Literature DB >> 35656789

Constant Pressure Convection-Enhanced Delivery Increases Volume Dispersed With Catheter Movement in Agarose.

Jason N Mehta1, Brianna E Morales2, Fang-Chi Hsu3, John H Rossmeisl4, Christopher G Rylander1.   

Abstract

Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) has been extensively studied for drug delivery to the brain due to its inherent ability to bypass the blood-brain barrier. Unfortunately, CED has also been shown to inadequately distribute therapeutic agents over a large enough targeted tissue volume to be clinically beneficial. In this study, we explore the use of constant pressure infusions in addition to controlled catheter movement as a means to increase volume dispersed (Vd) in an agarose gel brain tissue phantom. Constant flow rate and constant pressure infusions were conducted with a stationary catheter, a catheter retracting at a rate of 0.25 mm/min, and a catheter retracting at a rate of 0.5 mm/min. The 0.25 mm/min and 0.5 mm/min retracting constant pressure catheters resulted in significantly larger Vd compared to any other group, with a 105% increase and a 155% increase compared to the stationary constant flow rate catheter, respectively. These same constant pressure retracting infusions resulted in a 42% and 45% increase in Vd compared to their constant flow rate counterparts. Using constant pressure infusions coupled with controlled catheter movement appears to have a beneficial effect on Vd in agarose gel. Furthermore, constant pressure infusions reveal the fundamental limitation of flow-driven infusions in both controlled catheter movement protocols as well as in stationary protocols where maximum infusion volume can never be reliably obtained.
Copyright © 2022 by ASME.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agarose gel; constant pressure infusion; controlled catheter movement; convection-enhanced delivery; drug delivery; glioblastoma; volume dispersed

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35656789      PMCID: PMC9254693          DOI: 10.1115/1.4054729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   1.899


  39 in total

1.  Focal delivery during direct infusion to brain: role of flow rate, catheter diameter, and tissue mechanics.

Authors:  P F Morrison; M Y Chen; R S Chadwick; R R Lonser; E H Oldfield
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1999-10

2.  Intraparenchymal drug delivery via positive-pressure infusion: experimental and modeling studies of poroelasticity in brain phantom gels.

Authors:  Zhi-Jian Chen; William C Broaddus; Raju R Viswanathan; Raghu Raghavan; George T Gillies
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Influence of needle insertion speed on backflow for convection-enhanced delivery.

Authors:  Fernando Casanova; Paul R Carney; Malisa Sarntinoranont
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 4.  The blood-brain barrier: bottleneck in brain drug development.

Authors:  William M Pardridge
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2005-01

5.  In vitro and in vivo testing of a novel recessed-step catheter for reflux-free convection-enhanced drug delivery to the brain.

Authors:  T Gill; N U Barua; M Woolley; A S Bienemann; D E Johnson; G Murray; C Fennelly; O Lewis; C Irving; M J Wyatt; P Moore; S S Gill
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Infusion-line pressure as a real-time monitor of convection-enhanced delivery in pre-clinical models.

Authors:  Miu Fei Lam; Stacy W L Foo; Meghan G Thomas; Christopher R P Lind
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.390

7.  Poor drug distribution as a possible explanation for the results of the PRECISE trial.

Authors:  John H Sampson; Gary Archer; Christoph Pedain; Eva Wembacher-Schröder; Manfred Westphal; Sandeep Kunwar; Michael A Vogelbaum; April Coan; James E Herndon; Raghu Raghavan; Martin L Brady; David A Reardon; Allan H Friedman; Henry S Friedman; M Inmaculada Rodríguez-Ponce; Susan M Chang; Stephan Mittermeyer; David Croteau; Raj K Puri
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Detection of infusate leakage in the brain using real-time imaging of convection-enhanced delivery.

Authors:  Vanja Varenika; Peter Dickinson; John Bringas; Richard LeCouteur; Robert Higgins; John Park; Massimo Fiandaca; Mitchel Berger; John Sampson; Krystof Bankiewicz
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  A realistic brain tissue phantom for intraparenchymal infusion studies.

Authors:  Zhi-Jian Chen; George T Gillies; William C Broaddus; Sujit S Prabhu; Helen Fillmore; Ryan M Mitchell; Frank D Corwin; Panos P Fatouros
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 10.  Transferrin receptor ligand-targeted toxin conjugate (Tf-CRM107) for therapy of malignant gliomas.

Authors:  Michael Weaver; Douglas W Laske
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.