| Literature DB >> 35656471 |
Lei Tang1,2, Jing Liu2, Xiaozhuo Xu2, Juan Zhao3, Xu Han4.
Abstract
The traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula, Sheng Huang Chong Ji (SHCJ) is largely applied for treating Alzheimer's disease (AD), but not much is known regarding its active compounds, molecular targets, and mechanism of action. The current study aimed to predict the potential molecular mechanism of SHCJ against AD based on network pharmacology combined with in vitro validation. Using public databases, SHCJ's active compounds, their potential targets, and AD-related genes were screened, while Cytoscape Version 3.7.2 was used to build protein-protein interaction (PPI) and compound-disease-target (C-D-T) networks. Analysis of enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways and Gene Ontology (GO) terms was then carried out in R 4.0.2, including associated packages. Subsequently, molecular docking analysis was performed with AutoDock Vina 1.1.2, with intro experiments involving SH-SY5Y cells used to further investigate the mechanism of SHCJ against AD. Finally, a total of 56 active compounds of SHCJ and 192 SHCJ-AD-related targets were identified. Quercetin was identified as the top potential candidate agent. HSP90AA1, AKT1, and MAPK1 represent potential therapeutic targets. The PI3K-Akt signaling pathway potentially represents a core one mediating the effects of SHCJ against AD. Additionally, molecular docking analysis indicated that quercetin could combine well with AKT1 and multiple apoptosis-related target genes. During cell experiments, a significant increase in cell viability along with a decrease in Aβ 25-35-induced apoptosis was observed after treatment with SHCJ. Furthermore, SHCJ significantly increased the phosphorylation of PI3K and Akt while reversing Aβ 25-35-induced apoptosis-related protein expression downregulation.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35656471 PMCID: PMC9155915 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9243348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Figure 1Workflow for prediction and validation of anti-AD mechanisms based on in vitro cell experiments, molecular docking, and network pharmacology.
Central coordinates of the protein and the parameters of the docking region.
| Gene name | PDB ID | Grid box | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Center coordinates ( | Size parameters ( | ||
| HSP90AA1 | 6tn5 | 32.311, 14.712, 20.285 | 50.0, 52.0, 52.0 |
| AKT1 | 3mv5 | 2.29, −0.721, 25.379 | 66.0, 58.0, 70.0 |
| MAPK1 | 3sa0 | −2.025, 8.346, 46.564 | 66.0, 52.0, 78.0 |
| JUN | 1jnm | 15.865, 3.428, 29.021 | 32.0, 40.0, 96.0 |
| RELA | 6qhl | 23.715, 12.347, 8.034 | 58.0, 64.0, 58.0 |
| MAPK14 | 3lff | 11.153, −4.657, −17.657 | 76.0, 52.0, 62.0 |
| ESR1 | 3os8 | 21.44, 8.134, −68.509 | 62.0, 40.0, 62.0 |
| FOS | 1s9k | 26.55, 23.416, 65.415 | 86.0, 72.0, 96.0 |
| IL-6 | 4ni9 | 2.884, 21.709, 8.078 | 58.0, 56.0, 56.0 |
| MYC | 5i4z | 20.53, 26.142, 9.853 | 92.0, 38.0, 32.0 |
| CDKN1A | 5e0u | −45.634, 41.642, −12.013 | 46.0, 74.0, 60.0 |
| RB1 | 2qdj | 6.335, 35.71, 20.609 | 60.0, 72.0, 74.0 |
| Caspase 3 | 3kjf | 4.344, 6.913, 2.268 | 74.0, 70.0, 54.0 |
| Caspase 9 | 2ar9 | 16.849, 40.99, 0.996 | 46.0, 58.0, 58.0 |
| Caspase 8 | 3kjn | −3.27, 29.642, 27.204 | 56.0, 60.0, 70.0 |
| BAX | 4bd6 | −17.863, −14.654, −3.905 | 84.0, 72.0, 58.0 |
| Bcl2 | 1ysw | 2.222, -4.204, 3.104 | 54.0, 56.0, 40.0 |
Bioactive compounds of SHCJ.
| Mol ID | Molecule name | OB (%) | DL | Herb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOL002879 | Diop | 43.59 | 0.39 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL000449 | Stigmasterol | 43.83 | 0.76 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL000358 | Beta-sitosterol | 36.91 | 0.75 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma Polygonati rhizoma |
| MOL003648 | Inerminact | 65.83 | 0.54 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL000422 | Kaempferol | 41.88 | 0.24 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma Epimedii folium |
| MOL004492 | Chrysanthemaxanthin | 38.72 | 0.58 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005308 | Aposiopolamine | 66.65 | 0.22 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005314 | Celabenzine | 101.88 | 0.49 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005317 | Deoxyharringtonine | 39.27 | 0.81 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005318 | Dianthramine | 40.45 | 0.20 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005320 | Arachidonate | 45.57 | 0.20 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005321 | Frutinone A | 65.90 | 0.34 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005344 | Ginsenoside rh2 | 36.32 | 0.56 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005348 | Ginsenoside-Rh4_qt | 31.11 | 0.78 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005356 | Girinimbin | 61.22 | 0.31 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005357 | Gomisin B | 31.99 | 0.83 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005360 | Malkangunin | 57.71 | 0.63 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005376 | Panaxadiol | 33.09 | 0.79 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005384 | Suchilactone | 57.52 | 0.56 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005399 | Alexandrin_qt | 36.91 | 0.75 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL005401 | Ginsenoside Rg5_qt | 39.56 | 0.79 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL000787 | Fumarine | 59.26 | 0.83 | Ginseng radix et rhizoma |
| MOL001792 | DFV | 32.76 | 0.18 | Polygonati rhizoma Epimedii folium |
| MOL002714 | Baicalein | 33.52 | 0.21 | Polygonati rhizoma |
| MOL002959 | 3′-Methoxydaidzein | 48.57 | 0.24 | Polygonati rhizoma |
| MOL000359 | Sitosterol | 36.91 | 0.75 | Polygonati Rhizoma |
| MOL003889 | Methylprotodioscin_qt | 35.12 | 0.86 | Polygonati Rhizoma |
| MOL004941 | (2R)-7-Hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)chroman-4-one | 71.12 | 0.18 | Polygonati Rhizoma |
| MOL000546 | Diosgenin | 80.88 | 0.81 | Polygonati Rhizoma |
| MOL006331 | 4′,5-Dihydroxyflavone | 48.55 | 0.19 | Polygonati Rhizoma |
| MOL009760 | Sibiricoside A_qt | 35.26 | 0.86 | Polygonati Rhizoma |
| MOL009763 | (+)-Syringaresinol-O-beta-D-glucoside | 43.35 | 0.77 | Polygonati Rhizoma |
| MOL009766 | Zhonghualiaoine 1 | 34.72 | 0.78 | Polygonati Rhizoma |
| MOL002268 | Rhein | 47.07 | 0.28 | Polygoni multiflori radix praeparata |
| MOL008647 | N-trans-feruloyltyramine | 86.71 | 0.26 | Polygoni multiflori radix praeparata |
| MOL001525 | Daucosterol | 36.91 | 0.75 | Polygoni multiflori radix praeparata |
| MOL000359 | Sitosterol | 36.91 | 0.75 | Rehmanniae radix praeparata Epimedii folium |
| MOL000449 | Stigmasterol | 43.83 | 0.76 | Rehmanniae radix praeparata |
| MOL000622 | Magnograndiolide | 63.71 | 0.19 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL004367 | Olivil | 62.23 | 0.41 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL004388 | 6-Hydroxy-11, 12-dimethoxy-2, 2-dimethyl-1, 8-dioxo-2, 3, 4, 8-tetrahydro-1h-isochromeno[3, 4-h]isoquinolin-2-ium | 60.64 | 0.66 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL004382 | Yinyanghuo A | 56.96 | 0.77 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL004396 | 1,2-Bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl) propan-1, 3-diol | 52.31 | 0.22 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL004386 | Yinyanghuo E | 51.63 | 0.55 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL004391 | 8-(3-Methylbut-2-enyl)-2-phenyl-chromone | 48.54 | 0.25 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL000098 | Quercetin | 46.43 | 0.28 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL004384 | Yinyanghuo C | 45.67 | 0.50 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL004373 | Anhydroicaritin | 45.41 | 0.44 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL001645 | Linoleyl acetate | 42.10 | 0.20 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL004394 | Anhydroicaritin-3-O-alpha-L-rhamnoside | 41.58 | 0.61 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL004425 | Icariin | 41.58 | 0.61 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL004380 | C-homoerythrinan, 1,6-didehydro-3,15,16-trimethoxy-, (3.beta.)- | 39.14 | 0.49 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL003542 | 8-Isopentenyl-kaempferol | 38.04 | 0.39 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL001510 | 24-Epicampesterol | 37.58 | 0.71 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL001771 | Poriferast-5-en-3beta-ol | 36.91 | 0.75 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL000006 | Luteolin | 36.16 | 0.25 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL003044 | Chryseriol | 35.85 | 0.27 | Epimedii folium |
| MOL004427 | Icariside A7 | 31.91 | 0.86 | Epimedii folium |
OB, oral bioavailability; DL, drug-likeness.
Figure 2Venn diagram of AD-related targets as obtained from five databases (a) and the intersection of target genes of active compounds and those related to AD (b).
Figure 3C-D-T network containing 242 nodes and 947 edges. SHCJ's active compounds and the hub target genes in AD are represented by green and blue rectangular nodes, respectively. The connectivity between nodes from right to left gradually increases, and nodes having more edges are of greater significance.
Figure 4PPI network of SHCJ-AD. (a) The STRING database was used for obtaining an interactive PPI network with 158 nodes and 644 edges. (b) PPI network imported into Cytoscape 3.7.2 for building and visualizing the network. (c) PPI network of significant proteins obtained from (b) and based on six parameters: BC > 77.152593, CC > 0.093230535, DC > 6.00, EC > 0.037252683, NC > 2.6964285, and LAC >2.00. The new network contained 50 nodes and 292 edges. (d) PPI network of core proteins obtained from (c) after filtering the six parameters further: BC > 299.65972, CC > 0.096705395, DC > 14.5, EC > 0.110636165, NC > 6.144697, and LAC >4.435294. The core network contains 12 nodes and 43 edges. Larger node sizes and darker node colors indicate higher degree values.
Figure 5GO enrichment analysis annotating three functional aspects: BP (a), CC (b), and MF (c). The lower p value and the redder color represent greater enrichment of the GO terms.
Figure 6Bubble diagram of the top 30 enriched KEGG pathways. A larger dot size indicates that more genes were annotated in the entry, while redder colors reflected lower p values.
Figure 7Map of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, with SHCJ-AD-related genes represented as red nodes.
Figure 8The top 30 pathways in C–P-T networks, with the five herbs in SHCJ represented as a red circular node. Pink hexagon nodes represent active compounds from Ginseng Radix et Rhizoma, Polygonati Rhizoma, Rehmanniae Radix Praeparata, Epimedii Folium, and Polygoni Multiflori Radix Praeparata of SHCJ. Blue square nodes represent the target genes. Purple triangle nodes represent the top 30 significantly enriched pathways where node sizes reflected the size of the degree.
Figure 9The docking model of quercetin with the top 12 core target genes and apoptosis-related target genes in the topological analysis of AD-related PPI networks. (a-l) Twelve core target genes, including HSP90AA1, AKT1, MAPK1, JUN, RELA, MAPK14, ESR1, FOS, IL-6, MYC, CDKN1A, and RB1, with quercetin. (m-q) Apoptosis-related target genes, including Bcl2, BAX, Caspase-8, Caspase-9, and Caspase-3, with quercetin. (r) The chemical structure and molecular formula of quercetin.
Molecular docking of core target genes and quercetin.
| Gene name kcal/mol | PDB ID | Interactions | Cohesive energy |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSP90AA1 | 6tn5 | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, carbon hydrogen bond, pi-sigma, pi-sulfur, pi-alkyl | −9.0 |
| AKT1 | 3mv5 | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, unfavorable donor-donor, pi-cation, pi-anion, pi-donor hydrogen bond, amide-pi stacked | −8.1 |
| MAPK1 | 3sa0 | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, carbon hydrogen bond, unfavorable donor-donor, unfavorable acceptor- acceptor, pi-sigma, pi-sulfur, pi-alkyl | −7.4 |
| JUN | 1jnm | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, unfavorable donor-donor, unfavorable acceptor- acceptor, pi-alkyl | −5.3 |
| RELA | 6qhl | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, carbon hydrogen bond, pi-pi stacked | −8.1 |
| MAPK14 | 3lff | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, carbon hydrogen bond, pi-anion, pi-sigma, pi-alkyl | −9.1 |
| ESR1 | 3os8 | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, carbon hydrogen bond, | −8.0 |
| FOS | 1s9k | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, carbon hydrogen bond, pi-pi T-shaped, pi-alkyl | −8.0 |
| IL-6 | 4ni9 | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, pi-pi T-shaped, pi-alkyl | −6.3 |
| MYC | 5i4z | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, unfavorable acceptor- acceptor, pi-pi T-shaped, pi-alkyl | −6.0 |
| CDKN1A | 5e0u | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, carbon hydrogen bond, pi-anion, pi-sulfur, pi-alkyl | −7.0 |
| RB1 | 2qdj | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, carbon hydrogen bond, pi-sigma, pi-alkyl | −7.4 |
| Caspase 3 | 3kjf | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, unfavorable donor-donor, pi-cation, pi-donor hydrogen bond, pi-sulfur, pi-alkyl | −7.5 |
| Caspase 9 | 2ar9 | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, unfavorable acceptor- acceptor, pi-cation, pi-donor hydrogen bond, pi-alkyl | −7.3 |
| Caspase 8 | 3kjn | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, unfavorable donor-donor, pi-cation, pi-donor hydrogen bond, pi-alkyl | −7.0 |
| BAX | 4bd6 | van der Waals, pi-sigma, pi-pi T-shaped, pi-alkyl | −6.8 |
| Bcl2 | 1ysw | van der Waals, conventional hydrogen bond, unfavorable donor-donor, pi-cation, pi-anion, pi-pi shaped, pi-alkyl | −7.2 |
Figure 10In vitro validation based on SH-SY5Y cells. (a-b) Viability of SH-SY5Y cells after being treated with SHCJ, quercetin, and Aβ25-35, based on CCK8 assays. (c) Annexin V-FITC/PI staining was used for analyzing apoptosis which was quantified as the apoptosis rate. (d-e) The effects of quercetin on PI3K/AKT pathway protein expression and apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells treated with Aβ25-35. The data represent the mean ± SEM. n = 3. ++P < 0.01 vs. control; P < 0.05, P < 0.01 vs. Aβ25-35; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 vs. Aβ25-35 + quercetin.