| Literature DB >> 35664424 |
Yecheng Cao1,2, Yan Peng3, Zhaoxin Shen1, Hui Chen4, Bo Peng5.
Abstract
Objective. To construct the graph theory model and grey correlation model of table tennis mixed doubles technology and tactics so as to provide a new research method for the analysis of table tennis mixed doubles technology and tactics. The method of graphic theory and video observation is used to study the top tactical indicators of the game, and the method of graphic theory and video observation is used to analyze the tactical data of men and women, which has a certain contribution to the world level of table tennis. The grey correlation analysis can be better applied to the technical and tactical analysis of table tennis mixed doubles. The analysis of the contribution rate of men and women in eight rounds shows that there is little difference in the net average score between male and female athletes, and female athletes are slightly higher than male athletes. The net average score of the serving round is much higher than that of the receiving round, which shows that the serving round has certain advantages for the server, and the winner is often better able to grasp the opportunity of the serving round and get higher scores. Male athletes should strengthen physical training and adapt to a higher level of confrontation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35664424 PMCID: PMC9159889 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6543953
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Service mode and number of hitting points.
| Serial number | Serve way | Hit point | Hit point |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | Side spin | A | Diagonal line |
| b | Reverse spin | B | Center line |
| c | Screw spin | C | Straight line |
Technical application number.
| Number | Skill | Number | Skill |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forehand drop | 8 | Backhand loop |
| 2 | Backhand drop | 9 | Backhand bring |
| 3 | Forehand deep ball | 10 | Forehand bring |
| 4 | Backhand deep ball | 11 | Forehand block |
| 5 | Forehand flick | 12 | Backhand block |
| 6 | Backhand flick | 13 | Forehand sideways |
| 7 | Forehand loop |
Statistics of service times for different players.
| Country | Sex | Surname and personal name | Number of serves |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | Female | Liu Shiwen | 93 |
| Male | Xu Xin | 77 | |
|
| |||
| Japan | Female | Ito | 97 |
| Male | Jun | 77 | |
Frequency of the 13 different striking techniques.
| Number | Strike technology | Frequency | Number | Strike technology | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The forehand is short | 133 | 8 | The backhand pull | 167 |
| 2 | The backhand is short | 78 | 9 | Back hand fast tear | 22 |
| 3 | Forehand split long | 46 | 10 | Forehand fast belt | 8 |
| 4 | The backhand splits long | 9 | 11 | Forehand defense (block) | 60 |
| 5 | Forehand pick hit | 85 | 12 | Backhand defense (block) | 64 |
| 6 | Back twist (pick) | 71 | 13 | Side body pull | 120 |
| 7 | Forehand pull (attack) | 206 |
Figure 1Matrix diagram of all striking modes of Liu Shiwen.
Figure 2Matrix diagram of all striking modes of Xu Xin.
Figure 3Matrix diagram of all striking modes of ITO.
Figure 4Matrix diagram of all striking modes of JUN.
Figure 5Matrix heat map of grey correlation coefficient with “male” data as the reference sequence.
Figure 6Matrix heat map corresponding to the grey correlation coefficient with the first match data as the reference sequence.
Use of the first indicator “male male” data as the reference sequence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.000 | 0.724 | 0.720 | 0.730 | 0.751 | 0.771 | 0.764 | 0.754 |
|
| R1-10 | R1-11 | R1-12 | R1-13 | R1-14 | R1-15 | R1-16 |
| 0.774 | 0.727 | 0.761 | 0.758 | 0.751 | 0.743 | 0.743 | 0.721 |
The grey correlation degree corresponding to the first match data as the reference sequence is taken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.000 | 0.627 | 0.663 | 0.678 | 0.701 | 0.666 | 0.640 | 0.709 | 0.693 | 0.756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.717 | 0.704 | 0.647 | 0.702 | 0.679 | 0.660 | 0.721 | 0.587 | 0.691 | 0.730 |
Gross/net average scores in different service rounds.
| Male | Male | Male | Male | Female | Female | Female | Female | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G | 6.4 | 4.95 | 5.65 | 5.9 | 6.65 | 7.5 | 5.05 | 5.55 |
| N | 1.9 | 0.7 | 1.8 | −0.25 | 2 | 2.9 | 0.35 | −0.7 |
Figure 7Average scores in different service rounds.