| Literature DB >> 35664077 |
Yue Zhou1,2, Lei Xu1,2, Zhangding Wang1,2, Hongwen Liu1,2, Xiang Zhang1,2, Chuanjun Shu3, Meng Zhang1,2, Ting Wang4, Xinyun Xu4, Xiaohong Pu4, Jian He5, Pin Wang1,2, Yudong Qiu6, Guifang Xu1,2, Xiaoping Zou1,2, Yun Zhu1,2,7,8, Lei Wang1,2.
Abstract
Rationale: Synergistic treatment strategies for two or more drugs have gradually developed as the main options in clinics for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) owing to the complicated crosstalk between the tumor and stroma. However, the different synergetic mechanisms pose great challenges to the dosages and order of administration of drugs. Thus, a strategy for exploring and intervening in mutual targets derived from stromal cells and cholangiocarcinoma cells was proposed.Entities:
Keywords: CAFs; cholangiocarcinoma; drug delivery system; polo-like kinase 1; stroma; targeting
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35664077 PMCID: PMC9131280 DOI: 10.7150/thno.70557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.600
Figure 1Pathological stromal barrier and the impeding drugs distribution in CCA tissue. A) Desmoplastic stroma in human CCA by masson and IHC staining for α-sma and CK19. B) Schematic diagram for the stroma barrier and the detained stromal components distribution pattern in human CCA. C) Evaluation of stroma feature and resulting drugs distribution pattern in AKT/YapS127A induced murine CCA model, scale bar: 100μm.
Figure 2Pivotal role of PLK1 in cholangiocarcinoma tumorigenesis and the association with poor prognosis in CCA patients. A) Flow chart of the study design. B) KEGG enrichment analysis for the genes with top 100 node degree value in the PPI network. C) Kaplan-Meier survival curve in the high and low PLK1 expression groups. D-E) .PLK1 mRNA (Relative levels normalized to GAPDH (log2)) and protein levels in CCA cancerous specimen and paired noncancerous specimen by qRT-PCR, n = 10. F-G) PLK1 mRNA (Relative levels normalized to GAPDH (log2)) and protein levels in specimen from CCA murine models at different stages by qRT-PCR (2 weeks & 5 weeks post injection). H) Binding energy score of Ro3280, MLN0905 and GSK461364 with PLK1 structure, respectively. I) Cell apoptosis assays performed by flow cytometry after treatment of Ro3280 (left panel), quantification of the cell apoptosis assay results (right panel). J) Representative images of colony formation assay in HuCCT1 after treatment of Ro3280 (left panel), quantification of the colony formation assay results (right panel). K) Cell cycle assays performed by flow cytometry after treatment of Ro3280 (left panel), quantification of the cell cycle assay results (right panel).
Figure 3Investigation of potential effect for PLK1 on CAFs. A) The protein level evaluation of PLK1 and α-SMA in NIH/3T3 cells after different conditioned medium (collected from HuCCT1 cells) treatment by western blot. B) Expression level evaluation of PLK1 and α-SMA in activated NIH//3T3 cells by IF staining and quantitative results C-D). E-G) α-SMA mRNA and protein levels evaluation in PLK1 overexpression and deficiency NIH/3T3 cells by qRT-PCR and western blotting. H-I) α-SMA mRNA and protein levels evaluation after Ro3280 treatment in NIH/3T3 cells by qRTPCR and western blotting. J-K) α-SMA mRNA and protein levels evaluation after medium and Ro3280 treatment in NIH/3T3 cells. L) Expression level of α-SMA after medium and Ro3280 treatment in NIH/3T3 cells by IF staining and quantitative results M). scale bar: 100μm.
Figure 4The construction and characterization of AA-HA-ODA. A) Flow chart of AA-HAODA construction. B) 1H NMR spectra of ODA, PEG, AA, HA, HA-ODA, AA-HA-ODA. C). Particle size distribution of HA-ODA and AA-HA-ODA. D-E). Confocal images of HA-ODA/DiI and AA-HA-ODA/DiI on HuCCT1 and NIH/3T3. The red fluorescence was the encapsulated DiI, cell nucleus was stained by DAPI (blue). Scale bar: 50μm. Quantification of the fluorescence intensity (right panel).
Figure 5Penetration and antitumor efficacy of AA-HA-ODA/Ro on multicellular spheroids. A) Representative images of CCA organoids treated with Ro3280, HA-ODA/Ro and AA-HAODA/Ro for 1 weeks (scale bars: 50 μm, left panel) and quantification of cell viability from organoids (right panel). B) Penetration evaluation of AA-HA-ODA/Ro on MCTSs (NIH/3T3+HuCCT1) by confocal microscopy (left panel) and FACS (right panel). C) Representative images of MCTSs treated with Ro3280, HA-ODA/Ro and AA-HA-ODA/Ro, scale bars: 100μm. D) Antitumor efficacy of AA-HA-ODA/Ro were measured via flow cytometry by Annexin V/PI assay.
Figure 6Spatial distribution of dual targeting AA-HA-ODA A) In vivo distribution of ICG, HA-ODA/ICG and AA-HA-ODA/ICG by In vivo Imaging System. B) Amount of accumulated AA-HA-ODA in cholangiocarcinoma bearing liver. C) Distribution pattern of DiI, HAODA/DiI and AA-HA-ODA/DiI in vivo. α-SMA (pink) and CK19 (green) were marked by IF staining (24h). Dil was used as model drug. Scale bar : 50μm. D) Quantification analysis of the DiI positive area in liver. E) Flow cytometry evaluation of cells with both CK19 positive and AA-HAODA/DiI positive cells, α-SMA positive and AA-HA-ODA/DiI positive cells after 24h distribution, respectively.
Figure 7Antitumor efficacy of Ro3280 in the virtue of AA-HA-ODA on CCA A-B) Images and weight of livers from CCA mouse models treated with Ro3280, HA-ODA/Ro and AAHA-ODA/Ro. C) Represntive images of liver by H&E, Masson staining and IHC for α-SMA. Scale bar for “Full sacn”: 50μm. Scale bar for Amplified”: 500μm. (D-E) Quantification of α-SMA and masson positive area in the gross image.