| Literature DB >> 35662733 |
Cheng Cao1,2, Bo Fan2, Jin Zhu1, Na Zhu3, Jing-Yuan Cao4, Dong-Rong Yang1.
Abstract
Previous studies suggest that patients with nephrolithiasis exhibit dysbiosis in their gut microbiota, but those studies were conducted in calcium oxalate stone patients. We aimed to explore the association of gut microbiota and biochemical features of renal uric acid stone (UAS) patients in a Chinese population and identify the related bacteria that may affect the pathopoiesis of UAS. A case-control study of 117 patients with UAS, 123 patients with gout, and 135 healthy controls were included from January 2014 to October 2020. For each subject, data on demographics, biochemical parameters of blood and urine were analyzed. Fifteen patients with gout, 16 patients with UAS, 17 UAS patients with gout, and 17 healthy subjects were enrolled and provided fecal samples. The characteristics of gut microbiota were explored by using 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing and analyzed by using a combination of software mother and R. Hyperuricemia was the main risk factor for the development of gout and UAS. Obesity, dyslipidemia, and aciduria were unique risk factors for UAS patients. The richness, diversity, and relative abundance of dominant bacteria at the phylum and genus levels of gut microbiota in UAS patients were significantly distinct from other subjects. Abundance of Bacteroides and Fusobacterium was significantly positively correlated with the serum uric acid (UA) level of UAS patients. Fusobacteria was involved in the metabolism and degradation of certain short-chain fatty acids, amino acids, and sugars in pathopoiesis of UAS, and inhibited their synthesis pathways. Fusobacteria may be related to the pathogenesis of UAS, and this finding contributes to the personalized treatment of UAS from the perspective of maintaining micro-ecological equilibrium in gut.Entities:
Keywords: 16srRNA; biomarker; computational intelligence; gut microbiota; nephrolithiasis; uric acid stone
Year: 2022 PMID: 35662733 PMCID: PMC9160931 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.888883
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
Comparison of general characteristics between each group.
| Variables | Gout | UAS | Gout + UAS | Control |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 61.46 ± 15.58 | 60.32 ± 14.74 | 57.77 ± 14.39 | 59.25 ± 16.56 | 0.571# |
| Gender (%) | 0.310* | ||||
| Male | 105 (85.37) | 67 (77.01) | 26 (86.67) | 106 (78.52) | |
| Female | 18 (14.63) | 20 (22.99) | 4 (13.33) | 29 (21.48) | |
| BMI | 23.88 ± 2.46 | 24.92 ± 3.53 | 26.80 ± 2.19 | 23.75 ± 1.51 |
|
| Hypertension (%) |
| ||||
| Yes | 54 (43.90) | 36 (41.38) | 17 (56.67) | 31 (22.96) | |
| No | 69 (56.10) | 51 (58.62) | 13 (43.33) | 104 (77.04) | |
| Diabetes (%) | 0.413* | ||||
| Yes | 7 (5.69) | 6 (6.90) | 4 (13.33) | 7 (5.19) | |
| No | 116 (94.31) | 81 (93.10) | 26 (86.67) | 128 (94.81) |
#Analysis of variance (ANOVA)
*2-sided Chi-square test.
p < 0.05 (compared with the Gout + UAS, group).
p < 0.001 (compared with the Gout + UAS, group).
p < 0.05 (compared with the control group).
p < 0.001 (compared with the control group).
UAS, uric acid stone; BMI, body mass index.
Bold values indicate significant difference.
Biochemical parameters in different groups studied.
| Variables | Gout | UAS | Gout + UAS | Control |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lipid levels, mmol/L | ||||
| TG | 1.74 ± 1.08 | 1.81 ± 0.98 | 2.66 ± 1.97 | 1.37 ± 0.61 |
| TC | 4.66 ± 0.98 | 4.83 ± 0.87 | 4.77 ± 1.23 | 4.83 ± 0.98 |
| HDL-C | 1.18 ± 0.30 | 1.23 ± 0.35 | 1.06 ± 0.25 | 1.31 ± 0.34 |
| LDL-C | 2.60 ± 0.69 | 2.77 ± 0.63 | 2.72 ± 0.81 | 2.77 ± 0.71 |
| Electrolyte levels, mmol/L | ||||
| K | 4.04 ± 0.37 | 4.08 ± 0.41 | 4.33 ± 0.62 | 4.15 ± 0.42 |
| Na | 140.31 ± 3.37 | 140.95 ± 2.54 | 140.94 ± 2.74 | 140.79 ± 2.18 |
| Cl | 103.95 ± 3.39 | 104.54 ± 3.23 | 105.31 ± 3.46 | 104.24 ± 2.98 |
| Ca | 2.29 ± 0.15 | 2.34 ± 0.16 | 2.38 ± 0.16 | 2.35 ± 0.13 |
| P | 1.07 ± 0.24 | 1.05 ± 0.22 | 1.12 ± 0.36 | 1.03 ± 0.18 |
| Mg | 0.86 ± 0.10 | 0.87 ± 0.10 | 0.89 ± 0.20 | 0.88 ± 0.08 |
| UA (μmol/L) | 465.54 ± 126.22 | 392.71 ± 93.12 | 559.13 ± 76.57 | 336.09 ± 76.75 |
| Urinary pH | 5.72 ± 0.55 | 5.64 ± 0.55 | 5.57 ± 0.63 | 5.99 ± 0.67 |
p < 0.05 (compared with the Gout + UAS, group).
p < 0.001 (compared with the Gout + UAS, group).
p < 0.05 (compared with the control group).
p < 0.001 (compared with the control group).
UAS, uric acid stone; TG, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; and UA, serum uric acid.
Comparisons made using Student’s t test.
Multivariate logistic analysis of risk factors in each group studied.
| Variables | Gout | UAS | Gout + UAS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | |
| BMI | 0.612 | 1.03 (0.91–1.17) |
|
|
|
|
| Hypertension | 0.088 | 1.75 (0.92–3.34) | 0.066 | 1.93 (0.96–3.87) | 0.415 | 0.12 (0.01–19.00) |
| Hypertriglyceridemia | 0.154 | 1.76 (0.81–3.82) |
|
| 0.208 | 13.90 (0.23–839.09) |
| Low HDL-cholesterolemiamia | 0.080 | 1.96 (0.92–4.17) | 0.213 | 1.70 (0.74–3.93) | 0.051 | 89.59 (0.98–8.19e-3) |
| Hyperuricemia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Urinary pH | 0.122 | 0.68 (0.42–1.11) |
|
| 0.662 | 0.60 (0.06–6.09) |
Adjusted for age and sex in the multivariate logistic regression model.
Results of univariate logistic regression analysis.
UAS, uric acid stone and BMI, body mass index.
Bold values indicate significant difference.
FIGURE 1Analysis of gut microbiota among each group by using 16s rRNA. (A) Venn diagram for indicating the common and unique OTUs among four groups. (B) Multi-sample rarefaction curves for comparing the abundance of diverse species in each sample. (C) ANOSIM analysis for identifying the existence of differences between each group. (D) Comparison of alpha diversity of gut microbiota between each group. The ACE, Chao, Shannon, and Simpson indices at the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) level were compared between each group by Kruskal–Wallis test (*p < 0.05**p < 0.01).
FIGURE 2(A,C) Composition of gut microbiota between each group at the phylum and genus level. (B,D) Histograms of differences in the abundance of species analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test among four groups at the levels of phylum and genus (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001).
FIGURE 3Histogram (A) and cladogram (B) of Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis based on OTUs characterizes microbiota among the controls, Gout patients, UAS patients and Gout + UAS patients.
| Spearman correlation coefficient of significant different biochemical parameters and major bacterial genera in each group.
| Variables |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| R |
|
|
| |
| Gout | ||||||||||||
| TG (mmol/L) | −0.354 | 0.196 | 0.139 | 0.621 | 0.079 | 0.781 | −0.096 | 0.732 | 0.057 | 0.839 | 0.171 | 0.542 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.374 | 0.170 | 0.295 | 0.286 | −0.401 | 0.138 | 0.297 | 0.282 | −0.219 | 0.433 | −0.050 | 0.861 |
| K (mmol/L) | −0.414 | 0.125 | −0.257 | 0.355 | 0.234 | 0.401 | −0.361 | 0.187 | −0.241 | 0.374 | −0.339 | 0.217 |
| Ca (mmol/L) | −0.442 | 0.099 | −0.292 | 0.292 | 0.477 | 0.072 | −0.034 | 0.904 | 0.359 | 0.189 | 0.069 | 0.806 |
| UA (μmol/L) | −0.401 | 0.132 | −0.129 | 0.648 | 0.379 | 0.164 | −0.329 | 0.232 | 0.007 | 0.980 | 0.070 | 0.803 |
| Urinary pH | 0.489 | 0.064 | −0.075 | 0.790 | −0.235 | 0.399 |
|
| −0.075 | 0.789 | 0.194 | 0.487 |
| UAS | ||||||||||||
| TG (mmol/L) | −0.036 | 0.895 | 0.184 | 0.495 | 0.016 | 0.952 | 0.137 | 0.613 | −0.310 | 0.243 | 0.053 | 0.846 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | −0.301 | 0.257 | −0.137 | 0.614 | −0.048 | 0.859 | −0.218 | 0.417 |
|
| 0.021 | 0.937 |
| K (mmol/L) | −0.467 | 0.068 | −0.070 | 0.797 | 0.228 | 0.395 | 0.491 | 0.053 | −0.179 | 0.507 | 0.084 | 0.757 |
| Ca (mmol/L) | −0.493 | 0.052 | 0.146 | 0.589 | 0.332 | 0.208 | 0.207 | 0.442 | 0.090 | 0.740 | −0.092 | 0.735 |
| UA (μmol/L) | 0.231 | 0.390 |
|
| −0.022 | 0.937 | 0.026 | 0.924 |
|
| −0.358 | 0.173 |
| Urinary pH | −0.057 | 0.835 | −0.212 | 0.430 | 0.240 | 0.371 | −0.172 | 0.525 | 0.352 | 0.181 | 0.249 | 0.352 |
| Gout + UAS | ||||||||||||
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.373 | 0.141 | −0.103 | 0.694 | 0.201 | 0.438 |
|
| 0.040 | 0.880 | −0.446 | 0.073 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | −0.248 | 0.338 | 0.293 | 0.254 | −0.098 | 0.707 | 0.080 | 0.761 | −0.033 | 0.899 | 0.083 | 0.752 |
| K (mmol/L) | −0.012 | 0.963 | −0.292 | 0.256 | −0.135 | 0.605 | −0.064 | 0.808 | −0.217 | 0.402 | −0.442 | 0.076 |
| Ca (mmol/L) | −0.306 | 0.233 | 0.043 | 0.869 | 0.137 | 0.599 | 0.021 | 0.936 | 0.355 | 0.162 | −0.039 | 0.882 |
| UA (μmol/L) |
|
| −0.091 | 0.729 | −0.479 | 0.052 | −0.059 | 0.823 | −0.122 | 0.642 | −0.112 | 0.668 |
| Urinary pH | 0.160 | 0.539 | −0.357 | 0.159 | 0.376 | 0.136 | 0.043 | 0.869 | 0.190 | 0.466 | 0.106 | 0.687 |
| Control | ||||||||||||
| TG (mmol/L) | 0.020 | 0.940 | 0.444 | 0.074 | 0.007 | 0.978 | 0.303 | 0.237 | 0.048 | 0.856 | 0.056 | 0.831 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | −0.085 | 0.747 | −0.342 | 0.179 |
|
| −0.036 | 0.892 | −0.096 | 0.715 | 0.255 | 0.323 |
| K (mmol/L) |
|
| 0.273 | 0.289 | 0.001 | 0.996 | 0.101 | 0.700 | −0.086 | 0.743 | 0.074 | 0.777 |
| Ca (mmol/L) | 0.249 | 0.334 | −0.063 | 0.811 | 0.090 | 0.732 | −0.376 | 0.137 | −0.372 | 0.141 | 0.048 | 0.855 |
| UA (μmol/L) | 0.140 | 0.593 | 0.351 | 0.168 | −0.234 | 0.366 | −0.037 | 0.889 | −0.088 | 0.738 | −0.214 | 0.409 |
| Urinary pH | −0.037 | 0.889 | −0.213 | 0.412 | 0.033 | 0.900 | −0.363 | 0.152 | 0.412 | 0.101 | 0.094 | 0.721 |
TG, triglycerides; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; UA, serum uric acid; and UAS, uric acid stone.
Spearman correlation coefficient values were further adjusted for age and sex.
Bold values indicate significant difference.
FIGURE 4Correlation of different bacterial abundance and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) metabolic pathways in the controls (Group N) and the renal uric acid stone patients (Group S). The red cell indicates a positive correlation and the blue cell indicates a negative correlation. Stars indicate the degree of significant correlations (*,p < 0.05,**,p < 0.01).