Literature DB >> 35655842

Effect of 320-row CT reconstruction technology on fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography based on machine learning: single- versus multiple-cardiac periodic images.

Ke Shi1, Feng-Feng Yang2, Nuo Si1, Chen-Tao Zhu1, Na Li1, Xiao-Lin Dong1, Yan Guo3, Tong Zhang1.   

Abstract

Background: Fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography (CT-FFR) can be used to noninvasively evaluate the functions of coronary arteries and has been widely welcomed in the field of cardiovascular research. However, whether different image reconstruction schemes have an effect on CT-FFR analysis through single- and multiple-cardiac periodic images in the same patient has not been investigated.
Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled 122 patients who underwent 320-row computed tomography (CT) examination with both single- and multiple-cardiac periodic reconstruction schemes; a total of 366 coronary arteries were analyzed. The lowest CT-FFR values of each vessel and the poststenosis CT-FFR values of the lesion-specific coronary artery were measured using the two reconstruction techniques. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare differences in CT-FFR values between the two reconstruction techniques. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to determine the relationship between CT-FFR values derived using the two methods. Bland-Altman and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analyses were performed to evaluate the consistency of CT-FFR values.
Results: In all blood vessels, the lowest CT-FFR values showed no significant differences between the two reconstruction techniques in the left anterior descending artery (LAD; P=0.65), left circumflex artery (LCx; P=0.46), or right coronary artery (RCA; P=0.22). In blood vessels with atherosclerotic plaques, the poststenosis CT-FFR values (2 cm distal to the maximum stenosis) exhibited no significant differences between the two reconstruction techniques in the LAD (P=0.78), LCx (P=1.00), or RCA (P=1.00). The mean CT-FFR values of single- and multiple-cardiac periodic images showed excellent correlation and minimal bias in all groups. Conclusions: CT-FFR analysis based on an artificial intelligence deep learning neural network is stable and not affected by the type of 320-row CT reconstruction technology. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease (CAD); coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA); fractional flow reserve (FFR); machine learning (ML)

Year:  2022        PMID: 35655842      PMCID: PMC9131332          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  25 in total

1.  Impact of sublingual nitroglycerin dosage on FFRCT assessment and coronary luminal volume-to-myocardial mass ratio.

Authors:  Kenneth R Holmes; Tim A Fonte; Jonathan Weir-McCall; Malcolm Anastasius; Philipp Blanke; Geoffrey W Payne; Jen Ellis; Darra T Murphy; Charles Taylor; Jonathon A Leipsic; Stephanie L Sellers
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Prediction of Coronary Revascularization in Stable Angina: Comparison of FFRCT With CMR Stress Perfusion Imaging.

Authors:  Niels Peter Rønnow Sand; Louise Nissen; Simon Winther; Steffen E Petersen; Jelmer Westra; Evald H Christiansen; Pia Larsen; Niels R Holm; Christin Isaksen; Grazina Urbonaviciene; Lone Deibjerg; Majed Husain; Kristian K Thomsen; Allan Rohold; Hans Erik Bøtker; Morten Bøttcher
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-08-14

3.  Effect of Tube Voltage on Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary CT Angiography With Machine Learning: Results From the MACHINE Registry.

Authors:  Jakob De Geer; Adriaan Coenen; Young-Hak Kim; Mariusz Kruk; Christian Tesche; U Joseph Schoepf; Cezary Kepka; Dong Hyun Yang; Koen Nieman; Anders Persson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Virtual fractional flow reserve and virtual coronary stent guided percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Fang-Yang Huang; Qi Liu; Xiao-Xiao Liu; Bin Ma; Ye Zhu
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.737

5.  The influence of image quality on diagnostic performance of a machine learning-based fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Peng Peng Xu; Jian Hua Li; Fan Zhou; Meng Di Jiang; Chang Sheng Zhou; Meng Jie Lu; Chun Xiang Tang; Xiao Lei Zhang; Liu Yang; Yuan Xiu Zhang; Yi Ning Wang; Jia Yin Zhang; Meng Meng Yu; Yang Hou; Min Wen Zheng; Bo Zhang; Dai Min Zhang; Yan Yi; Lei Xu; Xiu Hua Hu; Hui Liu; Guang Ming Lu; Qian Qian Ni; Long Jiang Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  CT-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFRCT): From Gatekeeping to Roadmapping.

Authors:  Alex L Huang; Paul L Maggiore; Richard A Brown; Mansi Turaga; Anna B Reid; Jacob Merkur; Philipp Blanke; Jonathon A Leipsic
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.248

7.  Iodinated contrast opacification gradients in normal coronary arteries imaged with prospectively ECG-gated single heart beat 320-detector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Michael L Steigner; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Amanda G Whitmore; Hansel J Otero; Chunliang Wang; Orla Buckley; Noah A Levit; Alia Z Hussain; Tianxi Cai; Richard T Mather; Orjan Smedby; Marcelo F DiCarli; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 7.792

8.  Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Machine Learning Algorithm versus Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling.

Authors:  Christian Tesche; Carlo N De Cecco; Stefan Baumann; Matthias Renker; Tindal W McLaurin; Taylor M Duguay; Richard R Bayer; Daniel H Steinberg; Katharine L Grant; Christian Canstein; Chris Schwemmer; Max Schoebinger; Lucian M Itu; Saikiran Rapaka; Puneet Sharma; U Joseph Schoepf
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Influence of reconstruction kernels on the accuracy of CT-derived fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Fabian Ammon; Maximilian Moshage; Silvia Smolka; Markus Goeller; Daniel O Bittner; Stephan Achenbach; Mohamed Marwan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-11-04       Impact factor: 7.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.