| Literature DB >> 35656314 |
Dian Lu1, Zhiliang Xu1, Zhiyong Peng2, Yinghong Yang1, Bing Song1, Zeyu Xiong1, Zhirui Ma2, Hongmei Guan1, Bangzhu Chen1, Yukio Nakamura3, Juan Zeng1, Nengqing Liu1, Xiaofang Sun1, Diyu Chen1.
Abstract
Reactivation of γ-globin expression is a promising therapeutic approach for β-hemoglobinopathies. Here, we propose a novel Cas9/AAV6-mediated genome editing strategy for the treatment of β-thalassemia: Natural HPFH mutations -113A > G, -114C > T, -117G>A, -175T > C, -195C > G, and -198T > C were introduced by homologous recombination following disruption of BCL11A binding sites in HBG1/HBG2 promoters. Precise on-target editing and significantly increased γ-globin expression during erythroid differentiation were observed in both HUDEP-2 cells and primary HSPCs from β-thalassemia major patients. Moreover, edited HSPCs maintained the capacity for long-term hematopoietic reconstitution in B-NDG hTHPO mice. This study provides evidence of the effectiveness of introducing naturally occurring HPFH mutations as a genetic therapy for β-thalassemia.Entities:
Keywords: adeno-associated virus (AAV); fetal hemoglobin (HbF); genome editing; hereditary persistence of fetal hemoglobin (HPFH); thalassemia
Year: 2022 PMID: 35656314 PMCID: PMC9152165 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.881937
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
FIGURE 1Genome editing of HBG1/HBG2 promoters reactivate γ-globin expression in HUDEP-2 cells. (A) Schematic view of targeted genome editing at the HBG1/HBG2 promoters using CRISPR/Cas9 and AAV6. Guide RNA spacer sequence and protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) are underlined. Site-specific HPFH mutations are indicated by a red arrow. A DSB stimulates HDR using the AAV6 homologous donor as a repair template. Legend: Orange boxes, HBG1/HBG2 promoters with six specific HPFH mutations; deep blue boxes, homology arms; green or red boxes, GFP or mCherry expression cassette. (B) InDels and HDR frequencies measured by NGS after RNP electroporation and AAV6 transfection in HUDEP-2 cells. (C) γ-globin/β-like globin mRNA expression determined by RT-qPCR. (D) GFP-positive population were sorted from the group edited by RNP combined with HBG1/HBG2 AAV6, or from the group edited by RNP combined with CtrAAV6. NGS analysis was performed to identify InDels and determine HDR frequencies. (E) The percentage of HbF in HUDEP-2 cells were determined by HPLC on day 8 of differentiation before or after GFP+ sorting. The data in Figures 1B,D are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 2. In other figures, the data are presented as the mean ± SD, n = 3. Student’s t-tests were performed to analyse the data. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; and ***, p < 0.001 vs. RNP-CtrAAV6.
FIGURE 2Gene editing of HSPCs induces γ-globin expression and xenotransplantation of gene-edited HSPCs into NBSGW mice. Donor-cell progeny were analyzed in recipient bone marrow (BM) 16 weeks after transplantation. (A,C) Different genotype frequencies in the HSCs of one healthy donor (A) and two thalassemia donors (C) were determined by NGS before or after transplantation. (B,D) Flow cytometry analysis of human CD45+, CD33+, CD19+, and CD235a+ cell proportions in mouse bone marrow, which were grafted with HSCs from one healthy donor (B) and two thalassemia donors (D) at 16 weeks after transplantation. (E) Percentage of different genotypes frequencies in HSPCs of two thalassemia donors measured by NGS before or after transplantation. (F) Following differentiation of HSPCs into erythrocytes at day 14 in vitro, γ-globin mRNA expression determined by RT-qPCR in edited or non-edited cells of thalassemia donor. (G) γ-globin mRNA expression in hCD235a+ erythroblasts isolated from recipient bone marrow of thalassemia donor. (H) The left panel shows the predicted top-ranked off-target sites for RNP. The on-target sites are shown at the top. The matched nucleotides of the candidate off-target sequence aligned to the on-target sequence are indicated by dots, and the unmatched are shown as colored nucleotides. The right panel shows the InDels frequencies. The predicted off-target sites detected by NGS with 15,000 reads and 0.01% threshold. Figures 2A–D: Dots represent biologically independent experiments. Figures 2E–G: Data are presented as the mean ± SD, n ≥ 3. Student’s t-tests were performed to analyse the data. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; and ***, p < 0.001.
FIGURE 3The impact of the genome editing strategy on the differentiation of CD34+ HSPCs. (A) Erythroid differentiation was measured on indicated days by flow cytometric analysis based on the expression of CD235a and CD71. The data reflect studies of CD34+ cells from β-thalassemia donors in three independent experiments, the representative plots are shown. (B) Representative images of Wright-Giemsa staining of different time points of differentiated CD34+ cells (objective lens, ×40). (C) Left: morphology of colonies at 14 days culture were observed at a magnification of ×40. Right: colonies were counted and classified according to their morphology (mean ± SD, n = 3).