Binshen Wang1,2, Jiali Liu3, Ji-Young Ock2, Ryo Motoyoshi2, Shanglin Li2, Kazuhide Ueno2,3, Kaoru Dokko2,3, Seiji Tsuzuki3, Masayoshi Watanabe3. 1. Institute of New Energy and Low-Carbon Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610207, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Chemistry and Life Science, Yokohama National University, 79-5 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya-ku, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan. 3. Advanced Chemical Energy Research Center, Institute of Advanced Sciences, Yokohama National University, 79-5 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya-ku, Yokohama 240-8501, Japan.
Abstract
The design and fabrication of lithium secondary batteries with a high energy density and shape flexibility are essential for flexible and wearable electronics. In this study, we fabricated a high-voltage (5 V class) flexible lithium polymer battery using a lithium nickel manganese oxide (LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4) cathode. A LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4-hybridized gel polymer cathode (GPC) and a gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) membrane, both containing a sulfolane (SL)-based highly concentrated electrolyte (HCE), enabled the fabrication of a polymer battery by simple lamination with a metallic lithium anode, where the injection of the electrolyte solution was not required. GPC with high flexibility has a hierarchically continuous three-dimensional porous architecture, which is advantageous for forming continuous ion-conduction paths. The GPE membrane has significant ionic conductivity enough for reliable capacity delivery. Therefore, the fabricated lithium polymer pouch cells demonstrated excellent capacity retention under continuous deformation conditions. This study provides a promising strategy for the fabrication of scalable and flexible 5 V class batteries using GPC and GPE containing SL-based HCE.
The design and fabrication of lithium secondary batteries with a high energy density and shape flexibility are essential for flexible and wearable electronics. In this study, we fabricated a high-voltage (5 V class) flexible lithium polymer battery using a lithium nickel manganese oxide (LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4) cathode. A LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4-hybridized gel polymer cathode (GPC) and a gel polymer electrolyte (GPE) membrane, both containing a sulfolane (SL)-based highly concentrated electrolyte (HCE), enabled the fabrication of a polymer battery by simple lamination with a metallic lithium anode, where the injection of the electrolyte solution was not required. GPC with high flexibility has a hierarchically continuous three-dimensional porous architecture, which is advantageous for forming continuous ion-conduction paths. The GPE membrane has significant ionic conductivity enough for reliable capacity delivery. Therefore, the fabricated lithium polymer pouch cells demonstrated excellent capacity retention under continuous deformation conditions. This study provides a promising strategy for the fabrication of scalable and flexible 5 V class batteries using GPC and GPE containing SL-based HCE.
Rapid
technological innovation and growing market demand for flexible
electronic devices, such as roll-up displays, wearable electronic
products, and smart electronics, require the development of reliable
and highly effective power sources.[1,2] Lithium-ion
batteries (LIBs) have been established as state-of-the-art power sources
for portable electronics. In recent decades, significant progress
has been achieved in the fabrication of flexible LIBs based on custom-designed
materials.[3−5] In particular, electrodes based on advanced carbon-based
materials, such as carbon nanotubes,[6,7] nanofibers,[8,9] and graphene,[10−12] are used for flexibility. However, for practical
applications, viable production processes using procurable and economical
materials are of great importance. Concomitantly, the attainable energy
density of the fabricated flexible LIBs determines their application
prospects.Cobalt-free spinel structured lithium nickel manganese
oxide (LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4, LNMO) is a
potential cathode
owing to its ultrahigh working voltage of 4.7 V versus Li/Li+, a large theoretical capacity of 147 mAh g–1,
and a relatively low cost.[13−17] Based on the mass of the active material, LNMO can provide a high
energy density of 690 Wh kg–1, which is 20% and
30% higher than that of conventional cathode materials, LiCoO2 and LiFePO4, respectively.[18,19] However, the application of this cathode material for practical
energy storage is challenging and stymied by the decomposition of
conventional carbonate-based electrolyte.[20,21] In particular, the carbonate-based electrolytes suffer from oxidative
decomposition at operating voltages above 4.4 V, which leads to fading
cyclic performance and safety concerns of LIBs. Furthermore, LiPF6 easily decomposes to form HF in the presence of water at
a high voltage. Trace amounts of HF may accelerate the dissolution
of the transition metal, causing a structural collapse of the LNMO
electrode.[22] Therefore, selecting a suitable
electrolyte is crucial for the practical application of LNMO-based
batteries.Ionic liquids (ILs) are defined as molten salts having
melting
points lower than 100 °C. Due to their characteristic properties
such as nonvolatility, high thermal stability, and high ionic conductivity,
well-designed ILs could meet the rigorous demands/criteria of electrolyte
applications in Li/Na-ion batteries, Li-sulfur batteries, Li-oxygen
batteries, and so on.[23] We previously reported
that equimolar mixtures of Li salts and certain glymes form room temperature
liquids with high thermal and electrochemical stabilities, low flammability,
and a negligible vapor pressure similar to typical ILs, classified
as solvate ionic liquids (SILs).[24−27] The glyme-based SILs exhibit
several remarkable properties, in addition to IL-resembling properties,
such as oxidation stability enhancement of the solvent (glymes) by
coordinating with Li+,[25] low
solubility toward ionic materials owing to the negligible activity
of free solvent,[26] and unique electrochemical
reactions due to the instability of the solvate ions, as observed
reversible electrochemical intercalation of graphite in the absence
of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) forms such as ethylene carbonate.[27] Subsequently, the concept of SILs has been extended
to highly concentrated electrolytes (HCEs) with unique physicochemical
properties using Li salts and various solvents.[28−30] In certain
HCEs, significant electrochemical phenomena are reported, including
high reversibility of lithium deposition/stripping without lithium
dendrite formation[31] and fast electrochemical
reactions of electrode active materials.[32] Among HCEs, sulfolane (SL)-based HCEs exhibit unconventionally high
Li+-transference number owing to the highest diffusivity
of Li+ among the chemical species in the electrolytes (Li+, anion, and SL), which indicates a significant contribution
of the Li+ hopping conduction by the ligand (anion and
SL) exchange reactions.[33,34] The SL-based HCEs have
been successfully applied in Li-LiCoO2[33] and Li-sulfur cells.[34−36] The high oxidative stability
of SL effectuates the SL-based HCEs suitable for electrolytes of high-voltage
cathode materials.[37−40] Further, the main capacity fading mechanism of LNMO-based LIBs is
the oxidative decomposition of the electrolytes; however, for LIBs
using high-nickel LiNiMnCoO2, another
high-voltage cathode material, solvation-driven degradation mechanism
by the dissolution of the transition metals is predominant.[41]In this study, we fabricated a gel polymer
cathode (GPC) by incorporating
an SL-based HCE and a fluorinated polymer into a LNMO cathode. The
electrochemical performance of GPC demonstrated favorable cyclability
and rate capability. Furthermore, a gel polymer electrolyte (GPE)
membrane was successfully prepared by combining a SL-based HCE and
a fluorinated polymer, which exhibited favorable mechanical stability.
Considering the advantages of GPC and GPE, a high output voltage pouch
cell (∼4.7 V) was fabricated by laminating them using a lithium
metal anode. The cell delivered stable discharge capacities under
continuous bending, which demonstrated its high flexibility. The flexible
battery utilizing GPC and GPE may provide a new perspective for future
wearable electronics.
Experimental Section
Materials
LNMO powder was synthesized
according to the previous studies.[42] It
is widely accepted that the synthesis procedures for disordered LNMO
(Fd3̅m) and ordered LNMO (P4332) are different. Our proposed method is
similar to the procedures to synthesize the disordered LNMO, that
is, calcination in the air followed by annealing.[42] The prepared LNMO was characterized by X-ray diffraction
(XRD, Figure S1), revealing its pure phase
ascribed to the cubic spinel structure with space group of Fd3̅m (JCPDF #80-2183).[43] Acetylene black (AB) was obtained from Denka
Co., Ltd. (Japan). N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) was
purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Corp. (Japan). Poly(vinylidene fluoride)
(PVDF, Solef 5130) and poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF-HFP, Kynar flex 2801) were provided by
Solvay (Belgium) and Arkema (France), respectively. Battery-grade
lithium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amide (Li[TFSA]) was obtained
from Solvay, Japan. Battery-grade SL was purchased from Kishida Chemical
(Japan). HCE, [Li(SL)2][TFSA], was prepared by mixing Li[TFSA]
and SL at a molar ratio of 1:2 at 60 °C, overnight in an Ar-filled
glovebox to obtain a homogeneous liquid.
Preparation
of GPC Containing LNMO
To make LNMO-GPCs, a slurry comprising
67.2 wt % LNMO, 6.4 wt % AB,
6.4 wt % PVDF, and 20 wt % [Li(SL)2][TFSA] electrolyte
in NMP was prepared. The viscous slurry was coated onto a carbon-coated
aluminum foil current collector using the doctor blade technique.
After solvent drying, LNMO-GPC was cut into disks with diameters of
16 mm and rectangles with a length of 45 mm and a width of 37 mm to
assemble 2032-type coin cells and flexible pouch cells, respectively,
and dried under vacuum at 70 °C for 12 h. The thickness of LNMO-GPC
was ∼30 μm, and the density of LNMO-GPC was ∼1.5
g cm–3. The mass-loading of the active material
in the LNMO-GPC was ∼3.0 mg cm–2.
Electrochemical Tests for Coin Cell
The electrolyte,
[Li(SL)2][TFSA] (120 μL), was soaked
in a glass filter separator (GA-55, Advantec, Japan) with a diameter
of 17 mm. A Li metal foil (Honjo Metal, Japan) with a thickness of
200 μm and a diameter of 16 mm was used as the anode. The coin
cells were assembled inside an argon-filled glovebox, where both the
moisture and the oxygen content levels were maintained below 0.3 ppm.
Galvanostatic charge and discharge tests of the cells were performed
at 30 °C using a Nagano BTS-2004 battery testing system (Japan).
The voltage range was 3.4–4.9 V, and the 1 C rate was set at
147 mA g–1.
Characterization
X-ray diffraction
(XRD) analyses were performed on a Rigaku RINT-2000 diffractometer
with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å).
The morphology and elemental distribution of the samples were observed
by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, SU8000, Hitachi
High-Technologies, Japan) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
(EDX), respectively. Tensile tests were performed on a Shimadzu EZ-LX
(Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with a 10 N load cell for rectangular samples
at a strain rate of 1 cm min–1. Linear sweep voltammetry
(LSV) experiments were performed using an electrochemical analyzer
(VMP3, Biologic, France) at a scan rate of 1 mV s–1 at 30 °C, based on a three-electrode cell (stainless steel
as the working electrode and Li metal as the counter and reference
electrodes). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements
were performed using a ModuLab XM (Solartron Analytical, U.K.) in
the frequency range of 1 MHz to 0.01 Hz with a voltage amplitude of
10 mV.
Preparation of GPE Membrane
The chemicals
for the preparation of the GPE membrane, 70 wt % [Li(SL)2][TFSA] (0.250 g) and 30 wt % PVDF-HFP (0.107 g), were dissolved
in acetone (3.6 mL) and stirred in a vial for 1 h at room temperature.
The solution was then transferred to a flat Petri dish with a diameter
of 80 mm, placed in a dry chamber (dew point < −60 °C),
and dried at room temperature overnight. Thereafter, the GPE membrane
was obtained by drying overnight at 70 °C under vacuum. Thickness
of the GPE was measured using a thickness gauge (PG-01, TECLOCK, Japan).
Fabrication of Flexible LNMO-Li Polymer Pouch
Cell
For a pouch cell, two layers of GPC, two layers of GPE
membranes, and one layer of anode coated with Li metal on both sides
of the Cu foil (Li thickness = 20 μm, Honjo Metal) was laminated
using a layer-by-layer process in a dry chamber (dew point < −60
°C). The mass loading of the active LNMO was similar to that
of the coin cell. The dimensions (length [mm] × width [mm]) of
the GPC, GPE membrane, and anode were 45 × 37, 49 × 43,
and 49 × 41, respectively. A few drops of [Li(SL)2][TFSA] were added between the GPC/GPE membrane and the anode/GPE
membrane to slightly wet the electrodes to ensure firm contact. Aluminum
and nickel strips were attached to the sides of the cathode and anode,
respectively, as electrode tabs. Finally, the cell core was packaged
in a flexible aluminum plastic film bag using an edge-bonding machine.
Computational Methods
Gaussian
16 program[44] was used for the
DFT calculations. The HOMO energy levels of SL and the SL-(Li[TFSA])2 complex were calculated at the B3LYP/6-311G** level using
optimized geometries at the same level. The geometry of the complex
in the crystal structure[34] was used for
the initial geometry of the geometry optimization.
Results and Discussion
HCE-Based LNMO-GPC
LNMO-GPC was fabricated
using a slurry comprising LNMO, AB, PVDF, and a highly concentrated
[Li(SL)2][TFSA] electrolyte in NMP (Figure a). The viscous slurry was bladed onto a
carbon-coated aluminum foil current collector and dried to form a
uniform film over a large area. This solution-based preparation method
and its compatibility with roll-to-roll coating render this system
readily scalable for large-area electrode films.[45] The morphology of LNMO-GPC was examined by SEM. As shown
in Figure b, GPC showed
a relatively smooth surface consisting of a hierarchically continuous
three-dimensional (3D) porous foam-like network, and the diameters
of the holes in the GPC were approximately 2 μm. Furthermore,
the SEM images indicated the coexistence of nanosized pores on the
surface, which were generated by the packing of conductive carbon
(Figure c). This 3D
interconnected structure was advantageous for electrolyte penetration
when a liquid electrolyte was used with GPC, promoting the transportation
of ions for LNMO-GPC. In addition, uniform coverage of GPE on LNMO
particles was observed without exposure to the typical crystallization
edge observed in the newly prepared sample (Figure S2). Elemental mapping was conducted to evaluate the distribution
of the components in GPC. As shown in Figure d–k, the homogeneous distribution
of Ni, Mn, O, C, N, S, and F was confirmed by SEM-EDX. This indicates
that GPC did not induce agglomeration of the components. In particular,
the uniform distribution of N, S, and F illustrated that the LNMO
particles were surrounded by GPE containing the highly concentrated
[Li(SL)2][TFSA] electrolyte.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic of the
fabrication process, (b–d) SEM images,
(e) nickel, (f) manganese, (g) oxygen, (h) carbon, (i) nitrogen, (j)
sulfur, and (k) fluorine elemental mappings of LNMO-GPC.
(a) Schematic of the
fabrication process, (b–d) SEM images,
(e) nickel, (f) manganese, (g) oxygen, (h) carbon, (i) nitrogen, (j)
sulfur, and (k) fluorine elemental mappings of LNMO-GPC.Coin-type LNMO-Li half-cells were assembled using [Li(SL)2][TFSA] as the liquid electrolyte and GA-55 as the separator
to evaluate
the electrochemical stability of LNMO-GPC. The cell displayed two
characteristic voltage plateaus: a long and significant voltage plateau
at ∼4.7 V originating from the Ni2+/4+ redox processes,
and a short voltage plateau at ∼4.0 V attributed to the Mn3+/4+ redox reaction (Figure a).[18] The charging curve
of our material (Figure a) coincides with that of the disordered LNMO materials.[14] Moreover, the XRD pattern of disordered (Fd3̅m) LNMO agrees with that of our
material (Figure S1).[14,43] These results suggest that our LNMO material can be assigned as
a disordered (Fd3̅m) LNMO.
The initial specific discharge capacity at 0.1 C was 128 mAh g–1. With an increase in the current density to 0.2 and
0.5 C, a decrease in plateau voltage was observed with discharge capacities
of 120 and 90 mAh g–1, respectively. However, the
capacity contributions of the Ni2+/4+ plateaus were high,
and the well-defined Mn3+/4+ plateaus under a high current
density represented the stable structure of the GPC. Figure b displays the rate capability
of the cell, indicating the stable cycling performance of GPC at different
charge/discharge rates (the charge and discharge rates are the same).
Remarkably, when the current density returned to 0.1 C, 99% of the
original capacity was recovered, indicating the resilience of the
GPC. In addition, the high stability and robustness of for long-term
cycling are crucial for GPC. Galvanostatic charge/discharge measurements
at 0.2 C were conducted (Figure c), and after 100 cycles, the capacity retention relative
to the initial capacity was 86.1%, which corresponded to an average
capacity decay of 0.14% per cycle.
Figure 2
(a) Initial charge–discharge curves,
(b) rate performance,
and (c) cycling performance at 0.2 C rate for LNMO-GPC in a half-cell
(LNMO-GPC∥Li; 1C corresponds to 147 mAh g–1).
(a) Initial charge–discharge curves,
(b) rate performance,
and (c) cycling performance at 0.2 C rate for LNMO-GPC in a half-cell
(LNMO-GPC∥Li; 1C corresponds to 147 mAh g–1).The high durability of the cycling
test mainly comes from the oxidative
stability of [Li(SL)2][TFSA]. As described in the Introduction, most solvents are coordinated to Li+, and trace amounts of free (uncoordinated) solvents remain
in HCEs. The HOMO level of the Li+-coordinated solvents
tends to decrease because of the strong positive electric potential
of the Li+ ion, leading to the enhancement of the oxidation
stability of the coordinated solvent.[25] Meanwhile, SL-based electrolytes have relatively high oxidation
stabilities.[37−40] We previously reported the liquid structures of [Li(SL)2][TFSA],[34] where the two oxygen atoms
of the SL sulfonyl group coordinated to two different neighboring
Li ions and TFSA anions form ionic clusters with Li ions, in other
words, the SL- and anion-bridged, chainlike Li-ion coordination structure.
Therefore, the Li+-coordinated SL should exhibit higher
oxidation stability than the free SL that is known to be antioxidative.
To confirm the change in the electronic state of SL owing to the coordination
with Li+, the optimized structures of SL and SL-(Li[TFSA])2 complex were calculated. The initial geometries of the complexes
used for geometry optimization were prepared based on their crystal
structures.[34] As shown in Figure S3, the two oxygen atoms of SL are coordinated to different
Li+ ions in the optimized structure (B3LYP/6-311G** level).
The optimized structure in Figure S3 is
similar to that of the crystalline SL-Li[TFSA] complex.[34] The HOMO energy levels of SL were calculated
for the isolated SL molecule and the SL-(Li[TFSA])2 complex
at the B3LYP/6-311G** level using the optimized structures at the
same level, and the results are summarized in Table S1. As was the case in the glyme–LiTFSA complexes,[25] a distinct decrease was observed in the HOMO
energy levels of SL by the coordination to Li+ (compared
with the uncoordinated free solvent). As Li+ has a positive
charge, the electric potential around the SL coordinated to Li+ is high. The high electric potential stabilizes the electrons
of SL, resulting in a low HOMO energy level. The lowering of the HOMO
energy level leads to a favorable oxidation stability.However,
the SL-based HCEs are reductively unstable in contact
with Li metal, as revealed by first-principles molecular dynamics
simulations.[46] We demonstrated that SL
was reductively decomposed to generate tetrahydrothiophene and concurrently
formed Li2O on the anode surface.[47] However, the Coulombic efficiency approached nearly 100% when the
cycle number increased (Figure c), suggesting that an effective SEI was formed during the
initial cycles, preventing further reductive decomposition of the
electrolyte in the extended cycles. In this experiment, thick GA55
separators were used, where a large amount of electrolyte was preserved.
A large amount of electrolyte in GA55 may contribute to the formation
of the SEI and to the high cycling performance shown in Figure c.
HCE-Based
GPE Membrane
Currently,
most of the reported flexible LIBs employ carbonate-based liquid electrolytes.
GPEs are promising replacements for liquid electrolytes, with the
advantages of suppressed internal shorting, no leakage of liquid electrolytes,
and less flammability.[11] An applicable
method to obtain mechanically reliable GPEs should be explored. Figure a shows a schematic
of the fabrication process of the GPE membrane. The precursors comprising
HCE, [Li(SL)2][TFSA], and the PVDF-HFP polymer were dissolved
in acetone. After evaporation of the solvent, the GPE membrane was
obtained because of the partial crystallinity of PVDF-HFP, which served
as cross-linking points for the membranes. The photograph shown in Figure b demonstrates that
the membrane was a transparent solid and flexible enough for direct
handling. Furthermore, the membrane could be controlled to have a
uniform thickness of 35 μm. Burning test results showed that
the GPE membrane had considerable flame retardancy (Figure S4). The obtained membrane had a smooth surface morphology,
as shown in Figure S5a,b, which contained
a few parts of the rumples. The rumples appeared to originate from
the partially crystalline nature of PVDF-HFP. Thereafter, the distribution
of [Li(SL)2][TFSA] and PVDF-HFP in the GPE membrane was
examined using SEM-EDX elemental mapping (Figure S5c–h). The distribution of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen,
sulfur, and fluorine elements was uniform on the scale of 10–100
μm, which was consistent with the morphology of the LNMO gel
polymer electrode.
Figure 3
(a) Schematic of the fabrication process, (b) photograph
of [Li(SL)2][TFSA]/PVDF-HFP GPE membrane, (c) tensile stress–strain
curves for [Li(SL)2][TFSA]/PVDF-HFP GPE.
(a) Schematic of the fabrication process, (b) photograph
of [Li(SL)2][TFSA]/PVDF-HFP GPE membrane, (c) tensile stress–strain
curves for [Li(SL)2][TFSA]/PVDF-HFP GPE.We have already reported the electrochemical properties of
GPE
comprising [Li(SL)2][TFSA] and PVDF-HFP.[48,49] The ionic conductivity and Li+-transference number, estimated
by the Bruce–Vincent method,[50] at
30 °C is 1.5 × 10–4 S cm–1 and 0.65, respectively.[48] To evaluate
the mechanical properties of the obtained GPE membrane, stress–strain
measurements were performed. The tensile stress–strain curves
are shown in Figure c, and the tensile strength and maximal strain are summarized in
the inset. Remarkably, the obtained GPE membrane can sustain a fracture
stress of 3.1 MPa at a maximal strain of 186%, which was higher than
that of some previously reported ion gel electrolytes.[51−54]Previous studies on SL-based electrolytes demonstrated their
oxidative
decomposition threshold >5 V versus Li/Li+.[37−39] The oxidative stability of the SL-containing GPE membrane was experimentally
evaluated by LSV. Figure S6 demonstrates
the high oxidation stability of the [Li(SL)2][TFSA]/PVDF-HFP
GPE membrane approaching 5 V, which reflects the HOMO level calculation
(vide supra) and confirms the high antioxidation capability of GPE.
Flexible LNMO-Li Polymer Pouch Cell
After
studying the basic performance of LNMO-GPC and the fundamental
characterization of the GPE membrane, pouch-type cells were assembled
to verify their practical utility. Figure a depicts the inner structure of the prepared
pouch cell, which comprises two sheets of a single coated LNMO-GPC,
two sheets of [Li(SL)2][TFSA]/PVDF-HFP GPE membranes with
a thickness of 35 μm, and one sheet of both-side-covered lithium
anode on a Cu foil. After five initial charge–discharge cycles
at the flat state to stabilize the pouch cell, the typical charge–discharge
curves showed two well-defined plateaus of Ni2+/4+ and
Mn3+/4+, with a discharge capacity of 116 mAh g–1 (Figure b). Then,
the pouch cell underwent repeated 90° bending and immediate recovery
to a flat state to simulate its application to flexible devices. The
measurement itself in Figure b was conducted under flat state. The external deformation
resulted in a minimal increase in the capacities of 121, 124, and
125 mAh g–1 after 50, 100, and 500 bending cycles,
respectively. The increased capacities may be due to the firmer contact
between the LNMO-GPC and GPE membranes by external bending.
Figure 4
(a) Schematic
of the flexible pouch cell, (b) charge and discharge
curves of the flexible cell at 0.05 C after activation of five charge–discharge
cycles at flat state and then after 50, 100, and 500 bending cycles
between 0–90° (1 C corresponds to 147 mAh g–1), (c) SEM image of surface, and (d) cross-sectional SEM image of
LNMO-GPC after 500 bending cycles.
(a) Schematic
of the flexible pouch cell, (b) charge and discharge
curves of the flexible cell at 0.05 C after activation of five charge–discharge
cycles at flat state and then after 50, 100, and 500 bending cycles
between 0–90° (1 C corresponds to 147 mAh g–1), (c) SEM image of surface, and (d) cross-sectional SEM image of
LNMO-GPC after 500 bending cycles.To explore the effect of bending on the mechanical stability, the
LNMO-GPC and GPE membranes were characterized by SEM by observing
the structural changes after 500 bending cycles. As shown in Figure c, the 3D porous
structures were retained for LNMO-GPC, and no obvious collapse was
observed. The cross-sectional SEM image shows the firm contact between
the GPC layer and the carbon-coated aluminum current collector after
prolonged bending (Figure d). No change in the elemental distribution of LNMO-GPC after
500 bending cycles was observed (Figure S7), suggesting its good mechanical stability. In addition, SEM characterization
of the GPE membrane after 500 bending cycles was conducted to observe
the morphological changes (Figure S8).
Although the membrane exhibited more rumples and wrinkles after extended
bending, the homogeneous elemental distribution remained unchanged.Furthermore, EIS measurements were performed under different bending
states (flat, 90°, and 180° bending and rolling). Nyquist
plots of the flexible pouch cells with different bending states measured
in the fully charged state (4.9 V vs Li anode) are shown in Figure a. The Nyquist plots
exhibit two overlapped semicircles in all spectra under different
bending conditions. The equivalent circuit used to interpret the plots
is shown in Figure b,[11] where R1 is the electrolyte resistance.
The first semicircle from high frequency to midfrequency, denoted
as the parallel combination of R2 and CPE1 (100 Hz to 100 kHz), originates
from the interfacial impedance at the Li metal anode|GPE. Similar
semicircles at a similar characteristic frequency were observed for
a Li|GPE|Li symmetrical cell and a Li|GPE|LiCoO2 cell.[48] The second semicircle from midfrequency to low
frequency, denoted as the parallel combination of R3 and CPE2 (1–100
Hz), could be attributed to the charge transfer processes between
the LNMO active particle and the electrolyte, as seen at the GPE|LiCoO2 interface.[48] The low-frequency
spur can be attributed to the diffusion-limiting impedance, designated
by Ws1. A comparison of the EIS spectra of the cells under different
bending conditions showed that the interfacial resistances (R1 and
R2) were almost constant, verifying the strong adhesion between the
current collector/GPC coating layer/GPE/Li anode interfaces. In addition,
the electrolyte resistance (R1) remained unchanged, which also supported
stable interfaces. These results support that the intimate contact
between the electrolyte, LNMO particles, and conductive carbon through
the PVDF binder may have been formed by this simple solution-based
preparation method, which ensures a stable ionic/electronic conductivity
for the electrode.
Figure 5
(a) Nyquist plots of the flexible cell under different
bending
states at the cell voltage of 4.9 V, (b) equivalent circuit used for
simulating the experimental impedance data, (c) demonstration of the
flexible cell connected in series with a red LED, and (d) cycle performance
of the flexible cell cycled at 0.05 C under flat and bending states
(1 C corresponds to 147 mAh g–1).
(a) Nyquist plots of the flexible cell under different
bending
states at the cell voltage of 4.9 V, (b) equivalent circuit used for
simulating the experimental impedance data, (c) demonstration of the
flexible cell connected in series with a red LED, and (d) cycle performance
of the flexible cell cycled at 0.05 C under flat and bending states
(1 C corresponds to 147 mAh g–1).To demonstrate the flexibility of the cell, bending tests
were
performed via a connection in series with a light-emitting diode (LED).
As shown in Figure c, after the initial charging to 100% SOC, the fabricated cell lit
an LED continuously under a flat state and continued to operate even
under a 90° bending state. When the cell was further subjected
to 180° bending and rolling, the brightness of the LED remained
unchanged. The cycling performance under various bending conditions
was monitored (Figure d). The discharge capacity and Coulombic efficiency remained almost
unchanged. After the stress was removed (flat state), a discharge
capacity of 115 mAh g–1 was maintained. The Coulombic
efficiency of the pouch cell during the cycling test was stabilized
above 90%, which was slightly lower than the corresponding value of
approximately 100% for the coin cell with the liquid electrolyte (Figure c). Although the
same areal LNMO loading (∼3 mg cm–2) cathode
was used in the pouch cell and the coin cell, the electrolytes in
the coil and pouch cells are different, that is, liquid electrolyte
and GPE, respectively. The ionic conductivity is reduced from 4.2
× 10–4 S cm–1 for the liquid
electrolyte to 1.5 × 10–4 S cm–1 for the GPE owing to the gelation.[48] Further,
the actual current enhanced from 0.18 to 0.73 mA owing to the increase
in the electrode area for the pouch cell. These variations may lead
to a large overpotential and undesired side reactions on the anode
side, which causes the difference in the Coulombic efficiency between
the pouch and coin cells.[55] We believe
that lithium anode protection in our future study would circumvent
this limitation for the 5 V class flexible lithium polymer battery.
Conclusion
The present study demonstrated
a flexible lithium polymer battery
comprising GPC and GPE. A SL-based HCE was incorporated in both the
LNMO-GPC and GPE membranes because of its high oxidative stability.
The lithium polymer battery fabricated by simple lamination of GPC,
GPE, and lithium metal anode could be bent for more than 500 bending
cycles between 0 and 90° without any apparent capacity decay,
as implied by the lack of morphological change and because of the
strong adhesion between the current collector/GPC coating layer/GPE/Li
anode interfaces. The fabricated 5 V class lithium polymer battery
exhibited stable electrochemical behavior during continuous bending,
which was confirmed by EIS measurements. The present study provides
a new perspective on flexible batteries for future wearable electronics.