications.[33] Besides, vanadium-based materials with an abundance of compositions
and crystal structures have gained increasing attention because of
their high charge/discharge capacity arising from the multielectron
redox chemistry of vanadium.[34]First-principles
calculation has been proved to be a powerful tool
in studies of electrode materials in the rechargeable ion batteries.
Zhou et al. evaluated some important indexes of the layered compounds
in Materials Project database by database screening and DFT computations,
and achieved over 20 kinds of layered electrode materials for multivalent
batteries and some for SIBs, accelerating the development of battery
materials..[35,36] In this work, we have systematically
investigated the physical and electrochemical properties of V2N MXene monolayer by first-principles calculations, including
structural and electronic properties, ions diffusion barriers, theoretical
specific capacities, and open circuit voltage (OCV) of V2N monolayer as electrode materials for LIBs and beyond. Our studies
revealed that 2D V2N is an ideal candidate anode material
for electrochemical energy storage applications.
Computational
Method
The first-principles calculations are performed using
the Vienna
ab initio simulation package (VASP)[37,38] based on the
density functional theory (DFT).[39,40] In the computations,
valence wave functions are treated by projector augmented wave (PAW)[41] pseudopotential method. The plane-wave cutoff
energy is 450 eV. The exchange-correlation function is described by
the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of the Perdew, Burke,
and Ernzerhof (PBE) functional.[42] To correct
the interactions between the adsorbed metal ions and the 2D electrode,
the van der Waals (vdW) interaction is also included using the DFT-D3
method with Becke–Jonson damping[43,44] and is tested
with the original vdW-DF[45] and “opt”
functionals (optPBE-vdW).[46] For geometry
optimization of unit cell, the Brillouin-zone (BZ) integration is
performed using a regular Γ centered 16 × 16 × 1 k-mesh
within Monkhorst–Pack scheme.[47] To
avoid the spurious interactions, a vacuum space of more than 20 Å
is used. The structural optimizations is performed by using the conjugate
gradient method, and the convergence criterion is set to 1 ×
10–5 eV/atom in energy and 0.01 eV/Å in force.Here, a 4 × 4 × 1 supercell with one adsorbed metal atom
is used to simulate adsorption and diffusion of the metal ions on
V2N monolayer. The diffusion energy barrier and minimum
energy pathways of metal cation diffusion on the V2N monolayer[48] are calculated with the climbing image nudged
elastic band (CI-NEB) method. The force convergence criterion is less
than 0.03 eV/Å in CI-NEB calculations.
Results
and Discussion
Structure and Electronic
Properties of V2N MXene Monolayer
In the crystal
structure of V2N MXene monolayer, the N atoms are sandwiched
between the
V(1)–V(2) bilayer forming an edge-shared V6N octahedron
as shown in Figure a. The optimized in-plane lattice constant of bulk V2N
is 2.904 Å, and the thickness of V2N triple layers
is 2.069 Å with V–N bond length of 1.970 Å. These
values are well consistent with the previously reported theoretical
results of V2N.[49]
Figure 1
(a) Side and
top views of the V2N MXene monolayer, and
the edge-shared octahedron structure of V6N. a, b, and
c represent the possible adsorption sites: top adsorption site, on
top of V(1) atom in the first atomic layer; hcp adsorption site, on
top of N atom in the second atomic layer; fcc adsorption site, on
top of V(2) atom in the third atomic layer. (b) Calculated phonon
dispersion and (c) band structure and density of state of V2N monolayer.
(a) Side and
top views of the V2N MXene monolayer, and
the edge-shared octahedron structure of V6N. a, b, and
c represent the possible adsorption sites: top adsorption site, on
top of V(1) atom in the first atomic layer; hcp adsorption site, on
top of N atom in the second atomic layer; fcc adsorption site, on
top of V(2) atom in the third atomic layer. (b) Calculated phonon
dispersion and (c) band structure and density of state of V2N monolayer.Next, the stability of V2N MXene monolayer was examined
by calculating its phonon dispersion as shown in Figure b. Near the Γ-point,
the two in-plane acoustic phonons displayed linear dispersion, and
the out-of-plane acoustic branch exhibited parabolic energy dispersion,
presenting a typical phonon dispersion characteristic of 2D materials.
No imaginary frequency is found in the considered Brillouin zone.
Thus, the structure of V2N MXene monolayer exhibits phonon
stability. The calculated band structure and density of state of V2N monolayer was also presented in Figure c. The energy band of V2N monolayer
crossing the Ferimi energy indicates its metallic behavior. The electrons
near the Fermi energy that occupy mainly V-3d orbitals hybridized
with seldom occupied N-2p orbitals. This metallic character of the
V2N monolayer makes it more competitive as an electrode
material for LIBs and beyond, compared with the other 2D semconductors
such as transition metal dichalcogenides.
Metal
Atom Adsorption on the V2N MXene Monolayer
In
order to evaluate the electrochemical
performance of V2N monolayer, it is necessary to explore
the preferred adsorption sites of these monovalent and multivalent
metal atoms M (M = Li, Na, K, and Mg). In the V2N MXene
monolayer system, we considered three high symmetry adatom sites for
metal atoms: top adsorption site “a”, hcp adsorption
site “b”, and fcc adsorption site “c”,
as indicated in Figure a. The adsorption energy (Eads) of a
guest M atom on the V2N monolayer is defined aswhere Etotal and are the total energies of V2N 4 × 4 × 1 supercell with and without adsorbed atoms,
respectively. EM is the chemical potential
of the metal atom and is taken as the energy per one guest atom in
its bulk phase. Here the hcp Bravais lattice structure for Mg and
the bcc for Li, Na, and K are used for calculations as they are the
most stable structures respectively at room temperatures and pressures. c is the number of the adsorbed atoms; here c = 1. The Eads values of different guest
atoms for the different adsorption sites of the V2N monolayer
are displayed in Figure a. It is found that all of the studied metal atoms can be effectively
adsorbed on the V2N monolayer as indicated by the negative Eads values. The higher absolute value of Eads suggests the stronger interaction between
the guest metal atom and the V2N monolayer. Overall, the
investigated guest atom prefer to occupy the site “b”
than the other two high symmetry positions “a” and “c”.
This may be caused by the larger electronegativity differences between
the adsorbed atoms and the N atoms. Interesting for K atom, the Eads values of the three sites are almost the
same, which are also verified by its near zero diffusion barrier on
V2N monolayer.
Figure 2
(a) Adsorption energies Eads of Li,
Na, K, and Mg atoms at different adsorption sites of V2N monolayer. (b) Charge density difference of Li, Na, K, and Mg at
the most stable adsorption site of V2N monolayer. Yellow
and blue colors with the isosurface value of 0.0010 e/Bohr3 represent charge accumulation and depletion, respectively.
(a) Adsorption energies Eads of Li,
Na, K, and Mg atoms at different adsorption sites of V2N monolayer. (b) Charge density difference of Li, Na, K, and Mg at
the most stable adsorption site of V2N monolayer. Yellow
and blue colors with the isosurface value of 0.0010 e/Bohr3 represent charge accumulation and depletion, respectively.Furthermore, to obtain an insight into the bonding
of adsorption
adatoms and V2N monolayer, their charge transfer has been
explored based on Bader charge analysis between the guest metal atoms
and the monolayer V2N.[50] The
charge density difference (CDD) of the most stable adsorbed systems
is shown in Figure b, defined as Δρ(r) = ρtotal(r) – ρV2N(r) – ρM(r). Herein, ρtotal(r), ρV2N(r), and ρM(r) represent the charge
densities of the total adsorption system, pristine V2N,
and one metal atom in the same lattice parameter, respectively. This
CDD, as shown in Figure b, clearly visualizes the effect of adsorption on the charge distribution.
From the CDD, the positive charge is mainly distributed on the metal
ions. The Li, Na, K, and Mg atom can transfer 0.850, 0.733, 0.778,
and 0.855 electrons, respectively, to V2N monolayer. The
charge transfer is related not only with the electronegativity difference
but also the number of valence electrons of the adsorbed metal atoms.To obtain a deeper insight into the adsorption behavior of metal
ions, we also performed electron localization functions (ELF) to analyze
the charge distributions of V2N with one and two adsorption
layers. Figure a–d
shows the ELF of the (110) section for V2NM2 (M = Li, Na, K, and Mg). For Li, Na, and Mg, the electrons are spread
out in the M layers forming a negative electron cloud (NEC). The NEC
can screen the repulsion among the positive metal ions (M–M
and M–V), so as to stabilize the adsorption layers.[51] By contrast, there are almost no NEC in the
K layers of V2NK2, indicating that the electrons
are more localized. Thus, this causes strong repulsion between the
K ions and results in a positive Eads.
The screening effect can also be validated by the vertical distances
between metal ions to V2N monolayer. From Section , we know that K has the
longest distance to reduce the repulsive interaction. Since Mg has
two valence electrons compared with one for Li and Na, the screening
effect of NEC is stronger in Mg than that in Li and Na. Therefore,
Mg has the shortest distance, and Li and Na is in the middle. Figure e–g shows
the ELF isosurface (0.5) of the (110) section for V2NM4 (M = Li, Na, and Mg). It is clear that both the second layer
of Li, Na, and Mg are surrounded by NEC. However, there is almost
no NEC in the first adsorption layer of Na. Thus, the V2NNa2 phase is unstable because of strong repulsive interaction,
which results in the positive Eads value
of V2NNa4. The first layer of Li and Mg are
surrounded by NEC, confirming the stable of two layers adsorption.
Figure 3
(a–d)
Electron localization functions of (110) section for
V2NM2 (M = Li, Na, K, and Mg). (e–g)
Electron localization function isosurface (0.5) of the (110) section
for V2NM4 (M = Li, Na, and Mg).
(a–d)
Electron localization functions of (110) section for
V2NM2 (M = Li, Na, K, and Mg). (e–g)
Electron localization function isosurface (0.5) of the (110) section
for V2NM4 (M = Li, Na, and Mg).
Ion Diffusion on the V2N MXene
Monolayer
The charge/discharge rate capability of rechargeable
batteries is closely related to the mobility of cations on the electrodes.
Thus, in this section we studied the energy barriers of adsorbed metal
ions diffusion on the V2N monolayer. As shown in Figure a, the most stable
adsorption site is “b”. Therefore, the diffusion path
of metal ions on V2N monolayer was designed between two
neighboring most stable adsorption sites (b → b′). Here,
12 sampling points are equally and linearly separated on the pathway.
The optimized diffusion paths and diffusion barrier profiles of different
metal ions on V2N monolayer are displayed in Figure . For Li, Na, and Mg ions,
the calculated migration path is from one “b” site to
the nearest “b′” site across a “c”
site on top of V(2) atom in the third atomic layer (i.e., b →
c → b′), which is two most stable adsorption sites via
the metastable adsorption site “c”. The calculated ion
diffusion path is similar to diffusion path of Li ions on Ti3C2.[23] We can see that two saddle
points correspond to the middle position of the b → c and the
c → b′ bridges, and the local energy minimum of the
profiles correspond to the metastable site “c”. However,
for K ions the final path is consistent with the initial path and
a single saddle point is observed in the middle of the b →
b′ bridge with almost zero diffusion barrier 0.004 eV which
is also gained by almost the same adsorption energies of K at the
three symmetry positions as showed in Figure a.
Figure 4
Initial and final ion diffusion paths for (a)
Li, Na, and Mg. (b)
K ions on the V2N monolayer. (c) Diffusion barrier profiles
of Li, Na, K, and Mg ions on the V2N monolayer.
Initial and final ion diffusion paths for (a)
Li, Na, and Mg. (b)
K ions on the V2N monolayer. (c) Diffusion barrier profiles
of Li, Na, K, and Mg ions on the V2N monolayer.The diffusion energy barriers on V2N monolayer
are calculated
in the ascending order: K < Na < Li < Mg ions, with 0.004
eV for K, 0.014 eV for Na, 0.025 eV for Li, and 0.058 eV for Mg ions,
respectively. The Li diffusion barrier on V2N is a little
bit smaller than was reported by Pan.[49] Remarkably, compared with 0.33 eV on graphene[52] and 0.22 eV on VS2,[53] Li ions have much lower diffusion energy barrier on V2N, indicating faster transport and higher rate capability on V2N monolayer. Other metal ions do also, which can also be used
as high-rate electrode materials in rechargeable batteries. Although
the binding energy of Na–V2N system is stronger
than that of the Li–V2N system, Na has a lower diffusion
energy barrier on V2N monolayer than Li. The Na lower diffusion
energy barrier may be related to its larger vertical distance of 2.60
Å, including the radius of the ion than that of Li ion 2.26 Å
from the adsorption guest atom to V2N monolayer. K ion
does also, although K has the largest binding energy with V2N monolayer; the diffusion barrier of K ion is close to zero (∼0.004
eV) with a vertical distance of 3.05 Å to V2N monolayer.
Additionally, Mg ion also shows a relatively larger binding energy
with a relatively small adsorption distance of 2.12 Å. The Mg
ion diffusion energy barrier of ∼0.058 eV is still very low
for the reported 2D energy storage materials. These analyses showed
that 2D V2N is a promising candidate for high rate electrode
material because of low energy barrier of metal ions diffusion.
Storage Capacity and Open Circuit Voltage
of the V2N MXene Monolayer
The specific capacity
and working voltage of electrode materials are two important parameters
in rechargeable ion batteries. Here, we utilized a 4 × 4 ×
1 supercell of V2N monolayer to investigate the storage
capacity. The charge–discharge process of V2N can
be described as the following half-cell reactionwhere x is the valence state
of the metal ions (x = 1 for M = Li, Na, K ions,
and x = 2 for M = Mg ion). To estimate the maximum
storage capacity of different metal ions on V2N monolayer,
we first calculated the evolution of adsorption energy (Eads) per metal atom with the increased concentration of
adsorbed ions.We explored a series of adsorption configurations
with chemical formula V2NMc by placing different
number of metal ions on 2D monolayer, where c = 1/16,
1/4, 1/2, 3/4, 1, and 2 were defined as the number of M ions per chemical
formula V2N. The larger c demonstrates
the higher coverage of the M ions on 2D V2N, as displayed
in Figure b. Although
the stable cation-adsorption site “b” was found in a
4 × 4 × 1 supercell cell, the other two high symmetry sites
“a” and “c” with the increased coverage
are also investigated because the enhanced cation–cation interaction
may lead to the migration of metal ions. The calculations showed that
Li, K, and Mg prefer to staying at the site “c” when c ≥ 1/2, which is different from one metal cation
in a supercell. Na still prefers the site “b” with the
increased coverage. The absorbed atoms of c = 2 represent
that both sides of V2N monolayer are fully covered by the
metal ions. Figure a shows the dependence of Eads on c in V2NMc for different ions. It
can be seen that Eads gradually increases
with the increase of adsorbed metal ions because of the enhanced repulsion
among metal ions. However, this trend is not obvious for Li and Na
when c ≥ 1/2, especially for Mg, and Eads decreases a little. This may be due to the
slight impact of repulsion caused by the relatively smaller ionic
radius comparing to K ions. To ensure the accuracy of calculation,
we also employed two methods of nonlocal correlation functional and
“opt” functional that approximately accounts for dispersion
interactions. As displayed in Figure a, the trend is roughly the same with a little different
of the binding energy. Obviously, for the first adsorption layer of
both sides by Li, Na, and Mg ions on V2N monolayer, the
calculated Eads is −0.634, −0.248,
and −1.073 eV, respectively, which is energetically stable,
ensuring the feasibility of bilateral adsorption. However, the positive Eads value of 0.359 eV for K ions indicates that
the adsorption is unstable when c is larger than
1/2 because of the strong repulsive interaction caused by the relatively
larger ionic radius. It should be noted that the higher storage capacity
could be obtained through multilayer adsorption. Recently, double
Na-atomic layers were observed in one interlayer of the fully intercalated
sample.[54] Hence, we also considered bilayer
adsorption through layer by layer adsorption of metal ions. For the
second adsorption layer, three high symmetry sites including “a”,
“b”, and “c”, were all studied based on
the first layer adsorption of metal ions on both sides of 2D V2N at the most favorable sites.
Figure 5
(a) Dependence of adsorption
energies Eads on c in
V2NMc for different
ions M, with c = 1/16, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, 1, and 2; M
= Li, Na, K, and Mg. The DTF-D3, vdW-DF, and optPBE-vdW represent
three different methods to solved the vdW interaction. (b) Top view
of V2NM.
(a) Dependence of adsorption
energies Eads on c in
V2NMc for different
ions M, with c = 1/16, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, 1, and 2; M
= Li, Na, K, and Mg. The DTF-D3, vdW-DF, and optPBE-vdW represent
three different methods to solved the vdW interaction. (b) Top view
of V2NM.For the second layer, Mg ions show a negative Eads (−0.295 eV) indicating the stable bilayer adsorption.
Li ions show a slightly negative Eads (−0.009
eV), however, the value is comparable to that of the electrode material
Ca2N on which adsorption energy of Na is about −0.003
eV,[55] implying the practicability of bilayer
adsorption. But it is unstable for Na bilayer adsorption because of
a positive Eads (0.276 eV). So, the maximum
number of adsorbed metal ions are c = 4 for Li and
Mg, c = 2 for Na, and c = 0.5 for
K, respectively. In order to further confirm the stability of the
maximum adsorbed configuration, we also calculated their phonon spectra.
Except for V2NK0.5, no imaginary frequency was
found at any wavevector for V2NLi4, V2NMg4, V2NNa2, and V2NK0.25, indicating the dynamically stable of those maximum adsorbed
configurations.We considered bilayer adsorption of both sides
(c = 4) for Li and Mg ions, and one-layer adsorption
of both sides
(c = 2) for Na ions. Only partial-layer adsorption
was taken into consideration for K ions (c = 0.25).
So the estimated theoretical specific capacities are 925, 463, 58,
and 1850 mAh/g for Li, Na, K, and Mg ions, respectively. Significantly,
the theoretical capacity for Li is much higher than that of the conventional
graphite anode used in Li-ion batteries. Despite of the same adsorption
layers, the calculated capacity of multivalent Mg ions is obviously
larger than that of Li ions because it can carry two valence electrons
per atom.Next, we estimated the average of OCV which is another
key parameter
to characterize the output voltage of rechargeable batteries. The
electronic potential during the charge/discharge process can be determined
by change in Gibbs free energy of the system, which is approximately
equal to the difference in total energies before and after guest atoms
adsorption.[18] The expression is described
aswhere , and EM are
the total energy of V2N, and
bulk metal M (M = Li, Na, K or Mg),
respectively. c and x represent
the number and valence state of the adsorbed metal ions, respectively.
As analyzed above, the maximum number of adsorbed ions are c = 4 for V2NLi4/V2NMg4, c = 2 for V2NNa2,
and c = 0.25 for V2NK0.25.
Thus, the average OCVs of monolayer V2N for Li, Na, K,
and Mg ions can be calculated to be 0.32, 0.24, 1.22, and 0.34 V,
respectively. It is found that the average OCV values are all positive
and very low for V2NLi4, V2NNa2, and V2NMg4, further demonstrating
that it is feasible of V2N MXene monolayer as an anode
material for rechargeable Li, Na and Mg ion batteries.V2NK0.25 shows a relatively higher average OCV. The exception
may be due to the much stronger Eads of
K ion on V2N monolayer and its lower K ions coverage.
Comparison to Other 2D electrodes
We compared
V2N monolayer with other 2D electrode materials
about Li and Na ions diffusion barriers on these materials and their
capacities.[27,51,53,55−62] Our predicted small theoretical diffusion barriers and high capacities
for various monovalent and multivalent ions on V2N MXene
indicate that this nitride MXene is capable of high energy density
and excellent rate capability in lithium-ion and beyond lithium-ion
batteries. As is shown in Figure , the Li theoretical capacity of V2N monolayer
is much higher than that of the commercialized anode material graphite
and other 2D electrode materials, such as Ta2CS2, MoS2, VS2, Nb2S2C,
MoC, MoN2, and so on.[27,51,53,56−58,60,61] It is also found that the theoretical Li diffusion barrier on V2N monolayer is quite small among these 2D electrode materials.
For SIBs, the Na theoretical capacity of 463 mAh/g produced by V2N monolayer is higher than that of Ta2CS2, MoC, MoC2, Nb2S2C, and Sr2N,[27,55−57] and also shows
relative low theoretical diffusion barrier. Combined with the low
average OCVs of 0.32 V for Li and 0.24 V for Na, V2N monolayer
exhibits superior electrochemical performance as a promising candidate
for the anode materials of rechargeable Li and Na ion batteries.
Figure 6
A comparison
of V2N monolayer with other 2D electrode
materials: Li and Na ions diffusion barriers on these materials and
their capacities.
A comparison
of V2N monolayer with other 2D electrode
materials: Li and Na ions diffusion barriers on these materials and
their capacities.
Conclusions
We systematically investigated the physical properties and the
electrochemical performances of 2D V2N MXene monolayer
using first-principles calculations. We found that V2N
MXene monolayer is not only dynamically stable but also exhibits metallic
behavior. The diffusion barriers of these metal ions (M = Li, Na,
Mg) on V2N monolayer are rather low (<0.06 eV). The
theoretical specific capacities of V2N monolayer are as
high as 925, 463, and 1850 mAh/g for Li, Na and Mg ions, respectively.
Furthermore, the average OCVs of V2N monolayer for Li,
Na and Mg ions can be calculated to be 0.32, 0.24, and 0.34 V. All
of these calculating results indicate that this nitride MXene V2N can be used as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ion
batteries and beyond.
Authors: Vladislav Kamysbayev; Alexander S Filatov; Huicheng Hu; Xue Rui; Francisco Lagunas; Di Wang; Robert F Klie; Dmitri V Talapin Journal: Science Date: 2020-07-02 Impact factor: 47.728