| Literature DB >> 35656937 |
Jiangxiu Niu1, Ming Yuan1, Hongying Li2, Yao Liu1, Liye Wang1, Yanli Fan1, Yansong Zhang1, Xianghui Liu1, Lingmei Li1, Jingxiao Zhang1, Chenyu Zhao1.
Abstract
Challenges associated with topical analgesics and anti-inflammatory drugs include poor drug penetration and retention at the desired lesion site. Therefore, improving these challenges would help to reduce the toxic and side effects caused by drug absorption into the systemic circulation and improve the therapeutic efficacy of topical therapeutic drugs. Pentapeptide (KTTKS) is a signal peptide in skin tissue, it can be recognized and bound by signal recognition particles. In the current study, we successfully prepared novel indomethacin (IMC) loaded KTTKS-modified ethosomes (IMC-KTTKS-Es), and the physicochemical properties and topical efficacy were investigated. Results showed that the prepared IMC-KTTKS-Es displayed a particle size of about 244 nm, a negative charge, good deformability, and encapsulation efficiency (EE) exceeding 80% for IMC, with a sustained release pattern. In vitro percutaneous permeation studies revealed that the skin retention was increased after the drug was loaded in the IMC-KTTKS-Es. Confocal laser scanning microscopy also showed improved skin retention of IMC-KTTKS-Es. In addition, IMC-KTTKS-Es showed improved topical analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity with no potentially hazardous skin irritation. This study suggested that the IMC-KTTKS-Es might be an effective drug carrier for topical skin therapy with a good safety profile.Entities:
Keywords: Pentapeptide; efficacy activity; ethosomes; indomethacin; skin permeation and retention
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35656937 PMCID: PMC9176705 DOI: 10.1080/10717544.2022.2081739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Deliv ISSN: 1071-7544 Impact factor: 6.819
Figure 1.Schematic illustration of the preparation of IMC-KTTKS-Es for enhanced skin permeation and retention.
Optimization of the IMC-KTTKS-Es formulation.
| Amount of Pal-KTTKS (mg) | Particle size (nm) | PDI | Zeta potential (mV) | EE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 185.62 ± 9.05 | 0.138 ± 0.01 | −0.28 ± 0.06 | 65.58 ± 2.32 |
| 5 | 190.57 ± 6.43 | 0.088 ± 0.01 | −37.2 ± 8.52 | 76.10 ± 1.92 |
| 10 | 195.83 ± 8.80 | 0.183 ± 0.02 | −41.0 ± 8.87 | 82.42 ± 3.77 |
| 20 | 244.81 ± 9.52 | 0.225 ± 0.01 | −36.4 ± 7.34 | 82.16 ± 2.94 |
| 40 | 343.39 ± 7.26 | 0.439 ± 0.03 | −30.2 ± 7.66 | 66.10 ± 1.68 |
Figure 2.Characterization of formulations. (A) Particle size and distribution of IMC-KTTKS-Es measured by the instrument of Zetasizer Nano; (B) SEM image of IMC-KTTKS-Es.
Figure 3.The in vitro release of IMC from IMC plain gel, IMC-Es gel and IMC-KTTKS-Es gel in PBS of pH 7.4.
Figure 4.X-ray diffraction patterns (A) and FTIR pattern (B) of pure IMC, lyophilized blank KTTKS-Es, physical mixture, and freeze-dried IMC-KTTKS-Es.
Figure 5.(A) In vitro transdermal delivery of IMC plain gel, IMC-Es gel, and IMC-KTTKS-Es gel in porcine ear skin after 48 h of topical administration. (A) Cumulative transdermal permeation. (B) IMC retention in the skin (data given as the mean ± SD, n = 3; *p < .05, **p < .01).
Figure 6.Micrographs of the hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stained porcine ear sections after being treated with (A) Physiological saline (B) IMC plain gel (C) IMC-Es gel and (D) IMC-KTTKS-Es gel.
Figure 7.CLSM images of the vertical section of the skin treated with the various formulations post administration. The slides were stained with DAPI.
Mean reaction time of control, IMC plain gel, IMC-Es gel and IMC-KTTKS-Es gel in mice at various time intervals.
| Formulation | Pre-treatment (s) | Reaction time (s) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 min | 60 min | 90 min | ||
| Control | 15.49 ± 3.65 | 15.39 ± 3.26 | 15.11 ± 4.72 | 16.79 ± 7.65 |
| IMC plain gel | 14.79 ± 2.45 | 16.25 ± 3.48 | 20.91 ± 6.59* | 19.41 ± 5.65* |
| IMC-Es gel | 15.58 ± 4.53 | 22.25 ± 6.14*# | 29.21 ± 6.30*# | 26.50 ± 8.98*# |
| IMC-KTTKS-Es gel | 14.99 ± 2.89 | 20.86 ± 4.96*# | 31.59 ± 5.89*# | 35.55 ± 6.78*#$ |
*p < .05 vs. control group, #p < .05 vs. IMC plain gel, $p < .05 vs. IMC-Es gel treated group.
Figure 8.In vivo skin irritation test. Skin appearance of mice observed at 1 and 72 h.