| Literature DB >> 35664109 |
En Xin Neo1, Khairunnisa Hasikin1,2, Mohd Istajib Mokhtar3, Khin Wee Lai1, Muhammad Mokhzaini Azizan4, Sarah Abdul Razak5, Hanee Farzana Hizaddin6.
Abstract
Environmental issues such as environmental pollutions and climate change are the impacts of globalization and become debatable issues among academics and industry key players. One of the environmental issues which is air pollution has been catching attention among industrialists, researchers, and communities around the world. However, it has always neglected until the impacts on human health become worse, and at times, irreversible. Human exposure to air pollutant such as particulate matters, sulfur dioxide, ozone and carbon monoxide contributed to adverse health hazards which result in respiratory diseases, cardiorespiratory diseases, cancers, and worst, can lead to death. This has led to a spike increase of hospitalization and emergency department visits especially at areas with worse pollution cases that seriously impacting human life and health. To address this alarming issue, a predictive model of air pollution is crucial in assessing the impacts of health due to air pollution. It is also critical in predicting the air quality index when assessing the risk contributed by air pollutant exposure. Hence, this systemic review explores the existing studies on anticipating air quality impact to human health using the advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI). From the extensive review, we highlighted research gaps in this field that are worth to inquire. Our study proposes to develop an AI-based integrated environmental and health impact assessment system using federated learning. This is specifically aims to identify the association of health impact and pollution based on socio-economic activities and predict the Air Quality Index (AQI) for impact assessment. The output of the system will be utilized for hospitals and healthcare services management and planning. The proposed solution is expected to accommodate the needs of the critical and prioritization of sensitive group of publics during pollution seasons. Our finding will bring positive impacts to the society in terms of improved healthcare services quality, environmental and health sustainability. The findings are beneficial to local authorities either in healthcare or environmental monitoring institutions especially in the developing countries.Entities:
Keywords: air pollution; deep learning; federated learning; health hazard; machine learning
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35664109 PMCID: PMC9160600 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.851553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Search string of databases (Scopus and Web of Science).
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Scopus | (TITLE-ABS-KEY (“ |
| Web of science | (“ |
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for the searching in databases.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Literature type | Journal (research article) | Journal (review articles), conference proceeding, book series, book chapter, book, encyclopedia |
| Language | English | Non-English |
| Timeline | 2010–2021 | < 2010 |
| Area | Engineering, Environmental Science, Health Science, Artificial Intelligence | Other than Engineering, Environmental Science, Health Science, Artificial Intelligence |
Search strings for 7 databases.
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air pollution AND telehealth | 12 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 395 | 50 |
| Air quality AND telehealth | 11 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 335 | 41 |
| Air pollution AND digital health | 9 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 364 | 2 |
| Air quality AND digital health | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 310 | 71 |
| Sustainable health AND Air quality | 51 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 282 | 77 |
| Sustainable health AND Air pollution | 35 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 350 | 82 |
| Air quality AND Machine learning AND Health | 1407 | 14 | 168 | 18 | 60 | 7390 | 2000 |
| Air quality AND Deep Learning AND Health | 451 | 8 | 74 | 5 | 23 | 2864 | 94 |
| Total including duplicates | 1986 | 22 | 265 | 28 | 116 | 12290 | 2417 |
| Sub-total including duplicates | 17124 | ||||||
| Total selected | 18 | ||||||
Figure 1PRISMA flow chart of the review adopted from the PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (25).
Summary and overview of the review findings.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Reid et al. ( | Particulate Matter (PM2.5), Ozone (O3) | Respiratory diseases | Generalized additive model (GAM), generalized boosting model (GBM), k-nearest neighbor model regression, lasso regression | Poisson generalized estimating equations |
| Usmani et al. ( | Particulate Matters (PM10), Ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), nitrogen dioxides (NO2), nitrogen monoxide (NO), sulfur dioxide (SO2) | Cardiorespiratory diseases | Enhanced long short-term memory (ELSTM) | - |
| Tusnio et al. ( | Sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxides (NO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO),Ozone (O3), Particulate Matters (PM2.5,PM10), benzene (C6H6), Lead (Pb), Arsenic (As), Cadmium (Cd), Nickel (Ni), Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) in PM10 size | Various types of cancers | Random forest | Pearson correlation coefficient |
| Wang et al. ( | Particulate Matters (PM2.5, and PM1) | Blood cell counts for pregnancy preparation | - | Generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) |
| Achebak et al. ( | Ozone (O3), nitrogen monoxide (NO) | Premature mortality | - | Quasi-Poison regression model |
| Wang et al. ( | Particulate Matters (PM2.5, and PM1) | Blood pressure | Random forest model | Generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) |
| Zani et al. ( | Particulate Matters (PM2.5, and PM10) | Premature mortality | Deep neural network (DNN) | Generalized exposure mortality mixed model |
| Zou et al. ( | Particulate Matters (PM2.5) | Mortality | Ordinary multi-linear regression, generalized boosting method, random forest | - |
| Cazzolla Gatti et al. ( | Particulate Matters (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), Benzene (C6H6), ozone (O3) | Mortality and infectivity of COVID-19 | Random forest regression, Pearson's correlation coefficient | - |
| Sethi et al. ( | Carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matters (PM2.5), Ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ammonia (NH3), toluene (C7H8), benzene (C6H6) | Covid-19 fatalities | Decision tree, linear regression, random forest | - |
| Peng et al. ( | Carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), particulate matters (PM <2.5) | Respiratory disease | Bagging, adaptive boosting, and random forest | - |
| Shen et al. ( | Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2) | - | Prophet forecasting model (PFM) | - |
| Al Noaimi et al. ( | Particulate Matters (PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) | Prenatal and birth defect | Multivariate regression models | - |
| Li et al. ( | Particulate Matters (PM2.5) | Esophageal cancer | - | quasi-Poisson generalized linear model |
| Amoroso et al. ( | carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), methane (CH4), formaldehyde (CH2O), aerosol | Covid-19 mortality | Random forest | - |
| Hadei et al. ( | Particulate Matters (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3) | Covid-19 mortality and morbidity | Distributed-lag non-linear model (DLNM), generalized additive model (GAM) | - |
| Li et al. ( | Particulate Matters (PM2.5) | Esophageal cancer | - | Geographic weighted Poisson Regression |
| Ren et al. ( | Particulate Matters (PM10) | Congenital heart defects | Random forest (RF) and gradient boosting (GB) | - |
Recommendation of Air Quality Index (AQI) classification by U.S. EPA (32).
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Green | 0–50 | Good | Air pollution and satisfactory air quality pose little or no harm. |
| Yellow | 51–100 | Moderate | Air quality is adequate. Some people, however, may be at danger, particularly those who are highly sensitive to air pollution. |
| Orange | 101–150 | Unhealthy for sensitivity groups | Members of the sensitive group may suffer health consequences. Less liked to have an impact on the broader populace. |
| Red | 151–200 | Unhealthy | Some members of the general population may suffer from health consequences, while members of sensitive groups may suffer from more significant health problems. |
| Purple | 201–300 | Very unhealthy | Health warning: Everyone is at elevated risk of adverse health impacts. |
| Maroon | ≥301 | Hazardous | Everyone is most likely to be impacted by emergency situations, according to a health warning. |
Recommendation of pollutant concentrations by National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) by U.S. EPA (35).
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Monoxide (CO) | 8 h | 9 ppm | |
| 1 h | 35 ppm | ||
| Lead | 3 months average | 0.15 ug/m3 | |
| Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) | 1 h | 100 ppb | |
| 1 year | 53 ppb | ||
| Ozone (O3) | 8 h | 0.070 ppm | |
| Particulate matters / particles pollutions | PM2.5 | 1 year | 12.0 ug/m3 |
| 1 year | 15.0 ug/m3 | ||
| 24 h | 35.0 ug/m3 | ||
| PM10 | 24 h | 150.0 ug/m3 | |
ppm = parts per million by volume.
ppb = part per billion by volume.
ug/m.
Summary of Air Quality Guidelines (AQG) levels and interim targets recommendations by WHO (36).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | Annual | 35 | 25 | 15 | 10 | 5 |
| 24-h | 75 | 50 | 37.5 | 25 | 15 | |
| PM10 | Annual | 70 | 50 | 30 | 20 | 15 |
| 24-h | 150 | 100 | 75 | 50 | 45 | |
| O3 | Peak Season | 100 | 70 | - | - | 60 |
| 8-h | 160 | 120 | - | - | 100 | |
| NO2 | Annual | 40 | 30 | 20 | - | 10 |
| 24-h | 120 | 50 | - | - | 25 | |
| SO2 | 24-h | 125 | 50 | - | - | 40 |
| CO | 24-h | 7 | - | - | - | 4 |
In mg/m.
Air Pollution Index classification recommended by Department of Environment (DoE), Malaysia (37).
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–50 | Good | Blue | There is little pollution, and these are no harmful health effects. |
| 51–100 | Moderate | Green | It has no harmful effects on health. |
| 101–200 | Unhealthy | Yellow | Sensitive folks should avoid. Health conditions for the elderly, pregnant women, children, and persons with heart and lung issues deteriorate. |
| 201–300 | Very Unhealthy | Orange | Unhealthy for the public. Worsening health and a reduced tolerance for physical activity might lead to lungs and heart issues. |
| >301 | Hazardous | Red | Emergency |
Ambient air quality standard in Malaysia by Department of Environment (DoE), Malaysia (38).
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| PM10 | Annually | 40 μg/m3 |
| 24 h | 100 μg/m3 | |
| PM2.5 | Annually | 15 μg/m3 |
| 24 h | 35 μg/m3 | |
| SO2 | 1 h | 250 μg/m3 |
| 24 h | 80 μg/m3 | |
| NO2 | 1 h | 280 μg/m3 |
| 24 h | 70 μg/m3 | |
| O3 | 1 h | 180 μg/m3 |
| 24 h | 100 μg/m3 | |
| CO | 1 h | 30 mg/m3 |
| 24 h | 10 mg/m3 |
Figure 2Framework of integrated environmental and health impact assessment.