Literature DB >> 35664230

Towards discovery of inhibitors of the undecaprenyl-pyrophosphate phosphatase BacA by virtual high-throughput screening.

Marko Jukič1,2, Rodolphe Auger3, Victor Folcher3, Matic Proj4, Hélène Barreteau3, Stanislav Gobec4, Thierry Touzé3.   

Abstract

Increasing resistance to common antibiotics is becoming a major challenge that requires the development of new antibacterial agents. Peptidoglycan is an essential heteropolymer of the bacterial envelope that ensures the integrity and shape of all bacteria and is also an important target for antibiotics. The biosynthesis of peptidoglycan depends on a lipid carrier, undecaprenyl phosphate. As a byproduct of peptidoglycan polymerization, the lipid carrier is released as undecaprenyl pyrophosphate, which must be recycled to allow new polymerization cycles. To this end, it undergoes a dephosphorylation process catalyzed by the membrane phosphatase BacA, which is specific and highly conserved in bacteria. In the present study, we identified small molecules displaying inhibitory potency towards BacA. We began by preparing a commercial compound library, followed by high-throughput virtual screening by ensemble docking using the 3D structure of BacA and molecular dynamics snapshots to account for the flexibility of the protein. Of 83 compounds computationally selected and tested in a biochemical assay, one sulfamoylthiophene molecule showed significant inhibition of the undecaprenyl pyrophosphate dephosphorylation activity catalyzed by BacA. Subsequently, an additional 33 scaffold analogs were selected and acquired, of which 6 compounds exhibited BacA inhibition. The IC50 values of these compounds ranged from 42 to 366 μM. In addition, significant antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli was observed in TolC/PAP2-depleted strains. We believe that the overall strategy followed in this study and the identified class of inhibitors provide a solid foundation for the further development of potent BacA-targeted inhibitors and the discovery of novel antibacterial compounds.
© 2022 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibacterial drug design; Antibacterials; BacA; Binding site identification; C15-PP, Farnesyl pyrophosphate; C5-PP, Isopentenyl pyrophosphate; C55-P, Undecaprenyl phosphate; C55-PP, Undecaprenyl pyrophosphate; Ensemble docking; Escherichia coli; GlcNAc, N-acetylglucosamine; HTVS, High-Throughput Virtual Screening; In silico drug design; MD, Molecular Dynamics; MIC, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration; Molecular dynamics; MurNAc, N-acetylmuramic acid; Non-covalent inhibitors; PBPs, Penicillin-binding proteins; PG, Peptidoglycan; PP, Pyrophosphate; RA, Residual activity; RMSD, Root-mean-square deviation; TLC, Thin layer chromatography; Undecaprenyl pyrophosphate phosphatase; VS, Virtual Screening; Virtual screening

Year:  2022        PMID: 35664230      PMCID: PMC9127117          DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J        ISSN: 2001-0370            Impact factor:   6.155


Introduction

Peptidoglycan (PG) constitutes the essential and specific exoskeleton of a vast majority of bacterial cells. It is also one of their weaknesses, which is underlined by the extent of antibacterial compounds that impede its biogenesis, maturation, and regulation. PG surrounds the plasma membrane of the cell, where it withstands the internal osmotic pressure, confers the cell shape and serves as a scaffold for anchoring other cell envelope components. It constitutes a complex heteropolymer made of long glycan chains with alternating N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAC) and N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc) residues, which are cross-linked by short peptide stems [1]. The PG subunit consists of a disaccharide-pentapeptide that is sequentially assembled on a lipid carrier, the undecaprenyl phosphate (C55-P), on the cytoplasmic side of the plasma membrane, yielding lipid II (undecaprenyl-pyrophosphoryl-MurNAc(peptide)-GlcNAc) (Fig. 1) [2]. Anchoring of the PG subunit to C55-P allows its translocation to the outer side of the plasma membrane by the MurJ flippase [3]. Afterwards, the disaccharide-peptide subunit is transferred to the growing end of peptidoglycan strands by penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) [4] or SEDS (shape, elongation, division, and sporulation) proteins [5], releasing the lipid carrier as undecaprenyl pyrophosphate (C55-PP) at the outer leaflet of the membrane (Fig. 1). C55-P must be recycled to fuel the high polymerization rate of PG since it is present in a low copy number per cell and is also used for the synthesis of other cell envelope polymers [[6], [7]]. Therefore, the rate of C55-P recycling is critical to ensure the proper turnover of cell envelope biogenesis. The recycling of C55-P requires the dephosphorylation of C55-PP and the flip of C55-P back to the inner side of the membrane. Two classes of transmembrane C55-PP phosphatases have been identified: BacA enzymes and a sub-group of PAP2 enzymes (type 2 phosphatidic acid phosphatases) [[8], [9]]. Escherichia coli has one BacA and three PAP2 (PgpB, YbjG, and LpxT) proteins. From their structures, it was inferred that the two classes of C55-PP phosphatases bind their substrate from the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, i.e., the C55-PP released by PG polymerases [[10], [11], [12], [13]]. PgpB and BacA were found to interact with the PG polymerase PBP1B and to stimulate its glycosyltransferase activity [14]. C55-P recycling is hampered by the antibiotics bacitracin and friulimycin B, which sequester C55-PP and C55-P, respectively, thus blocking PG biosynthesis and causing cell lysis. These observations demonstrate the importance of C55-P recycling and its attractiveness as a target for new drugs.
Fig. 1

De novo synthesis, use and recycling of C55-P and peptidoglycan synthesis. At the cytoplasmic side of the membrane, the enzyme UppS catalyses de novo synthesis of C55-PP, which is subsequently converted to C55-P by dephosphorylation by a yet unknown enzyme. The successive transfer of phospho-MurNAc(pentapeptide) and GlcNAc to C55-P is catalysed by MraY and MurG, respectively, yielding lipid II. The lipid carrier, with the help of the flippase MurJ, allows the translocation of the glycan-pentapeptide subunit to the periplasmic side of the membrane, where it is eventually transferred to the growing peptidoglycan through glycosyltransferase activity (GTase) of PBPs or SEDS enzymes. The glycan strands are then reticulated by transpeptidase activities (TPase) of PBPs. Finally, the lipid carrier is released in its pyrophosphate form, C55-PP, which is dephosphorylated by a C55-PP phosphatase of BacA or PAP2 families yielding C55-P. The latter is then flipped back to the cytoplasmic side by a yet unknown mechanism to be reused for another cycle of transfer of a peptidoglycan subunit. M = MurNAc, G = GlcNAc, P = phosphate. Adapted from Manat et al., 2014 [7].

De novo synthesis, use and recycling of C55-P and peptidoglycan synthesis. At the cytoplasmic side of the membrane, the enzyme UppS catalyses de novo synthesis of C55-PP, which is subsequently converted to C55-P by dephosphorylation by a yet unknown enzyme. The successive transfer of phospho-MurNAc(pentapeptide) and GlcNAc to C55-P is catalysed by MraY and MurG, respectively, yielding lipid II. The lipid carrier, with the help of the flippase MurJ, allows the translocation of the glycan-pentapeptide subunit to the periplasmic side of the membrane, where it is eventually transferred to the growing peptidoglycan through glycosyltransferase activity (GTase) of PBPs or SEDS enzymes. The glycan strands are then reticulated by transpeptidase activities (TPase) of PBPs. Finally, the lipid carrier is released in its pyrophosphate form, C55-PP, which is dephosphorylated by a C55-PP phosphatase of BacA or PAP2 families yielding C55-P. The latter is then flipped back to the cytoplasmic side by a yet unknown mechanism to be reused for another cycle of transfer of a peptidoglycan subunit. M = MurNAc, G = GlcNAc, P = phosphate. Adapted from Manat et al., 2014 [7]. BacA is an important and conserved protein in the bacterial world and thus can be considered a promising drug target. To identify BacA-specific inhibitors, a high-throughput virtual screening was performed followed by biological evaluation of hit compounds. The in silico screening method used ensemble molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) on the available crystal structure of the apo-form of BacA (PDB ID: 5OON) [12] to evaluate the immediate conformational flexibility of the protein. The virtual screening scenario led to the selection of a total of 116 different compounds with characteristic functional groups. We then identified 7 compounds with a common 5-sulfamoyl-2-thenoic acid scaffold that exhibited inhibitory activity against BacA and BacA-dependent antibacterial activity.

3D structure and function of BacA

The 3D structure of BacA reveals key structural motifs that are common to a variety of transporters, which suggests that BacA, besides its C55-PP phosphatase activity, may also catalyse the flip of C55-P. In contrast to the dephosphorylation step, the subsequent flip of C55-P is still a black box in C55-P recycling ([[12], [13]], Fig. 1). In E. coli, BacA is responsible for 75% of the C55-PP phosphatase activity [9]. Due to the plurality of C55-PP phosphatases, the deletion of the bacA together with pgpB and ybjG genes was required to get a lethal phenotype [9]. Nevertheless, the deletion of bacA in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Mycobacterium smegmatis abolishes their virulence or their ability to form biofilms [[15], [16]]. Furthermore, the BacA proteins of Lactococcus lactis and Enterococcus faecalis are targeted by bacteriocins that cause membrane leakage by yet unknown mechanisms [17]. BacA consists of two pseudosymmetric domains, which are in an inverted orientation to one another with respect to the membrane plane [[12], [13]]. Each domain contains three transmembrane helices and a pair of short, antiparallel re-entrant helices. In each pair, the re-entrant helices are connected by a short loop enclosing one of the conserved motifs, designated as BacA1 and BacA2 (Fig. 2). These motifs come in close proximity to each other at mid-section of the protein in the mid-plane of the membrane (Fig. 2). The enzyme is open to the outside and to the periplasmic leaflet by a cavity that extends half-way into the membrane, where BacA1 and BacA2 motifs meet each other to shape the bottom of the cavity. The size of the cavity was calculated by the Mole software as the largest cavity 1 with a volume of 4628 Å3 (probe radius 5, interior threshold 1.1) and is shown in green-yellow in Fig. 2 [18]. The hydrolysis of C55-PP may therefore take place at the latter position. The conserved residues Glu21 and Ser27 from BacA1 motif and Arg174 from BacA2 motif were shown to be central for C55-PP catalysis [19]. Ser27 is a strictly conserved residue, which upon mutagenesis to Ala abolishes the phosphatase activity of BacA. It was then proposed to be responsible for the nucleophilic attack at the β-phosphate group of C55-PP.
Fig. 2

Crystal structure of BacA from E. coli. Top: view of BacA from the membrane plane (left). The structure is shown as a cartoon representation in cyan, with the largest cavity of the protein highlighted in green-grey, as calculated by the Mole software, and the entrance of the periplasmic cavity highlighted by a green arrow. The proposed binding pocket for C55-PP is shown in a box (right), with the conserved motifs, designated BacA1 and BacA2, coloured yellow and red, respectively, and the rest of the protein coloured cyan. The active site residues Glu17, Glu21, Ser27, Arg174, and Ser175 are shown in sticks and coloured according to the motifs. Bottom: the sequence of the BacA1 and BacA2 motifs, with the conserved residues in red and marked with asterisks. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Crystal structure of BacA from E. coli. Top: view of BacA from the membrane plane (left). The structure is shown as a cartoon representation in cyan, with the largest cavity of the protein highlighted in green-grey, as calculated by the Mole software, and the entrance of the periplasmic cavity highlighted by a green arrow. The proposed binding pocket for C55-PP is shown in a box (right), with the conserved motifs, designated BacA1 and BacA2, coloured yellow and red, respectively, and the rest of the protein coloured cyan. The active site residues Glu17, Glu21, Ser27, Arg174, and Ser175 are shown in sticks and coloured according to the motifs. Bottom: the sequence of the BacA1 and BacA2 motifs, with the conserved residues in red and marked with asterisks. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Material and methods

Molecular library preparation

Library preparation for HTVS (high-throughput virtual screening) is an essential step for efficient downstream processing. We commenced with conglomeration of commercial compound databases from ENAMINE, Vitas-M, Chembridge, Maybridge, Ambinter, Otava, PrincetonBIO, Key-Organics, Life Chemicals, Uorsy, and Specs suppliers to gather 6,836,270 compounds in total. We then proceeded towards pre-filtering using OpenEye FILTER software (FILTER 2.5.1.4 version, OpenEye Scientific Software, Inc., Santa Fe, NM, USA; ). The goal was exclusion of structural faults, metals, small fragments, extra-large molecules, aggregators, and compounds with poor physico-chemical properties, e.g., solubility. The following parameters were applied: min_molwt 250, max_molwt 800, min_solubility poorly, allowed elements (H, C, N, O, F, P, S, Cl, Br, I, Si). Furthermore, known or predicted aggregators were removed with FILTER software (aggregators true “eliminate known aggregators” and pred_agg true “eliminate predicted aggregators”) while the library was filtered for PAINS and REOS structures using inhouse KNIME workflows with RDKit nodes [[20], [21], [22]]. In this manner, all structures in the library were compared to the selection of SMARTS-formatted flags and removed accordingly to the filtered library consisting of 3,731,096 compounds. After initial compound collection, library was expanded to 8 million unique compounds via final enumeration of undefined chiral centres, calculation of tautomeric structures, ionisation at pH 7.4 and minimisation (using OPLS3 force-field) towards the final 3D conformation [23]. The final step was performed using command line Ligprep software by Schrödinger (Release 2019–1, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA; [[24], [25]] as illustrated in Fig. 3, panel A.
Fig. 3

(A) Used workflow for molecular library preparation; (B). High-throughput virtual screening on the E. coli BacA protein and biological evaluation.

(A) Used workflow for molecular library preparation; (B). High-throughput virtual screening on the E. coli BacA protein and biological evaluation.

Molecular dynamics

Crystal complex (PDB ID: 5OON) [12] was prepared with Yasara software [26]. Missing hydrogens were added, overlaps adjusted, hydrogen bond network optimized, and residue ionisation assigned at pH 7.4 (cleanup, 270 residues, 29.428 kDa; [[27], [28]]. The protein was placed (based on the most exposed hydrophobic residues) in an artificial membrane model consisting of 100% phosphatidyl-ethanolamine-164 molecules and solvated using TIP3P water model (cubic; 15 Å padding – 80.82×78.72×80.82 Å, periodic boundary conditions). To neutralize the cell, a physiological concentration of 0.9% NaCl was added with an appropriate excess of either Na+ (24) or Cl− (28). After steepest descent and simulated annealing minimizations with equilibration (250 ps) to remove steric clashes, the MD production run of 5 ns was calculated using the AMBER14 force field for the solute, GAFF and AM1BCC for ligands as well as TIP3P for water [29]. Nonbonded long-range interactions were calculated with the Particle Mesh Ewald algorithm. Timestep of 1.25 fs for bonded interactions and 2.5 fs for non-bonded interactions was used at a temperature of 298 K and a pressure of 1 atm (NPT ensemble; densostat) with snapshots saved every 100 ps. No SHAKE was used. Energy parameters of the system were stable throughout the production run, as were root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values of the protein backbone.

High throughput virtual screening

Protein conformation model snapshots were superimposed on the starting structure and clustered using ClusCo software (hierarchical clustering, pairwise average-linkage manner, RMSD score) [30]. Ensemble docking experiment was performed using GOLD (CCDC Enterprise; 5.5 version; [31]. Five protein structures obtained from clustered (ClusCo) MD trajectory were aligned and superimposed to the first structure (crystal complex PDB ID: 5OON) and hydrogens added using Hermes software (CCDC Enterprise; 5.5 version). Structures were also checked and optimized using Protein Preparation by Schrödinger (Release 2019-1, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, USA). Asn, Gln and His tautomers from the MD calculation were used. Glu17 and Glu49 were predicted to have potential to be protonated, however, since both residues are located out of the binding site, their protonation state has no effect on docking. Heavy atoms (2 Hg), waters (6 molecules, bulk), 2-amino-2-hydroxymethyl-propane-1,3-diol (TRS, 1 molecule), and (2R)-2,3-dihydroxypropyl (9Z)-octadec-9-enoate (OLS, 2 molecules) were removed as they were nonspecifically bound along the hydrophobic outer surface of the protein. The binding site was defined as a 12 Å region around Ser27 at the catalytic site as described by Manat et al. [19]. Flood fill settings with radius 12, origin 49.363, 42.159, 42.173, do_cavity 1, floodfill_atom_no 0, and floodfill_center point parameters were used. All planar R-NR1R2 were able to flip as well as protonated carboxylic acids. Torsion angle distributions and rotatable bond postprocessing were set to the default. Docking was performed with PLP scoring function with early termination (3 solutions, rms 1.5) enabled and default GOLD parameter file used [32]. Docking scores were normalized via N1/3 to abolish large molecule-bias and identify druglike compounds [33]. Genetic algorithm settings were set at ensemble with autoscale at 0.3 for first screening and 1 for final screening. Parallel gold calculation (initial database of 8 million compounds was trenched into 14 parts to alleviate parallel calculations on a cluster) was performed with concatenation of results and retention of best binding poses. No constraints were used in docking experiment. The results were analyzed using Data Warrior software and sorted according to the normalized GOLD PLP Fitness score. The top-scoring compounds were purchased from several vendors and evaluated biochemically and microbiologically. The workflow used for HTVS is summarized in Fig. 3, panel B.

Chemicals

Isopentenyl pyrophosphate (C5-PP) and farnesyl pyrophosphate (C15-PP) were purchased from Sigma. [14C]C5-PP (50.6 mCi/mmol) was purchased from Perkin Elmer Life Sciences. The [14C]C55-PP substrate was prepared as described below by successive condensations of [14C]C5-PP onto C15-PP catalysed by the purified UppS enzyme. The n-dodecyl-β-D-maltopyranoside (DDM) detergent was purchased from Anatrace and nickel-nitrilotriacetate-agarose (Ni2+-NTA-agarose) was from Qiagen. Compounds were purchased from Enamine and ChemBridge, and their identity and purity were confirmed (see Supplementary Information). All other materials were reagent grade and obtained from commercial sources.

Analytics

1H NMR spectra for active compounds were recorded in a deuterated solvent on a Bruker Avance III 400 MHz spectrometer, operating at 400 MHz frequency. HRMS mass spectra were recorded using a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer. Analytical reversed-phase HPLC was performed on Thermo Scientific Dionex UltiMate 3000 UHPLC system equipped with an Acquity UPLC® BEH Phenyl Column (details and full analytics can be found in Supplementary Information).

Bacterial strains, plasmids and media

All E. coli strains and plasmids used are listed in Table 1. Bacteria were grown in 2YT broth supplemented, when required, with ampicillin or kanamycin at concentrations of 100 and 50 µg/ml, respectively. The BWΔtolC strain was obtained from the Keio collection. The BWΔbacAΔtolC and BWbacA-singleΔtolC were generated by P1 transduction of the ΔtolC::KanR cassette from BWΔtolC strain to BWΔbacA and DMEG9 recipient strains, respectively. The strains S. aureus RN4220 and S. pneumoniae R6 were used to evaluate the antibacterial activity of certain compounds. S. aureus was grown on BHI (Brain Heart Infusion) broth and S. pneumoniae was grown on Colombia broth supplemented with 5% horse blood.
Table 1

All strains and plasmids used in our work.

StrainsGenotypeSource
DH5αsupE44, lacU169, hsdR17, recA1, endA1, gyr696, relA1, 80d lacZΔM15Invitrogen
C43(DE3)F-ompT, gal, hsdsB (rBnB), dcm, DE3Avidis
BW25113lacIqrrnBT14 ΔlacZWJ16,hsdR514 Δara BADAH33 ΔrhaBADLD78[34]
DMEG9BW25113 ΔybjG, ΔlpxT, ΔpgpB[9]
BWΔbacABW25113 ΔbacA[35]
BWΔtolCBW25113 ΔtolC::KanR[36]
BWΔbacAΔtolCBW25113 ΔbacA, ΔtolC::KanRThis study
BWbacA-singleΔtolCBW25113 ΔybjG, ΔlpxT, ΔpgpB, ΔtolC::KanRThis study



Plasmids
pTRCH30[37]
pTrcBac30pTrcH30: bacA E. coli[8]
pTrcH60pgpBpTrcH60: pgpB E.coli[35]
All strains and plasmids used in our work.

Purification of BacA and PgpB

C43(DE3) cells carrying pTrcBac30 plasmid were used for the expression of N-terminally His6-tagged BacA (His6-BacA) protein from E. coli. Cells were grown in 2YT-ampicillin at 37 °C and when the OD600 reached 0.9, the temperature of the culture was decreased to 22 °C and protein expression was induced by addition of 1 mM IPTG. Incubation was continued overnight at 22 °C and bacteria were harvested in the cold and washed in a buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.4 M NaCl, 10% glycerol and 10 mM β-mercaptoethanol (buffer A). The cells were disrupted by three successive passages through a French press and the suspension was centrifuged at 200,000× g, 4 °C for 45 min. The pellet of membranes was washed with buffer A. The membranes were resuspended in buffer A supplemented by 2% DDM detergent. This mixture was incubated for 2 h at 4 °C under agitation before being centrifuged as described above. The supernatant containing solubilised membrane proteins was used for the purification of His6-BacA on Ni2+-NTA-agarose. The supernatant was incubated overnight at 4 °C under agitation with 2 ml of Ni2+-NTA-agarose polymer pre-equilibrated with buffer A supplemented with 10 mM imidazole and 0.2% DDM. The mixture was then transferred into a Poly-prep chromatography column (Biorad) and the polymer was washed with 50 ml of buffer A containing 0.2% DDM and successively 10 and 30 mM imidazole. The elution of BacA was then performed with buffer A containing 0.2% DDM and 400 mM imidazole. Fractions containing the BacA protein were subjected to an additional gel-filtration purification step on Superdex 200 (HiLoadTM 16/600 SuperdexTM 200) equilibrated in 0.1% DDM-containing buffer A. 1-ml fractions were collected and analysed by SDS-PAGE. Pure fractions were pooled and concentrated to 1 mg/ml (50000 MWCO concentrator, Vivaspin™ 20). The BacA protein concentration was estimated by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm, based on a theoretical molar extinction coefficient of 25 565 M−1 cm−1. PgpB was purified as previously described [35].

Synthesis of radiolabelled C55-PP substrate

[14C]C55-PP was synthesized using purified E. coli UppS synthase as previously described [8]. The reaction mixture (300 μL) containing 100 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.5, 100 μM C15-PP, 800 μM [14C]C5-PP (56 kBq), 0.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 3 μg UppS was incubated at 25 °C for 2 h. The progress of the reaction was controlled by thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis with a 5-µL aliquot of the reaction mixture. The radiolabelled substrate (C5-PP) and product (C55-PP) were separated on pre-coated plates of silica gel 60 (Merck) using propanol/ammonium hydroxide/water (6:3:1, v/v/v) as a mobile phase and the radioactive spots were located and quantified with a radioactivity scanner (Rita Star, Raytest Isotopenmeβgeräte GmbH, Staubenhardt, Germany). [14C]C55-PP was then extracted from the reaction mixture by addition of 1 equivalent volume of 1 M pyridinium acetate, pH 4.5, and 2 volumes of butanol. It was recovered in the butanol-containing upper phase, which was stored at −20 °C. The concentration of [14C]C55-PP within the solution was measured by liquid scintillation counting of radioactivity based on the specific activity of the molecule being 1.22×1014 dpm/mol.

C55-PP phosphatase assay

The C55-PP phosphatase activity of BacA was assessed by measuring the percentage of transformation of [14C]C55-PP into [14C]C55-P upon incubation with BacA by TLC analysis. The butanol from the [14C]C55-PP solution was dried under vacuum so as to evaporate the organic solvent and to recover C55-PP as a lipidic film. The C55-PP substrate was then solubilised, at a final concentration of 50 µM, in 7 µL of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% DDM, 1 mM CaCl2. The compounds (1 µL) were added to the reaction mixture at 100 µM final concentration (at the first instance) from a 2 mM stock solution prepared in DMSO. A blank experiment without compound, but with 1 µL DMSO, was performed in order to determine the 100 % of BacA activity to which all other experiments were compared. BacA (2 µL) was then added at a final concentration of 5 nM from a dilution solution prepared in the reaction buffer. The concentration of enzyme was fixed so that the consumption of substrate at the end of the incubation time in the control was less than 30%. The reaction mixture was incubated for 10 min at 37 °C and the catalysis was stopped by freezing in liquid nitrogen. The radiolabelled substrate (C55-PP) and product (C55-P) were separated by TLC on pre-coated plates of silica gel 60 (Merck) using propanol/ammonium hydroxide/water (6:3:1, v/v/v) as a mobile phase. The radioactive spots were located and quantified with a radioactivity scanner. When an inhibitory activity was observed, a range of concentrations of the corresponding inhibitor was tested to determine its IC50 value. Dose-response curves were plotted as BacA residual activity (RA) versus the logarithms of inhibitor concentration. Plots were analyzed by using GraphPad Prism using non-linear regression analysis and the equation used to calculate the IC50 values was y = 100(1 + 10^((LogIC50-x)*HillSlope))). Reported values are the average of at least three experiments. The C55-PP phosphatase activity of PgpB was measured as described for BacA.

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against E. coli.

For compounds displaying inhibitory activity on BacA catalysis, their antibacterial activity was tested on different E. coli strains by monitoring bacterial growth in the presence of compounds (125, 250 and 500 µM). One colony was cultured in 10 ml of 2YT liquid medium and incubated at 37℃ for 6 h. The absorbance of the culture at 600 nm (A600) was measured to prepare a bacterial suspension in 2YT liquid medium at 15.106 CFU/ml (A600 = 1 corresponds to 3.108 CFU/ml). The bacterial suspension (200-µl) was then grown on 96-well plates in the presence or not of compounds (5-µl), which was added from a stock solution prepared in DMSO. Negative controls were then performed by growing the cells without inhibitors in 2YT medium and in 2YT medium supplemented with 2.5% of DMSO. The plates were incubated at 37℃ overnight with A600 measurements every 10 min using a Tecan F200 PRO microplate reader (iControl software).

Double-disc diffusion test

To evaluate the antibacterial activity of the compounds per se or in combination with bacitracin, against S. aureus RN4220 and S. pneumoniae R6 strains, disc diffusion method was used according to the CLSI guidelines. Bacterial suspensions equivalent to 108 CFU/ml were prepared in 5 ml BHI broth. A BHI-agar plate (for S. aureus) or Colombia-agar plate supplemented with 5% Horse Blood (for S. pneumoniae) were then flooded with a bacterial suspension for 1 min to allow the bacteria to sediment before removing the excess of medium. The commercial discs loaded with 130 µg of bacitracin (Biorad) was positioned on top of the bacterial lawn at distances of 10 mm (center to center) from another sterile and blank disc, which was then loaded with 7 µL of a compound solution (50 µg). The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and the diameter of the growth inhibition zone was measured and a photo of the plates was acquired using a ChemiDoc™ MP System.

Results and discussion

MD simulation and virtual screening of compounds

MD simulations were performed in an aqueous solvent (with a physiological concentration of 0.9% NaCl) placing the structure of BacA (PDB ID: 5OON) at 2.6 Å resolution in a 100% phosphatidylethanolamine-containing model membrane to investigate the immediate conformational flexibility of the protein and to prepare the input for ensemble docking experiments (inclusion of protein flexibility in molecular docking). No major conformational changes or domain movements were observed during MD, and the energetics and RMSD values of the protein backbone were very stable. RMSD values after alignment of 5 conformations with the initial structure ranged from 1.179 to 1.422 Å, focusing on the flexibility of the active site containing the catalytic residues Glu21, Ser27, and Arg174, which have analogous conformations in all snapshots (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

(A) Initial membrane (phosphatidyl-ethanolamine 15 Å around protein) embedded model for molecular dynamics simulation. View from the membrane plane. (B) Structural superposition of the highest-ranking clusters according to MD. (C) Conformational ensemble of the active site residues. The crystal structure is shown in a cyan cartoon model. The individual side-chain conformational ensembles of residues Glu17, Glu21, Ser27, Arg174, and Ser175 are shown as lines. View from the top of the protein into the cavity. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

(A) Initial membrane (phosphatidyl-ethanolamine 15 Å around protein) embedded model for molecular dynamics simulation. View from the membrane plane. (B) Structural superposition of the highest-ranking clusters according to MD. (C) Conformational ensemble of the active site residues. The crystal structure is shown in a cyan cartoon model. The individual side-chain conformational ensembles of residues Glu17, Glu21, Ser27, Arg174, and Ser175 are shown as lines. View from the top of the protein into the cavity. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) Nevertheless, the most distinct 5 protein conformation clusters (according to the RMSD average of pairwise linkage) were identified and the cluster centroid structures were selected for the ensemble HTVS along with the original protein crystal conformation [38]. Our goal was to identify commercially available, synthetically tractable and non-covalent inhibitors. We performed an initial screening of a prepared library of 8 million compounds using the software CCDC GOLD (GOLD 5.5, Cambridge Crystallography Data Centre, Cambridge, UK; auto-scale 0.3). We selected the 70,000 highest scoring compounds using the normalised Gold PLP scoring function to minimise the compound size bias (Fig. 3). We then performed a final exhaustive ensemble docking experiment with 70,000 compounds (auto-scale parameter of 1) and clustered the docked compounds according to structural fingerprints (hierarchical clustering, RMSD average linkage, molprint2D hashed fingerprints, Kelley criterion). For the virtual screening, we used ChemPLP scoring function that uses the ChemScore hydrogen bonding term and multiple linear potentials to model van der Waals and repulsive terms. ChemPLP is an efficient scoring function and it has been shown previously to offer superior performance in HTVS experiments compared to alternative scoring functions [32]. We employed a ChemPLP fitness score cutoff (55) for selection of compounds and covered top scoring representatives of all structural clusters to finally select a set of 100 compounds with the highest score and diversity. From the hit list, 83 compounds could be acquired from suppliers Enamine and Chembridge (the full hit list is deposited in the Supplementary Information).

Inhibitory activity of virtual hit compounds against BacA

The C55-PP substrate was synthesized by the condensation reaction of [14C]C5-PP on C15-PP, catalyzed by the purified UppS enzyme, as described in Material and methods section. Analysis of the reaction mixture showed a high yield of synthesis as 90% of the precursor [14C]C5-PP was converted into [14C]C55-PP (Fig. S1, panel A). After extraction of the product with butanol, a concentration of 31 µM of [14C]C55-PP was determined by measuring the radioactivity. The activity of BacA was then investigated by monitoring the initial velocity of [14C]C55-PP dephosphorylation, as described in Material and methods section. The inhibitory activity of the 83 hit compounds was assayed at a final concentration of 100 µM, whereas the [14C]C55-PP substrate was present at 50 µM and the BacA enzyme at 5 nM. The compounds were prepared as 2 mM DMSO stock solutions, resulting in a 5 % final concentration of DMSO in the reaction mixture. The activity of BacA without compound, but with 5 % DMSO, was defined as the reference value (100 % of C55-PP phosphatase activity, Fig. S1, panel B) and the activity obtained in the presence of each compound was expressed as residual activity (RA). Of the 83 virtual screening hits (Table S1), one compound, designated compound 1, showed significant inhibition of BacA, with 45 ± 6 % RA at 100 µM. It was then assayed at a range of concentrations to determine an IC50 value of 98 ± 11 µM (Fig. 5 and Table 2).
Fig. 5

A. Initial hit compound 1 (5-{p-[(3-pyridyl)methylthio]phenylaminosulfonyl}-3-thenoic acid). Right-hand side of the molecule is occupied by 5-{aminosulfonyl}-3-thenoic acid moiety while the left-hand side is a “variable region”. B. The RA of BacA (%) plotted against the logarithm of compound 1 concentration.

Table 2

Collection of 7 identified hit compounds showing significant inhibition of BacA.

Compound IDMW (Da)StructureBacA RA (%)aIC50 (µM)MICbOff-target activityc
1406.5045 ± 698± 11NDNo
2310.3666± 17132 ± 22500 µM (155 µg/ml)No
3338.3950 ± 1468 ± 10500 µM (169 µg/ml)Yes
4369.4145 ± 1042 ± 6250 µM (92 µg/ml)Yes
5355.3876 ± 13338 ± 35NDNo
6332.3770 ± 18151 ± 13250 µM (83 µg/ml)Yes
7340.3980 ±10366 ± 73500 µM (170 µg/ml)No

RA (%) of BacA in the presence of 100 µM of compound.

MICs were determined against BWbacA-singleΔtolC strain; ND, no growth inhibition detected up to 500 µM compound.

Whether the compound displayed off-target antibacterial activity (Yes) or not (No), i.e. whether they have antibacterial activity against BWΔtolC, is indicated.

A. Initial hit compound 1 (5-{p-[(3-pyridyl)methylthio]phenylaminosulfonyl}-3-thenoic acid). Right-hand side of the molecule is occupied by 5-{aminosulfonyl}-3-thenoic acid moiety while the left-hand side is a “variable region”. B. The RA of BacA (%) plotted against the logarithm of compound 1 concentration. Collection of 7 identified hit compounds showing significant inhibition of BacA. RA (%) of BacA in the presence of 100 µM of compound. MICs were determined against BWbacA-singleΔtolC strain; ND, no growth inhibition detected up to 500 µM compound. Whether the compound displayed off-target antibacterial activity (Yes) or not (No), i.e. whether they have antibacterial activity against BWΔtolC, is indicated.

Analogue identification and binding mode analysis

In order to explore the chemical space of the initial hit 1, we searched the ZINC library for easily purchasable 5-sulfamoyl-2-thenoic acid analogues using a precalculated hit compound 1 structural similarity search at ZINC [[39], [40]]. We then selected a set of 33 new compounds that were tested against BacA (Table S2). Six new compounds 2–7 with significant inhibition of BacA were identified (Table 2). We confirmed the identity and determined purity of active compounds (see Supplementary Information for analytical data). The inhibitory activity of these six related compounds 2–7 was further assessed by varying their concentration in the reaction mixture in order to determine their IC50 values. The IC50 values of these compounds ranged from 42 µM to 366 µM (Table 2 and Fig. 6). The similarity search thus yielded two compounds (3 and 4) with increased potency compared to the initial hit 1. Due to a small number of compounds, a detailed structure-activity relationship cannot be investigated. Nevertheless, a common 5-sulfamoyl-2-thenoic acid motif can be observed, with the sulfamoyl group derivatized with various aromatic or heteroaromatic systems. The variable regions (Fig. 5, panel A) of the inhibitors do not possess any functional group handles so we postulate functional group decoration and bioisosteric replacement study should be performed in the future in order to further optimize the reported 5-sulfamoyl-2-thenoic acid moiety into a viable scaffold for BacA inhibitor design. Furthermore, we are aware of the presence of the free carboxylic acid functional group and propose a bioisosteric replacement in the process of further development.
Fig. 6

Plots of the relative activity of BacA (%) versus the logarithms of compounds 2–7 concentration.

Plots of the relative activity of BacA (%) versus the logarithms of compounds 2–7 concentration. Upon inspection of the docked pose of the first hit compound 1 at the BacA active site, an abundance of interactions are available (Fig. 7). Namely, the compound forms hydrophobic interactions with Leu13, Phe40, Glu49, Ile52 and Phe117. It forms hydrogen bonds with Glu21 (protein as the acceptor) and Ser26, Glu49, Gln53, Gly171, Phe172, Ser173, and Arg174, all with protein as the donor. Furthermore, cation-π interaction with Arg174 can be observed. The common 5-sulfamoyl-2-thenoic acid moiety is thus found at the catalytic polar pocket defined by Gly171, Phe172, Ser173 and Arg174 while the tail is located at the more hydrophobic binding site entrance. A second binding mode can be observed for smaller hit compounds and upon inspection of compound 3, similar hydrogen bonding interactions are present between the 5-sulfamoyl-2-thenoic acid moiety and Gly171, Ser173 together with key catalytic Arg174, all with protein as the donor (Fig. 7). The aromatic distal end is positioned laterally to the binding site entrance, making hydrophobic interactions with Leu168 and Ala207. Other hit compounds behave analogously and the calculated binding poses also converged in both cases of ionised and protonated sulfamoyl moieties firmly placing 5-sulfamoyl-2-thenoic acid in the catalytic binding pocket near Arg174.
Fig. 7

Calculated binding modes of representative hit compounds 1 in the yellow stick model (left) and 3 in the purple-blue stick model (right). The protein is shown in a light blue cartoon model, and the residues in close proximity to the hit compounds are shown in magenta line models. Residues 171–174 are shown as magenta line models as they form the bottom of the catalytic pocket. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Calculated binding modes of representative hit compounds 1 in the yellow stick model (left) and 3 in the purple-blue stick model (right). The protein is shown in a light blue cartoon model, and the residues in close proximity to the hit compounds are shown in magenta line models. Residues 171–174 are shown as magenta line models as they form the bottom of the catalytic pocket. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) In order to determine the nature of the inhibition event, we further performed competition kinetic experiments. We have measured the specific activity of BacA at various concentrations of substrate in the absence or in the presence of compounds 2, 3 and 4. Of note, we observed an important inhibition of BacA activity by an excess of substrate above 300 µM (data not shown), preventing us to perform a full enzyme kinetic experiment. Nevertheless, we performed kinetic analysis within the frame of 25 to 300 µM of substrate in the presence and the absence of 200 µM of compounds. As shown in Fig. 8, BacA enzyme was apparently saturated in this frame work since the activity does not vary. Then, we observed the same inhibition rate in the presence of compound whichever the substrate concentration. Therefore, the data are strongly suggestive that these compounds are non-competitive inhibitors. This can be expected as the apo-form structural information used in the structure-based drug design does not provide insight into native substrate positioning at the active site and the complete volume around active site key residues was used for molecular docking experiment.
Fig. 8

Compound versus substrate competition kinetic experiments. The residual activity of BacA was measured at various concentrations of substrate in the absence (circle) and presence (square) of 200 µM compound 2 (A), 3 (B) and 4 (C). Plots of BacA residual activity versus the concentration of substrate.

Compound versus substrate competition kinetic experiments. The residual activity of BacA was measured at various concentrations of substrate in the absence (circle) and presence (square) of 200 µM compound 2 (A), 3 (B) and 4 (C). Plots of BacA residual activity versus the concentration of substrate.

Antibacterial activity of BacA inhibitors

Two compounds, 3 and 5, were assessed for antibacterial activity using the broth microdilution method against the E. coli BW25113 wild type strain. No growth inhibition of these cells was observed in the presence of compounds (Fig. 9, panel A). Considering the plurality of C55-PP phosphatases in E. coli, the inhibition of BacA may not induce growth inhibition as long as the PAP2 enzymes (PgpB, YbjG, and LpxT) are functional. Consequently, compounds 3 and 5 were tested against a BW25113 variant in which the PAP2 enzymes were depleted (DMEG9 strain, alias BWbacA-single). In this case, C55-P recycling relies only on BacA. Nevertheless, again no growth inhibition was observed (Fig. 9, panel B).
Fig. 9

Antibacterial activity evaluation of compounds 3 and 5 against different BW25113 E. coli variants. Each panel corresponds to one variant strain, whose name (genotype) is indicated on top. While compound 5 did not display any antibacterial activity, compound 3 caused growth inhibition upon inactivation of TolC and/or the PAP2 C55-PP phosphatases (i.e. pgpB, ybjG and lpxT deletions). A complete growth inhibition was observed with BWbacA-singleΔtolC strain, while solely a moderate inhibition was observed with BWΔtolC and BWΔbacAΔtolC strains, thus strongly suggesting that the arrest of growth arises through BacA inhibition but also that the compound displays off-target activity. The relative specificity of compound 3 towards BacA was confirmed by showing that in trans overexpression of bacA in BWbacA-singleΔtolC strain partially alleviated growth inhibition (we restored similar growth as for BWΔbacAΔtolC strain). Representative growth curves of bacterial cells obtained in 2YT medium in the absence or the presence of compound 3 and 5 at 500 µM.

Antibacterial activity evaluation of compounds 3 and 5 against different BW25113 E. coli variants. Each panel corresponds to one variant strain, whose name (genotype) is indicated on top. While compound 5 did not display any antibacterial activity, compound 3 caused growth inhibition upon inactivation of TolC and/or the PAP2 C55-PP phosphatases (i.e. pgpB, ybjG and lpxT deletions). A complete growth inhibition was observed with BWbacA-singleΔtolC strain, while solely a moderate inhibition was observed with BWΔtolC and BWΔbacAΔtolC strains, thus strongly suggesting that the arrest of growth arises through BacA inhibition but also that the compound displays off-target activity. The relative specificity of compound 3 towards BacA was confirmed by showing that in trans overexpression of bacA in BWbacA-singleΔtolC strain partially alleviated growth inhibition (we restored similar growth as for BWΔbacAΔtolC strain). Representative growth curves of bacterial cells obtained in 2YT medium in the absence or the presence of compound 3 and 5 at 500 µM. E. coli cells express an efflux pump, consisting of AcrA, AcrB and TolC proteins, which expels various noxious compounds from the cytoplasm, plasma membrane, and periplasm out of the cell. Consequently, the compounds might be expelled before they can bind BacA. Accordingly, the compounds were tested against a BW25113 variant depleted of TolC (BWΔtolC). In this case, compound 3 exhibited significant growth inhibition, by increasing the doubling time of cells by 3-fold (Fig. 9, panel C), thereby indicating that i) inactivation of TolC was required for this compound to exhibit antibacterial activity, and ii) compound 3 is recognized as a substrate by the pump. In contrast, compound 5 did not lead to any growth inhibition of this strain. Next, compounds 3 and 5 were tested against a strain combining the depletions of PAP2 enzymes together with TolC (BWbacA-singleΔtolC). In this case, a total growth inhibition was observed with 500 µM of compound 3, while no growth inhibition occurred with compound 5 (Fig. 9, panel D). These data demonstrate a synergistic effect of combining PAP2 and TolC depletions for the antibacterial activity of compound 3. The fact that the depletion of the PAP2 enzymes strongly enhances the effect of this compound on bacterial growth suggests that the observed antibacterial activity implies BacA inhibition. Nevertheless, to determine whether compound 3 also exhibits any BacA-independent antibacterial activity, this compound was also tested against BW25113 variant, depleted of both BacA and TolC (but possessing the PAP2 enzymes). Compound 3 exhibited similar antibacterial activity whether BacA was depleted or not, in a TolC depletion background, demonstrating that the compound displays a significant, although moderate, BacA-independent activity (Fig. 9, panel E). To further assess the specificity of compounds 3 and 5 with respect to BacA, they were tested against the strain depleted of both TolC and PAP2 but overexpressing an ectopic copy of the bacA gene on a plasmid. As expected, compound 3 caused total growth inhibition when used at 500 µM against the control strain carrying the empty vector (pTRCH30) (Fig. 9, panel F). Upon bacA overexpression, the susceptibility was decreased at the level observed with the strain depleted of TolC alone (Fig. 9, panel G). These data show that the overexpression of BacA alleviates the antibacterial activity of compound 3, in the same way as having functional PAP2 enzymes. They confirm that compound 3 interferes with BacA, causing total arrest of growth unless BacA is overexpressed to withstand the inhibitory activity of the compound. Nevertheless, when BacA was no longer present, a residual susceptibility to compound 3 was observed due to another unknown off-target effect of the molecule (Fig. 9, panel E). In order to determine MIC values and to assess the specificity of action towards BacA, all compounds displaying BacA inhibition were also tested against the TolC and TolC/PAP2-depleted strains (Fig. S2 and Table 2). Compounds 1 and 5 showed no growth inhibition up to 500 µM. Compounds 2 and 7 displayed total growth inhibition of TolC/PAP2-depleted strains (MIC = 500 µM) and had no effect on TolC-depleted strain, suggesting that these compounds have less off-target effect as compared to compound 3; i.e. they exhibit more specific activity towards BacA. Among the other inhibitors, compounds 4 and 6 displayed the lowest MIC value, 250 µM on TolC/PAP2-depleted strain, with no effect on TolC-depleted strain; i.e. they have higher antibacterial efficacy directed against BacA and minor off-target effect at this concentration. At 500 µM, the latter compounds displayed the same effect as compound 3, i.e., total growth inhibition against TolC/PAP2-depleted strain and a moderate inhibition of TolC-depleted strain. In order to determine whether the PAP2 C55-PP phosphatases could be the off-targets of our hit compounds, which could account for the growth inhibition of BWΔtolC strain, we tested the potential inhibitory activity of compounds 3 and 4 against purified PgpB enzyme. PgpB was not inhibited in the presence of 100 µM of the latter compounds (data not shown) suggesting that off-targets are not linked to the recycling process of C55-PP and could be any other essential cellular activity. As already mentioned, it was reported that the deletion of bacA gene in S. aureus and S. pneumoniae abolishes the virulence of these pathogenic bacteria, but it also increases their susceptibility to bacitracin by 16- and more than 1000-fold, respectively [15]. Therefore, we tested whether BacA inhibitors increase the bacterial susceptibility to bacitracin of both species by using double-disc diffusion tests. As shown on Fig. S3, panel A, none of the tested compounds were found to display any growth inhibition, nor to increase the bacitracin activity, towards S. aureus. In contrast, against S. pneumonia, compound 4, which exhibited the lowest IC50 and MIC against BacA and E. coli cells, respectively, increased bacitracin susceptibility (Fig. S3, panel B). Indeed, while the compound 4 didn’t display antibacterial activity per se (i.e. no inhibition zone was observed around compound 4-loaded disc), its proximity with bacitracin significantly increased the inhibition zone of the latter antibiotic (from 7.5 mm to 10 mm). The other compounds didn’t show any activity per se or in combination with bacitracin towards S. pneumonia. These data strongly suggest that our best hit compound towards BacA from E. coli, is able to target BacA from distant species in vivo.

Conclusion

In this work, we performed a robust and comprehensive high-throughput virtual screening using the available crystal structure of the undecaprenyl pyrophosphate phosphatase BacA from E. coli. We used a prepared library of 8 million unique compounds to identify new commercially available, synthetically tractable non-covalent inhibitors of BacA. Using ensemble docking and compound scaffold analysis, we acquired and biochemically evaluated a total of 116 compounds to find seven small molecule BacA inhibitors with IC50 values ranging from 42 to 366 µM. All active compounds have a 5-sulfamoyl-2-thenoic acid moiety on one side and variable aromatic systems on the other side of the molecule. We hypothesise that the variable aromatic region should be a good starting point for the design and optimization of future compounds. Indeed, biological evaluation has shown that compound 4 has an IC50 of 42 ± 6 µM for BacA and an MIC of 92 µg/ml against TolC/PAP2-depleted strains, suggesting that it is able to target protein in bacteria but is also a substrate for the efflux pump. We present a series of valuable experimentally identified inactive compounds that can serve as experimental decoys for future computational discovery of BacA inhibitors and, more importantly, seven initial BacA inhibitors that provide a solid foundation for future development of BacA-targeted antibacterial agents.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  39 in total

Review 1.  Designing screens: how to make your hits a hit.

Authors:  W Patrick Walters; Mark Namchuk
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Interpreting steep dose-response curves in early inhibitor discovery.

Authors:  Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Epik: a software program for pK( a ) prediction and protonation state generation for drug-like molecules.

Authors:  John C Shelley; Anuradha Cholleti; Leah L Frye; Jeremy R Greenwood; Mathew R Timlin; Makoto Uchimaya
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays.

Authors:  Jonathan B Baell; Georgina A Holloway
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Comparative Assessment of Scoring Functions: The CASF-2016 Update.

Authors:  Minyi Su; Qifan Yang; Yu Du; Guoqin Feng; Zhihai Liu; Yan Li; Renxiao Wang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Probing the role of cysteine residues in glucosamine-1-phosphate acetyltransferase activity of the bifunctional GlmU protein from Escherichia coli: site-directed mutagenesis and characterization of the mutant enzymes.

Authors:  F Pompeo; J van Heijenoort; D Mengin-Lecreulx
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 7.  The penicillin-binding proteins: structure and role in peptidoglycan biosynthesis.

Authors:  Eric Sauvage; Frédéric Kerff; Mohammed Terrak; Juan A Ayala; Paulette Charlier
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-02-11       Impact factor: 16.408

8.  Membrane Topology and Biochemical Characterization of the Escherichia coli BacA Undecaprenyl-Pyrophosphate Phosphatase.

Authors:  Guillaume Manat; Meriem El Ghachi; Rodolphe Auger; Karima Baouche; Samir Olatunji; Frédéric Kerff; Thierry Touzé; Dominique Mengin-Lecreulx; Ahmed Bouhss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Crystal structure of an intramembranal phosphatase central to bacterial cell-wall peptidoglycan biosynthesis and lipid recycling.

Authors:  Sean D Workman; Liam J Worrall; Natalie C J Strynadka
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Crystal structure of undecaprenyl-pyrophosphate phosphatase and its role in peptidoglycan biosynthesis.

Authors:  Meriem El Ghachi; Nicole Howe; Chia-Ying Huang; Vincent Olieric; Rangana Warshamanage; Thierry Touzé; Dietmar Weichert; Phillip J Stansfeld; Meitian Wang; Fred Kerff; Martin Caffrey
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  Metagenomic insights into the antibiotic resistomes of typical Chinese dairy farm environments.

Authors:  Jijun Kang; Yiming Liu; Xiaojie Chen; Fei Xu; Honglei Wang; Wenguang Xiong; Xiubo Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 6.064

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.