| Literature DB >> 35657065 |
Souad Baklouti1, Asma Aloui1,2, Hana Baklouti1, Nizar Souissi1, Mohamed Jarraya3.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of Hatha yoga practice on cognitive functions in the elderly. Thirty healthy older men participated in this study. They belonged to 2 groups. The first group included 15 Hatha yoga practitioners for at least 2 years. The control group involved 15 male older adults who shared the same characteristics (age, years of formal education, and level of physical activity) as the Hatha yoga group but were naive to yoga, meditation, or any mind-body intervention. Neuropsychological tests were applied to measure selective attention, sustained attention, episodic memory, and processing speed. The following tests were administered: The French adaptation of the Victoria Stroop test, the Zazzo's Cancellation Task, the Five Word Test, and a battery of computerized tests to evaluate reaction time. Long-term Hatha yoga practice showed promising results related to executive functions and reaction time, but no significant difference was found between the two groups in episodic memory and sustained attention although a trend of improvement was observed in favor of Hatha yoga practitioners. In conclusion, long-term Hatha yoga practitioners have better cognitive abilities compared to the control group in certain aspects of cognitive functions. Further physiological and psychological variables need to be examined in order to highlight the correlation between yoga intervention and cognitive performance.Entities:
Keywords: Yoga; episodic memory; executive functions; older adults; processing speed; selective attention; sustained attention
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35657065 PMCID: PMC9176371 DOI: 10.1080/19932820.2022.2080799
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Libyan J Med ISSN: 1819-6357 Impact factor: 1.743
Main characteristics of the control and Hatha yoga groups
| Hatha yoga group | Control group | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 64.00 ± 3.02 | 65.00 ± 5.11 |
| Years of formal education | 17.30 ± 3.12 | 17.50 ± 3.55 |
| Level of physical activity | 24.26 ± 1.27 | 24.00 ± 2.26 |
Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations.
Sample 60-minute yoga session construction
| Component | Exercises | Approximate duration |
|---|---|---|
| Sukṣmavyayama (loosening exercises/warm up) | Greeva Sanchalana (neck movement) | 10 minutes |
| Skandha Chakra (shoulder rotation) | ||
| Kati Chakrasana (hip extension) | ||
| Janu Chakra (knee movement) | ||
| Surya Namkaskar (3 rounds) | ||
| Asanas (physical postures) | Standing Asanas: e.g. Tadasana, Kati Chakrasana, Virabhadrasana I, II, and III | 20 minutes |
| Prāṇāyāmas | Diaphragmatic breathing | 15 minutes |
| Meditation | Pose: Siddhasana/Savasana | 15 minutes |
Indices of the Victoria Stroop test measured in the control and Hatha yoga groups
| Hatha yoga group | Control group | |
|---|---|---|
| Low interference index | 1.14 ± 0.22 | 1.20 ± 0.18 |
| High interference index | 1.53 ± 0.44 | 1.75 ± 0.55 |
| Number of errors made | 0.66 ± 0.81* | 2.53 ± 1.06 |
Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations.
*: Significantly different compared to the control group.
Indices of the Zazzo’s Cancellation Task measured in the control and Hatha yoga groups
| Dim 1 | Dim 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hatha yoga group | Control group | Hatha yoga group | Control group | |
| Time (s) | 5.00 ± 1.16 | 5.85 ± 1.61 | 10.91 ± 1.59* | 15.62 ± 3.05 |
| Number of omission errors | 9.60 ± 7.10 | 15.73 ± 9.65 | 16.07 ± 6.67* | 23.27 ± 6.79 |
| Number of commission errors | 0.00 ± 0.00* | 1.27 ± 2.66 | 0.33 ± 0.72* | 1.60 ± 1.24 |
Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations.
*: Significantly different compared to the control group.
Indices of the reaction time tests measured in the control and Hatha yoga groups
| Hatha yoga group | Control group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| First condition (Figure apparition) | Time (ms) | 313.99 ± 49.65* | 318.64 ± 68.13 |
| Number of errors | 0.20 ± 0.24* | 1.82 ± 1.63 | |
| Number of forgets | 0.02 ± 0.00* | 1.15 ± 1.74 | |
| Second condition (Figure comparison) | Time (ms) | 653.74 ± 87.45* | 719.97 ± 63.41 |
| Number of errors | 1.84 ± 1.32 | 2.75 ± 0.89 | |
| Number of forgets | 0.93 ± 0.30 | 1.15 ± 1.20 | |
| Third condition (A shape among X) | Time (ms) | 533.29 ± 60.87 | 562.19 ± 86.05 |
| Number of errors | 1.82 ± 0.92 | 2.02 ± 1.53 | |
| Number of forgets | 0.64 ± 0.50 | 1.00 ± 1.06 |
Data are expressed as means ± standard deviations.
*: Significantly different compared to the control group.