| Literature DB >> 35656159 |
Yulian Chen1,2, Jiaxu Chen1,3, Ruyang Chen1, Leike Xiao1, Xing Wu1, Lin Hu1, Zongjun Li1, Yuanliang Wang1, Mingzhi Zhu4,5, Zhonghua Liu4,5, Yu Xiao1,4.
Abstract
In this study, the fungal community structure, metabolites, antioxidant ability, and taste characteristics of five Fu brick tea (FBT) from different regions of China were determined and compared. A total of 69 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified and assigned into 5 phyla and 27 genera, with Eurotium as the predominant genus in all samples. Hunan (HN) sample had the strongest fungal diversity and richness, followed by Guangxi (GX) sample, and Zhejiang (ZJ) sample had the lowest. GX sample had higher amounts of gallic acid (GA), total catechins, gallocatechin (GC), and epicatechin gallate (ECG) as well as antioxidant activity than the other samples. The levels of total phenolics, total flavonoids, epigallocatechin (EGC), catechin, epicatechin (EC), thearubigins (TRs), and theaflavins (TFs) were the highest in the ZJ sample. Guizhou (GZ) and Shaanxi (SX) samples contained the highest contents of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and gallocatechin gallate (GCG), respectively. Total phenolics, GA, EC, CG, and TFs were positively associated with most of fungal genera. Total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), and most of catechins contributed to the antioxidant activities of FBT. HN sample had the strongest sourness and sweetness, ZJ sample had the strongest saltiness, SX sample had the strongest umami, and GZ sample had the strongest astringency, which was ascribed to the varied metabolites. This work reveals that FBT in different regions vary greatly in fungal community, metabolites, antioxidant activity, and taste characteristics, and provides new insight into the quality characteristics formation of FBT in different regions.Entities:
Keywords: Fu brick tea; antioxidant activity; chemical compositions; fungal community; taste characteristics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35656159 PMCID: PMC9152283 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.900138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
FIGURE 1The five Fu brick teas were collected from different provinces of China.
FIGURE 2The Venn diagram analysis of fungal community compositions of five Fu brick teas in different regions (A). The average relative abundance of fungal communities (B) at phylum level; (C) at genus level; (D) genus level with the highest abundance group removed] of FBT samples.
FIGURE 3Cluster analysis on fungal genera in five Fu brick teas in different regions.
FIGURE 4Cladogram (A) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score (B) showed the significant abundance differences of fungal taxa by LEfSe analysis. The node size represents the difference in relative abundance.
FIGURE 5Contents of (A) total polyphenols, (B) total flavonoids, (C) theaflavins, (D) thearubigins and (E) theabrownins of five Fu brick teas in different regions.
FIGURE 6Network visualized the relationship between main metabolites and fungal community, as well as antioxidant activity and main metabolites of five Fu brick teas in different regions.
Contents of gallic acid and catechins of five Fu brick teas in different regions.
| Compounds | Contents (mg/100 g) | ||||
| SX | HN | GZ | ZJ | GX | |
| GA | 181.5 ± 1.37 | 123.0 ± 2.10 | 117.3 ± 2.75 | 310.2 ± 4.47 | 416.4 ± 4.47 |
| GC | 113.0 ± 2.06 | 19.61 ± 1.28 | 114.7 ± 0.97 | 171.4 ± 2.95 | 190.0 ± 2.19 |
| EGC | 60.67 ± 0.63 | 7.03 ± 2.21 | 179.9 ± 0.46 | 574.6 ± 4.93 | 575.3 ± 6.18 |
| Catechin | 17.01 ± 0.22 | 16.49 ± 0.55 | 10.68 ± 2.15 | 40.63 ± 0.03 | 28.86 ± 1.40 |
| EC | 25.48 ± 0.26 | 29.19 ± 0.42 | 53.31 ± 0.77 | 246.7 ± 0.66 | 163.4 ± 0.56 |
| EGCG | 58.63 ± 1.13 | 664.9 ± 1.91 | 690.3 ± 0.89 | 134.7 ± 1.58 | 403.5 ± 5.61 |
| GCG | 82.48 ± 2.68 | 9.41 ± 1.82 | 35.63 ± 0.81 | 38.20 ± 0.44 | 71.78 ± 3.52 |
| ECG | 12.65 ± 0.35 | 5.88 ± 0.09 | 24.64 ± 0.44 | 74.60 ± 2.33 | 115.0 ± 2.79 |
| CG | 9.31 ± 0.25 | 10.03 ± 0.44 | 6.38 ± 0.18 | 67.90 ± 0.62 | 18.92 ± 0.39 |
| Total catechins | 379.2 ± 2.63 | 762.5 ± 4.90 | 1115.5 ± 3.21 | 1348.7 ± 4.30 | 1566.8 ± 11.47 |
GA, gallic acid; GC, gallocatechin; EGC, epigallocatechin; EC, epicatechin; EGCG, epigallocatechin gallate; GCG, gallocatechin gallate; ECG, epicatechin gallate; CG, catechin gallate. Each tea sample was determined with three replications. Letters indicate Duncan’s pairwise differences among different samples (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 7Antioxidant activity of five Fu brick teas in different regions. ABTS radical cation scavenging activity (A), DPPH radical scavenging activity (B), reducing power (C), OH radical scavenging ability (D) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (E). Data were recorded as the mean value ± standard deviation of three replicates. Mean values marked by the different letters among the samples denoted significant difference (p < 0.05).
FIGURE 8Principal component analysis score (A) and loading plot (B) assessing the metabolites and antioxidant activity of five Fu brick teas in different regions.
FIGURE 9Spider plot (A) and dendrogram plot (B) of the taste characteristics of five Fu brick teas in different regions evaluated by E-tongue. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
FIGURE 10Network correlation analysis of the taste profile and the main metabolites.