Literature DB >> 35658583

Sinovac vaccination and the course of COVID-19 disease in hospitalized patients in Turkey.

Leman Acun Delen1, Mesut Örtekus2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Alpha variant of SARS-CoV-2 has a higher transmission rate than the first variant identified. The efficacy of vaccines is affected by the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 variants.
OBJECTIVE: Investigate the relationship of vaccination and virus variant on the course of the disease in patients who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19.
DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study
SETTING: Tertiary health institution PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included patients older than the age of 18 years who were hospitalized in a COVID-19 service or the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of COVID-19 between 1 January 2021 and 30 April 2021. Demographic characteristics, vaccination and the Alpha virus variant status, comorbidities, and information about hospitalization were obtained from the hospital automation system and patient files. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Vaccination rate and relationship with course of disease. SAMPLE SIZE: 608
RESULTS: Most of the patients (n=482, 79.3%) were admitted to the COVID-19 service. More of the COVID-19 service patients had the Alpha variant than the patients admitted to ICU (P<.009). The Alpha variant was also more common in younger patients (P<.001). There was no relationship between the Alpha virus and comorbid diseases such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Mortality was lower in the patients who had received a second dose of the Sinovac vaccine (P=.004) compared with unvaccinated patients.
CONCLUSION: Although the Alpha variant spreads faster, it has a milder course. If only the Sinovac vaccine is available, we recommend that the two doses of the Sinovac vaccine be administered. LIMITATIONS: Our study is single-center and did not include pregnant and pediatric patients. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35658583      PMCID: PMC9167459          DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2022.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Saudi Med        ISSN: 0256-4947            Impact factor:   1.707


INTRODUCTION

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic began in December 2019. Presentation ranges from a severe course such as acute respiratory distress syndrome to clinically asymptomatic cases. It is usually asymptomatic or mild in the young.[1] Fever and cough are the most common symptoms.[2] Headache, weakness and fatigue, nausea-vomiting, taste disorders, diarrhea, shortness of breath are other symptoms.[2,3] In moderate and severe cases, lymphopenia, eosinopenia, increased D-dimer, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels can be seen.[4] The COVID-19 outbreak affected nearly 500 million people and killed more than 6 million people as of March 2022.[5] In Turkey, as of November 2021, it had affected more than 8.1 million people and killed approximately 72 000 people.[6] In addition to isolation measures such as masks, social distancing, and curfews as preventive health measures in the fight against COVID-19, vaccination also has an important role. Many countries today use Sinovac, which is an inactivated virus vaccine made in China, and two mRNA-based vaccines, Pfizer/BioNtech made in Germany and Sputnik V made in Russia. Moreover, phase III studies have started on TURKOVAC (), which is an inactivated virus vaccine developed in Turkey. As a result of vaccination, the number of cases, including severe cases of COVID-19, are decreasing. Because new variants may become resistant to the vaccine, the biggest concern in vaccination is the impact of virus mutations. The COVID-19 virus, SARS-CoV-2, is an enveloped RNA virus from strain B of the beta-coronaviruses of the coronavirus family.[7] RNA viruses mutate frequently, and several variants of COVID-19 viruses (Alpha variant, Delta variant, and others.) have been detected. The Alpha variant, designated a variant of concern (VOC) 202012/01 mutation, is highly contagious, but severe lung and respiratory tract involvement is less compared with other variants.[8] In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of vaccination and the variant on the course of the disease in patients who were hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The case definition for COVID-19 in our study was the presence symptoms (fever, respiratory distress, cough, etc.) and/or a ground glass image in the thorax CT and a positive PCR test performed in our hospital. Since mild cases were treated as outpatients, our patient population consisted of moderate and severe COVID-19 patients. Our study was a retrospective cohort study, which was approved by the Malatya Turgut Özal University Faculty of Medicine Clinical Research Ethics Committee (date: 08.03.2021; no: 2021/50). The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Patients aged 18 years and older who were being treated for a diagnosis of COVID-19 in Malatya Training and Research Hospital between 1 January 2021 and 30 April 2021 were included in the study. Patients younger than the age of 18 years, patients who were pregnant, and patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 after hospitalization were excluded from the study. The real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is routinely performed on patients with COVID-19 symptoms and/or a ground glass appearance in the thorax imaging. In addition, PCR testing is applied to people who have a history of contact with people diagnosed with COVID-19. We retrieved the data on patient age, gender, symptoms present during hospitalization (fever, cough, and respiratory distress), comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, malignancy), days in intensive care and/or the COVID-19 service, oxygen support on the day of hospitalization (oxygen support with a nasal prong and/or a reservoir mask), respiratory support (intubation and/or continuous positive airway pressure) status, discharge status (discharge, mortality), virus variant, and vaccine status. We analyzed relationships between the COVID-19 Alpha variant (testing was only available for the Alpha variant as it was the dominant variant at the time. Sinovac vaccination, comorbidities and mortality. Resources for our research were published in the last 5 years and in internationally published indexing services such as Google Science, PubMed, Index Copernicus, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies in non-international journals and non-peer-reviewed journals were excluded. IBM SPSS Statistics version 21.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA.) was used for the statistical analysis. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate the normal distribution. Age and total hospitalization days are given as the median (minimum, maximum). Other data are given as the number of cases (n) and percentages (%). The Mann-Whitney U test was used in the analysis of age and hospitalization days. The Pearson chi-square test was used for the analysis of the categorical variables. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship of hospitalization in the COVID-19 service or intensive care unit, gender, comorbidities, symptoms, vaccination status, and mutation on mortality (dependent variable). P<.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 608 patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19, 244 (40.1%) were vaccinated with either one or two doses of the Sinovac vaccine (). The COVID-19 variant known as the Alpha variant (VOC 202012/01; B.1.1.7) was detected in 270 (44.4%) patients. No other variants were detected. The Alpha variant was detected more frequently in younger patients () (P<.001). Analysis according to service and intensive care follow-up (n=608). Data are n (%) unless noted otherwise. Median (minimum-maximum). Alpha variant mutation (VOC 202012/01; B.1.1.7) of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 positive patients by age (P<.001, Mann-Whitney U test). While 4 (0.8%) patients who were followed up in the service died, 71 (56.3%) patients died in the ICU (P<.001). In the analysis of comorbid diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was more frequent in patients hospitalized in the COVID-19 service (P=.001). Otherwise, comorbidities were similar. Fever and cough were higher in the COVID-19 service patients, while respiratory distress was higher in the patients in intensive care. In the unvaccinated patients, 75% had the Alpha variant, while in the vaccinated patients fewer patients had the Alpha variant (P<.001) (). The number of hospitalization days and mortality rates were lower in the patients infected with the Alpha variant of the virus. Oxygen support was provided to 223 (36.67%) patients nasally, to 315 (52.06%) patients by reservoir mask, and to 7 (1.15%) nasally and with a reservoir mask. Continuous positive airway pressure support was given to 16 (2.63%) patients, and 11 (1.8%) patients were intubated. Mortality was lower in patients who received two vaccine doses compared to the patients who received a single vaccine dose (P=.004) (). Analysis according to the SARS-CoV-2 variant status. Data are n (%) unless noted otherwise. Median (minimum-maximum) Association of vaccination status and mortality. In the analysis of the relationship between comorbidity and vaccination, mortality was higher in patients with comorbidity and unvaccinated patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (). In the multivariant analysis, hospital unit (COVID-19 service or ICU), COPD, and vaccination were significantly associated with mortality (). Associations between vaccination status in COVID-19 patients with comorbid disease. Statistical analyses by chi-square test. Multiple logistic regression analysis with discharge alive or not as dependent variable. R2: 0.487, Overall test: P<.001

DISCUSSION

The COVID-19 virus directly or indirectly affects many tissues and systems, especially the respiratory system. Although the infection is usually asymptomatic or mild, severe pulmonary involvement can occur. The main natural reserve of the SARS-CoV virus is thought to be a certain bat species in the Yunnan province of China. The virus is thought to be transmitted to humans by ingestion of the infected animal.[9] The virus variant obtained from bats shows 79.5%–96.2% similarity to SARS-CoV-2.[9,10] The SARS-CoV-2 virus has a high mutation rate. After the first virus was isolated, many variants have been described as a result of mutations. Vang et al found mutations in 13 402 of 31 421 genome isolates.[11] With the emergence of variant viruses, variant analysis was started in cases with positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. The Alpha variant identified as VOC 202012/01 (B.1.1.7) is one variant that became dominant in 2021.[12] Studies show that this variant spreads faster than the original virus, and it is spreading rapidly in Turkey.[13,14] It has been shown that the N501Y mutation seen in the spike protein in the VOC 202012/01 variant increases viral affinity for angiotensin converting enzyme receptors.[13,15] Some researchers state that increased affinity may aggravate the course of the disease.[16,17] However, despite the increase in the severity of the disease, it is unclear whether the increase in number is a consequence or is due to increased pathogenicity. Conversely, the VOC 202012/01 variant is a subtype of the D614G variant,[18] and some studies have shown that although the transmission capacity of the D614G variant is high, it has a milder course.[19,20] In our study, 44.4% (n=270) of our patients were infected with the Alpha virus, which shows that the infection rate of this variant is high. Only the Alpha variant was detected in patients during the study period. Our study showed that the patients infected with the Alpha mutation had a lower follow-up rate in the ICU; in other words, it caused acute respiratory distress syndrome at a lower rate. In addition, the number of patients with the Alpha variant was significantly lower than the original variant. However, in the literature, some researchers have argued that there is no significant relationship between the VOC 202012/01 variant and the clinical course.[21,22] In our study, no relationship was found between gender and the VOC 202012/01 variant. However, the VOC 202012/01 variant was more common in the younger population. Other studies have also shown that it is more prevalent in the young population.23 It can be seen as natural that the young population is infected with the Alpha variant, which shows a higher spread rate due to the more active work and social lives of younger people. This result also provides clues about the clinical course of the patient population. The increase in comorbid diseases, such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension, which cause an increase in the mortality of COVID-19 in the elderly population, causes a more severe clinical course and thus increases mortality.[15] Therefore, the fact that the Alpha variant is more common in the young population appears to be a factor that reduces mortality. In our study, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), one of the comorbid diseases, affected the course of the disease and was significantly higher in intensive care patients. Studies in the literature support this finding.[24,25] However, when we examined the patients with COPD in relation to the course of the disease, no significant relationship was found between the virus variant and COPD. İn addition no association was found between other comorbid diseases (malignancy, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular diseases, cardiac disease, and heart failure) and the Alpha variant. Perhaps the most important element in the fight against the pandemic is vaccination. From the first days of the epidemic, many countries, including Turkey, started work to produce a vaccine. In addition to traditional vaccines (e.g., Sinovac and Turkovac) in parallel with the developing technology, studies are continuing to produce new-generation vaccines, including mRNA (CureVac BioNTtech), DNA (INO-4800), and protein-based vaccines (Ad5-nCoV, NVXCoV2373).[26] While some of these vaccines are in phase 1 and phase 2 studies, many countries have started to use some of the phase 3 vaccines (Sinovac, BioNTech, for example) with emergency use approval. At the time of our study, the patients who had been vaccinated had all received the inactive virus vaccine, Sinovac. We found no relationship between vaccinated vs nonvaccinated patients and the course of the disease, but the Alpha variant was more common in the vaccinated group. This result indicates that the Sinovac vaccine was less effective against the Alpha variant. Conti et al stated that the reason for this is that the antibodies formed by the vaccine may be less effective against this variant.[27] Along with vaccination, the number of severely ill patients has decreased worldwide. The isolation, travel restrictions, and filiation studies implemented in Turkey have attempted to bring the pandemic under control. With the administration of the Sinovac and later the BioNTec vaccines, the incidence and death rates have decreased significantly. However, it is open to debate whether this decrease is due to a decrease in the number of patients or whether the vaccine is effective in affecting the course of the disease. Another problem in vaccine studies is the duration of the antibody response created by the vaccine.[28] Re-infection of patients already infected or vaccinated is common. It is unclear whether the person is unable to produce an adequate antibody response or whether there is a decrease in the level of antibodies formed. Also, the fact that COVID-19 mutates quite frequently is a separate problem. In our study, the mortality of those who received two doses of the Sinovac vaccine was lower than those who were not vaccinated and those who received a single vaccine dose. However, there was no difference in mortality between those who were not vaccinated and those who received a single dose. Therefore, two doses of the Sinovac vaccine reduced mortality. We think that a single dose of vaccine does not produce sufficient antibody levels clinically. However, studies on this subject in larger patient groups are needed. As in our study, other researchers on vaccine efficacy have found that a single vaccine dose may not provide sufficient protection.[29,30] Since our study was single-centered and did not include pediatric or pregant patients, our data may be considered insufficient and results and conclusions should be interpreted with caution. Since only the Sinovac vaccine was used in our country at the time of the study, only the efficacy of that vaccine could be evaluated. In our study, the previous COVID-19 history of the patients, vaccination immunity and the history of re-infection (normal variant, Alpha variant) in the treated patients were not in the hospital data. Therefore, it was not possible to evaluate the mortality and course of the disease in patients with recurrent COVID diseases. In conclusion, COVID-19 virus variants are a determining factor in the spread and course of the disease. As a result of our study, we suggest that although the Alpha variant spreads rapidly, it has a milder course. We also recommend that the Sinovac vaccine be administered in two doses to provide adequate clinical protection.
Table 1.

Analysis according to service and intensive care follow-up (n=608).

COVI D-19 service (n=482, 79.3%)Intensive care (n=126, 20.7%)P value
Male257 (53.3)77 (61.1).118
Age (years)[a]61 (13–94)69 (43–94) <.001
Alpha variant227 (47.1)43 (34.1) .009
Vaccination status285 (59.1)78 (62.4).164
 No vaccine80 (16.6)26 (20.8)
 Single dose
 Two doses117 (24.3)21 (16.8)
Mortality4 (0.8)71 (56.3) <.001
Hypertension167 (34.6)55 (43.7).062
Diabetes mellitus83 (17.2)13 (10.3).059
Cerebrovascular disease26 (5.4)8 (6.3).678
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease442 (91.7)103 (81.7) <.001
Congestive heart failure35 (7.3)16 (12.7).050
Malignancy3 (0.6)3 (2.4).075
Symptoms194 (40.2)37 (29.4) .025
 Fever
 Cough200 (41.5)38 (30.2) .020
Respiratory distress227 (47.1)122 (96.8)<.001

Data are n (%) unless noted otherwise.

Median (minimum-maximum).

Table 2.

Analysis according to the SARS-CoV-2 variant status.

No variant detected (n=338)Alpha variant (n=270)P value
Male185 (54.7)149 (55.2).911
Age (years)[a]68 (14–94)58 (13–90) <.001
Length of stay (days)[a]8 (1–52)7 (1–72) .004
Vaccine
 No vaccine160 (47.5)203 (75.2)
 Single dose69 (20.5)37 (13.7) <.001
 Two doses108 (32.0)30 (11.1)
Mortality51 (15.1)24 (8.9) .021
Hypertension133 (39.3)89 (33.0).104
Diabetes mellitus57 (16.9)39 (14.4).416
Cerebrovascular disease21 (6.2)13 (4.8).456
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease38 (11.2)25 (9.3).425
Congestive heart failure34 (10.1)17 (6.3).096
Malignancy3 (0.9)3 (1.1).782
Symptoms Fever
 Fever127 (37.6)104 (38.5).812
 Cough125 (37.0)113 (41.9).222
 Respiratory distress192 (56.8)157 (58.1).739

Data are n (%) unless noted otherwise.

Median (minimum-maximum)

Table 3.

Association of vaccination status and mortality.

Mortality (n)P valueTotal number of cases
Vaccination status
 No vaccine51 (14.1%).011 vs vaccination363
 Single dose17 (16.0%).609 vs no vaccine106
 Two dose7 (5.1%).004 vs no vaccine138
Table 4.

Associations between vaccination status in COVID-19 patients with comorbid disease.

ComorbidityVaccination statusMortalityDischarged from HospitalP value
Intensive care unitNoNo vaccine1517 .011
Single dose42
Two dose37
YesNo vaccine3422 .023
Single dose137
Two dose29
COVID-19 service unitNoNo vaccine0148.100
Single dose031
Two dose138
YesNo vaccine2148.703
Single dose031
Two dose138

Statistical analyses by chi-square test.

Table 5.

Multiple logistic regression analysis with discharge alive or not as dependent variable.

BSEβt P
Constant0.0450.0251.791.074
Hospital stay unit0.5450.0270.6720.163 <.001
Gender−0.0140.02−0.021−0.706.480
Hypertension0.0080.030.0110.262.794
Diabetes mellitus0.0430.0310.0471.384.167
Cardiovascular disease0.0130.0460.0090.288.773
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease0.080.0360.0742.189 .029
Congestive heart failure0.0670.0380.0561.76.079
Fever−0.0110.02−0.016−0.55.583
Respiratory disease0.0030.0220.0040.138.891
Comorbidity−0.0360.035−0.053−1.002.317
Vaccination−0.0260.012−0.066−2.104 .036
Alpha variant−0.0280.021−0.042−1.354.176

R2: 0.487, Overall test: P<.001

  24 in total

1.  The British variant of the new coronavirus-19 (Sars-Cov-2) should not create a vaccine problem.

Authors:  P Conti; Al Caraffa; C E Gallenga; S K Kritas; I Frydas; A Younes; P Di Emidio; G Tetè; F Pregliasco; G Ronconi
Journal:  J Biol Regul Homeost Agents       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.711

2.  Assessing transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England.

Authors:  Erik Volz; Swapnil Mishra; Meera Chand; Jeffrey C Barrett; Robert Johnson; Axel Gandy; Andrew Rambaut; Neil M Ferguson; Lily Geidelberg; Wes R Hinsley; Daniel J Laydon; Gavin Dabrera; Áine O'Toole; Robert Amato; Manon Ragonnet-Cronin; Ian Harrison; Ben Jackson; Cristina V Ariani; Olivia Boyd; Nicholas J Loman; John T McCrone; Sónia Gonçalves; David Jorgensen; Richard Myers; Verity Hill; David K Jackson; Katy Gaythorpe; Natalie Groves; John Sillitoe; Dominic P Kwiatkowski; Seth Flaxman; Oliver Ratmann; Samir Bhatt; Susan Hopkins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The COVID-19 epidemic.

Authors:  Thirumalaisamy P Velavan; Christian G Meyer
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Zheng-Yi Ni; Yu Hu; Wen-Hua Liang; Chun-Quan Ou; Jian-Xing He; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; David S C Hui; Bin Du; Lan-Juan Li; Guang Zeng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Ping-Yan Chen; Jie Xiang; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Lin Wang; Zi-Jing Liang; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Nan-Shan Zhong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A clade of SARS-CoV-2 viruses associated with lower viral loads in patient upper airways.

Authors:  Ramon Lorenzo-Redondo; Hannah H Nam; Scott C Roberts; Lacy M Simons; Lawrence J Jennings; Chao Qi; Chad J Achenbach; Alan R Hauser; Michael G Ison; Judd F Hultquist; Egon A Ozer
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 8.143

Review 6.  Contentious issues and evolving concepts in the clinical presentation and management of patients with COVID-19 infectionwith reference to use of therapeutic and other drugs used in Co-morbid diseases (Hypertension, diabetes etc).

Authors:  Ritesh Gupta; Anoop Misra
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr       Date:  2020-03-25

Review 7.  Insights into SARS-CoV-2 genome, structure, evolution, pathogenesis and therapies: Structural genomics approach.

Authors:  Ahmad Abu Turab Naqvi; Kisa Fatima; Taj Mohammad; Urooj Fatima; Indrakant K Singh; Archana Singh; Shaikh Muhammad Atif; Gururao Hariprasad; Gulam Mustafa Hasan; Md Imtaiyaz Hassan
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 5.187

Review 8.  The D614G mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: Implications for viral infectivity, disease severity and vaccine design.

Authors:  Danielle C Groves; Sarah L Rowland-Jones; Adrienn Angyal
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Mutations on COVID-19 diagnostic targets.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Yuta Hozumi; Changchuan Yin; Guo-Wei Wei
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 5.736

Review 10.  One year update on the COVID-19 pandemic: Where are we now?

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar Mishra; Timir Tripathi
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 3.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.