| Literature DB >> 35656198 |
Tayyab Ali1, Fatma Hussain1, Muhammad Naeem2, Ajmal Khan3, Ahmed Al-Harrasi3.
Abstract
Nigella sativa is one of the most commonly used medicinal plants as it exhibits several pharmacological activities such as antioxidant, antibacterial, anticancer, antidiabetic, and hemolytic. The purpose of this study was to apply the nanotechnology approach for exploring the enhanced bioactivities of freshly prepared Nigella sativa L. nanosuspensions and the phytochemical profile of N. sativa seed ethanolic extract. In this study, we performed the biochemical characterization of Nigella sativa L. ethanolic extract through High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and Gas chromatography (GC), and bioactivities in terms of antioxidant, antidiabetic, antibacterial, and hemolytic activities of nanosuspension and extract were competitively studied. The results revealed that the nanosuspension of N. sativa seeds showed higher total phenolic (478.63 ± 5.00 mg GAE/100 g) and total flavonoid contents (192.23 ± 1.390 mg CE/100 g) than the ethanolic seed extract. The antioxidant activity was performed using the DPPH scavenging assay, and nanosuspension showed higher potential (16.74 ± 1.88%) than the extract. The antidiabetic activity was performed using antiglycation and α-amylase inhibition assays, nanosuspension showed higher antidiabetic potential [antiglycation (58 ± 0.912%)] and [bacterial α-amylase inhibition (18.0 ± 1.3675%)], respectively. Nanosuspension showed higher biofilm inhibition activity against Escherichia coli (66.44 ± 3.529%) than the extract (44.96 ± 2.238%) and ciprofloxacin (59.39 ± 3.013%). Hemolytic activity was performed and nanosuspension showed higher hemolytic activity than the extract as 7.8 ± 0.1% and 6.5 ± 0.3%, respectively. The study showed that nanosuspension had enhanced the bioavailability of bioactive plant compounds as compared to the ethanolic extract. Therefore, nanosuspension of N. sativa seed extract showed higher biochemical activities as compared to the ethanolic extract. This nanotechnology approach can be used as a platform for the development of combination protocols for the characterization of liquid state nanosuspensions in an adequate manner and also for therapeutic applications.Entities:
Keywords: FT-IR; GC; HPLC; Nigella sativa; antiglycation; antioxidant; nanosuspension
Year: 2022 PMID: 35656198 PMCID: PMC9152536 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.888177
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Principle phase of searching of bioactivities of Nigella sativa L. nanosuspension.
Comparison of antioxidant potential of nanosuspension of N. sativa with control.
| Treatments | TPC (mg GAE/100 g) | TFC (mg CE/100 g) | DPPH scavenging potential (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| NS | 478.63 ± 5.00 | 192.23 ± 1.390 | 16.74 ± 1.88 |
| E | 326.7070 ± 4.38 | 104.26 ± 2.23 | 4.07 ± 2.68 |
| Control | 750.87 ± 6.63 | 244.44 ± 2.63 | 90 ± 0.00 |
NS: Nigella sativa nanosuspension, E: Nigella sativa extract.
Antidiabetic potential of extract and nanosuspension of N. sativa.
| Treatments | % Antiglycation activity | % alpha-amylase inhibition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial Fungal | |||
| NS | 58 ± 0.912,133 | 18.0 ± 1.3675 | 17.8 ± 1.6445 |
| E | 54 ± 2.16547 | 12.9 ± 2.9655 | 17.2 ± 1.8957 |
| Metformin/Acarbose | 56.91 ± 2.162 | 82.53 ± 2.6445 | 82.53 ± 2.6445 |
NS: Nigella sativa nanosuspension, E: Nigella sativa extract.
Antibacterial activity of N. sativa extract and nanosuspension against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus isolates.
| Treatments | % Biofilm inhibition | Zone of inhibition (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| NS | 66.44 ± 3.529 | 27.73 ± 1.523 | 00 | 00 |
| E | 44.96 ± 2.238 | 9.24 ± 0.862 | 00 | 15 ± 0.984 |
| Ciprofloxacin | 59.39 ± 3.013 | 42.01 ± 2.862 | 26 ± 1.239 | 39 ± 1.976 |
NS: Nigella sativa nanosuspension, E: Nigella sativa extract.
FIGURE 2Antibacterial activity of N. sativa extract and nanosuspension against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus isolates.
FIGURE 3Phase-contrast microscopy of biofilm inhibition (A) (Qualitative assay) inhibition of E. coli by extract fraction (min.), (B) inhibition of E. coli by nanosuspension fraction (max.), (C) inhibition of S. aureus by extract fraction (min.), (D) inhibition of S. aureus by nanosuspension fraction (max.), (E) inhibition of negative control against E. coli, (F) inhibition of negative control against S. aureus, (G) inhibition of positive control against E. coli, and (H) inhibition of positive control against S. aureus.
Hemolytic activity of N. sativa extract and nanosuspension.
| Treatments | % Hemolysis |
|---|---|
| NS | 7.8 ± 0.1 |
| E | 6.5 ± 0.3 |
| Triton X-100 | 96.45 ± 0.00 |
NS: Nigella sativa nanosuspension, E: Nigella sativa extract.
FIGURE 4HPLC profile of N. sativa seed extract.
Quantification of different bioactive compounds.
| Retention | Compound | Area (mv. s) | Height | Amount (ppm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (min) | Name | |||
| 2.870 | Chlorogenic acid | 373,556.6 | 53,080.9 | 4.22 |
| 3.344 | Gallic acid | 3,832,983.8 | 220,651.2 | 3.34 |
| 11.071 | Kaempferol | 23,063.8 | 52,511.9 | 0.09 |
FIGURE 5FTIR spectra of N. sativa seed powder.
FTIR spectrum chart indicating the identified functional groups in N. sativa seed powder.
| Peak no | Characteristic absorption | Identified functional groups | Compound class |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3,278 | O–H stretching | Alcohol |
| 2 | 2,924 | C–H stretching | Alkane |
| 3 | 1,149 | C–F stretching | Alkyl halide |
| 4 | 1,075 | C–F stretching | Alkyl halide |
| 5 | 995 | C–F stretching | Alkyl halide |
Identified compounds by GC in N. sativa ethanolic extract.
| Sr.no | Name of the compound | Retention time (min) | Percentage (%) | Molecular formula |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thymoquinone | 15.324 | 7.568 | C10H12O2 |
| 2 | Amyl benzene | 12.064 | 0.280 | C11H16 |
| 3 | Carvacrol | 16.467 | 3.110 | C10H14O |
| 4 | Butyl benzene | 9.678 | 0.381 | C10H14 |
| 5 | Alpha-ylangene | 16.780 | 0.048 | C15H24 |
| 6 | Delta-cadinol | 16.987 | 0.0392 | C15H26O |
| 7 | 1-Monolinolein | 24.44 | 3.402 | C21H38O4 |
| 8 | Myristic acid | 20.467 | 0.142 | C14H28O2 |
| 9 | 1,13 Tetradecadiene-3-1 | 14.467 | 0.04 | C14H24O |
| 10 | Trilinolein | 23.02 | 21.324 | C57H98O6 |
| 11 | Laevojunenol | 19.021 | 0.112 | C15H26O |
| 12 | O-eugenol | 16.689 | 1.274 | C10H12O2 |
| 13 | Beta caryophyllene | 16.128 | 0.187 | C15H24 |
| 14 | Acetoiso vanillone | 17.346 | 5.346 | C9H10O3 |
| 15 | Hexa deca methyl cyclo | 19.23 | 0.086 | C16H48O8Si8 |
| Octa siloxane | ||||
| 16 | Cycloocta siloxane hexa deca methyl | 18.789 | 0.098 | C16H48O8Si8 |
| 17 | Monoelaidin | 22.42 | 3.023 | C21H40O4 |
| 18 | Laevojunenol | 19.021 | 0.112 | C15H26O |
| — | Total | — | 49.28% | — |