Literature DB >> 356619

Enamel surface characteristics on removal of bonded orthodontic brackets.

V Burapavong, G W Marshall, D A Apfel, H T Perry.   

Abstract

Thirty-six premolars which were scheduled for routine extraction were bracketed with either N or G system adhesives. After one week the brackets were removed and the residual adhesive removed by low-speed green stone, a hand scaler, or an ultrasonic scaler. Half the teeth were given a final pumice, and then all were extracted. The SEM was used to evaluate the enamel surface, and quantitative assessments were made for the area covered with retained adhesive and for damage to the surface. All three removal techniques left appreciable amounts of retained adhesive 20 to 60 per cent coverage for G and 55 to 75 per cent for N adhesive. All detectable adhesive was removed by final pumicing. The detectably roughened area was over 50 per cent for the green stone treatment for both materials and appeared to introduce unnecessary roughness. The hand scaler and the particular ultrasonic scaler used in this study did not severely roughen the enamel for either material and appeared to be effective for initial adhesive removal. All three techniques introduced occasional gouges 10 to 20 micrometer in depth which could not be removed. All other roughness was generally smoothed by final pumicing. Thus, pumicing is a necessary final step with all removal procedures studied.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 356619     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(78)90083-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  8 in total

1.  [Elemental analytical and quantitative morphometric determination of the synthetic resin residues and enamel avulsion after the removal of metal brackets].

Authors:  T Ruppenthal; U Stratmann; H G Sergl; D Czech
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1992-04

2.  Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of human dental enamel after bracket debonding: a noncontact three-dimensional optical profilometry analysis.

Authors:  Fabiano G Ferreira; Darcy F Nouer; Nelson P Silva; Ivana U Garbui; Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho; Paulo R A Nouer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Roughness of enamel surfaces after different bonding and debonding procedures : An in vitro study.

Authors:  Lorenz M Brauchli; Eva-Maria Baumgartner; Judith Ball; Andrea Wichelhaus
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Enamel surface evaluation after bracket debonding and different resin removal methods.

Authors:  Michele Machado Vidor; Rafael Perdomo Felix; Ernani Menezes Marchioro; Luciane Hahn
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

Review 5.  Effect of orthodontic debonding and adhesive removal on the enamel - current knowledge and future perspectives - a systematic review.

Authors:  Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Tomasz Szatkiewicz; Robert Tomkowski; Katarzyna Tandecka; Katarzyna Grocholewicz
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-10-20

6.  Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Xiao-Chuan Fan; Li Chen; Xiao-Feng Huang
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Enamel surface roughness after debonding of orthodontic brackets and various clean-up techniques.

Authors:  Farzaneh Ahrari; Majid Akbari; Javad Akbari; Ghahraman Dabiri
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2013-01-31

8.  Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of adhesive remnants and enamel loss resulting from debonding orthodontic molar tubes.

Authors:  Joanna Janiszewska-Olszowska; Katarzyna Tandecka; Tomasz Szatkiewicz; Katarzyna Sporniak-Tutak; Katarzyna Grocholewicz
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.151

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.