Dongling Yu1, Huiling Zhang1, Xiaoyu Feng1, Dahai Liao1, Nanxing Wu1,2. 1. School of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Jingdezhen Ceramic Institute, Jingdezhen 333403, Jiangxi, China. 2. Laboratory of Ceramic Material Processing Technology Engineering, Jingdezhen 333403, Jiangxi, China.
Abstract
To investigate the subsurface damage of 6H-SiC nanofriction, this paper uses molecular dynamics analysis to analyze the loading process of friction 6H-SiC surfaces, thus providing an in-depth analysis of the formation mechanism of subsurface damage from microscopic crystal structure deformation characteristics. This paper constructs a diamond friction 6H-SiC nanomodel, combining the radial distribution function, dislocation extraction method, and diamond identification method with experimental analysis to verify the dislocation evolution process, stress distribution, and crack extension to investigate the subsurface damage mechanism. During the friction process, the kinetic and potential energies as well as the temperature of the 6H-SiC workpiece basically tend to rise, accompanied by the generation of dislocated lumps and cracks on the sides of the 6H-SiC workpiece. The stresses generated by friction during the plastic deformation phase lead to dislocations in the vicinity of the diamond tip friction, and the process of dislocation nucleation expansion is accompanied by energy exchange. Dislocation formation is found to be the basis for crack generation, and cracks and peeled blocks constitute the subsurface damage of 6H-SiC workpieces by diamond identification methods. Friction experiments validate microscopic crystal changes against macroscopic crack generation, which complements the analysis of the damage mechanism of the simulated 6H-sic nanofriction subsurface.
To investigate the subsurface damage of 6H-SiC nanofriction, this paper uses molecular dynamics analysis to analyze the loading process of friction 6H-SiC surfaces, thus providing an in-depth analysis of the formation mechanism of subsurface damage from microscopic crystal structure deformation characteristics. This paper constructs a diamond friction 6H-SiC nanomodel, combining the radial distribution function, dislocation extraction method, and diamond identification method with experimental analysis to verify the dislocation evolution process, stress distribution, and crack extension to investigate the subsurface damage mechanism. During the friction process, the kinetic and potential energies as well as the temperature of the 6H-SiC workpiece basically tend to rise, accompanied by the generation of dislocated lumps and cracks on the sides of the 6H-SiC workpiece. The stresses generated by friction during the plastic deformation phase lead to dislocations in the vicinity of the diamond tip friction, and the process of dislocation nucleation expansion is accompanied by energy exchange. Dislocation formation is found to be the basis for crack generation, and cracks and peeled blocks constitute the subsurface damage of 6H-SiC workpieces by diamond identification methods. Friction experiments validate microscopic crystal changes against macroscopic crack generation, which complements the analysis of the damage mechanism of the simulated 6H-sic nanofriction subsurface.
6H-SiC is characterized
by high hardness,[1] high stiffness,[2] and a high forbidden
band width[3] and is widely used in high-temperature,
high-radiation aerospace[4] and high-voltage,
high-magnetic-field optoelectronic integration[5] as well as biomedical applications.[6] Conventional
grinding methods can no longer meet the requirements of nanoscale
machining[7] and efficient and high precision
of atomic-level 6H-SiC materials with the development of the ultra-precision
manufacturing technology. The ultra-precision machining technology[8,9] is one of the effective methods to achieve non-destructive machining.
The ultra-hardness and brittleness of 6H-SiC[10,11] and the damage caused by defects such as crystal fracture, crystalline
transformation, dislocation slip, and microcracking during reworking[12−15] affect the performance of machined parts. The temperature gradient
of friction, friction parameters, and parameter changes of residual
stresses can affect the surface deformation damage of 6H-SiC to different
degrees. The material contact surface stress generated by friction
is the main cause of dislocation formation, and the extensional change
of dislocation is the key to crack formation. An in-depth study of
material removal mechanisms such as surface generation, subsurface
damage, and tool wear during nanomachining of silicon carbide can
not only improve the quality of mechanics of 6H-SiC materials but
also promote the development of the product technology of 6H-SiC materials.Some scholars are now exploring the performance characteristics
of silicon carbide by means of high-precision lathe machining and
polishing and finite element analysis to further investigate the formation
mechanism of friction on subsurface damage at the nanoscale. Duan
et al.[16] observed the removal process of
single-crystal SiC by scratching with conical diamond abrasive grains
with different tip fillet radii and found that the elastic–plastic
deformation critical point and deformation mode change as the diamond
radius increases, the brittle-plastic critical-brittle removal transition
point[17] keeps getting deeper, the microcracks
become longer, and the material damage form escalates. Tian et al.[18] explored the removal of subsurface defects from
6H-SiC surfaces by friction experiments based on molecular dynamics
simulation methods and found that the deformation of the material
consisted mainly of plastic amorphous transformation and dislocation
slip and also found that less amorphous deformation of the C phase
compared to Si indicated better material removal. Their study lays
the foundation for the selection of processing control parameters
for optimal surface quality. Xiao et al.[19] performed a visualization study of 6H-SiC using reproduction of
the interaction potential of high-temperature elastoplasticity of
silicon carbide and found that the corresponding potential of elastoplasticity
of 6H-SiC HPPT and dislocation activity act together, with dislocations
playing a dominant role in crack damage. Greiner et al.[20] combined molecular dynamics simulation methods
with friction experiments to observe the high-purity copper under
friction loading the evolution of the peritectic structure, observing
the activity of dislocations, as well as dislocation movement trajectories
and subgrain boundaries of the core and found and hypothesized that
the clusters formed on the surface after friction introduce a new
stage of damage, while causing recrystallization of the surface due
to rotational friction. The above studies show that subsurface damage
is mostly caused by the formation of dislocations, and the nucleation
expansion of dislocations becomes a breakthrough for exploring 6H-SiC,
and the strength of the tool and subsurface damage of the workpiece
are the focus of production processing. Therefore, the process and
internal stress of 6H-SiC friction are deeply analyzed from the nano
perspective, and the subsurface damage mechanism is analyzed in combination
with experiments to further improve the precision of the 6H-SiC material
processing process.To investigate the subsurface damage of
6H-SiC nanofriction, this
paper analyzes the loading process of the 6H-SiC nanofriction surface
based on the molecular dynamics analysis method. The subsurface damage
mechanism is investigated by analyzing the dislocation evolution,
stress distribution, and crack extension. In order to investigate
the surface friction of 6H-SiC and to gain insight into the subsurface
damage mechanism, the friction process is monitored in real time by
visualization software. This method is a guideline for the in-depth
understanding of the surface friction mechanism of 6H-SiC and the
improvement of the non-destructive processing technology of 6H-SiC.
6H-SiC Simulation Modeling
Simulation
Model Construction
To
ensure the accuracy of the simulated friction process, a three-dimensional
molecular dynamics model containing a yellow diamond abrasive and
a blue silicon carbide workpiece was established, as shown in Figure .
Figure 1
Simulation model of the
6H-SiC nano-orthogonal cutting.
Simulation model of the
6H-SiC nano-orthogonal cutting.The simulation does not take into account the deformation of the
indenter and sets the indenter as a rigid body. The dimensions of
the simulated box are 30 nm × 12 nm × 17 nm, the diameter
of the indenter is 2.5 nm, the tip height is h =
2.9 nm, and the indenter extension length is 0.8 nm, containing a
total of 9811 atoms. The 6H-SiC artifact has a size of 25 nm ×
12 nm × 15 nm and contains a total of 389,207 atoms. To eliminate
boundary disturbances in modeling, the X- and Z-directions are set as periodic boundary conditions and
the Y-direction is set as the acyclic boundary condition.[21] To simulate the friction process more accurately,
the 6H-SiC and diamond indenter atoms were divided into a thermostatic
layer of atoms with a thickness of 1 nm and a boundary layer of atoms
according to Newton’s law of motion, where the boundary layer
can fix the atomic boundaries and the thermostatic layer ensures the
heat exchange of the internal atoms,[22] and
the Newton layer in the figure is the atomic layer for the simulated
friction test. Balint[23] et al. indicated
that as a friction tool, the friction depth of diamond would have
a certain impact on the deformation of the workpiece. When the friction
depth of the tool is small relative to the thickness of the workpiece,
the friction decreases and gradually increases with the increase of
the contact depth and has little influence on the elastic field, and
the effect of the shallow friction depth on the length of the dislocation
is also small. Therefore, in order to ensure the accuracy of the simulation
effect, reduce the influence of the tool on the friction effect, and
facilitate the subsequent dislocation observation, the friction depth
in this paper is set at 3 nm. The friction simulation test was performed
along the negative direction of the Y-axis. The data
are shown in Table .
Table 1
Simulation Parameters and Values of
6H-SiC Nanofriction
parameter
values
simulated box size
30 nm × 12 nm × 17 nm
tool diameter
2.5 nm
length of the tool
tip
2.9 nm
number of atoms in the workpiece
9811
6H-SiC workpiece size
25 nm × 12 nm × 15 nm
number of atoms in the 6H-SiC workpiece
389,207
depth of the
cutting
3 nm
cutting crystal
(0001)
Tersoff Potential Function
The selection
of the potential function is an important issue in the field of studying
molecular dynamics. The potential function determines the physical
and chemical properties of the modeled material; therefore, the accuracy
of the potential function selection determines the accuracy and precision
of the simulation results. The Tersoff potential function[24] is based on quantum mechanics, where the interatomic
bond levels depend on their own environment, and the stronger their
bonds, the more accurately they can calculate the interatomic forces
in covalent systems when there are more atoms around them. The Tersoff
potential function is applicable to materials with more complex structures
such as diamond and silicon carbide. 6H-SiC belongs to covalently
bonded crystals, and the calculation of the interatomic potential
energy should consider the interaction between the polyatomic covalent
bonds. Therefore, the Tersoff potential function is used to describe
the interaction forces of Si-Si, C-C, and C-Si atomic bonds in 6H-SiC,
which is expressed asThe expression for the potential energy
between atoms iswhere V is the potential energy function between
atoms i and j, fA denotes the
attractive interaction function between atomic pairs, which is related
to the covalent bonding bond energy, fR is the repulsive interaction function between atomic pairs, which
is related to the electron fluctuation orthogonality, the Tersoff
potential function takes into account the influence factor of the
surrounding environment and introduces the truncation function fC for interatomic interactions to limit the
range of action of the potential function V, and r denotes the distance between atom i and atom j. The low-valence function b contains the interdependence on the bond angle
and the many-body interaction, A and B denote the attraction term binding energy and the repulsion term
binding energy, respectively, R is the truncation
length, β is the bond level coefficient, ζ is the bond angle energy, and θ denotes the
bond angle between atoms.
Simulation Environment
Settings
In
molecular dynamics simulation, the whole system needs to be relaxated
after modeling. In order to keep the system temperature in a constant
temperature range, transfer the heat induced by the indenter, and
ensure the equilibrium state of the system before the friction, the
atoms of the constant temperature layer were set at about 300 K using
the regular system synthesis (NVT).[25] During the friction simulation, the friction speed was
set to 50 m/s and along the negative direction of the Y-axis with a time step of 1 fs in order to save computational time
while ensuring the accuracy of the experimental results. The simulation
was performed in a massively parallel machine (Lammps)[26] developed by Plimpton. The atomic microscopic
changes were monitored in real time by a visualization tool (Ovito)[27] monitored in real time, and the simulation environment
parameters are shown in Table .
Table 2
Simulated Environmental Parameters
relevant
parameter
parameter
values
ensemble
(NVT)
cutting crystal
(0001)
cutting speed
50 m/s
creasing
temperature
300 K
cutting step length
1 fs
Results
and Discussion
Analysis of Friction Force
6H-SiC,
as a brittle ceramic material, will undergo a certain elastic–plastic
deformation by the friction of the diamond grinding tool in the process
of friction. Newton’s equations of motion and the superposition
theorem are the theoretical basis of molecular dynamics. The interatomic
trajectories are derived from the equations of the laws of motion
in classical physics. The molecular dynamics method ignores the quantum
effect between particles. For particle i, the equation
of motion is as followsThe frictional forces Fx, Fy, and Fz in the three directions
of the friction process are shown in Figure . It can be seen from the figure that with
the increase of the friction distance, the frictional forces in different
directions change differently, but the general trend is basically
the same, with an upward trend. This is due to the fact that in the
process of friction, the 6H-SiC workpiece is deformed and phase-transformed
in the contact part under the action of shear stress, and the energy
transformation in the system, which is accompanied by the breaking
of covalent bonds, requires greater frictional force, so the friction
force becomes larger; at the same time, some chemical energy is transformed
into heat energy and the temperature rises. As can be seen in the
figure, the friction force in all directions is 0 at the beginning,
and with the increase of distance, the trend of friction force along
the Y- and Z-directions is basically
the same; moreover, the fluctuation degree does not change much, basically
showing a more stable trend and indicating that the simulated friction
indentation system is well balanced during the chilling phase. Figure is a graph of the
change of friction force in each direction of 6H-SiC, from which it
can be seen that with the increase of friction distance, the friction
force changes differently in different directions, but the general
trend is basically the same: all have an upward trend. This is due
to the deformation and phase change in the contact part of the 6H-SiC
workpiece under the action of shear stress during the process of friction
and the energy transformation in the system. As the process of friction
is accompanied by the breaking of covalent bonds, a greater frictional
force is required, while some of the chemical energy is converted
into heat and the temperature rises. As can be seen in the figure,
the friction force in all directions is 0 at the beginning, and with
the increase of distance, the trend of friction force along the Y- and Z-directions is basically the same;
moreover, the fluctuation degree does not change much, basically showing
a more stable trend and indicating that the simulated friction indentation
system is well balanced during the chilling phase. However, there
is a certain difference between the friction force along the X-direction and the above two forces. As shown in (a), when
the friction distance is 0.2 nm, the friction force decreases for
the first time instead of rising in the x-direction,
which may be related to the lattice arrangement of 6H-SiC. The X-direction corresponds to the [101̅0] crystal direction,
and the lattice arrangement of 6H-SiC in this direction is a “Z-type”
arrangement. The Si–C double-layer arrangement of 6H-SiC is
ABCACB–ABCACB, with the perpendicular arrangement of atoms
of 6H-SiC in the z-direction, resulting in a blocked friction; the
normal force will be larger. The same phenomenon occurs in (b), but
the reason for the drop in the X-direction here is
that the resistance becomes smaller at 4.1 nm because the tool has
formed defects or cracks in the X-direction with
larger voids before 4.1 nm.
Figure 2
Variation curves of friction in each direction
of 6H-SiC.
Variation curves of friction in each direction
of 6H-SiC.
Friction
Process Energy Change Analysis
In order to have a deeper
understanding of the changes during the
deformation damage of 6H-SiC, the trend graphs of the friction force
as well as the potential energy are extracted in this study, as shown
in Figure . In Figure a, the curve of force
basically shows a smooth trend after a continuous rise and no further
change, indicating that the system eventually stays in an equilibrium
position as time increases during the friction process due to the
initial conditions set. The friction force is small at the beginning,
and the covalent bonds between the silicon carbide atoms are difficult
to break and the required force slowly becomes larger, so the curve
keeps showing an upward trend and basically stops changing at about
7 nm. However, at the friction distance of 15.8 nm, the force decreases,
and the potential also shows small fluctuations at this time, as shown
in Figure b. During
the friction, shear stress appears between the contact surface of
the tool and 6H-SiC, which is the key to dislocation formation. Due
to the increase of shear stress, a delamination phenomenon appears
on the workpiece side of 6H-SiC, as shown in Figure c. This is due to the fact that in the process
of friction, as the workpiece is squeezed by the tool, the top atomic
layer transfers the pressure to the bottom, and the system energy
rises in the micro-regular system synthesis in order to reach an equilibrium
state of energy, leading to intense atomic motion and appearance of
the atomic delamination phenomenon. In addition to this, it is found
that there is a tendency for the energy to decrease at 15.8 nm, and
the corresponding potential energy also decreases and then tends to
equilibrium. This is caused by a combination of phase changes in the
silicon carbide atoms after lattice reconstruction and the elastic
recovery of the machined surface of the silicon carbide workpiece.
In order to show the effect of delamination more intuitively, this
paper extracts the effect of delamination on both sides of the workpiece,
as shown in Figure c1,c2. (c1) shows the delamination
view on the left side of Figure c, which forms two “V” effects during
the friction process, and the right side Figure c2 shows the delamination view
on the right side of Figure c, which presents two “W” delamination effects.
This phenomenon is due to the fact that the shear force on the atomic
layer differs between the two sides due to the different squeezing
forces, which results in different layering effects on the two sides.
The diagram in Figure d shows that the delamination starts to form at the position below
the tool; the atoms on both sides of the frictional groove appear
to be crowded out to the sides, and the crowded-out atomic layers
are distributed in a step-like pattern at the outer edges, as shown
in diagram (f). The above phenomenon proves the reason for the formation
of the delamination phenomenon.
Figure 3
Energy variation curve of the 6H-SiC friction
process. (a) Pressure
trend diagram. (b) Potential energy trend diagram. (c) Structure diagram
of subsurface damage. (c1) Crystalline surface damage ⟨11̅00⟩.
(c2) Crystalline surface damage ⟨12̅11⟩.
(d) Damage main view. (e) Deformation diagram of crystal plane structure
[0001]. (f) Partial view of (e).
Energy variation curve of the 6H-SiC friction
process. (a) Pressure
trend diagram. (b) Potential energy trend diagram. (c) Structure diagram
of subsurface damage. (c1) Crystalline surface damage ⟨11̅00⟩.
(c2) Crystalline surface damage ⟨12̅11⟩.
(d) Damage main view. (e) Deformation diagram of crystal plane structure
[0001]. (f) Partial view of (e).During the machining process, the changes in friction temperature
and kinetic energy affect the wear of the tool and the accuracy of
the workpiece, so friction temperature and kinetic energy are important
physical quantities for investigating the friction process. The friction
temperature generally refers to the average temperature of the polishing
area between the diamond tool and the workpiece of 6H-SiC. It can
be seen from Figure a,b that the temperature and kinetic energy of the workpiece change
in almost the same trend. As the friction progress increases, the
depth of the tool rubbing the workpiece also increases, and finally,
the curve of temperature and kinetic energy basically tends to balance.
This is mainly due to the fact that the early friction is the tool
applied force and tool and workpiece extrusion; the temperature between
atoms gradually increased, accompanied by kinetic energy increase,
and at the same time, 6H-sic extrusion shear deformation increased,
resulting in 6H-sic workpiece lattice deformation and atomic bond
fracture, accompanied by an increase in the amorphous phase. The energy
released goes up, the temperature goes up, and the kinetic energy
goes up. Since then, the temperature between atoms almost never changes,
which is not only related to the system setting. We speculate that
some deformation layers may have completely slipped and formed dislocation.
The diffusion of dislocation and the movement of atoms require energy
consumption, so the energy and temperature of the system almost do
not fluctuate and tend to balance. In the equilibrium stage, it is
observed that there is a downward trend at the friction distance of
10.6 nm. In order to explore the reason, the temperature distribution
cloud map of 6H-SiC at 10.6 nm was obtained by Ovito, as shown in Figure c, and the atomic
temperature distribution in the figure that is not worn tends to be
more uniform. The atomic temperature is higher in the crescent region
near the tool, and the cloud map of atomic kinetic energy in Figure d also confirms that
the atomic kinetic energy around the tool is larger. In order to continue
to compare the temperature changes at 10.6 nm, the color of the temperature
region is deepened by rendering, and the temperature cloud map changes
at 10.5, 10.6, and 10.7 nm are compared, as shown in Figure c1–c3. By comparison, it is found that atoms with a higher temperature
appear at 10.5 and 10.7 but not at 10.6 nm, which may be due to the
breakage of atomic bonds at both 10.5 and 10.7 nm and the bonding
between atoms; the force decreases, the number of atoms removed increases,
and the temperature increases. In addition, in the friction process,
there is not only the formation of amorphousness but also the generation
of phase transition; the original atomic bonds are broken, some atoms
are recombined to form new covalent bonds, and the temperature will
also fluctuate slightly. The crystal structures of internal energy
released and consumed largely offset each other but almost will not
have too big change, basic into balance.
Figure 4
Temperature and kinetic
energy curves of the 6H-SiC friction process.
(a) Temperature change trend diagram. (b) Kinetic energy change trend
diagram. (c) Temperature distribution cloud diagram. (d) Kinetic energy
distribution cloud diagram near the tool. (c1–c3) Temperature distribution cloud at 10.5, 10.6, and 10.7 nm.
Temperature and kinetic
energy curves of the 6H-SiC friction process.
(a) Temperature change trend diagram. (b) Kinetic energy change trend
diagram. (c) Temperature distribution cloud diagram. (d) Kinetic energy
distribution cloud diagram near the tool. (c1–c3) Temperature distribution cloud at 10.5, 10.6, and 10.7 nm.
Dislocation Analysis
In the process
of friction, the action of the friction blade on the workpiece has
three stages, which are the elastic deformation stage, the elastic–plastic
transformation stage, and the plastic stage. The plastic stage occurs
at the initial stage of friction. In this stage, the friction depth
of the tool is shallow, only the surface of 6H-SiC is damaged, the
workpiece produces recoverable elastic deformation, and no chips are
produced. Figure I,II
represents the number and length of dislocations in 6H-SiC, respectively,
where the dislocation length represents the total dislocation length.
In the initial stage, the number and length of dislocations are 0,
indicating that no dislocations are generated at this time, and the
friction is in the elastic stage. As the friction force gradually
increases, when the stress exceeds the yield strength, the workpiece
undergoes an elastoplastic transition stage. At this stage, the workpiece
material bulges on both sides and in front of the tool, and a deformation
layer appears inside; the appearance of the deformation layer is a
dislocation of the premise of formation. The time of the above two
stages is short and the change is not obvious, and the two stages
have little effect on the processing process. The cracks, defects,
and damages generated by the friction process of 6H-SiC are the focus
of the processing process. Therefore, the plastic deformation stage
is the main part in the 6H-SiC friction process, and the sign to judge
the plastic deformation is the formation and expansion of dislocations.
The dislocation extraction method (DXA) can automatically identify
the dislocation changes in the simulation process and indirectly represent
the atomic change trajectory through the Burgess vector, which makes
the dislocation expansion and fracture slip analysis more intuitive
and concrete. In order to observe the changes of dislocations intuitively
and accurately, in Figure , eight dislocations with different friction distances (3,
6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 nm) were intercepted by the dislocation
extraction method (DXA). Expanding the figure, it can be seen from Figure I,II that the number
and length of dislocations basically show an increasing trend with
the increase of friction depth, but the number and length will decrease
at certain moments. There are two dislocations formed in (a); the
Burgers vector (hereinafter referred to as the Burgers vector) is b = 1/3[2̅110] and b = 1/3[12̅10]
in the figure. In Figure b, a new dislocation vector is formed as b = 1/3[2̅110]. In Figure a,b, it is clearly seen that the dislocations increase
at 3 and 6 nm. It is observed in the figure that the dislocation is
formed in the area below the cutter head, and the dislocation is continuously
expanded outward through the partially enlarged dislocation line diagram
(a2). With the formation of amorphousness, the workpiece
has undergone a phase transition, which has lost the original hexagonal
structure and transformed into an amorphous state. However, in Figure b, the number and
length of dislocations are reduced. In Figure c, it is observed that due to the increase
of frictional stress, the degree of deformation becomes larger, more
atomic bonds are broken, atoms move with the stress, some atoms recombine,
and two dislocations recombine into one, which also verifies a phenomenon
in which the number and length of dislocations are reduced. This feature
can also be observed in Figure d–h. The dislocations expand from the periphery of
the tool in a “claw” shape, and some dislocations form
dislocation loops as shown in Figure h; the original dislocation breaks when the friction
depth is 21 nm (as shown by the vector b = 1/3[1̅1̅20]
in Figure c). In addition,
as shown in the red dislocation line in Figure e, there are some incomplete dislocations
and other dislocations. It can be observed from Figure I,II that the number and length of dislocations
of b = 1/3[12̅10] are significantly larger
than those of b = 1/3[11̅0]. This is because
the complete dislocation (such as b = 1/3[12̅10])
mostly appears below the tool friction grain, appearing earlier and
for a longer time throughout the whole process of the plastic deformation
stage. However, incomplete dislocations (such as b = 1/3[11̅00]) are mainly formed at the friction distance of
12 nm, with a shorter length, a shorter duration, and easier fracture,
which may be related to the shear stress nearby. After the atom is
sheared, another atom replaces the original atom, and the atom moves
in a direction, resulting in the change of the lattice structure and
the extension of the dislocation.
Figure 5
Number and length of dislocations in the
friction process and the
dislocation evolution diagram: (I) number of dislocations in 6H-SiC.
(II) Length of dislocation in 6H-SiC. (a–h) Dislocation extension
at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 nm. (a1–h1) Top view of dislocation extension. (a2–h2) Local enlargement of dislocation.
Number and length of dislocations in the
friction process and the
dislocation evolution diagram: (I) number of dislocations in 6H-SiC.
(II) Length of dislocation in 6H-SiC. (a–h) Dislocation extension
at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 nm. (a1–h1) Top view of dislocation extension. (a2–h2) Local enlargement of dislocation.
Shear Strain Analysis
The generation
of dislocation is affected by stress. In order to further understand
the influence mechanism of stress and strain on the friction process
of 6H-SiC, the shear strain cloud map was extracted. The shear strain
cloud map can accurately analyze the stress of the workpiece and the
microscopic crack propagation. The shear stress algorithm was used
to observe the internal stress and strain under a certain truncation
radius. The change of stress is an intuitive reflection of the change
of material structure. By calculating the distribution and change
trend of shear stress, the change of defects such as phase transformation
and dislocation near the grain boundary and the tool under the action
of friction can be judged. Meanwhile, the change trend of stress can
be predicted with the increase of friction distance. There are crack
propagation and the structural failure trend of the 6H-SiC subsurface.
Shear stress is expressed by three-dimensional stress tensorwhere δ, δ, and δ and τ, τ,
and τ represent
each component of the stress tensor. The processing of 6H-SiC ceramics
in the brittle zone produces a large number of microscopic cracks,
which are related to the joint action of stress, strain, and dislocation.
In the theory of fracture mechanics, the scoring effect of the friction
tip on the workpiece surface is regarded as a sharp indenter applying
a load perpendicular to the material surface, and the crack extension
is judged by probing the stress–strain intensity factor of
its surface. The crack system caused by the tapered tool is mainly
transverse crack. As shown in Figure a, in order to explore the induced deformation and
cracks, the tool applies a certain rate of increasing normal load
to the workpiece surface, and this rate is controlled by the wear
depth. The tensile stress generated on both sides and at the bottom
of the plastic deformation zone exceeds the strength limit of the
material, resulting in transverse microcracks parallel to the surface
of the workpiece. The tensile stresses on both sides and at the bottom
of the plastic deformation region exceed the strength limit of the
material, resulting in the corresponding dislocations, which lead
to transverse microcracks parallel to the workpiece surface. Figure shows the shear
stress cloud diagram during the friction process of 6U-SiC, Figure c is the section
stress cloud diagram at the friction of 10 nm, and Figure d is the sectional view. The
tool friction depth and the strain in the surrounding area are smaller;
when the stress away from the tool is smaller, more stressed atoms
are concentrated near the tool. Typically, the bottom shear stress
without contact with the indenter is less than 5 GPa. With the increase
of the friction depth, the atoms with larger stress increase ceaselessly,
and it is obvious that the stress on both sides of the tool extends
to both sides; dislocations are formed here and gradually extend outward.
At the same time, the expansion of dislocations will lead to more
atoms generating large shear stress. Dislocation usually occurs on
the slip plane of the crystal plane. Under the action of stress, some
atoms move away from their original positions, driving the migration
of other atoms and causing the slip of the crystal plane. In the process
of slip, dislocation is gradually formed and diffused with the influence
of stress and gradually extends outwardly. The extension of dislocation
leads more atoms to produce larger shear stress, which ranges from
6 to 8 GPa. Shear stress near the indenter tends to be large, often
exceeding 8.5 GPa, as shown in red in Figure d,f. Figure (d) should
become more symmetric distribution, mainly concentrated in the tool
below. This is because the stress does not spread around and stress
did not reach the area; graph (f) shows that stress as dislocation
extension of atomic motion has spread involving the A neighborhood
and strain with migration, and because both sides have an uneven distribution
of stress and strain area, there is A difference too. In the subsequent
friction, due to the joint action of stress, strain, and dislocation,
it is observed that area A gradually deforms macroscopically, and
the workpiece appears with crack or fracture layers. In addition,
it is observed that when the depth of the friction tool reaches a
certain depth, the formation time and speed of dislocation are different.
In the following exploration, we will also focus on exploring the
different depths of the tool pressed into the workpiece, which affects
the internal microcracks.
Figure 6
Stress–strain cloud diagram of the 6H-SiC
friction process.
(a) Mechanical model diagram of indentation fracture. (b) Distribution
diagram of friction atoms. (c) Shear strain distribution at 10 nm.
(d) Strain distribution in the section view of figure (c). (e) Shear
strain distribution at 20 nm. (f) Strain distribution in the section
view of figure (e).
Stress–strain cloud diagram of the 6H-SiC
friction process.
(a) Mechanical model diagram of indentation fracture. (b) Distribution
diagram of friction atoms. (c) Shear strain distribution at 10 nm.
(d) Strain distribution in the section view of figure (c). (e) Shear
strain distribution at 20 nm. (f) Strain distribution in the section
view of figure (e).
Radial
Distribution Analysis
In order
to explore the influence of tool depth on the microstructure of 6H-SiC
nanofriction, four radial distribution functions at different depths
were selected as examples, as shown in Figure , and C–C, C–Si, and Si–Si
bond pairs were selected for comparison. The radial distribution function
is used to judge the diffusion of atoms in the crystal. When changes
occur in the crystal, a large number of amorphous states will be generated.
The radial distribution function can more intuitively describe the
change of the density of amorphous states. Its expression iswhere n(r) is the number of atoms in the spherical shell with thickness
λr from the target atom r. μ0 is
the number
of atoms per unit volume; V is the volume of the
spherical shell with radius r and thickness λr. The
radial distribution function can analyze the distribution of internal
atoms and has a certain supporting effect on the analysis of microcrack
propagation inside the workpiece. As the depth increases in the figure,
the peak of g(r) gradually becomes
smaller and the peak value of the main peak decreases, but the position
of the maximum value is basically unchanged, indicating that the region
where the atomic structure changes during the friction process is
basically fixed, the friction depth increases, the interatomic stress
increases, the atomic spacing becomes smaller, and the structure becomes
smaller. In Figure a,c, the peak at the truncation radius r > 8
Å
flattens out and disappears when the friction depth is 15 nm, but
the C–Si bond pair in Figure b has flattened out and has no peak at r > 6 Å. This is due to the fact that the bond energy between
C and Si is much smaller than the bond energy between the same atoms.
Moreover, the main peak of the C–Si bond pair in Figure b is generally much higher
than that of C–C and Si–Si bond pairs, indicating that
under the same friction depth, the distance between C and Si in the
deformation region is larger, and the atomic bond is easier to break.
With the increase of friction depth, dislocations are more likely
to nucleate and expand, forming microcracks.
Figure 7
Radial distribution of
frictional deformation area at different
depths. Radial function distribution at 0, 5, 10, and 15 nm. (a) C–C
atoms. (b) C–Si atoms. (c) Si–Si atoms.
Radial distribution of
frictional deformation area at different
depths. Radial function distribution at 0, 5, 10, and 15 nm. (a) C–C
atoms. (b) C–Si atoms. (c) Si–Si atoms.After exploring the radial distribution function, in order
to further
observe the microscopic changes at 15 nm, as shown in Figure , the local atomic arrangement
and dislocation map with vector b = 1/3[1̅21̅0]
dislocation at 15 nm were extracted. In the red region of Figure a, when the truncation
radius r > 8 Å, the curve of the C–Si
bond pair no longer has a peak and even has a downward trend, while
the C–C and Si–Si bond pairs can clearly see the peak,
and a peak appears when the truncation radius r >
9.4 Å. Figure b shows the friction nanosimulation at 15 nm; the yellow line part
shows that the atoms are irregularly arranged. Figure c is a partial magnification of the dislocations,
in which it can be seen that the lattice structure has changed and
the atoms have migrated a lot to form dislocations, and the dislocations
are not generated in the same direction but extend and extend from
inside to outside. The shape of the dislocation is not visible in Figure c, but the overall
shape of the dislocation can be visualized in Figure d, where the dislocation is formed below
the surface atomic layer and the extension direction is to the left.
In order to see the specific situation of the dislocation more intuitively,
the system materializes the dislocation and uses the dislocation line
to represent the shape of the dislocation, as shown in Figure e. When the friction depth
increases, the atomic spacing becomes larger due to the influence
of stress. When the strength limit of the material is exceeded, the
atomic bonds are broken. (f1–f3) marks
the process of dislocation breaking. Compared with the C–C
and Si–Si bond pairs, the distance is much smaller. From the
potential function of the system, it can be seen that the attraction
between the same atoms is much larger than the attraction between
different atoms, so it is more likely to break. This shows that the
peak of the C–Si bond pair is smaller at the radial distribution
function of 15 nm, and the truncation radius of the main peak of the
C–Si bond pair is higher than that of the other two bond pairs.
Figure 8
Radial
distribution function and dislocation evolution at 15 nm.
(a) Radial distribution function diagram at a friction depth of 15
nm. (b–e) Dislocation evolution diagram. (f1–f3) Model diagram of dislocation expansion and the fracture
ball bond.
Radial
distribution function and dislocation evolution at 15 nm.
(a) Radial distribution function diagram at a friction depth of 15
nm. (b–e) Dislocation evolution diagram. (f1–f3) Model diagram of dislocation expansion and the fracture
ball bond.
Subsurface
Damage Analysis
When the
diamond tool rubs the 6H-SiC workpiece, it will go through the elastic
deformation stage, the elastic–plastic transformation stage,
and the plastic deformation stage in turn, and the first two stages
are short in time. In order to study the subsurface damage of the
workpiece, the first two stages will not be explored. The plastic
deformation stage is mainly discussed. Figure shows the dislocation cloud diagram and
local atomic arrangement diagram of the deformation stage of the 6H-SiC
workpiece, indicating the beginning of the plastic stage, when the
dislocations are formed. Three regions are marked in Figure a; the purple box represents
the amorphous deformed region, the red box represents the deformed
region, and the black box represents the undeformed region. The right Figure b is an enlarged
view of Figure a,
and the bond angle is added to Figure b to facilitate the analysis of the phase transition
of the crystal structure during the friction process. The atoms in
the undeformed area are arranged in a hexagonal and regular arrangement.
With the increase of depth of friction, the friction entered the stage
of plastic deformation, and the dislocation tool of the atomic layer
near the pressure produces and extends outward; at this time, atomic
bonds by stress disconnect, and dislocation lines around the atom
are no longer a six-square arrangement and free of some atoms with
the pentagon and rectangular shapes; this phenomenon shows that workpiece
internal lattice change already occurred at this time. After the atomic
bonds are broken, a large number of amorphous crystals are formed
due to the increase of atomic spacing. The atoms in the amorphous
region are irregularly arranged, and the larger distance causes the
crystal structure to change, while the amorphous deformation region
spacing gradually expands outward and microcracks are formed, which
will accelerate the expansion of microcracks in most dislocation intersection
regions and cause damage on the workpiece surface.
Figure 9
Dislocation clouds and
local atomic arrangements during the deformation
phase.
Dislocation clouds and
local atomic arrangements during the deformation
phase.
Experimental
Validation
Experimental Platform
The nanofriction
simulation analyzes the friction damage from the microscopic point
of view. In order to verify the accuracy of the simulation effect,
the experimental part is added to further analyze the damage mechanism
from the experimental point of view.Figure shows the nanofriction experimental platform,
which adopts the NHT3 nanoscratch tester. The chemically and mechanically
treated 6H-SiC workpiece is fixed on the working table, and then the
table is moved to fix the diamond tool to rub the 6H-SiC workpiece
at a speed of 50 m/s with a friction depth of 0.01 mm. The friction
surface is the [0001] crystal surface with the direction inward, and
the workpiece is kept fixed during the rubbing process. A Hitachi
S-4700 scanning electron microscope and a transmission electron microscope,
Hitachi H-9000NAR, were tested to observe the internal changes after
friction.
Figure 10
Friction experimental platform model.
Friction experimental platform model.
Experimental Validation
Figure shows the surface
damage map and a partial enlarged view of 6H-SiC after friction. Figure a shows the scratches
on the surface after rubbing, and the direction of rubbing is marked
with red arrows. As mentioned above, friction is divided into three
stages: the elastic deformation stage, elastic–plastic deformation
stage, and plastic deformation stage. It can be seen from the figure
that the friction is relatively smooth, and the chips do not appear
in the two deformation stages of elasticity and elastoplasticity.
It can be seen from the figure that the friction is relatively smooth
in the two deformation stages of elasticity and elastoplasticity,
no chips appear, and the non-friction areas on both sides are relatively
smooth. Due to improper chemical and mechanical treatment in the early
stage, there are some pits on both sides. However, according to the
images in the plastic deformation stage, the crystal has changed and
some amorphous features can be found in the surrounding area. In area
A, bulges on both sides have been clearly seen, and uneven cracks
appear, which is consistent with the simulation effect in Figure e. At the same time,
a fracture phenomenon was also found at B. After enlarging the B area,
it was seen that due to the stress of the friction cutter head, the
side surface of the 6H-SiC workpiece was broken, and there were lumps
falling off. The cracks near the upper surface were relatively large,
and the cracks continue to expand downward, and the expansion path
is irregular. When the gap between the two gaps is large, a gap is
formed on the subsurface, and the workpiece peels off and falls off
with the gap. It can be seen that the expansion of such cracks is
the main form of fracture of 6H-SiC workpieces.
Figure 11
Surface friction damage
and local magnified SEM. (a) Image of the
friction. A is the purple dotted box area in (a). B is the green dotted
box area in (a).
Surface friction damage
and local magnified SEM. (a) Image of the
friction. A is the purple dotted box area in (a). B is the green dotted
box area in (a).We continue to enlarge
the block-shaped peeling area. The crack
depth in this part is shallow, and the arrangement is relatively regular.
It is initially judged that the crack is just formed. The wrinkle-like
area appeared in the lower area of the tool, which was preliminarily
determined to be dislocation. Compared with the enlarged picture,
it was found that there were more filament-like strips similar to
dislocation in the wrinkle-like area. Thus, the former wrinkle-like
area was found to be the crystal plane slip state, as shown in (a)
of Figure . However,
the strips found in the latter magnification are dislocations, as
shown in the enlarged view of area A in Figure , in which multiple dislocations are concentrated
on the slip plane. After zooming in, it can be seen that the multiple
cracks are not closely arranged, and the lengths are different. The
strip-shaped cracks below the tool are shorter, and the strip-shaped
cracks in the area that have been rubbed are longer. Therefore, the
crack was determined to be formed by transverse dislocation propagation.
One of the dislocations was selected in the experiment, and the vector
of the dislocations was found to be B = 1/3[12̅10],
as shown in the ellipse marked in red. The arrangement of dislocations
can be clearly seen from the TEM image. The dislocations on both sides
are longer, but the dislocations below the tool are shorter, and this
area is more prone to fracture and recombination of dislocations,
which is similar to Figure above. The simulated phenomena are basically consistent,
indicating that dislocations are the basis for the formation of subsurface
damage.
Figure 12
SEM images of the plastic deformation area and TEM images of dislocation
(a). SEM local image of the plastic deformation area. A is the dotted
wireframe diagram in (a). A1 is the TEM image of area A.
SEM images of the plastic deformation area and TEM images of dislocation
(a). SEM local image of the plastic deformation area. A is the dotted
wireframe diagram in (a). A1 is the TEM image of area A.
Conclusions
The friction
forces in the three directions
are obviously different during the subsurface damage process of 6H-SiC
nanofriction using molecular dynamics simulation, and the friction
force in the X-direction is significantly smaller
than that in the Y- and Z-directions.
The kinetic energy, potential energy, temperature, and acting force
in the friction process basically showed an upward trend, and the
flank of the 6H-SiC workpiece was accompanied by the formation of
falling blocks and cracks. Due to the stress generated by friction,
dislocations appear near the friction of the diamond tip, and most
of them appear as lateral dislocations. The dislocation formation
and expansion process is accompanied by energy exchange. Cracks and
exfoliated blocks constitute the subsurface damage of the 6H-SiC workpiece
on a macroscopic scale.The microscopic crystal changes and
the formation of macroscopic cracks were compared by friction experiments,
which supplemented the analysis of the subsurface damage mechanism
experiments of simulating nanofriction 6H-SiC. The analysis and exploration
of the subsurface damage mechanism of simulated 6H-SiC nanofriction
provide a certain guiding significance for the realization of high-precision
machining of 6H-SiC precision devices.