| Literature DB >> 35656115 |
Yanhui Cui1, Xueqin Wang2, Fengyu Lin1, Wen Li1, Yuhao Zhao1, Fei Zhu1, Hang Yang1, Mingjun Rao1, Yi Li1, Huaying Liang1, Minhui Dai1, Ben Liu1, Lingli Chen1, Duoduo Han1, Rongli Lu1, Wenzhong Peng1, Yan Zhang1, Chao Song3, Yanwei Luo4, Pinhua Pan1.
Abstract
Alveolar epithelial cell damage is an important determinant of the severity of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI/ARDS). However, the molecular mechanisms of alveolar epithelial death during the development of ALI/ARDS remain unclear. In this study, we explore the role of miR-29a-3p in ALI/ARDS and its molecular mechanism. Plasma samples were collected from healthy controls and ARDS patients. Mice were intratracheally instilled with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to establish acute lung injury. N6-adenosine (m6A) quantification, RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation, cell viability assay, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and western blotting were performed. We found that miR-29a-3p was down-regulated in plasma of ARDS patients and lung tissue of ALI model mice, and miR-29a-3p agomir injection down-regulated the levels of the inflammatory factors, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the lungs, reducing alveolar epithelial cell PANoptosis as evaluated by the downregulation of Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1), gasdermin D (GSDMD), caspase-3, caspase-8, and mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL), ultimately improving lung injury in the ALI model mice. Mechanism studies demonstrated that the knockout of methyltransferase 3 (N6-adenosine-methyltransferase complex catalytic subunit) removed the m6A modification of miR-29a-3p and reduced miR-29a-3p expression. Our findings suggest that miR-29a-3p is a potential target that can be manipulated for ALI/ARDS. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: N6-methyladenosine; PANoptosis; acute lung injury; inflammation; miRNA
Year: 2022 PMID: 35656115 PMCID: PMC9116916 DOI: 10.14336/AD.2021.1023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging Dis ISSN: 2152-5250 Impact factor: 9.968
Clinical characters of ARDS patients.
| ARDS patient | Age (years) | Gender | Diabetes | Hypertension | Smoking history | Pathogen | APACHE II | PaO2/FiO2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | Male | No | No | Yes | Virus | 16 | 177 |
| 2 | 38 | Male | No | No | Yes | Virus | 6 | 245 |
| 3 | 68 | Female | No | No | No | Bacteria | 13 | 90 |
| 4 | 54 | Male | Yes | Yes | Yes | Bacteria | 14 | 91 |
| 5 | 41 | Male | No | No | No | Bacteria | 16 | 180 |
| 6 | 62 | Female | No | Yes | No | Bacteria | 12 | 99 |
| 7 | 25 | Female | No | No | No | Virus | 7 | 240 |
| 8 | 69 | Male | No | Yes | No | Bacteria | 11 | 245 |
| 9 | 50 | Female | No | No | No | Bacteria | 16 | 230 |
| 10 | 40 | Male | No | No | Yes | Bacteria | 14 | 150 |
| 11 | 30 | Female | No | No | No | Bacteria | 14 | 96 |
| 12 | 33 | Male | No | No | Yes | Bacteria | 4 | 241 |
| 13 | 62 | Male | Yes | No | Yes | Virus | 3 | 214 |
| 14 | 42 | Female | No | Yes | No | Virus | 13 | 178 |
| 15 | 68 | Female | No | No | No | Virus | 16 | 150 |
Figure 1.MiR-29a-3p is down-regulated in the plasma of ARDS patients and lung tissue of ALI model mice. (A) RT-qPCR analysis for miR-29a-3p expression in the plasma of healthy controls (N=15) and ARDS patients (N=15). HC, healthy control. ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome. (B) RT-qPCR analysis for miR-29a-3p expression in the plasma of ALI mouse model. (C) RT-qPCR analysis for miR-29a-3p expression in the lung tissue of ALI mouse model. (D) In situ hybridization analysis for miR-29a-3p expression in the lung tissue of ALI mouse model. scale bar = 50 μm. NS, normal saline. LPS, Lipopolysaccharide. *** p <0.001.
Figure 2.METTL3-mediated m6A modification stabilizes the expression of miR-29a-3p. (A) The level of total m6A in the lung tissue of ALI mouse model. (B) m6A RIP detects the m6A level of pri-miR-29a in the lung tissue of ALI mouse model. (C) RT-qPCR detection of METL3 expression in the lung tissue of ALI mouse model. (D) Western blot analysis for the expression of METTL3 in the lung tissue of ALI mouse model. (E) Western blot analysis for the expression of METTL3 in A549 cells after siRNA transfection. (F) RT-qPCR analysis for the level of miR-29a-3p in A549 cells after METTL3 siRNA transfection. *** p <0.001.
Figure 3.miR-29a-3p improves lung injury in ALI mice. (A) HE staining of lung tissue. scale bar = 50 μm. (B) Lung tissue wet/dry ratio. (C) Total protein concentration in the BALF. (D) LDH activity in the BALF. ** p <0.01, *** p <0.001 vs NS; # p <0.05, ## p <0.01 vs LPS+NC.
Figure 4.miR-29a-3p agomir reduces lung inflammation in ALI mice. (A-C) ELISA assays were performed to measure the levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the BALF after LPS or combined miR-29a-3p agomir treatment. (D-E) RT-qPCR analysis for the mRNA levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the lung tissues after LPS or combined miR-29a-3p agomir treatment. *** p < 0.001 vs NS; ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 vs LPS+NC.
Figure 5.miR-29a-3p targets TNFR1 to inhibit PANoptosis in alveolar epithelial cells. (A) RT-qPCR analysis for the expression of TNFR1 in A549 cells after LPS or combined miR-29a-3p agomir treatment. (B) Western blot analysis for the expression of TNFR1 in A549 cells after LPS or combined miR-29a-3p agomir treatment. (C) CCK8 assay was performed to measure the cell viability of A549 cells after LPS or combined miR-29a-3p agomir treatment. (D-E) Western blot analysis for the expression of PANoptosis markers in A549 cells after LPS or combined miR-29a-3p agomir treatment (D), and quantification (E). * p <0.05, *** p <0.001 vs NS; ## p <0.01, ### p <0.001 vs LPS+NC.
Figure 6.TNFR1 knockdown inhibits PANoptosis in alveolar epithelial cells. (A) Western blot analysis for the expression of TNFR1 in A549 cells after siRNA transfection. (B) CCK8 assay was performed to measure the cell viability of A549 cells after LPS or combined with TNFR1 siRNA treatment. (C-D) Western blot analysis for the expression of PANoptosis markers in A549 cells after LPS or combined TNFR1 siRNA treatment (D), and quantification (E). * p <0.05, *** p <0.001 vs NS; ## p <0.01, ### p <0.001 vs LPS+NC.