| Literature DB >> 35662948 |
Lili Gai1, Er-Fang Ren2, Wen Tian1, Debao Niu1, Weidong Sun1, Fangxue Hang1, Kai Li1.
Abstract
In this work, the investigation mainly focused on ultrasonic-assisted dual-alkali pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse followed by Candida tropicalis fermentation to produce xylitol. The results showed that the combination of NaOH and ammonia water had the best effect by comparing the effects of the four single-alkali (NaOH, KOH, ammonia water, Ca(OH)2) and their mixed double-alkali pretreatments on xylose content. Then, the optimal conditions for ultrasonic-assisted pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse were obtained by response surface methodology. When the ratio of NaOH and ammonia water was 2:1, the mixed alkali concentration (v/v) was 17%, the ultrasonic temperature was 45°C, the ultrasonic power was 300 W, and the ultrasonic time was 40 min, the content of xylose reached a maximum of 2.431 g/L. Scanning electron microscopy showed that sugarcane bagasse by ultrasonic-assisted alkali pretreatment aggravated with more folds and furrows. Moreover, the fermentation results showed that the concentration ratio of enzymatic hydrolysate of sugarcane bagasse affected the xylitol yield, and when concentrated three times, the highest yield of xylitol (54.42%) was obtained.Entities:
Keywords: enzymatic hydrolysis; pretreatment; sugarcane bagasse; ultrasonic; xylitol
Year: 2022 PMID: 35662948 PMCID: PMC9159370 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.913106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Box-behnken design (BBD) matrix with response values for the xylose content.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1:1 | 15 | 30 | 300 | 30 | 1.486 |
| 2 | 3:1 | 10 | 40 | 300 | 30 | 1.589 |
| 3 | 2:1 | 20 | 40 | 400 | 30 | 1.287 |
| 4 | 3:1 | 15 | 40 | 300 | 40 | 1.924 |
| 5 | 2:1 | 15 | 50 | 300 | 20 | 2.072 |
| 6 | 3:1 | 15 | 40 | 400 | 30 | 1.367 |
| 7 | 2:1 | 10 | 40 | 400 | 30 | 1.295 |
| 8 | 2:1 | 15 | 50 | 300 | 40 | 2.141 |
| 9 | 2:1 | 20 | 50 | 300 | 30 | 1.722 |
| 10 | 2:1 | 15 | 40 | 200 | 20 | 1.188 |
| 11 | 3:1 | 15 | 40 | 300 | 20 | 1.768 |
| 12 | 2:1 | 10 | 40 | 200 | 30 | 1.298 |
| 13 | 3:1 | 20 | 40 | 300 | 30 | 1.687 |
| 14 | 1:1 | 15 | 40 | 200 | 30 | 1.362 |
| 15 | 2:1 | 10 | 30 | 300 | 30 | 1.381 |
| 16 | 1:1 | 15 | 40 | 400 | 30 | 1.452 |
| 17 | 2:1 | 15 | 40 | 300 | 30 | 2.145 |
| 18 | 2:1 | 15 | 30 | 400 | 30 | 1.630 |
| 19 | 2:1 | 20 | 40 | 200 | 30 | 1.660 |
| 20 | 2:1 | 15 | 30 | 200 | 30 | 1.359 |
| 21 | 3:1 | 15 | 50 | 300 | 30 | 1.995 |
| 22 | 2:1 | 10 | 50 | 300 | 30 | 1.548 |
| 23 | 3:1 | 15 | 40 | 200 | 30 | 1.591 |
| 24 | 1:1 | 15 | 50 | 300 | 30 | 1.998 |
| 25 | 2:1 | 10 | 40 | 300 | 20 | 1.781 |
| 26 | 2:1 | 20 | 40 | 300 | 40 | 2.091 |
| 27 | 2:1 | 10 | 40 | 300 | 40 | 1.900 |
| 28 | 2:1 | 15 | 40 | 300 | 30 | 2.193 |
| 29 | 1:1 | 15 | 40 | 300 | 40 | 1.896 |
| 30 | 1:1 | 15 | 40 | 300 | 20 | 1.575 |
| 31 | 2:1 | 15 | 30 | 300 | 40 | 1.730 |
| 32 | 2:1 | 15 | 40 | 400 | 40 | 1.812 |
| 33 | 2:1 | 20 | 30 | 300 | 30 | 1.424 |
| 34 | 2:1 | 20 | 40 | 300 | 20 | 1.700 |
| 35 | 3:1 | 15 | 30 | 300 | 30 | 1.481 |
| 36 | 2:1 | 15 | 40 | 300 | 30 | 2.039 |
| 37 | 2:1 | 15 | 40 | 300 | 30 | 2.340 |
| 38 | 1:1 | 10 | 40 | 300 | 30 | 1.211 |
| 39 | 2:1 | 15 | 40 | 300 | 30 | 2.183 |
| 40 | 1:1 | 20 | 40 | 300 | 30 | 1.870 |
| 41 | 2:1 | 15 | 40 | 200 | 40 | 2.251 |
| 42 | 2:1 | 15 | 50 | 200 | 30 | 1.990 |
| 43 | 2:1 | 15 | 40 | 400 | 20 | 1.931 |
| 44 | 2:1 | 15 | 50 | 400 | 30 | 1.519 |
| 45 | 2:1 | 15 | 30 | 300 | 20 | 1.610 |
| 46 | 2:1 | 15 | 40 | 300 | 30 | 2.259 |
Figure 1Effects of ultrasonic-assisted (A) NaOH, (B) KOH, (C) ammonia water, and (D) Ca(OH)2 and its mixed alkaline solution on xylose content from sugarcane bagasse enzymatic hydrolysate. Error bars are the standard deviation of three replications and different lowercase letters (a–c) on top of the bars indicate a significant difference (P < 0.05). Different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Figure 2The SEM images of sugarcane bagasse with different pretreatments. (A) Without pretreatment, (B) with ultrasonic-assisted single alkali pretreatment, (C) with ultrasonic-assisted mixed alkali pretreatment, (D) with ultrasonic–assisted mixed alkali pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis.
Regression coefficients estimate and significance test for the quadratic polynomial model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 4.0678 | 20 | 0.2034 | 11.0712 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| A | 0.0189 | 1 | 0.0189 | 1.0314 | 0.3196 | |
| B | 0.1294 | 1 | 0.1294 | 7.0447 | 0.0136 | Significant |
| C | 0.5196 | 1 | 0.5196 | 28.2847 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| D | 0.0103 | 1 | 0.0103 | 0.5602 | 0.4612 | |
| E | 0.2807 | 1 | 0.2807 | 15.2816 | 0.0006 | Significant |
| AB | 0.0784 | 1 | 0.0784 | 4.2691 | 0.0493 | Significant |
| AC | 0.0000 | 1 | 0.0000 | 0.0001 | 0.9924 | |
| AD | 0.0246 | 1 | 0.0246 | 1.3392 | 0.2581 | |
| AE | 0.0068 | 1 | 0.0068 | 0.3696 | 0.5487 | |
| BC | 0.0043 | 1 | 0.0043 | 0.2357 | 0.6316 | |
| BD | 0.0341 | 1 | 0.0341 | 1.8549 | 0.1854 | |
| BE | 0.0185 | 1 | 0.0185 | 1.0046 | 0.3258 | |
| CD | 0.1372 | 1 | 0.1372 | 7.4680 | 0.0114 | Significant |
| CE | 0.0007 | 1 | 0.0007 | 0.0354 | 0.8523 | |
| DE | 0.3496 | 1 | 0.3496 | 19.0285 | 0.0002 | Significant |
| A2 | 0.7637 | 1 | 0.7637 | 41.5705 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| B2 | 1.1509 | 1 | 1.1509 | 62.6487 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| C2 | 0.4468 | 1 | 0.4468 | 24.3210 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| D2 | 1.4025 | 1 | 1.4025 | 76.3442 | <0.0001 | Significant |
| E2 | 0.0114 | 1 | 0.0114 | 0.6191 | 0.4388 | |
| Residual | 0.4593 | 25 | 0.0184 | |||
| Lack of Fit | 0.4073 | 20 | 0.0204 | 1.9579 | 0.2351 | Not significant |
| Pure Error | 0.0520 | 5 | 0.0104 | |||
| Cor Total | 4.5271 | 45 | ||||
| Adeq Precision | 10.9710 | |||||
| R2 | 0.8985 | |||||
|
| 0.6236 | |||||
|
| 0.8174 |
The df represents degree of freedom.
Significant coefficient (P < 0.05).
Figure 3The effects of (A) the ratio of NaOH and ammonia water; (B) mixed alkali concentration (%); (C) ultrasonic temperature (°C); (D) ultrasonic power (W) and (E) ultrasonic time (min) on xylose content of three-dimensional (3D) response surface curves.
Figure 4Influence of the concentration ratio of the enzymatic hydrolysate of sugarcane bagasse on xylitol obtained by fermentation with Candida tropicalis.