Literature DB >> 35656934

Role of β-Blockers in Chronic Coronary Artery Disease Management in the Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Era: Good Symptom Control or Something More?

Ji Woong Roh1, Yongcheol Kim2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35656934      PMCID: PMC9257154          DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2022.0105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean Circ J        ISSN: 1738-5520            Impact factor:   3.101


× No keyword cloud information.
β-blockers provide survival benefits to patients with myocardial infarction (MI) or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and effectively reduce the mortality and/or incidence of cardiovascular events.1)2)3)4) However, there is no definite evidence of survival benefits of β-blockers in chronic coronary artery disease (CAD). Nevertheless, β-blockers are recommended as Class IA treatment on the current chronic CAD guidelines for effective symptom control mediated by a reduction in the myocardial oxygen demand with left ventricular wall stress through heart rate and myocardial contractility reduction.5) Regarding the indications for revascularization in patients with chronic CAD, the persistence of symptoms despite optimal pharmacotherapy and significant CAD is confirmed by anatomical and/or functional assessment.6) However, only a few observational studies have assessed the clinical benefits of β-blockers in patients with chronic CAD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).7)8) Park et al.9) demonstrated that the β-blockers were not associated with outcome improvement, including mortality, in patients with chronic CAD undergoing PCI. Even different doses and types of β-blockers showed no significant differences in the outcomes, including mortality. However, in patients with previous MI, β-blockers provided benefits of mortality reduction in that study. The strength of their study was that patients who were maintained on β-blockers after discharge were included and their data were analyzed according to the different doses and types of β-blockers during the study follow-up. These meticulous efforts could be the basis for the evaluation of the clinical benefit of continuous β-blocker administration in patients with chronic CAD undergoing PCI, not to whether they received β-blockers at specific time-points, such as at discharge or immediately after PCI. Moreover, a subgroup analysis of this study showed that β-blockers could provide the clinical benefits of reducing mortality in patients with previous MI with or without revascularization. Although the observational study had inherent limitations, its results suggest that β-blockers should be prescribed for chronic CAD patients with prior MI with or without revascularization for survival benefits, not just for symptom control. However, there are no data on the role of symptom control by β-blockers in patients with chronic CAD in the current study. Nonetheless, β-blockers are highly effective in reducing symptoms of angina, improving the exercise capacity, and diminishing the requirement for sublingual nitroglycerin in chronic CAD, regardless of PCI.10) Therefore, β-blockers should be prescribed to patients with chronic CAD undergoing PCI who require control of heart rate and symptoms regardless of previous MI or revascularization. In addition, β-blockers are recommended in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (<40%), although this study did not show the clinical benefits of β-blockers in those patients. Therefore, this suggests a need for conducting randomized control trials that accurately evaluate whether β-blockers provide any benefit in chronic CAD in PCI era.
  10 in total

1.  2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  Franz-Josef Neumann; Miguel Sousa-Uva; Anders Ahlsson; Fernando Alfonso; Adrian P Banning; Umberto Benedetto; Robert A Byrne; Jean-Philippe Collet; Volkmar Falk; Stuart J Head; Peter Jüni; Adnan Kastrati; Akos Koller; Steen D Kristensen; Josef Niebauer; Dimitrios J Richter; Petar M Seferovic; Dirk Sibbing; Giulio G Stefanini; Stephan Windecker; Rashmi Yadav; Michael O Zembala
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Juhani Knuuti; William Wijns; Antti Saraste; Davide Capodanno; Emanuele Barbato; Christian Funck-Brentano; Eva Prescott; Robert F Storey; Christi Deaton; Thomas Cuisset; Stefan Agewall; Kenneth Dickstein; Thor Edvardsen; Javier Escaned; Bernard J Gersh; Pavel Svitil; Martine Gilard; David Hasdai; Robert Hatala; Felix Mahfoud; Josep Masip; Claudio Muneretto; Marco Valgimigli; Stephan Achenbach; Jeroen J Bax
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Predictors, Trends, and Outcomes (Among Older Patients ≥65 Years of Age) Associated With Beta-Blocker Use in Patients With Stable Angina Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the NCDR Registry.

Authors:  Apurva A Motivala; Valay Parikh; Matthew Roe; David Dai; J Dawn Abbott; Abhiram Prasad; Debabrata Mukherjee
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure.

Authors:  M Packer; A J Coats; M B Fowler; H A Katus; H Krum; P Mohacsi; J L Rouleau; M Tendera; A Castaigne; E B Roecker; M K Schultz; D L DeMets
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  β-blocker use in patients after percutaneous coronary interventions: one size fits all? Worse outcomes in patients without myocardial infarction or heart failure.

Authors:  Neiko Ozasa; Takeshi Morimoto; Bingyuan Bao; Yutaka Furukawa; Yoshihisa Nakagawa; Kazushige Kadota; Masashi Iwabuchi; Satoshi Shizuta; Hiroki Shiomi; Junichi Tazaki; Masahiro Natsuaki; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 6.  Expert consensus document: A 'diamond' approach to personalized treatment of angina.

Authors:  Roberto Ferrari; Paolo G Camici; Filippo Crea; Nicolas Danchin; Kim Fox; Aldo P Maggioni; Athanasios J Manolis; Mario Marzilli; Giuseppe M C Rosano; José L Lopez-Sendon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 7.  Medical Management of Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Barry Greenberg
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  The Clinical Impact of β-Blocker Therapy on Patients With Chronic Coronary Artery Disease After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Jiesuck Park; Jung-Kyu Han; Jeehoon Kang; In-Ho Chae; Sung Yun Lee; Young Jin Choi; Jay Young Rhew; Seung-Woon Rha; Eun-Seok Shin; Seong-Ill Woo; Han Cheol Lee; Kook-Jin Chun; DooIl Kim; Jin-Ok Jeong; Jang-Whan Bae; Han-Mo Yang; Kyung Woo Park; Hyun-Jae Kang; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hyo-Soo Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.101

9.  β blockers and mortality after myocardial infarction in patients without heart failure: multicentre prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Etienne Puymirat; Elisabeth Riant; Nadia Aissaoui; Angèle Soria; Gregory Ducrocq; Pierre Coste; Yves Cottin; Jean François Aupetit; Eric Bonnefoy; Didier Blanchard; Simon Cattan; Gabriel Steg; François Schiele; Jean Ferrières; Yves Juillière; Tabassome Simon; Nicolas Danchin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-09-20

10.  Clinical Impact of Beta Blockers in Patients with Myocardial Infarction from the Korean National Health Insurance Database.

Authors:  Hoyoun Won; Yongsung Suh; Gwang Sil Kim; Young Guk Ko; Myeong Ki Hong
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.243

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.