| Literature DB >> 35657658 |
Erdenebayar Urtnasan1,2, Jung Hun Lee3, Byungjin Moon2, Hee Young Lee2,3, Kyuhee Lee1,2, Hyun Youk2,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hyperkalemia monitoring is very important in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in emergency medicine. Currently, blood testing is regarded as the standard way to diagnose hyperkalemia (ie, using serum potassium levels). Therefore, an alternative and noninvasive method is required for real-time monitoring of hyperkalemia in the emergency medicine department.Entities:
Keywords: ECG; deep learning; electrocardiogram; emergency medicine; hyperkalemia; noninvasive screening; single-lead ECG
Year: 2022 PMID: 35657658 PMCID: PMC9206199 DOI: 10.2196/34724
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Med Inform
Figure 1Diagram of the proposed method for noninvasive screening of hyperkalemia. ECG: electrocardiogram.
Characteristics of the study participants.
| Characteristics | Participants (N=2958) | |||
|
| Non-CRFa (n=1168) | CRF (n=1790) | Total | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Female | 496 (39.9) | 747 (60.1) | 1243 (42) |
|
| Male | 672 (39.2) | 1043 (60.8) | 1715 (58) |
|
| Total | 1168 (39.5) | 1790 (60.5) | 2958 (100) |
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 70.3 (19.0) | 72.6 (13.2) | 71.7 (15.8) | |
| Height (cm), mean (SD) | 155.5 (26.2) | 159.4 (14.4) | 158.0 (19.7) | |
| Weight (kg), mean (SD) | 58.8 (15.5) | 62.2 (12.2) | 60.9 (13.6) | |
| Myocardial infarction, n (%)b | 35 (23) | 117 (77) | 152 (5.1) | |
| Heart failure, n (%)b | 116 (30) | 271 (70) | 387 (13.1) | |
| Angina, n (%)b | 93 (28.4) | 235 (71.6) | 328 (11.1) | |
| Diabetes, n (%)b | 251 (21.6) | 912 (78.4) | 1163 (39.3) | |
| Hypertension, n (%)b | 323 (23.8) | 1037 (76.3) | 1360 (46) | |
aCRF: chronic renal failure.
bThe denominator used to calculate percentages is the sum of the non-CRF and CRF participants in that category (ie, row).
Data sets for this study.
| Data sets | Data set I, n | Data set II, n | Data set III, n |
| Training set | 1186 | 879 | 1426 |
| Validation set | 296 | 220 | 357 |
| Test set | 370 | 275 | 446 |
| Total | 1852 | 1374 | 2229 |
Architecture of the proposed deep learning model for hyperkalemia screening.
| Number and layers | Activation | Filter size | Output shape | Parameter | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
batchnorm_1 | = |
= |
1400×1 | 4 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
conv1D_1 maxpool_1 | ReLu |
100@50×1 2×1 |
1351×100 675×100 | 5100 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
conv1D_2 maxpool_2 dropout_2 | ReLu |
80@50×1 2×1 p=0.25a |
626×80 313×80 313×80 | 400,080 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
conv1D_3 maxpool_3 dropout_3 | ReLu |
60@30×1 2×1 p=0.25 |
284×60 142×60 142×60 | 144,060 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
conv1D_4 maxpool_4 dropout_4 | ReLu |
40@20×1 2×1 p=0.25 |
123×40 61×40 61×40 | 48,040 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
conv1D_5 maxpool_5 dropout_5 | ReLu |
20@10×1 2×1 p=0.25 |
52×20 26×20 26×20 | 8020 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
flatten_1 dense_1 | Softmax |
2 |
520×2 | 1042 | |||
| Total |
5 conv layers |
|
124 filters |
| 606,027 | |||
ap: One of the setting parameters of the dropout technique.
The performance of the proposed method for the test set of data set I.
| Index and events | Leads | ||||||||
|
| I | II | V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Normal | 0.52 | 0.96 | 0.47 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.66 | 0.51 | 0.54 |
|
| Hyperkalemia | 0.61 | 0.94 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.64 | 0.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Normal | 0.48 | 0.93 | 0.56 | 0.66 | 0.51 | 0.66 | 0.50 | 0.60 |
|
| Hyperkalemia | 0.64 | 0.97 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Normal | 0.50 | 0.94 | 0.51 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 0.50 | 0.57 |
|
| Hyperkalemia | 0.62 | 0.95 | 0.58 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.60 |
The performance of the proposed method for the test set of data set III.
| Index and events | Leads | ||||||||
|
| I | II | V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Normal | 0.56 | 0.95 | 0.53 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.61 |
|
| Hyperkalemia | 0.47 | 0.94 | 0.74 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.60 | 0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Normal | 0.61 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.59 |
|
| Hyperkalemia | 0.42 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.48 | 0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Normal | 0.58 | 0.96 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.64 | 0.66 | 0.62 | 0.60 |
|
| Hyperkalemia | 0.44 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.52 |
Figure 2Confusion matrix of this study. Confusion matrix of (A) the training set, (B) the validation set, and (C) the test set for the lead II electrocardiogram channel of data set I.
The performance of the proposed method for the test set of data set II.
| Index and events | Leads | ||||||||||||||||
|
| I | II | V1 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| Normal | 0.31 | 0.88 | 0.28 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.52 | 0.36 | 0.51 | ||||||||
|
| Hyperkalemia | 0.75 | 0.93 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.72 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| Normal | 0.22 | 0.85 | 0.17 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.50 | 0.28 | 0.30 | ||||||||
|
| Hyperkalemia | 0.82 | 0.95 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.87 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| Normal | 0.26 | 0.87 | 0.21 | 0.31 | 0.25 | 0.51 | 0.31 | 0.38 | ||||||||
|
| Hyperkalemia | 0.78 | 0.94 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.79 | ||||||||