| Literature DB >> 35656002 |
Tingting Liu1,2, Lin Kang2, Jinglin Xu1,2, Jing Wang2, Shan Gao2, Yanwei Li2, Jiaxin Li2, Yuan Yuan2, Bing Yuan2, Jinglin Wang2, Baohua Zhao1, Wenwen Xin2.
Abstract
The potentially pathogenic species of the genus Vibrio pose a threat to both humans and animals, creating medical burdens and economic losses to the mariculture industry. Improvements in surveillance and diagnosis are needed to successfully manage vibriosis outbreaks. Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) can provide rapid diagnosis and has been widely used in the identification of Vibrio spp. The main weakness of this technology is the limited number of strains and species of Vibrio in the existing commercial database. Here, we develop a new in-house database named PVBase containing 790 main spectra projections (MSP) of ten Vibrio species that come from various regions of China and include abundant clinical and environmental strains. PVBase was validated through a blind test of 65 Vibrio strains. The identification accuracy and scoring of Vibrio strains was greatly improved through the addition of PVBase. Identification accuracy increased from 73.4 to 100%. The number of strains with identification scores above 2.2 increased from 53.1% to 96.9% and 53.1% of strains had an identification score above 2.59. Moreover, perfect discrimination was obtained when using all of the MSPs created for the Vibrio species, even for very closely related species such as V. cholerae, V. albensis, and V. mimicus or V. alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. harveyi. In addition, we used phyloproteomic analysis to study whether there are differences in protein fingerprints of different regions or pathogenic strains. We found that MSP characteristics of Vibrio species were not related to their region or source. With the construction of PVBase, the identification efficiency of potentially pathogenic Vibrio species has been greatly improved, which is an important advance for epidemic prevention and control, and aquaculture disease detection.Entities:
Keywords: Vibrio species; clinical strain; database; environmental strain; pathogenic; regional strain
Year: 2022 PMID: 35656002 PMCID: PMC9152771 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.872825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
FIGURE 1The main geographical distribution of Vibrio strains.
Numbers of main spectra projections (MSP) for the Vibrio species that are potentially pathogenic in the Bruker MBT Library and in our PVBase.
| Species | Bruker MBT Library MSP number | PVBase MSP number |
|
| 5 | 52 |
|
| 7 | 20 |
|
| 5 | 9 |
|
| 11 | 121 |
|
| 1 | 3 |
|
| 2 | 3 |
|
| 0 | 197 |
|
| 3 | 11 |
|
| 3 | 4 |
|
| 9 | 370 |
FIGURE 2Correlations between the number of main spectra filed in PVBase and expected mean of highest matching scores. Data for V. parahaemolyticus, V. cholerae, and V. vulnificus are provided as examples. Numbers in parentheses below points represent the number of strains added in a single addition and the matching score.
FIGURE 3Correlation between number of main spectra for V. alginolyticus archived in the PVBase and the highest expected matching score or identification accuracy.
FIGURE 4Blind test of identification of Vibrio spp. using MALDI-TOF MS. (A) Results based on the Bruker MBT Library. (B) Results based on the Bruker MBT Library and PVBase combined.
FIGURE 5Dendrogram analysis of different Vibrio species. 77 strains of all Vibrio species were randomly selected from PVBase and 48 strains of all Vibrio species were randomly selected from Bruker MBT library. The dendrogram analysis was performed using MALDI BioTyper Compass Explorer v. 4.1.
FIGURE 6CCI matrix of different Vibrio species. 77 strains of all Vibrio species were randomly selected from PVBase, which were consistent with the 77 strains selected for dendrogram analysis. A CCI analysis was performed using ClinPro Tools 3.0.
FIGURE 7Dendrogram analysis of strains in different regions. (A) Dendrogram analysis of V. vulnificus in different regions. (B) Dendrogram analysis of V. parahaemolyticus in different regions.
FIGURE 8Dendrogram analysis of clinical strains and environmental strains. (A) Dendrogram analysis of V. vulnificus. (B) Dendrogram analysis of V. parahaemolyticus.