| Literature DB >> 35662902 |
Zeyu Zhao1,2, Meng Yang1, Jinlong Lv3, Qingqing Hu4, Qiuping Chen2, Zhao Lei1, Mingzhai Wang5, Hao Zhang6, Xiongjie Zhai7, Benhua Zhao1, Yanhua Su1, Yong Chen8, Xu-Sheng Zhang9, Jing-An Cui3, Roger Frutos2, Tianmu Chen1.
Abstract
Objective: In China, the burden of shigellosis is unevenly distributed, notably across various ages and geographical areas. Shigellosis temporal trends appear to be seasonal. We should clarify seasonal warnings and regional transmission patterns. Method: This study adopted a Logistic model to assess the seasonality and a dynamics model to compare the transmission in different areas. The next-generation matrix was used to calculate the effective reproduction number (R eff) to quantify the transmissibility.Entities:
Keywords: ARIMA, Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (model); CDC, Center of Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention; CI, confidence interval; Early warning; MSM, men who sex with a man; ODE, ordinary differential equation; R0, basic reproductive number; R2, Coefficient of determination; Reff, effective reproduction number; SD, standard deviation; SEIAR, Susceptible–Exposed–Infectious/Asymptomatic–Recovered (model); SEIARW, Susceptible–Exposed–Infectious/Asymptomatic–Recovered-Water/Food (model); Seasonality; Shigellosis; Transmissibility
Year: 2022 PMID: 35662902 PMCID: PMC9144056 DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2022.05.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Model ISSN: 2468-0427
Fig. 1The chosen basis of four areas on the different incidence in 2005 of China.
Definition of six compartments in the SEIARW model.
| Variable | Description | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Susceptible individuals density | Individuals·km−2 | |
| Exposed individuals density | Individuals·km−2 | |
| Infectious individuals density | Individuals·km−2 | |
| Asymptomatic individuals density | Individuals·km−2 | |
| Recovered individuals density | Individuals·km−2 | |
| Pathogen concentration in water/food reservoir | Cells·mL−3 | |
| Total number of population density | Individuals·km−2 |
Fig. 2The flowchart of the SEIARW model.
Definition, value and source of all parameters in the SEIARW model.
| Parameter | Description | Unit | Value | Range | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transmission rate from person-to-person | Individuals−1·days−1 | – | ≥0 | – | |
| Scaled person-to-person contact rate | Individuals−1·days−1 | – | ≥0 | Curve fitting | |
| Transmission rate from reservoir-to-person | Individuals−1·days−1 | – | ≥0 | – | |
| Scaled water/food-to-person contact rate | Individuals−1·days−1 | – | ≥0 | Curve fitting | |
| Relative transmissibility rate of asymptomatic to symptomatic individuals | 1 | 0.3125 | 0–1 | References | |
| Proportion of the asymptomatic | 1 | 0.1 | 0.0037–0.27 | References | |
| Incubation relative rate | days−1 | 1 | 0.3333–1.000 | References | |
| Recovery rate of the infectious | days−1 | 0.0741 | 0.0477–0.1428 | References | |
| Recovery rate of the asymptomatic | days−1 | 0.0286 | 0–0.0357 | References | |
| Pathogen lifetime rate | days−1 | 0.6931 | 0–1 | References | |
| Relative shedding rate of asymptomatic compared to infectious | 1 | 0.3125 | 0–1 | References | |
| Person–to-reservoir contact rate (“shedding” by Infectious) | cells·mL−3 ·day−1 ·km2 ·individuals−1 | – | – | – | |
| Person–to-reservoir contact rate (“shedding’’ by Asymptomatic) | cells·mL−3 ·day−1 ·km2 ·individuals−1 | – | – | – | |
| Birth rate of the population | 1 | – | 0.00605–0.01651 | Statistical Yearbook or CDC | |
| Death rate of the population | 1 | – | 0.00456–0.00758 | Statistical Yearbook or CDC |
-means not applicable.
Fig. 3The reported incidence of shigellosis from 2005 to 2017 in China (excepted Hong Kong City, Macao City, and Taiwan Province).
Fig. 4The number of cases and reported incidence per month of shigellosis from 2005 to 2017 in total population and < 1 years old. (A) Total population; (B) < 1 years old.
Fig. 5The reported incidence of shigellosis from 2005 to 2017 in different age groups.
Fig. 6The number of cases and the reported incidence of shigellosis in Yichang City, Xiamen City, Chuxiong City, and Longde County. (A) Yichang City; (B) Xiamen City; (C) Chuxiong City; (D) Longde County.
Fig. 7The number of cases and reported incidence between males and females in Xiamen City, Chuxiong City, and Longde County. (A) Xiamen City; (B) Chuxiong City; (C) Longde County.
Fig. 8The reported incidence of shigellosis from 2005 to 2018 in different age groups in Xiamen City and Longde County. (A) Xiamen City: (A-a) total population, (A-b) ≤ 5 years old; (B) Longde County: (B-a) total population, (B-b) ≤ 5 years old.
Fig. 9Curve fitting of Logistic model to the reported data per month from 2005 to 2017. (A) Total population; (B) < 1 years old.
Fig. 10Curve fitting of SEIARW model to the reported data per day in four areas. (A) Yichang City; (B) Xiamen City; (C) Chuxiong City; (D) Longde County.
Fig. 11Reported incidence and median incidence per month in each province of China from 2005 to 2017. (A) Reported incidence per month from 2005 to 2017; (B) Median monthly incidence from 2005 to 2017.
Fig. 12Reported incidence and median incidence per month in each age group of China from 2005 to 2017. (A) Reported incidence per month from 2005 to 2017; (B) Median monthly incidence from 2005 to 2017.
Simulation results of Logistic model in total population.
| Year | Peak/ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.5468 | 0.00035 | −4.06 | 5.02 | 7.43 |
| 2006 | 0.5999 | 0.00034 | −4.30 | 4.98 | 7.17 |
| 2007 | 0.5784 | 0.00030 | −4.00 | 4.65 | 6.92 |
| 2008 | 0.5842 | 0.00024 | −3.96 | 4.53 | 6.78 |
| 2009 | 0.5951 | 0.00021 | −3.96 | 4.45 | 6.66 |
| 2010 | 0.5597 | 0.00020 | −3.93 | 4.67 | 7.02 |
| 2011 | 0.5889 | 0.00018 | −4.00 | 4.56 | 6.79 |
| 2012 | 0.5675 | 0.00016 | −3.81 | 4.39 | 6.71 |
| 2013 | 0.5440 | 0.00015 | −3.68 | 4.34 | 6.76 |
| 2014 | 0.5599 | 0.00012 | −3.71 | 4.27 | 6.62 |
| 2015 | 0.5444 | 0.00011 | −3.59 | 4.17 | 6.59 |
| 2016 | 0.5494 | 0.00009 | −3.71 | 4.36 | 6.76 |
| 2017 | 0.5610 | 0.00008 | −3.64 | 4.14 | 6.49 |
Simulation results of Logistic model in under 1 years old.
| Year | Peak/ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.6264 | 0.00339 | −4.21 | 4.62 | 6.72 |
| 2006 | 0.6082 | 0.00311 | −4.15 | 4.66 | 6.83 |
| 2007 | 0.5910 | 0.00309 | −4.01 | 4.55 | 6.78 |
| 2008 | 0.6072 | 0.00270 | −3.99 | 4.40 | 6.57 |
| 2009 | 0.6391 | 0.00221 | −4.16 | 4.45 | 6.51 |
| 2010 | 0.5862 | 0.00203 | −4.04 | 4.64 | 6.89 |
| 2011 | 0.6048 | 0.00205 | −4.16 | 4.69 | 6.87 |
| 2012 | 0.6017 | 0.00225 | −4.16 | 4.72 | 6.91 |
| 2013 | 0.5840 | 0.00211 | −3.86 | 4.36 | 6.61 |
| 2014 | 0.5819 | 0.00158 | −3.99 | 4.59 | 6.86 |
| 2015 | 0.5609 | 0.00147 | −3.69 | 4.23 | 6.57 |
| 2016 | 0.5466 | 0.00113 | −3.95 | 4.82 | 7.23 |
| 2017 | 0.5639 | 0.00120 | −3.79 | 4.39 | 6.73 |
Fig. 13Fitting and prediction of peak and early warning time by Linear model. (A) Total population; (B) < 1 years old.
Fig. 14‘Knock-out’ simulation in Yichang City, Xiamen City, Chuxiong City, and Longde County. (A) Yichang City; (B) Xiamen City; (C) Chuxiong City; (D) Longde County.
Fig. 15The transmissibility (R) comparison among Yichang City, Xiamen City, Chuxiong City, and Longde County. (A) Yichang City; (B) Xiamen City; (C) Chuxiong City; (D) Longde County.
Fig. 16Sensitivity analysis of SEIARW model in Longde County of 2009. (A) κ = 0.3125 (0–1); (B) p = 0.1 (0.0037–0.27); (C) ω = 1 (0.3333–1); (D) γ = 0.0741 (0.0477–0.1428); (E) γ’ = 0.0286 (0–1); (F) ε = 0.6931 (0–1); (G) c = 0.3125 (0–1).