Literature DB >> 35664630

Two-Dimensional V2N MXene Monolayer as a High-Capacity Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries and Beyond: First-Principles Calculations.

Hongli Liu1, Yongmao Cai1, Zhendong Guo1, Jing Zhou2.   

Abstract

Two-dimensional metallic electrode materials with high energy density and excellent rate capability are crucial in rechargeable ion batteries. In this work, two-dimensional V2N MXene monolayer has been predicted to be an attractive candidate anode material for rechargeable lithium, sodium, and magnesium ion batteries by first-principles calculations. We observe that V2N monolayer is a metallic compound. The ion diffusion barriers on V2N monolayer are predicted to be 0.025, 0.014, 0.004, and 0.058 eV for Li, Na, K, and Mg ions, respectively, which are rather low on the state-of-the-art two-dimensional energy storage materials. In addition, the calculated theoretical capacities of V2N MXene monolayer are 925 mAh/g for Li ion, 463 mAh/g for Na ion, and 1850 mAh/g for Mg ion. The capacity of Li ions on V2N monolayer is much higher than that of Li ions on the conventional anode graphite, and the extralarge capacity for Mg ions on V2N monolayer is ascribed to the two-electron reaction and multilayer adsorption of Mg ions. Last, the average open circuit voltages of the V2N MXene monolayer are also calculated to be 0.32 V for Li ions, 0.24 V for Na ions, and 0.34 V for Mg ions. These results provide a fundamental insight into electrochemical energy storage applications of two-dimensional V2N MXene monolayer as a suitable candidate anode material for rechargeable Li, Na, and Mg ion batteries on the atomic scale.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35664630      PMCID: PMC9161271          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c00936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

Rechargeable lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have played an important role in the electrochemical energy storage devices since the first commercialization by Sony in 1991,[1] because of their high energy density, long cycling life, and lightweight design.[2] However, the large-scale application of LIBs has been hindered by high cost, safety issues, and limited Li reserves.[3,4] Therefore, batteries utilizing other metal ions are urgently needed. Compared with LIBs, rechargeable sodium-ion batteries (SIBs), potassium-ion batteries (PIBs), and magnesium-ion batteries (MIBs) have received much attention due to their abundant source, low cost, and operational safety.[5−8] Nevertheless, a bottleneck for practical applications of these batteries is the lack of high-performance electrode materials. For example, graphite, which is the most commonly used anode for LIBs, is not suitable in SIBs because of the extremely low capacity (35 mAh/g) caused by the weak interaction between Na and C atom.[9,10] Multivalent rechargeable ion batteries based on Mg2+ ions could provide higher capacity compared with monovalent ion batteries, however, they have poor mobility due to the stronger electrostatic interactions in solids and the polarization effect of divalent ions.[11,12] Two-dimensional (2D) materials have attracted much attention in electrochemical energy storage because of their high specific surface area, adequate electrochemically active sites and large interlayer space, which enhanced the capacities and mobilities.[13−15] Transition metal dichalcogenides, such as MoS2, have a high theoretical capacity. However, the intrinsically poor electronic conductivity of MoS2 seriously limits its electrochemical performance.[15] A new class of 2D transition-metal carbides/nitrides (so-called MXenes) with a general chemical formula MX, where “M” represents an early transition metal element and “X” refers to C, N, or their blends, are promising anode materials because of their good electrical conductivity, high rate performance, high capacity, and so forth.[16−18] Mashtalir et al. showed experimentally that Li ion capacity of Ti3C2T nanosheets could reach 410 mAh/g with good rate capability.[19] Moreover, MXenes can be readily intercalated by a wide range of metal ions, such as Na, K, Mg, and Al ions, which is different from graphite.[20] As the synthesis of MXene is usually performed in aqueous solutions containing fluoride ions, the surface of the MXene layers are generally terminated with O, OH, or F.[21,22] Then, those metal ions’ diffusion becomes more difficult with higher energy barriers because of these surface functional groups.[23,24] Significantly, these terminations can be altered or completely removed by postprocessing,[25,26] which has a profound effect on properties. Er et al. studied the energy storage of a variety of metal ions, including Li, Na, K, and Ca, on Ti3C2 MXene monolayers by first-principles calculations and revealed the cation storage mechanisms of MXenes on the atomic scale.[18] Recently, Wu et al. provided a fundamental insight into Ta2CS2 in the field of energy conversion and storage.[27] Compared with the carbide and carbonitride MXenes, it is more difficult to synthesize nitride MXenes. In addition, the lower cohesive energy of MX suggests the lower stability of the products after selective removal, which may lead to the products dissolution in the presence of hydrofluoric acid.[28] To date, only Ti4N3, Ti2N, V2N, MoN, and W2N have been synthesized.[28−31] However, the study shows that it is feasible to transform the carbide MXenes into nitrides by high-temperature treatment in ammonia,[32] opening the door to chemical synthesis of 2D nitride MXenes. It should be noted that transition-metal nitrides provide higher conductivity than the corresponding carbides, which is desired in the battery applications.[33] Besides, vanadium-based materials with an abundance of compositions and crystal structures have gained increasing attention because of their high charge/discharge capacity arising from the multielectron redox chemistry of vanadium.[34] First-principles calculation has been proved to be a powerful tool in studies of electrode materials in the rechargeable ion batteries. Zhou et al. evaluated some important indexes of the layered compounds in Materials Project database by database screening and DFT computations, and achieved over 20 kinds of layered electrode materials for multivalent batteries and some for SIBs, accelerating the development of battery materials..[35,36] In this work, we have systematically investigated the physical and electrochemical properties of V2N MXene monolayer by first-principles calculations, including structural and electronic properties, ions diffusion barriers, theoretical specific capacities, and open circuit voltage (OCV) of V2N monolayer as electrode materials for LIBs and beyond. Our studies revealed that 2D V2N is an ideal candidate anode material for electrochemical energy storage applications.

Computational Method

The first-principles calculations are performed using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP)[37,38] based on the density functional theory (DFT).[39,40] In the computations, valence wave functions are treated by projector augmented wave (PAW)[41] pseudopotential method. The plane-wave cutoff energy is 450 eV. The exchange-correlation function is described by the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of the Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) functional.[42] To correct the interactions between the adsorbed metal ions and the 2D electrode, the van der Waals (vdW) interaction is also included using the DFT-D3 method with Becke–Jonson damping[43,44] and is tested with the original vdW-DF[45] and “opt” functionals (optPBE-vdW).[46] For geometry optimization of unit cell, the Brillouin-zone (BZ) integration is performed using a regular Γ centered 16 × 16 × 1 k-mesh within Monkhorst–Pack scheme.[47] To avoid the spurious interactions, a vacuum space of more than 20 Å is used. The structural optimizations is performed by using the conjugate gradient method, and the convergence criterion is set to 1 × 10–5 eV/atom in energy and 0.01 eV/Å in force. Here, a 4 × 4 × 1 supercell with one adsorbed metal atom is used to simulate adsorption and diffusion of the metal ions on V2N monolayer. The diffusion energy barrier and minimum energy pathways of metal cation diffusion on the V2N monolayer[48] are calculated with the climbing image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) method. The force convergence criterion is less than 0.03 eV/Å in CI-NEB calculations.

Results and Discussion

Structure and Electronic Properties of V2N MXene Monolayer

In the crystal structure of V2N MXene monolayer, the N atoms are sandwiched between the V(1)–V(2) bilayer forming an edge-shared V6N octahedron as shown in Figure a. The optimized in-plane lattice constant of bulk V2N is 2.904 Å, and the thickness of V2N triple layers is 2.069 Å with V–N bond length of 1.970 Å. These values are well consistent with the previously reported theoretical results of V2N.[49]
Figure 1

(a) Side and top views of the V2N MXene monolayer, and the edge-shared octahedron structure of V6N. a, b, and c represent the possible adsorption sites: top adsorption site, on top of V(1) atom in the first atomic layer; hcp adsorption site, on top of N atom in the second atomic layer; fcc adsorption site, on top of V(2) atom in the third atomic layer. (b) Calculated phonon dispersion and (c) band structure and density of state of V2N monolayer.

(a) Side and top views of the V2N MXene monolayer, and the edge-shared octahedron structure of V6N. a, b, and c represent the possible adsorption sites: top adsorption site, on top of V(1) atom in the first atomic layer; hcp adsorption site, on top of N atom in the second atomic layer; fcc adsorption site, on top of V(2) atom in the third atomic layer. (b) Calculated phonon dispersion and (c) band structure and density of state of V2N monolayer. Next, the stability of V2N MXene monolayer was examined by calculating its phonon dispersion as shown in Figure b. Near the Γ-point, the two in-plane acoustic phonons displayed linear dispersion, and the out-of-plane acoustic branch exhibited parabolic energy dispersion, presenting a typical phonon dispersion characteristic of 2D materials. No imaginary frequency is found in the considered Brillouin zone. Thus, the structure of V2N MXene monolayer exhibits phonon stability. The calculated band structure and density of state of V2N monolayer was also presented in Figure c. The energy band of V2N monolayer crossing the Ferimi energy indicates its metallic behavior. The electrons near the Fermi energy that occupy mainly V-3d orbitals hybridized with seldom occupied N-2p orbitals. This metallic character of the V2N monolayer makes it more competitive as an electrode material for LIBs and beyond, compared with the other 2D semconductors such as transition metal dichalcogenides.

Metal Atom Adsorption on the V2N MXene Monolayer

In order to evaluate the electrochemical performance of V2N monolayer, it is necessary to explore the preferred adsorption sites of these monovalent and multivalent metal atoms M (M = Li, Na, K, and Mg). In the V2N MXene monolayer system, we considered three high symmetry adatom sites for metal atoms: top adsorption site “a”, hcp adsorption site “b”, and fcc adsorption site “c”, as indicated in Figure a. The adsorption energy (Eads) of a guest M atom on the V2N monolayer is defined aswhere Etotal and are the total energies of V2N 4 × 4 × 1 supercell with and without adsorbed atoms, respectively. EM is the chemical potential of the metal atom and is taken as the energy per one guest atom in its bulk phase. Here the hcp Bravais lattice structure for Mg and the bcc for Li, Na, and K are used for calculations as they are the most stable structures respectively at room temperatures and pressures. c is the number of the adsorbed atoms; here c = 1. The Eads values of different guest atoms for the different adsorption sites of the V2N monolayer are displayed in Figure a. It is found that all of the studied metal atoms can be effectively adsorbed on the V2N monolayer as indicated by the negative Eads values. The higher absolute value of Eads suggests the stronger interaction between the guest metal atom and the V2N monolayer. Overall, the investigated guest atom prefer to occupy the site “b” than the other two high symmetry positions “a” and “c”. This may be caused by the larger electronegativity differences between the adsorbed atoms and the N atoms. Interesting for K atom, the Eads values of the three sites are almost the same, which are also verified by its near zero diffusion barrier on V2N monolayer.
Figure 2

(a) Adsorption energies Eads of Li, Na, K, and Mg atoms at different adsorption sites of V2N monolayer. (b) Charge density difference of Li, Na, K, and Mg at the most stable adsorption site of V2N monolayer. Yellow and blue colors with the isosurface value of 0.0010 e/Bohr3 represent charge accumulation and depletion, respectively.

(a) Adsorption energies Eads of Li, Na, K, and Mg atoms at different adsorption sites of V2N monolayer. (b) Charge density difference of Li, Na, K, and Mg at the most stable adsorption site of V2N monolayer. Yellow and blue colors with the isosurface value of 0.0010 e/Bohr3 represent charge accumulation and depletion, respectively. Furthermore, to obtain an insight into the bonding of adsorption adatoms and V2N monolayer, their charge transfer has been explored based on Bader charge analysis between the guest metal atoms and the monolayer V2N.[50] The charge density difference (CDD) of the most stable adsorbed systems is shown in Figure b, defined as Δρ(r) = ρtotal(r) – ρV2N(r) – ρM(r). Herein, ρtotal(r), ρV2N(r), and ρM(r) represent the charge densities of the total adsorption system, pristine V2N, and one metal atom in the same lattice parameter, respectively. This CDD, as shown in Figure b, clearly visualizes the effect of adsorption on the charge distribution. From the CDD, the positive charge is mainly distributed on the metal ions. The Li, Na, K, and Mg atom can transfer 0.850, 0.733, 0.778, and 0.855 electrons, respectively, to V2N monolayer. The charge transfer is related not only with the electronegativity difference but also the number of valence electrons of the adsorbed metal atoms. To obtain a deeper insight into the adsorption behavior of metal ions, we also performed electron localization functions (ELF) to analyze the charge distributions of V2N with one and two adsorption layers. Figure a–d shows the ELF of the (110) section for V2NM2 (M = Li, Na, K, and Mg). For Li, Na, and Mg, the electrons are spread out in the M layers forming a negative electron cloud (NEC). The NEC can screen the repulsion among the positive metal ions (M–M and M–V), so as to stabilize the adsorption layers.[51] By contrast, there are almost no NEC in the K layers of V2NK2, indicating that the electrons are more localized. Thus, this causes strong repulsion between the K ions and results in a positive Eads. The screening effect can also be validated by the vertical distances between metal ions to V2N monolayer. From Section , we know that K has the longest distance to reduce the repulsive interaction. Since Mg has two valence electrons compared with one for Li and Na, the screening effect of NEC is stronger in Mg than that in Li and Na. Therefore, Mg has the shortest distance, and Li and Na is in the middle. Figure e–g shows the ELF isosurface (0.5) of the (110) section for V2NM4 (M = Li, Na, and Mg). It is clear that both the second layer of Li, Na, and Mg are surrounded by NEC. However, there is almost no NEC in the first adsorption layer of Na. Thus, the V2NNa2 phase is unstable because of strong repulsive interaction, which results in the positive Eads value of V2NNa4. The first layer of Li and Mg are surrounded by NEC, confirming the stable of two layers adsorption.
Figure 3

(a–d) Electron localization functions of (110) section for V2NM2 (M = Li, Na, K, and Mg). (e–g) Electron localization function isosurface (0.5) of the (110) section for V2NM4 (M = Li, Na, and Mg).

(a–d) Electron localization functions of (110) section for V2NM2 (M = Li, Na, K, and Mg). (e–g) Electron localization function isosurface (0.5) of the (110) section for V2NM4 (M = Li, Na, and Mg).

Ion Diffusion on the V2N MXene Monolayer

The charge/discharge rate capability of rechargeable batteries is closely related to the mobility of cations on the electrodes. Thus, in this section we studied the energy barriers of adsorbed metal ions diffusion on the V2N monolayer. As shown in Figure a, the most stable adsorption site is “b”. Therefore, the diffusion path of metal ions on V2N monolayer was designed between two neighboring most stable adsorption sites (b → b′). Here, 12 sampling points are equally and linearly separated on the pathway. The optimized diffusion paths and diffusion barrier profiles of different metal ions on V2N monolayer are displayed in Figure . For Li, Na, and Mg ions, the calculated migration path is from one “b” site to the nearest “b′” site across a “c” site on top of V(2) atom in the third atomic layer (i.e., b → c → b′), which is two most stable adsorption sites via the metastable adsorption site “c”. The calculated ion diffusion path is similar to diffusion path of Li ions on Ti3C2.[23] We can see that two saddle points correspond to the middle position of the b → c and the c → b′ bridges, and the local energy minimum of the profiles correspond to the metastable site “c”. However, for K ions the final path is consistent with the initial path and a single saddle point is observed in the middle of the b → b′ bridge with almost zero diffusion barrier 0.004 eV which is also gained by almost the same adsorption energies of K at the three symmetry positions as showed in Figure a.
Figure 4

Initial and final ion diffusion paths for (a) Li, Na, and Mg. (b) K ions on the V2N monolayer. (c) Diffusion barrier profiles of Li, Na, K, and Mg ions on the V2N monolayer.

Initial and final ion diffusion paths for (a) Li, Na, and Mg. (b) K ions on the V2N monolayer. (c) Diffusion barrier profiles of Li, Na, K, and Mg ions on the V2N monolayer. The diffusion energy barriers on V2N monolayer are calculated in the ascending order: K < Na < Li < Mg ions, with 0.004 eV for K, 0.014 eV for Na, 0.025 eV for Li, and 0.058 eV for Mg ions, respectively. The Li diffusion barrier on V2N is a little bit smaller than was reported by Pan.[49] Remarkably, compared with 0.33 eV on graphene[52] and 0.22 eV on VS2,[53] Li ions have much lower diffusion energy barrier on V2N, indicating faster transport and higher rate capability on V2N monolayer. Other metal ions do also, which can also be used as high-rate electrode materials in rechargeable batteries. Although the binding energy of Na–V2N system is stronger than that of the Li–V2N system, Na has a lower diffusion energy barrier on V2N monolayer than Li. The Na lower diffusion energy barrier may be related to its larger vertical distance of 2.60 Å, including the radius of the ion than that of Li ion 2.26 Å from the adsorption guest atom to V2N monolayer. K ion does also, although K has the largest binding energy with V2N monolayer; the diffusion barrier of K ion is close to zero (∼0.004 eV) with a vertical distance of 3.05 Å to V2N monolayer. Additionally, Mg ion also shows a relatively larger binding energy with a relatively small adsorption distance of 2.12 Å. The Mg ion diffusion energy barrier of ∼0.058 eV is still very low for the reported 2D energy storage materials. These analyses showed that 2D V2N is a promising candidate for high rate electrode material because of low energy barrier of metal ions diffusion.

Storage Capacity and Open Circuit Voltage of the V2N MXene Monolayer

The specific capacity and working voltage of electrode materials are two important parameters in rechargeable ion batteries. Here, we utilized a 4 × 4 × 1 supercell of V2N monolayer to investigate the storage capacity. The charge–discharge process of V2N can be described as the following half-cell reactionwhere x is the valence state of the metal ions (x = 1 for M = Li, Na, K ions, and x = 2 for M = Mg ion). To estimate the maximum storage capacity of different metal ions on V2N monolayer, we first calculated the evolution of adsorption energy (Eads) per metal atom with the increased concentration of adsorbed ions. We explored a series of adsorption configurations with chemical formula V2NMc by placing different number of metal ions on 2D monolayer, where c = 1/16, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, 1, and 2 were defined as the number of M ions per chemical formula V2N. The larger c demonstrates the higher coverage of the M ions on 2D V2N, as displayed in Figure b. Although the stable cation-adsorption site “b” was found in a 4 × 4 × 1 supercell cell, the other two high symmetry sites “a” and “c” with the increased coverage are also investigated because the enhanced cation–cation interaction may lead to the migration of metal ions. The calculations showed that Li, K, and Mg prefer to staying at the site “c” when c ≥ 1/2, which is different from one metal cation in a supercell. Na still prefers the site “b” with the increased coverage. The absorbed atoms of c = 2 represent that both sides of V2N monolayer are fully covered by the metal ions. Figure a shows the dependence of Eads on c in V2NMc for different ions. It can be seen that Eads gradually increases with the increase of adsorbed metal ions because of the enhanced repulsion among metal ions. However, this trend is not obvious for Li and Na when c ≥ 1/2, especially for Mg, and Eads decreases a little. This may be due to the slight impact of repulsion caused by the relatively smaller ionic radius comparing to K ions. To ensure the accuracy of calculation, we also employed two methods of nonlocal correlation functional and “opt” functional that approximately accounts for dispersion interactions. As displayed in Figure a, the trend is roughly the same with a little different of the binding energy. Obviously, for the first adsorption layer of both sides by Li, Na, and Mg ions on V2N monolayer, the calculated Eads is −0.634, −0.248, and −1.073 eV, respectively, which is energetically stable, ensuring the feasibility of bilateral adsorption. However, the positive Eads value of 0.359 eV for K ions indicates that the adsorption is unstable when c is larger than 1/2 because of the strong repulsive interaction caused by the relatively larger ionic radius. It should be noted that the higher storage capacity could be obtained through multilayer adsorption. Recently, double Na-atomic layers were observed in one interlayer of the fully intercalated sample.[54] Hence, we also considered bilayer adsorption through layer by layer adsorption of metal ions. For the second adsorption layer, three high symmetry sites including “a”, “b”, and “c”, were all studied based on the first layer adsorption of metal ions on both sides of 2D V2N at the most favorable sites.
Figure 5

(a) Dependence of adsorption energies Eads on c in V2NMc for different ions M, with c = 1/16, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, 1, and 2; M = Li, Na, K, and Mg. The DTF-D3, vdW-DF, and optPBE-vdW represent three different methods to solved the vdW interaction. (b) Top view of V2NM.

(a) Dependence of adsorption energies Eads on c in V2NMc for different ions M, with c = 1/16, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, 1, and 2; M = Li, Na, K, and Mg. The DTF-D3, vdW-DF, and optPBE-vdW represent three different methods to solved the vdW interaction. (b) Top view of V2NM. For the second layer, Mg ions show a negative Eads (−0.295 eV) indicating the stable bilayer adsorption. Li ions show a slightly negative Eads (−0.009 eV), however, the value is comparable to that of the electrode material Ca2N on which adsorption energy of Na is about −0.003 eV,[55] implying the practicability of bilayer adsorption. But it is unstable for Na bilayer adsorption because of a positive Eads (0.276 eV). So, the maximum number of adsorbed metal ions are c = 4 for Li and Mg, c = 2 for Na, and c = 0.5 for K, respectively. In order to further confirm the stability of the maximum adsorbed configuration, we also calculated their phonon spectra. Except for V2NK0.5, no imaginary frequency was found at any wavevector for V2NLi4, V2NMg4, V2NNa2, and V2NK0.25, indicating the dynamically stable of those maximum adsorbed configurations. We considered bilayer adsorption of both sides (c = 4) for Li and Mg ions, and one-layer adsorption of both sides (c = 2) for Na ions. Only partial-layer adsorption was taken into consideration for K ions (c = 0.25). So the estimated theoretical specific capacities are 925, 463, 58, and 1850 mAh/g for Li, Na, K, and Mg ions, respectively. Significantly, the theoretical capacity for Li is much higher than that of the conventional graphite anode used in Li-ion batteries. Despite of the same adsorption layers, the calculated capacity of multivalent Mg ions is obviously larger than that of Li ions because it can carry two valence electrons per atom. Next, we estimated the average of OCV which is another key parameter to characterize the output voltage of rechargeable batteries. The electronic potential during the charge/discharge process can be determined by change in Gibbs free energy of the system, which is approximately equal to the difference in total energies before and after guest atoms adsorption.[18] The expression is described aswhere , and EM are the total energy of V2N, and bulk metal M (M = Li, Na, K or Mg), respectively. c and x represent the number and valence state of the adsorbed metal ions, respectively. As analyzed above, the maximum number of adsorbed ions are c = 4 for V2NLi4/V2NMg4, c = 2 for V2NNa2, and c = 0.25 for V2NK0.25. Thus, the average OCVs of monolayer V2N for Li, Na, K, and Mg ions can be calculated to be 0.32, 0.24, 1.22, and 0.34 V, respectively. It is found that the average OCV values are all positive and very low for V2NLi4, V2NNa2, and V2NMg4, further demonstrating that it is feasible of V2N MXene monolayer as an anode material for rechargeable Li, Na and Mg ion batteries.V2NK0.25 shows a relatively higher average OCV. The exception may be due to the much stronger Eads of K ion on V2N monolayer and its lower K ions coverage.

Comparison to Other 2D electrodes

We compared V2N monolayer with other 2D electrode materials about Li and Na ions diffusion barriers on these materials and their capacities.[27,51,53,55−62] Our predicted small theoretical diffusion barriers and high capacities for various monovalent and multivalent ions on V2N MXene indicate that this nitride MXene is capable of high energy density and excellent rate capability in lithium-ion and beyond lithium-ion batteries. As is shown in Figure , the Li theoretical capacity of V2N monolayer is much higher than that of the commercialized anode material graphite and other 2D electrode materials, such as Ta2CS2, MoS2, VS2, Nb2S2C, MoC, MoN2, and so on.[27,51,53,56−58,60,61] It is also found that the theoretical Li diffusion barrier on V2N monolayer is quite small among these 2D electrode materials. For SIBs, the Na theoretical capacity of 463 mAh/g produced by V2N monolayer is higher than that of Ta2CS2, MoC, MoC2, Nb2S2C, and Sr2N,[27,55−57] and also shows relative low theoretical diffusion barrier. Combined with the low average OCVs of 0.32 V for Li and 0.24 V for Na, V2N monolayer exhibits superior electrochemical performance as a promising candidate for the anode materials of rechargeable Li and Na ion batteries.
Figure 6

A comparison of V2N monolayer with other 2D electrode materials: Li and Na ions diffusion barriers on these materials and their capacities.

A comparison of V2N monolayer with other 2D electrode materials: Li and Na ions diffusion barriers on these materials and their capacities.

Conclusions

We systematically investigated the physical properties and the electrochemical performances of 2D V2N MXene monolayer using first-principles calculations. We found that V2N MXene monolayer is not only dynamically stable but also exhibits metallic behavior. The diffusion barriers of these metal ions (M = Li, Na, Mg) on V2N monolayer are rather low (<0.06 eV). The theoretical specific capacities of V2N monolayer are as high as 925, 463, and 1850 mAh/g for Li, Na and Mg ions, respectively. Furthermore, the average OCVs of V2N monolayer for Li, Na and Mg ions can be calculated to be 0.32, 0.24, and 0.34 V. All of these calculating results indicate that this nitride MXene V2N can be used as a high-performance anode material for lithium-ion batteries and beyond.
  35 in total

1.  van der Waals density functional for general geometries.

Authors:  M Dion; H Rydberg; E Schröder; D C Langreth; B I Lundqvist
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Enhanced Li Adsorption and Diffusion on MoS2 Zigzag Nanoribbons by Edge Effects: A Computational Study.

Authors:  Yafei Li; Dihua Wu; Zhen Zhou; Carlos R Cabrera; Zhongfang Chen
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 6.475

3.  Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1996-10-15

4.  Projector augmented-wave method.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1994-12-15

5.  2D Electrides as Promising Anode Materials for Na-Ion Batteries from First-Principles Study.

Authors:  Junping Hu; Bo Xu; Shengyuan A Yang; Shan Guan; Chuying Ouyang; Yugui Yao
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 9.229

6.  Covalent surface modifications and superconductivity of two-dimensional metal carbide MXenes.

Authors:  Vladislav Kamysbayev; Alexander S Filatov; Huicheng Hu; Xue Rui; Francisco Lagunas; Di Wang; Robert F Klie; Dmitri V Talapin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Ti₃C₂ MXene as a high capacity electrode material for metal (Li, Na, K, Ca) ion batteries.

Authors:  Dequan Er; Junwen Li; Michael Naguib; Yury Gogotsi; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 9.229

8.  Synthesis of two-dimensional titanium nitride Ti4N3 (MXene).

Authors:  Patrick Urbankowski; Babak Anasori; Taron Makaryan; Dequan Er; Sankalp Kota; Patrick L Walsh; Mengqiang Zhao; Vivek B Shenoy; Michel W Barsoum; Yury Gogotsi
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 7.790

9.  Metallic VO2 monolayer as an anode material for Li, Na, K, Mg or Ca ion storage: a first-principle study.

Authors:  Yusheng Wang; Nahong Song; Xiaoyan Song; Tianjie Zhang; Qiaoli Zhang; Meng Li
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.036

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.