Literature DB >> 35663290

Genetic testing and insurance implications: Surveying the US general population about discrimination concerns and knowledge of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA).

Anya E R Prince1, Wendy R Uhlmann2, Sonia M Suter3, Aaron M Scherer4.   

Abstract

Globally, due to public concerns of genetic discrimination, some countries and insurance industries have adopted policies restricting insurer use of genetic information, such as the US Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). This study reports on combined analysis of two surveys assessing public knowledge of GINA and concerns of genetic discrimination in a diverse U.S. sample (N=1616). We focus on whether occupation, genetic testing history, and insurance status are correlated with knowledge of GINA or concerns of discrimination. While bivariate analysis identified some populations with higher subjective/objective knowledge and concern relative to counterparts, multivariable regression identified very few significant associations with outcomes of interest. Overall, this study highlights lack of awareness and understanding of GINA, even among subpopulations hypothesized to have greater knowledge of the law. These findings have implications for the broader debate around insurer use of genetic information.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 35663290      PMCID: PMC9165621          DOI: 10.1111/rmir.12195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Manag Insur Rev        ISSN: 1098-1616


  21 in total

1.  The Human Genome Project and the end of insurance.

Authors:  Roberta M Berry
Journal:  Univ Fla J Law Public Policy       Date:  1996

2.  Unravelling fears of genetic discrimination: an exploratory study of Dutch HCM families in an era of genetic non-discrimination acts.

Authors:  Els Geelen; Klasien Horstman; Carlo L M Marcelis; Pieter A Doevendans; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Annet Wauters; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Health law - genetics - Congress restricts use of genetic information by insurers and employers. - Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-233, 122 Stat. 881 (to be codified in scattered sections of 26, 29, and 42 U.S.C.).

Authors: 
Journal:  Harv Law Rev       Date:  2009-01

5.  Consumer awareness and attitudes about insurance discrimination post enactment of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.

Authors:  Dawn C Allain; Sue Friedman; Leigha Senter
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Monitoring the genetic testing and life insurance moratorium in Australia: a national research project.

Authors:  Jane Tiller; Ingrid Winship; Margaret Fa Otlowski; Paul A Lacaze
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Time to End the Use of Genetic Test Results in Life Insurance Underwriting.

Authors:  Mark A Rothstein
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Knowledge of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination act among individuals affected by Huntington disease.

Authors:  E R Dorsey; K C Darwin; P E Nichols; J H Kwok; C Bennet; L S Rosenthal; Y Bombard; I Shoulson; E Oster
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 4.438

9.  Trust and satisfaction with physicians, insurers, and the medical profession.

Authors:  Rajesh Balkrishnan; Elizabeth Dugan; Fabian T Camacho; Mark A Hall
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Insurance Risk Classification in an Era of Genomics: Is a Rational Discrimination Policy Rational?

Authors:  Anya E R Prince
Journal:  Neb Law Rev       Date:  2017
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.